• Aucun résultat trouvé

needs contribute to patient perception of physician empathy? How does a physician’s accurate understanding of a cancer patient’sunmet Patient Education and Counseling

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "needs contribute to patient perception of physician empathy? How does a physician’s accurate understanding of a cancer patient’sunmet Patient Education and Counseling"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Communication study

How does a physician’s accurate understanding of a cancer patient’s unmet needs contribute to patient perception of physician empathy?

Sophie Lelorain

a,b,

*, Anne Bre´dart

c,d

, Sylvie Dolbeault

c,e,f

, Alejandra Cano

c

, Ange´lique Bonnaud-Antignac

g

, Florence Cousson-Ge´lie

h,i

, Serge Sultan

j

aUnivLilleNorddeFrance,DepartmentofPsychology,Lille,France

bUDL3,SCALabUMRCNRS9193,Villeneuved’Ascq,France

cInstitutCurie,Psycho-oncologyUnit,Paris,France

dParisDescartesUniversity,LPPSEA4057—IUPDP,Boulogne-Billancourt,France

eInserm,U669,Paris,France

fUnivParis-SudandUnivParisDescartes,UMR-S0669,Paris,France

gUniversityofNantes,EA4275SPHERE‘bioStatistics,PharmacoepidemiologyandHumansciEncesResearch’,Nantes,France

hUniversityofMontpellier3,LaboratoryEpsylon‘DynamicsofHumanAbilities&HealthBehaviors’,Montpellier,France

iICM,InstitutRe´gionalduCancerdeMontpellier,EpidaurePreventionandEducationCancerCenter,Montpellier,France

jUniversityofMontreal,SainteJustineUniversityHospitalResearchCenter,Montreal,Canada

1. Introduction

Patientperceptionofphysicianempathy(PE)isanimportant factor in cancer care, often associated with positive patient outcomes[1],suchasabetterqualityoflife[2]oradherenceto treatment[3].Inspiteofitsvariousdefinitions[4],empathyina medicalsettingisoftendefinedastheclinician’scognitiveability tounderstandaccuratelytheir patient’sneedsandconcerns[5],

which we willrefer toas accurateunderstanding (AU) in this article1.Strikingly,fewempiricalstudieshavetestedwhetherAU reallymattersforPE.Infact,thesparsedataavailableinoncology donotrevealanylinkbetweenphysicianAUandconceptscloseto PE,suchaspatienttrustinthephysician[6]orsatisfactionwiththe consultation[7].

Thus, on onehand,it couldbethat thephysician’saccurate perceptionofpatientsisnotsoimportantforPE.Agoodbedside mannerwithoutanaccurateperceptionofthepatient,butwith ARTICLE INFO

Articlehistory:

Received13June2014

Receivedinrevisedform19February2015 Accepted7March2015

Keywords:

Physicianaccurateunderstanding Perceivedempathy

Supportivecareneeds Rapport

Expressivesuppression Oncology

ABSTRACT

Objective:Unmetsupportivecareneedsofpatientsdecreasepatientperceptionofphysicianempathy (PE).Weexploredwhethertheaccuratephysicianunderstandingofagivenpatient’sunmetneeds(AU), couldbuffertheadverseeffectoftheseunmetneedsonPE.

Methods:Inacross-sectionaldesign,28physiciansand201 metastaticcancerpatientsindependently assessedtheunmetsupportivecareneedsofpatients.AUwascalculatedasthesumofitemsforwhich physicianscorrectlyratedthelevelofpatientneeds.PEandcovariateswereassessedusingself-reported questionnaires.Multilevelanalyseswerecarriedout.

Results:AUdidnotdirectlyaffectPEbutactedasamoderator.Whenpatientswerehighlyexpressive andwhenphysiciansperceivedpoorrapportwiththepatient,ahighAUmoderatedtheadverseeffectof patientunmetneedsonPE.

Conclusion:PhysicianAU hasthepowertoprotect thedoctor–patientrelationshipinspite ofhigh patientunmetneeds,butonlyincertainconditions.

Practiceimplications:PhysiciansshouldbeencouragedtowardAUbutwarnedthathighrapportand patientlowemotionalexpressionmayimpedeanaccuratereadingofpatients.Inthislattercase,they shouldrequestaformalassessmentoftheirpatients’needs.

ß2015ElsevierIrelandLtd.Allrightsreserved.

* Correspondingauthorat:SCALabUMRCNRS9193,Universite´ Lille3,UFRde Psychologie,RueduBarreau,BP60149,F-59653Villeneuved’Ascqcedex,France.

Tel.:+33320416968;fax:+330320416036.

E-mailaddress:sophie.lelorain@univ-lille3.fr(S.Lelorain).

1Inthepresentstudy,wewilluse‘accurateunderstanding’(AU)todescribethe accuracywithwhichaphysicianperceivestheneedsandconcernsofaspecific patient.

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Patient Education and Counseling

j ou rna l hom e pa ge : ww w. e l s e v i e r. c om/ l o ca t e / pa t e duc ou

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.002

0738-3991/ß2015ElsevierIrelandLtd.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

active listening and warmth [8,9], as well as sufficient time devoted to the patient [10–14], seems sufficient for patient satisfaction. Consistent with this idea, in a vignette study responded tobyanalogue patients, Blanch-Hartiganfoundthat

‘patients’weresatisfiedwith‘physicians’whowereabletodetect theoccurrenceofpatientemotions,even iftheywerewrongat determiningthenature ofthe detectedemotions [15].Thus, as someauthorsargue,accuracymaynotbeasfunctionallyimportant asmightaprioribethought[16].

On theother hand,an accurateperceptionof patient needs shouldbenecessaryforclinicianstoaddresstheseneedsandthus beperceivedasempathic.Findingsthatpatients’unmetinforma- tionneedsarestronglyrelatedtolowPE[17–19]supportthisline ofreasoning.

Wereasonedthatpreviousstudieshavefailedtodemonstrate theassociationofAUwithPE[6,7]becauseofthetwofollowing methodologicaldrawbacks.

First,ratherthaninfluencingPEdirectly,AUcouldmoderatethe linkbetween patientunmetneedsandPE.Aspreviouslystated, thereisastrong linkbetweenpatientunmetneeds andlowPE [17–19]. However, somewhat surprisingly, PE depends on ele- mentsthatgobeyondtheactionscopeofphysicians,suchasthe hospital’s organization of care [20–22]. Dysfunctional hospital organizationcouldcreatepatientunmetsupportivecareneeds,for whichphysiciansarenotresponsible,butwhichdostillimpactPE.

However,itcouldbeexpectedthat,althoughphysiciansarenot responsibleforandperhapsunabletomeetthesepatientneeds, theiraccurateawarenessoftheseconcernscouldatleastlessenthe strongnegativeimpactofunmetneedsonPE.Wethusexpecteda moderatingeffectofAUonthelinkbetweenpatientunmetneeds andPE.Althoughthereisnoempiricalstudytodatetosupportthis hypothesis,fromatheoreticalpointofview,itisconceivablethat AU,asanacknowledgementofpatientsuffering,couldbufferthe negativeimpactofunmetneedsonPE.Nevertheless,asdeveloped inthefollowingtwoparagraphs,themoderatingeffectcouldbe possibleonlyundercertainconditions.

Second, according to some authors’ point of view [16,23], perspective-taking(i.e.adoptinganother’sperspective)couldbe oneway,amongothers,toachieveAU.Therefore,itmightbethat previousstudiesdidnotassesstheAUstemmingfromphysician perspective-taking[24,25],whichrecallsthedistinctiveaccuracyof social psychology [26,27], but rather a normative or stereotype accuracyresultingfromphysicianheuristicstoobtainanideaof thepatient’ssituationrapidlyandeffortlessly.Theseheuristicsare typicallystereotypes(e.g.‘Alladvancedcancerpatientsmusthave a lot of unmetneeds’) or egocentric perspectives (e.g. ‘If, as a physician,Ihave doneall that canbedone for a patient,(s)he should not have unmet needs’) [16,23,25]. If, for example, a physician then assumes that cancer patients always have numerousunmetneeds, (s)hewillbeaccuratewithallpatients thatdohavemanyunmetneeds.However,althoughthisstereotype AUcanbehigh,sinceitisnotbasedonasoundknowledgeofa specific patientby taking his/her perspective,it shouldnot be related to PE. We therefore propose that AU could have the speculated moderating effect (i.e. AU moderating the negative impactofunmetneedsonPE)butonlyforadistinctiveAU.

Becauseofphysicianexternalconstraints[8],suchaslackof time,and since perspective-takingis anenergy-consuming and demandingtask,itcanbeassumedthat,bydefault,physiciansdo not take patient perspectives but use heuristics instead. A distinctiveAU ought tooccur ifphysicians have a goodreason toengageactivelyintheinteractionwithpatientsandtaketheir perspectives[28].Amongothermotivations,perspective-takingis triggeredindifficultsituationstocopewithrelationshipthreats [29]orlackofpersonalcontrol[30].Thismayexplainwhymedical studentselicitmorepatientperspectivesinthecaseofanunclear

diagnosis, which can be challenging for the doctor–patient relationship,comparedtoacleardiagnosis[31].Therefore,although itmaynotseemintuitive,weassumedthatdistinctiveAUwould bemorelikelywithpatientsforwhom physiciansperceivepoor rapportratherthanwith‘easy’patients.Moreover,distinctiveAU can only occur with patients who disclose information/cueson whichphysicianscandrawinordertounderstandthemaccurately [32–34].Withoutclearavailableinformation,physicianshaveno otherchoicebuttouseheuristics.

To summarize, our primary goal was to investigate the unresolved issue of how AU could contributeto PE. Clarifying this issueis vital todemonstrate theimportance of AU in the doctor–patientrelationship.Basedonatheoreticalreasoning,we hypothesizedthatAUwouldbufferthenegativeimpactofunmet patientneedsonPE,butonlyforanassumeddistinctiveAU,which, in this study, is either with expressive patients providing diagnosticinformationabouttheirneedsorwhenphysicianshave poorrapportwithapatient.Highpatientexpressivenessandpoor rapportwillbeusedas‘proxies’foranassumeddistinctiveAU,as our study does not allow distinctive AU to be empirically disentangledfromstereotypeAU.

Asubsidiarygoalwastoexplorewhetherclassicalcovariatesof PE, i.e. physician self-reported empathy [14,35,36], length of consultations[10,11,22,37],andphysicianexperienceinoncology inareversesense[35,38,39],wouldalsocorrelatewithPEinthe contextofadvancedcancercare.

Advanced metastatic cancer patients were chosen to reach thoselikelytoreportunmetsupportivecareneedsandbecausethe doctor–patientrelationshipwasdeemedparticularlyimportantin thisphaseofthediseasetrajectory.

2. Methods

Fulldetailsofthestudymaybefoundinanotherreport[32]so onlythemaininformationisgivenhere.

2.1. Procedure

EligiblephysiciansfromfourFrenchhospitalswereinvitedto participate in the study. Upon acceptance, they completed a questionnaireassessingtheirself-reportedempathyandproviding theirsocio-professionalcharacteristics.Theythenhadtoinclude 10consecutivepatientsmeetingtheinclusioncriteria.Attheend ofaconsultationwiththephysician,patientsweregivenadetailed written study description, a written consent form and the questionnaires to fill in. Within one day of each inclusion, physicians had to fill in a short questionnaire assessing their understandingofthepatient’sunmetsupportive careneeds(i.e.

theAUtask,seeSection2.3).

2.2. Participants

The sample was composed of 28 clinicians, mostly medical oncologists with19 yearsofexperience inoncologyonaverage (SD=8.4), and 201 adult advanced metastatic cancer patients.

Mostpatientswerefemaleandlivedwithsomeone,theirmeanage was62yearsandtheprimarycancersiteswerebreast,colorectal andlungcancers.Inallcases,patientshadalreadyconsultedthe physicianatleast3 timesbeforejoiningthestudysothatthey alreadyhadaminimalknowledgeofeachother.

2.3. Measures

Patientperceptionofphysicianempathy(PE)wasmeasuredusing theConsultationAndRelationalEmpathymeasure(CARE),a10- item5-pointLikertscaleprovidinganoverallscoreofPE[40,41],

(3)

withahigherscoremeaningahigherPE.Itemsofthescaledeal with patient perception of physician listening, respect, clear explanations and information provision, whether thephysician (from the patient point of view) fully understands his/her concerns,andshowscareandcompassion.Cronbach’salpha(

a

) was0.97inoursample.

Physicianself-reportedempathywasmeasuredusingtheJefferson ScaleofPhysicianEmpathy(JSPE),a20-item7-pointLikertresponse scale [42] with good psychometric properties [42,43]. In these validation articles, the scale provides scores for 3 dimensions:

perspective-taking(e.g.‘Itrytounderstandwhatisgoingoninmy patients’mindsbypayingattentiontotheirnonverbalcuesandbody language’or‘Itrytothinklikemypatientsinordertorenderbetter care’),compassionatecare(e.g.‘Ibelievethatemotionhasnoplacein thetreatmentofmedicalillness’,reverseditem)andinthepatients’

shoes(e.g.‘Itisdifficultformetoviewthingsfrommypatients’

perspectives’,reversed).Higherscoresindicatehigherself-reported empathy.Inoursample,

a

was0.64,0.57and0.85,respectively,for thethreedimensions.

Patient expressive suppression was assessed with the 4-item 7-point Likert expressive suppression scale from the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) [44]. Expressive suppression describestowhatextent peoplegenerally inhibitongoingemo- tion-expressivebehavior(e.g.‘WhenIamfeelingnegativeemotions, ImakesureIdon’texpressthem’).Theexpressivesuppressionscore rangesfrom4to28.Inoursample,

a

was0.83.

Rapport was evaluated by a single question assessing the physician-perceived quality of the relationship with a given patienton a 7-pointLikert scale: ‘Whatis thequality of your relationshipwiththispatient?’from1‘verydifficultrelationship’

to7‘veryeasyrelationship’.

Patientunmetsupportivecareneedswereassessedusinganad- hocadaptationoftheSupportiveCareNeedsSurvey-ShortForm34 (SCNS-SF34) [45,46]. This contains 34 items grouped into five domainsofneeds:physical,psychological,sexual,informational, and care/support. Because physicians should also fill in this questionnairetakingthepatientperspective(seebelow),it was deemedtoo long for this purpose. So, we shortened the scale

further,keepingfromthe5originaldimensionsthe13itemsthat patients had rated as the most important in a previous study [47].Foreachitem,patientswereaskedtorate,ona7-pointLikert scale,theextenttowhichtheyhadneededsomehelpoverthelast month,from1‘noneedatall’to7‘atotalneedofhelp’.Dueto frequentmissingdata,theretaineditemaboutunmetsexualneeds wasdiscarded.Withtheexceptionofonecross-loadeditem(about pain),thusalsodiscarded,anexploratoryfactoranalysis(principal components,varimaxrotation,andscreetest)extractedtwoclear factorslabeled‘psychological’and‘staff-related’dimensionswith

a

of0.87and0.91,respectively(seeTable1fordetailsofitems).

AccurateUnderstanding(AU) ofpatientunmetneeds.Indepen- dentlyofthepatient,thephysicianhadtoratethepatient’sunmet needs on the abridged SCNS-SF34. Physicians were clearly instructedtotakethepatient’sperspectiveandnotindicatetheir own view of the situation. For each item, the physician was consideredaccurateif(s)hegavethesameratingasthepatientto withinonepoint.Thischoicewasmadetofindabalancebetweena too stringent and a too permissive criterion, from both a probabilisticand a clinicalpoint of view.Then,a physician AU scorewasgeneratedbysummingthephysician’saccurateitems foreachofthetwodimensions:psychological(possiblerangefrom 0to5)andstaff-relatedneeds(possiblerangefrom0to6).

2.4. Statisticalanalyses

Torespectthetwo-levelhierarchicalstructureofpatients(level 1) nested within doctors (level 2), multilevel analyses were performed[48,49]withMLwiNsoftware2.30[50,51].

Westartedfromtheemptymodel(M0),whichcontainsonly theinterceptandresidualsforbothpatientorsituational(

s

2e)and physician (

s

2phy) levels. This model enabled the intraclass correlation(ICC)tobecalculated,whichhere isthevariancein PEduetophysicians,i.e.

s

2phy/(

s

2phy+

s

2e).

Next,theassociationsofthepotentialcovariateswithPEwere tested one by one in bivariate analyses. Those significantly associated withPE enteredModel 1. Then, ourhypothesis was specifiedin two differentmodels (2a and 2b)according tothe

Table1

Patientunmetneedsasratedbypatientsandphysicians.

Patient’srating Physician’srating Differencey AUz ICC

Mean SD Mean SD

Dimension/item Psychologicaldimension

Lackofenergy,tiredness 3.32 1.92 4.09 1.73 0.77*** 49 0.37***

Uncertaintyaboutthefuture 3.64 2.11 4.11 1.78 0.48** 43 0.25*

Keepingapositiveoutlook 3.11 2.05 3.91 1.66 0.79*** 43 0.36***

Feelingsaboutdeathanddying 3.08 2.17 3.89 1.68 0.81*** 42 0.34***

Beinginformedaboutthingsyoucandotohelpyourself togetwell

3.83 2.24 3.42 1.55 0.41* 41 0.17

Dimensionscore 3.40 1.69 3.89 1.39 0.49*** 2.17(1.47) 0.29***

Staff-relateddimension

Beinggivenexplanationsofthosetestsforwhichyou wouldlikeexplanations

3.05 2.05 3.03 1.50 0.02 43 0.01

Beinginformedaboutyourtestresultsassoonasfeasible 3.44 2.27 3.31 1.67 0.13 43 0.24*

Hospitalstaffattendingpromptlytoyourphysicalneeds 2.43 1.85 3.25 1.61 0.82*** 51 0.36***

Reassurancebymedicalstaffthatthewayyoufeelisnormal 3.02 2.08 3.68 1.66 0.66*** 48 0.30**

Beingtreatedlikeapersonnotjustanothercase 2.60 2.07 2.44 1.41 0.16 57 0.20*

Beingadequatelyinformedaboutthebenefitsandside effectsoftreatmentsbeforeyouchoosetohavethem

3.38 2.24 3.19 1.59 0.19 42 0.17

Dimensionscore 2.99 1.73 3.15 1.27 0.16 2.83(1.85) 0.24***

Foreachitem,AUisthepercentageofphysicianswhowereaccurateonthisitem(i.e.sameratingasthepatienttowithinonepoint).Foreachdimension,AUisthemeanscore ofaccurateitemsperphysician,withstandarddeviationinbrackets;ICC=IntraClassCorrelationCoefficient.

*** p<.001.

** p<.01.

* p<.05.

y Differencewastestedusingpairedttests.

z AU=accurateunderstandingofpatient’sunmetneeds.

(4)

dimensionofneeds,andusingathree-wayinteraction:2a)patient unmetstaff-relatedneedsAUrapport;and2b)patientunmet psychological needsAUpatient expressive suppression. In fact, patient expressive suppression was deemed particularly relevantforphysiciandistinctiveAUonpsychologicalneeds,while rapportwasthoughtmorerelevantforstaff-relatedneeds.Indeed, as expressive suppression is really about the expression of emotions,itseemedmorerelevantforpsychologicalneeds,which arepreciselyaboutemotions.Moreover,asapoorrapportprobably reflects the patient’s dissatisfaction withinformation and staff care,it seemedmorerelevantforstaff-related needs,whichtap preciselytheseissuesratherthanemotions.

Thetestofathree-wayinteractionrequirestheintroductionof thethreetermsplusthethreetwo-wayinteractionsinthemodel before entering the final interaction [52]. Models 2a and 2b thereforecontainsevennewparameters.

Finally,model fit wasevaluatedwiththe2Log Likelihood (2LL). The smaller the 2LL is, the better the model is. The differencein 2LLbetween two modelswastestedusinga chi squaretest.Lastly,althoughmultilevelanalysesdonotprovidean R2fortheexplainedvariance,apseudoR2canbecomputedasthe reductioninvariancebetweentwomodels,forexample:(

s

2Model 1

s

2Model2)/

s

2Model1.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptiveresults

ThemeanforPEwasratherhigh:38.4(SD=8.9;possibleand sample range: 10–50). Consultations lasted on average 26min (SD=14;range:5–90).Physicianself-reportedempathywas48.9 (SD=6.5;possiblerange:10–70)onthe‘perspective-taking’factor, 41.2(SD=5.4;possiblerange:8–56)onthe‘compassionatecare’

factor, and 7.7 (SD=3.3; possible range: 2–14) for the ‘in the patients’shoes’factor.Meanrapportwithpatientswashigh,5.7 (SD=1.1, possiblerange: 1–7,sample range:2–7), and patient expressivesuppressionwasmoderate:15.0(SD=6.4;possibleand samplerange:4–28).

PatientunmetneedsandAUarereportedinTable1.Withthe exception of the item about ‘things patients coulddo to help themselvestogetwell’,forwhichphysiciansunderestimatedtheir

patients’ needs,physicians eitheroverestimatedor equivalently ratedtheirpatients’needs.Onaverage,physicianswereaccurate for2.17outofthe5itemsofthepsychologicaldimension,andfor 2.83outofthe6itemsofthestaff-relateddimension.

3.2. Physicianeffectsandcovariates

TheICCcomputedfromtheemptymodel(M0, Table2)was 18%. This means that PE was significantly different between physicians.

In bivariate analyses, physician‘compassionate care’ and ‘in the patients’ shoes’ empathy were not related toPE (

b

=0.21, standard error (SE)=0.17, p=0.22, and

b

=0.10, SE=0.28, p=0.72, respectively), whereas ‘perspective-taking’ empathy was positively related (

b

=0.32, SE=0.13, p=0.01). Length of consultations positively correlated with PE (

b

=0.18, SE=0.05, p<0.001), while physician experience in oncology negatively correlatedwithPE(

b

=0.23,SE=0.10,p=0.02).Thethreelatter variablesenteredModel1,whichwassignificantlybetterthanthe emptymodel(

D

2LL=17.5,p<.001,seeTable2).Inparticular, thecovariatesenabledareductionof39.8%inphysicianvariance (from 14.06to8.47).When thecovariatesweretogetherinthe model,onlythelengthofconsultationremainedsignificantlyand positivelylinkedtoPE.

3.3. ModeratingeffectofAUontherelationshipbetweenunmet‘staff- related’needsandPE

Inthefinalmodel(Table2),asexpected,patientunmet‘staff- related’needswerestronglynegativelyrelatedtoPE(p<0.001) whereasAUonthoseneedsdidnotdirectlyaffectPE.However,AU significantlypredictedPEinthethree-wayinteractionincluding both unmet needs and rapport (p<0.05). The interaction was plottedfortheoreticalvaluesoflow(rapport=3;Fig.1a)andhigh rapport (rapport=5; Fig. 1b). Because of the negative skewed distributionofthisvariable,wepreferredtoplottheinteraction withtheoreticalvaluesof3and5ratherthanusingtheclassical criteriaofpercentiles20and80.Whenrapportwaslow(Fig.1a), AUhadastrongeffectontheneeds-PElink.WhenAUwaslow, unmetneedscorrelatedstronglyandnegativelywithPE,whereas whenAUwashigh,unmetneedscorrelatedpositivelywithPE.In

Table2

MultilevelmodelsforthepredictionofPEbyAUonpatientunmet‘staff-related’needs.

Models M0:Emptymodel Model1 Model2a

Parameters Fixedeffects

Intercept 38.70***(0.94) 38.45***(0.81) 37.72***(0.80)

Lengthofconsultation 0.14**(0.05) 0.19**(0.04)

Experienceinoncology 0.13(0.09) 0.11(0.09)

Physicianperspective-taking(JSPE) 0.16(0.13) 0.15(0.12)

Patientunmet‘staff-related’needs 2.26***(0.35)

AUofunmet‘staff-related’needs 0.46(0.31)

Rapport 1.17**(0.56)

RapportAU 0.22(0.29)

Rapportunmet‘staff-related’needs 0.73*(0.30)

AUunmet‘staff-related’needs 0.28(0.20)

Unmet‘staff-related’needsAUrapport 0.40*(0.18)

Randomeffects

Physicianvariances2phy 14.06(6.42) 8.47(4.71) 8.91(4.21)

Patientorsituationalvariances2e 64.42(6.89) 61.01(6.51) 44.46(4.75)

Modelfit:2LogLikelihood(2LL) 1432.83 1415.30 1356.92

Differencein2LLbetween2models(df) 17.5***(3dfwithM0) 58.38***(7dfwithM1)

Effectsignificance=estimate/standarderror(inbrackets).Foreachmodel,therandomslopemodel,whichallowstheslopestovaryacrossphysicians,wastested.Norandom slopemodelsweresignificantlybetterthanthemodelwithoutrandomslopeeffects;thesemodelswerethereforediscarded(datanotshown).

* p<.05.

** p<.01.

*** p<.001.

(5)

other words, when rapport was low, overlooked unmet ‘staff- related’needswerenegativelylinkedtoPE,whereasaccurately understoodunmet‘staff-related’needswerepositivelylinkedto PE.Incontrast,whenrapportwashigh(Fig.1b),AUnolongerhad anyeffect.

Model2aalsodemonstratedthatrapportpositivelycorrelated withPE(p<0.01).Overall,thismodelwassignificantlybetterthan Model 1 (

D

2LL=58.38, p<0.001, see Table 2). While it had almostnoeffectonphysicianvariance,itreducedvariancedueto patientorsituationalfactorsfrom61.01to44.46,i.e.by27.1%.

3.4. ModeratingeffectofAUontherelationshipbetweenunmet psychologicalneedsandPE

As predicted, patients’ unmet psychological needs were stronglyand negatively correlated withPE(p<0.001) whereas AUoftheseneedsdidnotdirectlyaffectPE(Table3).However,AU significantlypredicted PEinthethree-wayinteractionincluding bothunmetneedsandpatientexpressivesuppression(p<0.05).

Theinteractionwasplottedforlow(atpercentile20;Fig.2a)and

highpatientexpressionsuppression(atpercentile80;Fig.2b).For low patient expressive suppression (i.e. patient is expressive;

Fig.2a),AUhadaneffectontheneeds-PElink.WhenAUwaslow, unmetpsychologicalneedswerestronglynegativelyrelatedtoPE, whereaswhenAUwashigh, unmetneeds almostdidnotaffect PE.Inotherwords,whenpatientswereexpressiveandtheirunmet psychologicalneedsoverlooked,therewasanegativerelationship betweenunmetneedsand PE,whereaswhentheseneedswere accurately understood by the physician(high AU), highunmet needswerenotrelatedtolowerPE.Incontrast,whenpatientswere notexpressive(Fig.2b),AUnolongerhadanyeffect.

Overall, Model 2b was significantly better than Model 1 (

D

2LL=36.19,p<0.001, seeTable2).While it hadalmostno effectonphysicianvariance,itreducedvarianceduetopatientor situationalfactorsfrom61.01to50.76,i.e.by16.8%.

4. Discussionandconclusion

Our goalwastotestwhether physicianAUcouldbufferthe adverseeffectofpatientunmetneedsonPE,controllingforusual covariatesofPE.

First,amongthecovariates,inagreementwiththeliterature, theconsultationdurationhadthestrongestpositiverelationship withPE.Withouttime,PEisinevitablylimited.Thiscouldexplain why,althoughcommunicationskillstrainingimprovesempathic behavior,patientperceptionof,andsatisfactionwith,healthcare professionalsisnotbetteraftertheseinterventions[37,53].

Second, ourresult that in bivariate analyses physician self- reported perspective-taking but not compassionate care was positivelyrelatedtoPEechoesthosestudieswhereapersonalized medicalapproachbyphysicians(i.e.physiciansknewtheunique elements of patients’ cases and offered supportabout medical aspects),butnottheirfocusonpatientemotionsorpersonaltopics, wasthecoreelementofPE[54,55].Allthesedatahighlightthe importanceofperspective-takingasa keycomponentofpatient satisfaction [56]. Third, still in bivariate analyses, physician experience in oncology was negatively related to PE. An experimentalstudyhasdemonstratedthattoomuchexperience triggers a desensitization, which decreases perspective-taking abilities[57].Perhapsafteracertaintimeinoncology,physicians alsoexperiencea sortof desensitization,bywhich theyprotect themselves against compassion fatigue, but at the expense of showinganinterestinpatients.Finally,only18%ofthevariancein PEwasexplainedbydifferencesinphysicians.Thisconfirmsthat PEisalsosensitivetopatientandsituationalvariables[58–60].

Fig.1.(a)Interactionplotbetweenpatientunmetstaff-relatedneedsandPEforalowrapportwiththepatient(leftfigure);AU=accurateunderstandingofpatient’sneeds.(b) Interactionplotbetweenpatientunmetstaff-relatedneedsandPEforahighrapportwiththepatient(rightfigure).

Table3

MultilevelmodelsforthepredictionofPEbyAUonpatientunmetpsychological needs.

Model Model2b

Parameters Fixedeffects

Intercept 38.39***(0.75)

Lengthofconsultation 0.16**(0.05)

Experienceinoncology 0.17(0.09)

Physicianperspective-taking(JSPE) 0.17(0.12) Patientunmetpsychologicalneeds 1.72***(0.32)

AUofunmetpsychologicalneeds 0.28(0.36)

Patientexpressivesuppression 0.03(0.08)

PatientexpressivesuppressionAU 0.07(0.05) Patientexpressivesuppressionunmet

psychologicalneeds

0.05(0.05)

AUunmetpsychologicalneeds 0.31(0.21)

UnmetpsychologicalneedsAUpatient expressivesuppression

0.06*(0.03) Randomeffects

Physicianvariances2phy 7.48(4.03)

Patientorsituationalvariances2e 50.76(5.42)

Modelfit:2LogLikelihood(2LL) 1379.11

Differencein2LLbetween2models(df) 36.19***

(7dfwithM1)

*p<.05;**p<.01;***p<.001.SeeTable2foremptymodel(M0)andModel1.Effect significance=estimate/standarderror(inbrackets).Norandomslopemodelswere significantlybetterthanfixedslopemodels,andwerethusdiscarded.

(6)

Asexpected,patientunmetneedswerestronglyandnegatively associatedwithlowPE,andthequalityofrapportwaspositively associated withPE.More importantly, themoderatingeffectof highAUwasobservedinthetwoconditionsthatwereexpectedto preventphysiciansfromheuristics:poorrapportandhighpatient expressiveness. Informalfeedback fromphysicians inthestudy addedcredencetoourargumentthatdistinctiveAUisdifficultto achieve in this context. In fact, in the debriefing interviews followingtheresearch,thephysicianstoldusthattheAUtaskwas difficult and that they sometimes felt they had performed it randomly.Consistentwithpreviousworks[61],theyreportedthat theyrarelyquestionedthemselvesabouttheirpatients’careneeds intheirusualroutine.Althoughthismayseemsurprising,itshould berememberedthattheheavyworkloadandcompassionfatigue oftenfacedbyphysiciansarerealbarrierstotheperspective-taking thatunderliesAU[8,62,63].

However,patientopenemotionaldisclosureandlowrapport allowed a different pattern to emerge. Two alternatives may explainhowlowrapportcanfacilitatedistinctiveAUandPE.Low rapport can come from either high patient disclosure of their unmet needs and discontent [64] or, conversely, from patient silenceanddisengagement inmedicalinteractions[59].Inboth cases, those physicians who overcome low rapport to try and understandtheirpatientsandachieveAU,whetherbymaintaining aninterestinthepatientsinspiteoftheirdiscontentorbyeliciting concerns from silentpatients, should logically be perceivedas highlyempathic.ThisisprobablywhywefoundhighPEinspiteof physician-perceivedlowrapport,butonlywhenAUwashigh.This explanationisallthemorelikely since oncologistsusually give littleroomfordisclosure ofpatientimplicitorambiguous cues [65],sothatthosewhomakethiseffortshouldobtainbothhigher AUand,asaresult,higherPE.

Beforeconcluding,weaddressthelimitationsofthisinvestiga- tion.First,thephysiciansamplewaslimited,thecross-sectional design rules out any causal direction, and measurement flaws should be acknowledged: a low Cronbach’s alpha for the

‘compassionatecare’dimensionoftheJSPEandasingleitemto assess rapport. Second, although both the literature and our findings support the idea that AU can result from different processes, thus leading todifferent outcomes, our data do not formallydemonstratethis.Third,wehavenoinsightintophysician empathicbehavior such as paralinguistic expressions or verbal reassurance[66].Therefore,itisstillunknownwhetherAUalone orAUcoupledwithempathicbehavioristhesourceofPE.Although itwasnecessarytoinvestigateAUalonefirst[67],researchinto bothAUandbehaviorsisnowwarranted.

5. Conclusion

Toourknowledge,thisstudyisthefirsttoelucidatehowAU contributestoPEinanaturalisticmedicalsetting.Itshowsthat, underconditionsmaximizingperspective-takingandthusdistinc- tive AU, e.g. when physicians perceive a low rapport withthe patientorwhenthepatientisparticularlyexpressive,AUbuffers theadverseeffectofpatientunmetneedsonPE.

5.1. Practiceimplications

Physiciansshouldalsobewarnedofthepitfallsofhighperceived rapportand/or lessexpressivepatients.Although these typesof patientandrapportmightappearcomfortableforphysicians,they donotenabledistinctiveAU,andthusitsbeneficialeffectonPE.This is whyan assessment ofunmet needs should besystematically offeredtoallcancerpatients,includingthoseforwhom nothing special cameupin consultations.In parallel,patients shouldbe encouragedoreventrainedtocommunicateopenlyandeffectively withdoctorssoastofacilitatephysicianAUandhenceimprovetheir own qualityof life[68]. Ultimately,continuing educationabout empathywouldbenefitfrominformingphysiciansoftheminimal logisticconditions,suchasconsultationduration,whichseemvital for PE,sothattheycan organizethemselves accordingly and/or advocateamodifiedorganizationofthehealthcaresystem.

Conflictofintereststatement Noconflictofinterest.

Acknowledgments

ThisstudywassupportedbyINCASHS2008and2009awarded toSergeSultanandAnneBre´dart.Itwasconductedwhenthefirst authorwasapostdoctoralfellowatUniversite´ ParisDescartesand theInstitutCurie.ThefirstauthoralsothankstheInstitutCurieand the SIRIC ONCOLille Grant INCa-DGOS-Inserm 6041, for their supportduringthewritingofthearticle.

References

[1]LelorainS.,Bre´dartA.,DolbeaultS.,SultanS..Asystematicreviewofthe associationsbetweenempathymeasuresandpatientoutcomesincancercare.

Psychooncology2012;21:1255–64.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.2115.

[2]FarinE.,NaglM..Thepatient–physicianrelationshipinpatientswithbreast cancer:influenceonchangesinqualityoflifeafterrehabilitation.QualLifeRes 2013;22:283–94.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0151-5.

Fig.2.(a)InteractionplotbetweenpatientunmetpsychologicalneedsandPEforalowpatientexpressivesuppression(i.e.patientisexpressive,leftfigure);AU=accurate understandingofpatient’sneeds.(b)InteractionplotbetweenpatientunmetpsychologicalneedsandPEforahighpatientexpressivesuppression(i.e.patientisnot expressive,rightfigure).

Références

Documents relatifs

Ce schéma linéaire se heurte à deux diffi- cultés bien connues qu’il nous faut cependant préciser, celle du patient reconnu comme sujet singulier, mais aussi comme sujet

Part 2 – presents what is known about the incidence of adolescent pregnancy and childbearing (includ- ing very young adolescents aged 10 – 14 years) in developed and

Decision support systems would also change the pattern of communication within a health care group, and challenge the master/apprentice relationship [22] The health care

In particular we have pointed out the need for managers in different organizations to agree on ways of communicating and collaborating on the operational level

[14], the hypothesized correlates of EA were physician empathic positive attitude, higher self-efficacy in empathic skills, as well as lower patient expressive suppression and

At both national and international level, fierce debates are unfolding about: the need for healthy and robust generic competition; the importance of health technology

Table 3 presents patients ’ feelings concerning the manage- ment of their pain. More precisely, a good understanding and manage- ment of pain treatment were reported with a mean

• If I am a candidate for a screening test, help me understand pros and cons, and benefits and harms, then give me time to process the information before I decide.. Allow me