• Aucun résultat trouvé

News Topic Recommendation Using an Extended Bayesian Personalized Ranking

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "News Topic Recommendation Using an Extended Bayesian Personalized Ranking"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

News Topic Recommendation using an extended Bayesian Personalized Ranking

?

Alireza Gharahighehi1,2 and Celine Vens1,2

1 ITEC research group, imec - KU Leuven, Etienne Sabbelaan 51, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium

2 KU Leuven, Campus KULAK - Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium

{alireza.gharahighehi,celine.vens}@kuleuven.be

Abstract. Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) is a recommendation approach which learns to rank candidate items based on user’s implicit feedback. In this study I use an extended version of BPR using consump- tion behavior of user on news articles to recommend them news topics.

The extended version of BPR performs better compare to the original version based on two evaluation measures.

Keywords: News topic recommendation·Implicit feedback·Bayesian Personalized Ranking.

1 Introduction

Recommendation systems try to model user preferences based on their previous feedback. This feedback in many cases is implicit. For instance, when a user visits a web-page or clicks on a link or adds an item to her basket the feed- back is implicit. Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) [1] is a learning to rank recommendation framework which uses implicit feedback as input. In the origi- nal version, the user-item interaction matrix contains binary values (observed/

unobserved) and the general assumption is that user prefers observed items to unobserved items. BPR is trained based on bootstrap samples of user-specific relative preferences using Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD).

Instead of using binary implicit feedback (observed/unobserved), some stud- ies extend BPR by using different kinds of implicit feedback. Loni et al. [2]

defined multi-channel implicit feedback and extended BPR to adapt the train- ing process with these channels. For instance in a web-shop, a user may add an item to the basket (weak positive feedback), purchase an item (strong positive feedback), or even dislike the item (negative feedback). Lerche and Jannach [3]

proposed a framework to draw bootstrap samples not only from observed and unobserved items but also from levels of observed items. Yu et al. [4] divided the implicit negative feedback into several levels and proposed a multiple pair-wise ranking using several items instead of individual pairwise ranking.

?Copyright c2019 for this paper by its authors. Use permitted under Creative Com- mons License Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

(2)

2 Alireza Gharahighehi and Celine Vens

2 Methodology

The approach of this study is similar to [3] in drawing bootstrap samples from observed items. The contribution is that we introduce consumption levels for user’s reading behavior based on dwelling time, scroll-depth and timestamp, and use these levels to form pair-wise comparison between observed items.

3 Results

Table 1 shows the results of news topic recommendation with three methods:

BPR, EBPR and CEBPR. BPR only uses the binary feedback, EBPR uses the number of user interactions with articles related to a specific topic, and CEBPR considers consumption behavior (dwelling time, scroll-depth and timestamp) in each interaction. CEBPR performs better in both AUC and nDCG metrics.

Table 1.Results of news topic recommendation

AUC nDCG@10

#Iteration BPR EBPR CEBPR BPR EBPR CEBPR 10 0.900 0.914 0.913 0.236 0.256 0.373 20 0.876 0.865 0.920 0.272 0.271 0.392 50 0.833 0.838 0.920 0.238 0.256 0.385

4 Conclusion

In this study we propose an extended version of BPR which uses consumption levels to recommend news topics. The idea can be used in other domains such as playlist and video channel recommender systems.

References

1. Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., Gantner, Z., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp. 452–461. AUAI Press, (2009) 2. Loni, B., Pagano, R., Larson, M., Hanjalic, A.: Bayesian personalized ranking with multi-channel user feedback. In: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Rec- ommender Systems, pp. 361–364. ACM, (2016)

3. Lerche, L., Jannach, D.: Graded implicit feedback for bayesian personalized ranking.

In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Recommender systems, pp. 353–356.

ACM, (2014)

4. Yu, R., Zhang, Y., Ye, Y., Wu, L., Wang, C., Liu, Q., Chen, E.: Yu, Runlong, et al. Multiple pairwise ranking with implicit feedback. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp.

1727–1730. ACM, (2018)

Références

Documents relatifs

This setting implies two types of feedback are received at every recommenda- tion list displayed: the first one is the list of skipped items and the clicked item (aka.

For learning in the setting of dyad ranking, we propose an extension of an existing label ranking method based on the Plackett-Luce model, a statistical model for rank data [1]..

More precisely, we propose to learn for each label an imprecise probabilistic model of its rank, and use these models to infer a partial prediction, using robust

To address the needs of the EU NoAW project, in this paper we intro- duce a new modular framework that generates viewpoints (i.e. extensions) based on ranking argumentation semantics

Experiments show that a feature ranking using weights from linear SVM models yields good performances, even when the training and testing data are not identically distributed..

Secondly, Glicko assumes that the performance difference follows the logistic distribution (the model is termed the Bradley-Terry model), while TrueSkill uses the Gaussian

Medical News, News Aggregation, Content Ranking, User Needs, Intelligent System, Content Analisis, Data Mining, Context Filtering, Bayesian Clustering, Bayesian Networks.. 1

The Meta discovery system is designed to aid biomedical researchers in keeping up to date on the most recent and most impactful research publications and preprints via