R ENDICONTI
del
S EMINARIO M ATEMATICO
della
U NIVERSITÀ DI P ADOVA
B OGDAN R ZEPECKI
An existence theorem for bounded solutions of differential equations in Banach spaces
Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, tome 73 (1985), p. 89-94
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=RSMUP_1985__73__89_0>
© Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova, 1985, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico della Università di Padova » (http://rendiconti.math.unipd.it/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions).
Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit conte- nir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
of Differential Equations in Banach Spaces.
BOGDAN RZEPECKI
(*)
SUMMARY - In this note we shall
give
sufficient conditions for the existence of bounded solutions of the differentialequation y’= f (t, y),
y(0) = zo on the half-line t > 0. Heref
is a function with values in a Banach spacesatisfying
someregularity
Ambrosettitype
conditionexpressed
in termsof the « measure of
noncompactness
ce».Let J = and let
(E, ~~ ’ 11) )
be a Banach space. Assume that is a function which satisfies thefollowing
conditions:(1)
for each themapping
t Hf (t, x)
ismeasurable; (2)
foreach fixed t E J the
mapping
x -f (t, x)
iscontinuous;
and(3) x) ~~ c Il x 11)
for where the function G ismonotonically nondecreasing
in the second variable such that t HG(t, u)
islocally
bounded for any fixed u E J and t H
G(t, y(t))
is measurable for each continuous boundedfunction y
of J into itself.Let xo E E.
By (PC)
we shall denote theproblem
offinding
asolution of the differential
equation
satisfying
the initial conditiony(o)
= xo.(*)
Indirizzo dell’A.:Bogdan Rzepecki,
Institute of Mathematics, A. Mi- ckiewiczUniversity, Matejki 48/49,
60-769 Poznan, Poland.90
We deal with the
problem (PC) using
a methoddeveloped by
Ambrosetti
[1].
This method is based on theproperties
of the measureof
noncompactness
oc. Theproof
of our theorem issugested by
a paper of Stokes[7] concerning
finite-dimensional vector differentialequations.
The measure of
noncompactness
of anonempty
bounded subset X of E is defined as the infimnm of all 8 > 0 such that there esists afinite
convering
of .Xby
sets of diameter 8. Forproperties
of x thereader is referred to
[2], [3], [5].
Denote
by C(J)
the set of all continuous functions from J to E.The set
C(J)
will be considered as a vector space endowed with thetopology
of uniform convergence oncompact
subsets of J.Let us
put
and
for t E J and X c
C(J). Moreover,
we use the standard notations.The closure of a subset A of a
topological
vector space, its convex hull and its closed convex hull bedenoted, respectively, by A,
conv Aand conv A. For a
mapping
lç’ defined on A we denoteby F[A]
theimage
of A under F.The Ascoli theorem we state as f ollows : X c
C(J)
isconditionally compact
if andonly
if X is almostequicontinuous
and.X (t )
iscompact
for
every t E
J. We shall use also thefollowing
result due to Ambro- setti[1) :
If I is acompact
subset of J and Y is a boundedequicontinuous
subset of the usual Banach space of continuous E-valued functions on
I,
then
Our result be
proved by
thefollowing
fixedpoint
theorem of Furi andVignoli type (see
e.g.[6],
Theorem2):
Let X be a
nonempty
closed convex subset ofC(J).
Let 0:2~ -~
-
[0, oo)
be a function such that~x~~
=X) =
-
c ~(X2)
wheneverXl
cX2,
and if = 0 thenX
iscompact,
for every x E X and every subsetsX~, Xl, X2
ofSuppose
that T is a continuous
mapping
of 3C into itself and16(X)
for
arbitrary
subset X oi 3C with > 0. Under thehypotheses,
T has a fixed
point
in ~.THEOREM. Let
h,
.~ be fonctions of J into itself such that h isnondecreasing
withh(0)
= 0 andh(t)
t for t >0,
and L is measurablet
and
integrable
oncompact
subsets of J with supt E J} 1.
Suppose
that the scalarinequality
0has a bounded
solution g existing
onJ;
denoteby Zo
the set of allx E E with = sup
{g(t):
t EJ}. Assume,
moreover, that for anyt > 0, ~
> 0 and X cZo
there exists a closed subsetQ
of[0, t]
suchthat mes
([0, t~BQ)
e andfor each closed subset I of
Q.
Then
(PC)
has at least onesolution y
defined on J andIly(t) Il g(t)
for t E J.
PROOF. Denote
by
3C the set of all x EC(J)
such thatIl g(t)
on J and
for J, r in J. The set 3C is a closed convex bounded and almost
equi
continuous subset of
C(J).
Let us
put
çb(X)
= sup t EJ}
for a subset X of X.Obviously
~(X)
oo,16(Xi) ~(X2)
for.Xl
cX2,
and U{x})
= forx E X. Since
so
92
for t E J. Hence
and
consequently, (l)(X).
If(l)(X)
= 0 thenX(t)
is com-pact
for every t EJ;
therefore Ascoli’s theorem proves that X iscompact
in
C(J).
To
apply
our fixedpoint
theorem we define the continuousmapping
T as follows : for y E
C(J),
Modyfying
thereasoning
from[7]
we infer thatLet X be a subset of 3C such that > 0. To prove the theorem it remains to be show that
To this
end,
fix t in J. Let e >0,
and let ô _b(e)
> 0 be a number such thatfor each measurable A c
[0, t]
with mes(A) ~. By
the Luzin theorem there exists a closed subsetB,
of[0, t]
with mes([0, t]BBI) à/2
andthe function .~ is continuous on
B¡. Furthermore, by
ourcomparison condition,
there exists a closed subsetB2
of[0, t]
such thatmes
([0, Ô/2
andfor each closed subset I of
1~.
Define:
where
A
==[0, t]BB
fori = 1, 2 .
Since .~ isuniformly
continuous onB,
for anygiven
E’ > 0 thereexists q
> 0 such thatt’,
t" E B andimplies a(X t)
-L(t") C
8’. For apositive integer
m >
let to
= 0C t1
... tm = t be thepartion
of the interval[0, t]
with t j
=+ (j
=1, 2,
... ,m) . Moreover,
letIl
=and
let 8j
be apoint
inIj
such thatL(s;)
= sup~Z(s) :
s EIj}.
By
theintegral
mean-valuetheorem,
for x E .X we haveThus
and therefore 8
-E- h(a(Xt)).
Sincewe obtain
a( T [~] (t) ) c ~ --~- h( S~(X ) ) ;
as e isarbitrary,
thisimplies
oc(T[XI(t»
Hence andconsequently
Thas a fixed
point
in X. Theproof
iscomplete.
REFERENCES
[1]
A. AMBROSETTI, Un teorema di esistenza per leequazioni differenziali negli spazi
di Banach, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 39(1967),
pp. 349-360.[2]
G. DARBO, Punti uniti intrasformazioni
a codominio noncompatto,
Rend.Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova, 24
(1955),
pp. 84-92.[3]
K. DEIMLING,Ordinary Differential Equations
in BanachSpaces,
Lect.Notes in Math. 596,
Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, 1977.94
[4]
M. FURI - A. VIGNOLI, On03B1-nonexpansive mappings
andfixed points,
Rend. Atti Acc. Naz. Lincei, 18 (1977), pp. 195-198.
[5]
R. H. MARTINjr.,
NonlinearOperators
andDifferential Equations
in BanachSpaces,
JohnWiley
and Sons, New York, 1976.[6] B. RZEPECKI, Remarks on Schauder’s
fixed point principle
and itsappli-
cations, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér.Math.,
27(1979),
pp. 473-480.[7]
A. STOKES, Theapplication of
afixed-point
theorem to avariety of
non-linear
stabitity problems,
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 45 (1959), pp. 231-235.[8] S. SZUFLA, On the existence
of
solutionsof differential equations
in Banachspaces, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Math., 30
(1982),
pp. 507-515.Manoscritto