• Aucun résultat trouvé

A User Centered Annotation Methodology for Multimedia Content

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "A User Centered Annotation Methodology for Multimedia Content"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

A User Centered Annotation Methodology for Multimedia Content

Tobias B¨urger and Christian Ammendola Semantic Technology Institute (STI), Innsbruck, Austria

{tobias.buerger, christian.ammendola}@sti2.at

Abstract. Fully automated solutions for semantic annotation of multi- media content still do not deliver satisfying results. Most manual ontology- based annotation approaches are not suitable for end users who are not experienced with navigating huge ontologies or extending the ontologies used to annotate. We thus present an annotation methodology which supports the user in the aforementioned tasks. This lowers the entry- barrier for non-experienced users to produce ontology based annotations and thus could be used in situations in which annotation should happen just-in-time during the creation of the media which is being annotated.

1 Introduction

In an increasing number of domains classification of media assets is becoming a growing challenge. With the trend towards re-use of content, both the develop- ment and consumption of media are demanding more accurate, accessible and flexible ways of listing, categorizing and showing relationships. Approaches for the annotation of media objects try to limit the so-called Semantic Gap [5], i.e.

the large gulf between low level image features and high level concepts. These so-called high level semantics are typically derived based on the experience and background of the user. Thus most of the automated approaches are not deliv- ering promising results.

Therefore we propose a manual annotation methodology which allows non–

experienced users to annotate multimedia content using elements from an on- tology in an easy way. The methodology combines several semantic–based ap- proaches from the information retrieval domain (e. g. [2] or [3]) and recent pro- posals for end user–driven semantic content creation [1, 4] in one coherent frame- work: the ElementSelection and ElementAddition (SA) – Methodology.

2 The SA Methodology

The aim of the SA methodology is to support users in the process of manual annotation by providing aid in the selection of adequate ontology elements and in the extension of ontologies during annotation time. The methodology will be integrated in media production environments to be available just in time of the

(2)

Fig. 1.SA Methodology Structure

creation of new media elements. Figure 1 depicts the structure of the methodol- ogy which consists of two parts: TheElement Selection – part includes a set of components for the selection of ontology elements based on semantic techniques presented in [2] and [3]. The key idea is to help the user in finding adequate ontology elements by using semantic retrieval techniques and by automatically proposing ontology elements that could be relevant for annotating a specific resource.

TheElement Addition– part consists of two components enabling a collabo- rative and work-embedded ontology engineering approach based on mechanisms presented in [1] and [3], and the classification mechanism used in [4]. These components provide the possibility to add missing elements to ontologies while working with them, to adapt previously added elements and to provide support for classification through a manual and a semi–automatic classification approach.

For the addition of elements, the user is guided through the existing elements of the ontologies and for the classification, elements are proposed based on a recommendation system.

Acknowledgements The research leading to this paper was partially supported by the European Commission under contract FP6-027122 “SALERO”.

References

1. Simone Braun, Andreas Schmidt, and Andreas Walter. Ontology maturing: a collab- orative web 2.0 approach to ontology engineering. InProceedings of the Workshop on Social and Collaborative Construction of Structured Knowledge, Banff, Canada, 2007.

2. Eero Hyv¨onen and Eetu M¨akel¨a. Semantic autocompletion. In Proceedings of the First Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC 2006), 2006.

3. Eero Hyv¨onen, Samppa Saarela, and Kim Viljanen. Application of ontology tech- niques to view-based semantic search and browsing. In Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS 2004), 2004.

4. Katharina Siorpaes and Martin Hepp. Ontogame: Weaving the semantic web by on- line gaming. InProceedings of the 5th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 2008.

5. Arnold W. M. Smeulders, Marcel Worring, Simone Santini, Amarnath Gupta, and Ramesh Jain. Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 22(12):1349–1380, 2000.

Références

Documents relatifs

RightField was designed to be a spreadsheet annotation tool because spreadsheets, particularly MS Excel, are ubiquitous in the laboratory science community for

“Less is more” illustrates the collaboration dynamic that embodies the Long Tail (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_Tail) principle within the Social Web; a huge

Whenever new multimedia content is provided as input for analysis, the existing a- priori knowledge base is used to compare, by means of matching the MPEG-7 visual descriptors,

The determination of block labels is achieved by identifying distinctive semiotic properties across morpho-syntagmatic systems (paradigmatic analysis) and by taking into account the

Therefore, the inter-annotator agreement reaches higher values when annotators have to identify gene name couples involved in a renaming rela- tionship than when they have to

However, this value was determined for the following working parameters: velocity at the inlet – 1.18 m/s, gauge pressure at the inlet and outlet – 0.4 MPa, discrete phase

The data collected through the literature review comprises for each methodology the following information (if applicable): Its goal and definition, the entailed steps and

Semantic annotation and enrichment of the crawled data enable additional rea- soning and introduce new features into existing methods, resulting in a better estimation of indices