• Aucun résultat trouvé

TOPOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF LINEAR ENDOMORPHISMS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "TOPOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF LINEAR ENDOMORPHISMS"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 23,2 (1973), 93-95.

TOPOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF LINEAR ENDOMORPHISMS

by N. H. KUIPER and J. W. ROBBIN

Endomorphisms f: X -> X and g : Y -> Y of topological spaces X and Y are called homeomorphic (notation : f ~ g) if there is a homeomorphism h: X ->• Y such that g=hfh~~1. When X and Y are smooth manifolds and h is a diffeo- morphism, f and g are called diffeomorphic (notation:

f ^L g). When X and Y are vector spaces and h is a linear isomorphism, f and g are called linearly isomorphic (notation : f ~ g). A general problem in the theory of dyna- mical systems is to classify large classes of endomorphisms up to the relation ^ (where ^ is say one of ~, ^, ~).

One classifies linear endomorphisms of finite dimensional (real) vector spaces up to ~ via the Jordan normal form;

-^L gives nothing 'new: if f and g are linear, then f ^ g ,<==>. f ^L g. For ^L the situation changes: for X = Y === R, f{x) == 2x, g{x) == 80; ( o ^ e R ) , we see that f and g are linearly distinct (different eigenvalues) but topo- logically the same. To check / ~ g note that g == A/7i~1 where A(a0=a?.

Our problem is to classify linear endomorphism up to homeomorphism: ~. To state our theorem we need some notation. Any linear endomorphism f can be written as a direct sum of endomorphisms :

/ ^ / L e A e / o ©/*-

where the eigenvalues X of f^ (resp. /+; fe\ /*-) satisfy

(2)

94 N. H. KUIPER AND J. W. ROB6IN

X = = 0 (resp. 0 < |X| < 1; |X| = |;1 < |x|). If f is an endo- morphism denote by dim (f) the dimension of the domain (== target) of /*; thus

dim (f) = dim (/,) + dim (/+) + dim (f,) + dim (/L).

When f is an automorphism, or (/*) denotes the sign of the determinant of f.

Conjecture,— Let f and g be linear endomorphisms of R". Then f^ g if and only if /, ^ g,, dim (^.) == dim (g,.), or(/+) == or(g+), / o ~ go, • •

dim (/•-) == dim (g-) or (/•-) == or (g-).

As a special case consider the situation when f and g have finite order (some positive power is the identity). Then all eigenvalues are roots of unity so f = f^ and g == go- Thus :

Special case. — If f and g are linear automorphisms of R" of finite order, then /*^L g if and only of /^g.

Fortunately, the special case is very difficult. It is easily seen to be equivalent to :

Special case reformulated. — If /*, g e 0{n+ 1, R) have finite order, then fjS" ^ gjS" if and only if f ^ g.

This last assertion is known to be true when the action of f on S" is free (Attiyah-Bott-Lefschetz Theorem as modified by Wall). A theorem of the Rham asserts that for /*, g e 0(n+l?

R) one has 7|S" ^L g[S71 if and only if f A. g. The proof uses a kind of Whitehead-Reidemeister torsion; this is easily seen to be a differentiable invariant; if it is a topblogical invariant, our special case is true. Finally, Sullivan claims that ourspecial case is true when the order is a prime power.

These three cases suggest strongly that the special case always obtains.

We prove that the special case implies the conjecture and that the conjecture holds when no eigenvalue X of the linear maps involved is a root of unity except possibly X == ± 1,

± t or {/— 1.

(3)

TOPOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF LINEAR E N D O M O R P H I S M S 95

To illustrate our theorem consider the two linear automor- phisms of R4 given by:

/ I 1 0 0\ / I 1 0 0'

. f 0 1 0 0 \ _ f 0 1 1 0

/

~~ [ 0 0 1 1 ]

g ~ [ 0 0 1 0

\0 0 0 I/ \0 0 0 1,

These two automorphisms are clearly not linearly isomorphic.

(They are in Jordan normal form). Their sole eigenvalue is one. Thus according to our theorem, they are not homeo- morphic. We invite the reader to prove this himself.

Our work will appear shortly in Inventiones Mathematicae.

N. H. KUIPER,

Institut des Hautes fitudes Scientifiques 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette

et

J. W. ROBBIN,

Department of Mathematics University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (USA).

Références

Documents relatifs

The proof uses a kind of Whitehead-Reidemeister torsion; this is easily seen to be a differentiable invariant; if it is a topblogical invariant, our special case is true..

We prove that energy minimizing Yang–Mills connections on compact homogeneous 4-manifolds are either instantons or split into a sum of instantons on passage to the adjoint bundle..

Suppose R is a right noetherian, left P-injective, and left min-CS ring such that every nonzero complement left ideal is not small (or not singular).. Then R

By Lemma 3.6, if N contains three non-zero projections orthogonal to one another, then Φ induces an isometric bijection from the normal state space of M to that of N , and hence, we

(Note that if E is compact and all sets in I are nowhere dense, then I perf is dense in K(E) as closures of non-empty open sets are elements of I perf and they form a dense set.)

My fi rst recognition of the changing profi le of residents came several years later when one resident emphatically tried to win me over to his perspective that developing rapport

Please at- tach a cover sheet with a declaration http://tcd-ie.libguides.com/plagiarism/declaration confirming that you know and understand College rules on plagiarism1. On the

• Watch out when a child’s mouth is closed and he/she hypersalivates and emits fetid breath with a putrid smell, regardless of whether he/she has fever or not. Signs and symptoms