LAWS OF EXCURSIONS ASSOCIATED TO ADDITIVE FUNCTIONALS
Reçu le 07/01/2006– Accepté le 22/06/2006 Résumé
Soit (Pt)un semi-groupe droit de Borel, et soit (St) l’inverse continu à droite d’une fonctionnelle additive continue (Bt).
Soit
( )
t t R
Y
∈ un processus stationnaire à naissance et mort aléatoires, markovien de semi-groupe (Pt) sous la mesure de Kuznetsov Q associée à une mesure excessive. On définit, sous l’hypothèse que la mesure caractéristique{ } ( )
1
0 t
B Q IY B dt
υ =
∫
∈. de (Bt) est purement excessive pour le semi-groupe St⎛
P
⎞⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠, une fonctionnelle additive pour
( ) Y
t t R∈ en fonction de (Bt) et on étudie les lois des excursions associées à l’ensemble regénératif constitué des temps de discontinuité de l’inverse continu à droite (Ut) de cette fonctionnelle additive. Plus précisément, si on note par
( ) Φ
t le processusUt
⎛
Y
⎞⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ et par H la
σ
-algèbre engendrée par Ht(
t∈R)
où Ht est la Q-complétion de H+t0 [ (Ht0) étant la filtration naturelle de( ) Φ
t ], alors si T est un (Ht)-temps d’arrêt tel queT T
U − ≠U est T
T−
Φ ≠ Φ , la loi
conditionnelle de l’excursion chevauchant
T T
U −U
⎤ ⎡
⎥ ⎢
⎦ , ⎣ par rapport à H dépend uniquement de
Φ
T et deΦ
T−. Les lois conditionnelles des couples d’excursions ont été également étudiées. MSC: 60J25; 60J40; 60J55.Mots clés: Standard process; Predictable process; Excursion; Additive functional; Conditional law; Exit measure; Kuznetsov process.
Abstract
Let (Pt) be a right borel semigroup and let (St) the right inverse of a continuous additive functional (Bt). Let
( )
t t R
Y
∈ be a right stationary process with random birth and death, Markov with semi group (Pt) under the Kuznetsov measureQ
associated to an excessive measure. We define, under the assumption that the characteristic measure { }
( )
1
0 t
B Q IY B dt
υ =
∫
∈. of (Bt) is purely excessive for the semigroup (Ps), an additive functional for( )
t t R
Y
∈ in terms of (Bt) and we study the laws of excursions associated to the regenerative set which consists in times of discontinuity of the right inverse (Ut) of this additive functional. More precisely, if we note by( ) Φ
t the processUt
⎛
Y
⎞⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ and by H the
σ
-algebra generated by Ht
( t ∈ R )
where Ht is the Q-completion of 0H
t+ ( ⎛⎜⎝H
t0⎞⎟⎠ is the natural filtration of( ) Φ
t ), then ifT
is a( ) H
t -stopping time such that TU
T−≠ U
andΦ ≠ Φ ,
T− T the conditional law of the excursionstraddling T
U
T−U
⎤ ⎡
⎥ ⎢
⎦
,
⎣ with respect toH
depend only onΦ
T and T−Φ
. Conditional laws of pairs of excursions are also considered.Keywords: Standard process; Predictable process; Excursion; Additive functional; Conditional law; Exit measure; Kuznetsov process.
MSC: 60J25; 60J40; 60J55
n 1985 Kaspi
[ ]
6 constructs, for a standard processX
, an additive functionalB
associated to a regenerative systemM
and gives, under the classical duality hypothesis, the probability measuresP
x y, allowing the law of excursions associated toB
with respect to theσ
-algebra(
t)
K = σ Z : ∈ t R
+ , known to start atx
end aty (
t St
Z = X
whereS
t=
inf{ u B :
u> t }
).I
H. BOUTABIA Département de Mathématiques, Faculté des Sciences
Universté Badji-Mokhtar Annaba 23000, B.P.12.
Algérie.
ﺺﺨﻠﻣ
.
( ) B
t ةﺮــﻤــﺘﺴﻤﻟا ﺔـــﻴﻌــﻤﺠﻟا لاوﺪــﻠﻟ ﻦــﻴﻤــﻴﻟا ﻦــﻣ سﻮــﻜﻌﻟا( ) S
t ﻦﻜــﻴﻟو ،ﻦــﻴـــﻤﻴﻟا ﻦﻣ ةﺮـــﻣز ﻒﺼﻧ( ) P
t ﻦﻜـــﺘﻟ ﻦﻜــﻴﻟو( ) Y
t t R∈ ﻦــﻴﻤــﻴﻟا ﻦــﻣ ﺮﻘــﺘﺴﻤــﻟا ﻂـــﻤﻨﻟا ةﺮــﻣﺰﻟا ﻒــﺼﻨﻟ ﺎﻌــﺒﺗ ﺔﻴﻓﻮآ رﺎﻤﻟا تﺎــﻴﻓﻮﻟاو ﺪــﻴﻟاﻮـــﻤﻟا ﺔــﻴﺋاﻮــــﺸﻌﻟ
( ) P
t سﺎـــﻴﻗ ﻖﻓوKuznetsov Q سﺎﻴﻗ قﻮﻔﻟ ﻖﻓاﺮﻤﻟا .
ﺰﻴﻤﻤﻟا سﺎﻴﻘﻟﺎﺑ ﺔﻘﻠﻌﺘﻤﻟا تﺎﻴﺿﺮﻔﻟا ﻖﻓو فﺮﻌﻧ
{ }
( )
1
0 t
B
Q I
YB dt
υ = ∫
∈.
( ) B
t ـﻟ ﻲهوﺔﻴﻗﻮﻓ ﺔﻴﻓﺎﺻ ةﺮﻣﺰﻟا ﻒﺼﻨﻟ ﺔﻴﻌﻤﺠﻟا لاوﺪﻟا
( )
ل t t RY
∈ ﺖﻤﻟا ــﺑ ﺔﻘﻠﻋ( ) B
t( ) U
t و ﺔﻘﻓاﺮﻤﻟا ﺔﻴﺋاﻮﺸﻌﻟا ﺔﻠﺣﺮﻠﻟ ﻦﻴﻧاﻮﻘﻟا سرﺪﺗﻦــﻳﺄﻨﻨﻨــﻴﻤــﻴﻟا ﻦــﻣ سﻮﻜــﻌﻠﻟ ﻊــﻄﻘﺘﻟا ﺔﻨﻣزأ ﻦــﻣ ﺔﻠﻜﺸﻣ ،ةﺪﻟﻮﺘﻣ ﺔﻋﻮﻤﺠﻤﻟ
( t ∈ R )
H
t ﺪﻟﻮﻤﻟا ﺮﺒﺟ ـσ
ـﻨﻋ ل ـH
ـﺑ و Ut
⎛
Y
⎞⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
ﻂﻤــﻨﻠﻟ
( ) Φ
t ــﺑ ﺎـــﻧﺰــﻣر اذإ ﺪﻳﺪﺤﺘﻟﺎﺑ ،ﺔــﻴﻌــﻤﺠﻟا لاوﺪﻟا ﻩﺬﻬﻟ -ﺚﻴﺤــﺑ ﻒﻗﻮــﺗ ﻦــﻣز
( ) H
tT
ﻮه نﺎآ اذإ ﻪــﻧﺈــﻓ( ) Φ
t ـﻟ ﻲﻌﻴﺒﻄﻟا نﺎﻳﺮﺴﻟا ﻲه 0H
t⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
0 )
H
t+ ــﻟ ﺔﻠﻤﻜـﺗQ
- ﻲــهH
ﻷ T ﻮ ﻔﻗU
T−U
⎤ ⎡
⎥ ⎢
⎦
,
⎣. ﻟا ﺔﻠــﺣﺮﻟ ﺔــﻴﻃﺮﺸﻟا ﻦﻴﻧاﻮﻘ
لﺎـــﺠﻤﻠﻟ ﺔﻳﺰﻔﻗ ﺔــﻴﺋاﻮــﺸﻋ
T− T
Φ ≠ Φ ,
T T
U
−≠ U
ﻚﻟﺬآ ﺎﻬﺘﺳارد ﻢـــﺗ ﺔـــﻴﺋاﻮـــﺸﻌﻟا تﻼـﺣﺮﻟا جاوزﻷ ﺔـــﻴﻃﺮﺸﻟا ﻦــﻴــﻧاﻮــﻘﻟاو
Φ Φ
و ﻰـــﻠﻋ ﻷا ﺪﻤﺘﻌﺗIt was given in
[ ]
2 , without duality, the measuresP
x y, in terms of theDt
⎛
F
⎞⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠-predictable exit measures for a regenerative system consisting of the closure of the set of times that the regular points of an arbitrary continuous additive functional are visited. The purpose of this paper is to give the conditional laws of pairs of excursions for a Markov process with random birth and death
( ) Y
t t R∈having the same semigroup as
X
. To this respect, we define an "additive functional " for( ) Y
t t R∈ and we extend this result to( ) Y
t t R∈ . Laws of pairs of excursions for( ) Y
t t R∈ are discussed.Preliminaries and notations
Let ⎛⎜⎝
Ω, , , , , F F X
t tθ
tP
x⎞⎟⎠ be the canonical realization for a borel standard semigroup( ) P
t . We assume that the state spaceE
is lusinian, and we note byE
itsσ
-algebra of borel sets. The cemetery pointδ
is absorbent and outside ofE
. Let( ) B
t be a continuous additive functional and letR
be the perfect exact terminal time inf{ u B :
u>
0}
. We note by( )
{
x0 1 }
C = x P : R = =
the fine support of( ) B
t . LetF
∗ be the universal completion of theσ
- algebraσ ( X
t: ∈ t R
+)
. We consider the random homogeneous setM = + { t R
oθ
t: ∈ t R
+}
, and its family of ⎛⎜⎜F
Dt⎞⎟⎟⎝ ⎠ -predictable exit measures
{ }
0 x
P
x E δ⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ∈ ∪ (we
assume that
R
isF
∗-measurable), whereD
t is the random variable inf{ s > : ∈ t s M }
. Note that ifS
t−≠ S
t, thenSt t
D S
−
=
, hence the excursion associated tot
is defined by:( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
if if
t St
S s t t
t R
t t
X s S S
e s k s
s S S
ω ω ω
ω θ ω
δ ω ω
− −
−
−
⎧
+< −
= =⎨ ⎪
≥ −
o ⎪⎩
where
k
t killing operator att
defined by:( )( ) ( )
k
tω s = ω s
ifs < t
andδ
ifs ≥ t
. We consider for( ) x y , ∈ × E E
such thatx ≠ y
, themeasures
P
x y, on⎛⎜⎝Ω, F
∗⎞⎟⎠ ”defined by”:( )
where 0( )
x y x x x
R R R
P
,= H k ∈. X = y H = P .; X ≠ x
Since ⎛⎜⎝
Ω, F
0⎞⎟⎠ is an U-space, and according to a classical lemma of Doob the measuresP
x y, can be chosen measurable for the pair( ) x y ,
.We associate to the right inverse
{ }
t u
S = u B : > t
of( ) B
t , the following notations:t St
Z = X
,t St
M = F
andSt
t
θ
θ =
. It is well known that the processZ = Ω, ,
⎛⎜⎝F M Z
t, , ,
tθ
tP
x⎞⎟⎠ is strong Markov with semigroupt St
P
⎛⎜⎜P
⎞⎟⎟⎝ ⎠
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
and takes values onC C E
∗⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝
, ∩
⎠ (cf. Jacods[ ]
5 ).Let
( ) K
t t R∈ + be the filtration, whereK
t is the intersection of theP
π-completions of theσ −
algebra0
K
t+ whereπ
is in the set of all the bounded measures onE
; ⎛⎜⎝K
t0⎞⎟⎠ is the natural filtration of the process( ) Z
t.
It was shown in[ ]
2 that ifT
is a finite( ) K
t−
stopping time such thatS
T−≠ S
Ta s . .
,then we have:T
S T
F
⎛ ⎞−K
−⎜ −⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
(1)and that if
S
T−≠ S
T andZ
T−≠ Z
Ta s .
., then( ( )
T)
ZT ZT( )
P f e K = P
−,f
(2) for all positive andF
∗−
measurable functionf
, where( )
x( ) ( )
P A = ∫ P A µ dx
( µ
is an arbitrary law onE ) .
Note that the formula
( )
2 was proved by Kaspi[ ]
8 underthe duality hypothesis.
Excursions of Kuznetsov processes
Let
W
be the set of applications{ }
w R :
aE ∪ δ
which satisfies the following properties: there exits an open subset ofR
on whichw
isE
-valued right -continuous with left limits and out which equalsδ
. We note by( )
t t R
Y
∈ the coordinate process onW
.Let 0
t R
G
t∈
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ be the natural filtration of
( )
t t R
Y
∈ and let0 0
t R t
G =
∈VG .
Then the birth and the death times of( ) Y
t t R∈ are respectively:
{ } ( )
{ } ( )
inf inf
sup sup
t
t
t R Y E t R Y E α
β
= ∈ : ∈ ∅ = +∞ ,
= ∈ : ∈ ∅ = −∞ .
We define the families of operators on
W
by:( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
such that for
such that for
t t
t t
W w s w s t s R t R
W W w s w s t s t R
τ τ
σ σ
: Ω = + ∈ , ∈
+: = + , ∈
a a
Note that
X
so τ
t= Y
t s+ on{ Y
t∈ E }
andt u t u
σ σ o = σ
+ fort u , ∈ R
,s ∈ . R
+ Letη
be an excessive measure with respect to( ) P
t and letQ
be the Kuznetsov measure onW
that corresponds to( ) P
t(
η
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎝
,
⎠ cf.[ ] [ ]
8 10 ),
. We note byG
t andG
theQ
- completions ofG
t0 andG
0, and we assume that the semigroup( ) P
t satisfies "les hypothèses droites de Meyer". It follows by[ ]
10 that the process( )
( )
t t t R t
Y W G G Y τ α β Q
= , , ,
∈, , , ,
is stationary(
i e. . σ
t( ) Q = Q )
and strong Markov with semigroup( ) P
t.
For the generalization of formula
( )
2 , we consider the additive functionalsB
andS
given in the previous section. We also note byB
the random measure onW
, carried by] α β , [
such that:{ }
] ] on for all 0 and
s t t
B o τ = B t t s , + Y ∈ E s > t ∈ R
We assume that the characteristic measure { }
( )
1
0 t
B
Q I
YB dt
υ = ∫
∈. ofB
is purely excessive for the semigroup ⎛⎜P
t⎞⎟⎝ ⎠ (i.e.
∫ P f x
t( ) ( ) υ
Bdx →
0 ast → ∞
ifυ
B( ) f < ∞
). It was shown in[ ]
7 thatQ
a.e.] ]
B α , < ∞ t
for allt > . α
Let
( ) V
t t R∈ be the nondecreasing process defined onW
by:{ } { }
] ] on and on
t t
V = + α B α , t α < t V = α t ≤ α ,
and let
( ) U
t t R∈ be the right-continuous inverse of( ) V
t t R∈ that is:{ }
t inf u
U = u > : α V > t
We also note by
M
the closed random subset of] α β , [
defined by:
M = < < ∪ + α t β { t R o τ
t}
which verifies the following property of homogeneity ( cf.[ ] 4 )) :
( M − ∩ ,∞ = t ) ] [ 0 M o τ
ton { Y
t∈ E }
Remark:
1) If
α = −∞
,{ u > : α V
u> = t } %
andU
t= +∞
, thenα > −∞
on{ α < U
t< β } .
2)U
t= α
on{ t ≤ α } .
For
t ∈ R
, let( )
0
t t t
t
Y
UG
tG
Uτ
tτ
UH
tσ
uu t
Φ = , = , = , = Φ : ≤
and
H
0= σ ( H
t0:t ∈ R )
. We note byH
t (resp.H
) theQ
-completion ofH
t0+ (resp.H
0) .
Note that for all the following formulas, theσ −
finiteness ofQ
is guaranteed by the argument used in[ ] 1 .
It is not hard to show that( ) Φ
t has the same properties as( ) Z
t and the following result hold.Proposition:
1) The process
( ) U
t is right continuous, has left limits, and satisfiesU
t= U
β for allt ≥ β
Q a e . .
.2)
( ) U
t is( ) G
t -adapted.3) For all
t ∈ R
ands > 0
we have:a)
U
t= + α S
t−αo τ
α on{ −∞ < < α t }
b)
V
t s+= + V
tB
so τ
t on{ Y
t∈ E }
andt s t s t
U
+= U + S o τ
on{ α < U
t< β } .
4) On ⎧⎪⎨⎪⎩U
tU
t−⎫⎪⎬⎪⎭U
t−U
t⎤ ⎡
⎥ ⎢
⎦ ⎣
≠ , ,
is a contiguous interval ofM
.If t
U ≠ U
t−,
letE
t be the excursion associated toB
defined by:( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
if 0 if
Ut
s t t
t
t t
Y w s U w U w
E w s
s U w U w δ
− −
−
+
≤ < −
= ⎨ ⎧⎪
≥ −
⎪⎩
According to the previous proposition, the process
( ) V
t t R∈ has got the same role asB
for the process( ) Y
t t R∈.
We say that( ) V
t t R∈ is an" additive functional "for
( ) Y
t t R∈ . We have the extension of theorem 2[ ] 2
onW
.Theorem1:
1)The process
Φ = ( W ,Φ , , , ,
tG G
tτ
tQ )
is strongMarkov in the sense that for all
( ) G
t−
stopping timeT
ands > : 0
( )
(
T s T)
s( ) on {
T}
Q f Φ
+G = P f ,Φ
Tα < U < β
(3) for all function positive andF
-measurablef
.2) Assume that
T
1 is a finite( ) H
t−
stopping time such that1 1
T T
U ≠ U
−and1 1
T T−
Φ ≠ Φ
Q a e . .
.Then we have:(
T1)
T1 T1( ) on {
T1}
Q F E
⎛⎜⎜ ⎞⎟⎟H P
−F α U β
⎝ ⎠
=
Φ ,Φ< <
(4) for allF ≥ 0
,F
∗-measurable.Proof : If
T ≡ t
is constant, the formula( ) 3
follows from the Markov property of the process( ) Y
t t R∈ at time
U
t and the fact thatΦ =
t s+Z
so τ
t andτ
t s+= θ τ
so
t on{ α < U
t< β } .
This formula is also true forT
n instead ofT
, where( ) T
n is the decreasing dyadic approximation ofT
, which extends for a generalT
by the right continuity of the processes( ) ( ) Φ ,
tU
t and( ) τ
t.
The formula( ) 4
is argued in the same manner as
( ) 2
by using the formula( ) 30
of[ ] 1
.Conditional laws of pairs of excursions
We consider now the time-reversed process
( )
( )t R
t t R
Y
tY
−∈
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
∈
=
⎝ − ⎠ . It is anE
-valued right continuous process with left limits on⎤ ⎦ α β , ⎡ ⎣ = − , − ] β α [
, and which is equal to
δ
outside of⎤ ⎦ α β , ⎡ ⎣
. As in[ ] 1
and
[ ] 10
, we assume that( ) Y
t is also Markov with respect to another standard semigroup( ) P
t satisfying "les hypothèses droites de Meyer", which implies the strong Markov property and the existence of exit systems. The measure$ ( ) B Q ( Y
tB t )
η = ∈ ; < < α β
is
( ) P
t -excessive and the stationarity of( ) Y
t isguarantee. Let
τ $
t, , G
tB, S V $ ,
t, U
t andE
t be the analogous ofτ
t, , G B
t ,S , V U
t, ,
t andE
tcorresponding to
( ) Y
t.
As previously we assume thatQ a e . . B ⎤ ⎦ α , < ∞ t ⎤ ⎦
for allt > . α
For the process( ) Ψ =
t( ) Y
Ut and the random subset{
t}
M = < < ∪ + α t β t R
oτ
$of
⎤ ⎦ α β , ⎡ ⎣
, we have the analogous of theorem 1. In particular if we design byH
andH
t theQ
completions ofσ ( Ψ : ∈
uu R )
andσ ( Ψ : ≤
uu t )
+ respectively, and byP
x y, the measure defined asP
x y, in terms of the exit measures 0P
x ofM
for the canonical realization of( ) P
t , we have the following formula:( ( )
T2)
T2 T2( ) on {
T2}
Q F E H = P
Ψ ,Ψ−F α < U < β
(5) for all finite( ) H
t−
stopping timeT
2 such thatT2
U ≠
T2
U
−andΨ ≠ Ψ
T2− T2−Q a e . .,
and for all positive functionF
∗−
measurableF .
For the following theorem which gives the conditional law of pairs of excursions, we consider the family of probability measures
Q
x y z u, , ,= P
x y,⊗ P
z u,.
Theorem 2:
Let
T
1 (resp.T
2)
as in( ) 4 ( resp 5 . ( ) )
. We assume that the following hypotheses are satisfied:1)
σ
⎛⎜⎜⎜⎝U
T1−⎞⎟⎟⎟⎠∩ Λ ⊂ H
T2− 2)( ) U
T2H
T1σ
−∩ Λ ⊂
−,
where
Λ = { α < − U
T2−≤ U
T1−< β } .
Then we have the following formula:( )
(
T1 T2)
T1 T1 T2 T2( ) on
Q H E E H H Q H
− −
Φ ,Φ ,Ψ ,Ψ
, ∩ = Λ
(6)for all positive and
F
∗⊗ F
∗-measurable functionH
. Proof:We have to prove that:
( )
1 1( )
2 2( )
1 2
T T T T
T T
Q F E F E ZI Q P F P F ZI
⎛ ⎞ − −
⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Φ ,Φ
⎛ ⎞
⎛ ⎞ ⎜ Ψ ,Ψ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎜ Λ⎟ ⎜ Λ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
⎝ ⎠ (7)for all
F F ,
positive functions andF
∗-measurable, and for all positive random variableZ
,H ∩ H
-measurable.Since
2 1 T2 1
T UT U UT
U
θ
τ $
−=
−+ −o τ $
− − onΛ
, and since1
UT
τ $
− −isT1
U
G
⎛ ⎞−⎜ ⎟
⎜ −⎟
⎝ ⎠
−
measurable and1 1
T T
D U
G
⎛ ⎞−H
−⎜ ⎟
⎜ −⎟
⎝ ⎠
= ,
then2 T1
T
U
H
σ τ
− −⎛ ⎞ ∩Λ ⊂
⎜ ⎟
⎝ $ ⎠
(G
tD= G
Dt⊃ G
t where{ }
t
inf
D = s > : ∈ t s M
onW
, fort ∈ R
). By using the same argument, we prove thatσ
⎛⎜⎜⎜⎝Ψ , Ψ ∩ Λ ⊂
T2− T2⎞⎟⎟⎟⎠H
T1− ,1 2
T T
U H
σ
⎛⎜⎜⎜⎜⎝ −⎞⎟⎟⎟⎟⎠ −∩ Λ ⊂
and
σ
⎛⎜⎜⎜⎝Φ ,Φ ∩ Λ ⊂
T1− T1⎞⎟⎟⎟⎠H
T2−.
The Markov property at time
T
1 and the formula( ) 5
implied that for all positive random variable
Z
1,T1
H
−−
measurable and for all positive andF
0−
measurable functionϕ
:( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
1 2 1
1 1
2 1
1
1
T T
T T T
T T
Q F E F E Z I
Q P F F E Z I
ϕ τ ϕ τ
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
−
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎜ Λ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Φ ,Φ
⎛ ⎞
⎜ ⎟
⎜ Λ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
and according to the fact that
H
is generated by1 T
H
− andT1
τ
, we have:( )
1 1( ) ( )
1 2 2
T T
T T T
Q F E F E ZI Q P F F E ZI
⎛ ⎞ −
⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Φ ,Φ
⎛ ⎞
⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎜ Λ⎟ ⎜ Λ⎟
⎝ ⎠
=
⎝ ⎠(8)The formula
( ) 7
follows by using formulas( ) 8
and( ) 5 .
REFERENCES
[1]- BOUTABIA H..-Lois conditionnelles des excursions d’un processus de Markov à naissance et mort aléatoires, Portugaliae Mathematica., Vol 56 fasc 2, 239-255, 1999.
[2]- BOUTABIA H.-Additive functionals and excursions of Kuznetsov processes, International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences., 2031-2040 (2005).
[3]- GETOOR R.K.and SHARPE M.J.-Two results on dual excursions, Seminar on Stochastic Processes1981, Birkauser (1981), 31-52.
[4]- GETOOR R.K.-Killing a Markov process under a stationary measure involves creation, Ann.Prob.,16(1988).
[5]- JACODS.PA-Excursions of a Markov process induced by continuous additive functionals, Z.Wahrs.Verw.Geb.
44(1978),325-336.
[6]- KASPI H.-Excursion laws of Markov processes in classical duality, Ann.Prob., 33, (1985), 492-518.
[7]- KASPI H.-Random time changes for processes with random birth and death, Ann.Prob., 16, (1988), 586-599 [8]- KUZNETSOV S.E.-Construction of Markov processes with random times of birth and death, Prob.Th. Fiel 18 (1973), 571-575.
[9]-MAISONNEUVE B.-Systéme de sortie
Dt
⎛
F
⎞⎜ ⎟
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠-
prévisibles, Prob.Th.Fields 80 (1989), 395-405.
[10]- MITRO J.B.-Exit Systems for Dual Markov
Processes, Z.Wahrs.Verw
Geb. 66(1984), 259-267.