• Aucun résultat trouvé

Strain Variation within Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Strain Variation within Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00532447

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00532447

Submitted on 4 Nov 2010

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Strain Variation within Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats

Miriam G.J. Koene, Dirk J. Houwers, Jeroen R. Dijkstra, Birgitta Duim, Jaap A. Wagenaar

To cite this version:

Miriam G.J. Koene, Dirk J. Houwers, Jeroen R. Dijkstra, Birgitta Duim, Jaap A. Wagenaar. Strain

Variation within Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats. Veterinary Microbiology, Elsevier,

2008, 133 (1-2), pp.199. �10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.022�. �hal-00532447�

(2)

Accepted Manuscript

Title: Strain Variation within Campylobacter Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats

Authors: Miriam G.J. Koene, Dirk J. Houwers, Jeroen R.

Dijkstra, Birgitta Duim, Jaap A. Wagenaar

PII: S0378-1135(08)00257-5

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.022

Reference: VETMIC 4088

To appear in: VETMIC Received date: 1-4-2008 Revised date: 16-6-2008 Accepted date: 26-6-2008

Please cite this article as: Koene, M.G.J., Houwers, D.J., Dijkstra, J.R., Duim, B., Wagenaar, J.A., Strain Variation within Campylobacter Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats, Veterinary Microbiology (2007), doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.06.022 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.

As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.

The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof

before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process

errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that

apply to the journal pertain.

(3)

Accepted Manuscript

Strain Variation within Campylobacter Species in Fecal Samples from Dogs and Cats 1

2

Miriam G.J. Koene a,c,d,1*, Dirk J. Houwers a, Jeroen R. Dijkstra b,2, Birgitta Duim b,3, 3

Jaap A. Wagenaar a,b,c,d 4

5 6

a. Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, 7

Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80165, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands.

8

b. Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB, Lelystad, The 9

Netherlands.

10

c. OIE Reference Laboratory for campylobacteriosis, The Netherlands.

11

d. WHO Collaborating Centre for Campylobacter, The Netherlands.

12

1. present address: Central Veterinary Institute of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, 8200 AB, 13

Lelystad, The Netherlands 14

2. present address: Dept. of Pathology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, 15

Nijmegen, The Netherlands 16

3. present address: Academic Medical Centre, Dept. Medical Microbiology, Amsterdam, The 17

Netherlands 18

19

*Corresponding author:

20

M.G.J. Koene, 21

Phone: +31 320 238425 22

Fax: +31 320 238961 23

Electronic mail address: miriam.koene@wur.nl 24

Manuscript

(4)

Accepted Manuscript

Abstract 1

To investigate the incidence of co-colonization of different strains of Campylobacter species 2

present in canine and feline stool samples, isolates were recovered by culture from 40 samples 3

from dogs (n=34) and cats (n=6). Animals were of different ages, with diarrhoea or without 4

clinical signs. Three isolation procedures were used: two selective agars and a filtration 5

method. In each stool sample, multiple colonies were identified to the species level by PCR, 6

subsequently genotyped by AFLP and pattern similarities (451 isolates) were calculated to 7

investigate their phylogenetic relationships.

8

Genetic heterogeneity of strains in individual stool samples was detected within the species 9

Campylobacter jejuni , C. upsaliensis and C. helveticus, though to a different degree in dogs 10

and cats. In 3 of the 34 (9%) canine samples, more than one genotype of the same 11

Campylobacter species was present, while strain variation was detected in four of the six 12

feline samples. The results show that preferably, multiple colonies should be analysed in 13

molecular epidemiological and aetiological studies.

14 15

Keywords 16

Campylobacter jejuni 17

Campylobacter upsaliensis 18

Campylobacter helveticus 19

Co-colonization 20

AFLP 21

strain variation 22

dogs 23

cats 24

25

(5)

Accepted Manuscript

Introduction 1

Most Campylobacter species, like C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari and C. upsaliensis, show a 2

genetically diverse population. Natural transformability and intragenomic DNA 3

rearrangements contribute to this diversity (Boer et al., 2002). Co-colonization of multiple 4

genotypes of a Campylobacter species has been shown to occur in humans, pigs and poultry 5

(Richardson et al., 2001; Schouls et al., 2003; Weijtens et al., 1999) and is thought to facilitate 6

DNA exchange and therewith increase the genetic diversity.

7

In both dogs and cats, long term colonisation of Campylobacter (Bender et al., 2005; Hald et 8

al., 2004) and co-colonisation of distinct Campylobacter species (Koene et al., 2004; Shen et 9

al., 2001) have been described. However, data on the incidence and extent of genotypic 10

variation of Campylobacter species in companion animals are currently lacking.

11

Such information is important for epidemiological purposes and could help in assessing the 12

role of Campylobacter as a pathogen in these animals. Campylobacter is regarded as a 13

possible cause of diarrhoea in dogs and cats, although prevalence studies, experimental 14

infections and response to antibiotic therapy have been inconclusive (Fox et al., 1983; Hald 15

and Madsen, 1997; Sandberg et al., 2002, Weber et al., 1983a; Weber et al., 1983b). In 16

addition to its clinical relevance, the presence of Campylobacter in companion animals is of 17

interest in view of public health. Contact with pet animals has been shown to be a risk factor 18

for Campylobacter infections in humans and actual transmission has been demonstrated 19

(Wolfs et al., 2001).

20

The presence of multiple strains of a Campylobacter species in a host should be taken in 21

consideration when performing molecular epidemiological and aetiological studies. The aim 22

of this survey is to study the extent of co-colonization of different genotypes of 23

Campylobacter in stool samples from dogs and cats by using AFLP.

24

25

(6)

Accepted Manuscript

Material and methods 1

A total of 40 Campylobacter-culture positive faecal samples from dogs (n=34) and cats (n=6) 2

were examined that were either submitted for routine bacteriological analysis (diarrheal 3

animals), samples taken from dogs in a boarding kennel on their day of arrival, and from a 4

veterinary practice (healthy animals). Age distribution of animals was as follows: twenty-two 5

dogs (65%) were adult, 12 dogs (35%) were younger than one year. Cat samples were 6

obtained from one adult, three juveniles, and two for which no information about their age 7

was provided. Diarrhoea was reported in 16 dogs (47%) and 5 cats (83%). The remaining 8

animals had no clinical signs reported by their owner.

9

Samples, with average size of about 25 g (minimum, 5 g), were transported to the laboratory 10

without transport medium or cooling and were collected over a period of two years (August 11

1999-July 2001). The time interval between sampling and processing of the samples ranged 12

from two hours to several days (Table 1a, 1b). Species identification of Campylobacter 13

isolates in some of these samples was reported previously (Koene et al., 2004), and these 14

samples are indicated in Table 1a.

15

Three procedures for the isolation of Campylobacter were used, (i) modified charcoal 16

cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA), a blood-free selective agar base supplemented 17

with 32 μg/ml cefoperazone and 10 μg/ml amphotericin (Oxoid CM 739 with Oxoid 18

supplement SR 155), (ii) Karmali, a blood-free charcoal based agar containing 32 μg/ml 19

cefazolin, 20 μg/ml vancomycin, and 100 μg/ml cycloheximide (Oxoid supplement SR 167), 20

and (iii) a filtration method, for which 10 to 12 drops of a fecal suspension in brain heart 21

infusion were placed on a 0.65-μm-pore-size cellulose acetate filter (Sartorius, Goettingen, 22

Germany) on blood agar base no. 2 (Oxoid) supplemented with 5% sheep blood. After 1 h of 23

incubation at 37°C under aerobic conditions, the filter was removed. All plates were 24

incubated in jars under microaerobic conditions (6% O

2

, 7% CO

2

, 7% H

2

and 80% N

2

) (Mart,

25

(7)

Accepted Manuscript

Anoxomat, Lichtenvoorde, the Netherlands) at 37°C for up to six days. From plates showing 1

growth suspect of Campylobacter (colony morphology and Gram stain), multiple separate 2

colonies (2-33), depending on the number of colonies found in the primary isolation, were 3

subcultured on blood agar base no. 2 (Oxoid) supplemented with 5% sheep blood. These 4

isolates were stored as glycerol stocks at –80°C until further analysis.

5

Chromosomal DNA was isolated using a commercial kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA.) and 6

DNA concentrations were estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis.

7

Species were identified through PCR-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism analysis, 8

using two methods. PCR-RFLP of the 16S rRNA (Marshall et al., 1999) identified C.

9

helveticus, C. hyointestinalis, C. lari and C. upsaliensis. C. jejuni was identified by 10

amplifying a highly polymorphic part of the 23S rRNA gene and subsequently digesting the 11

PCR product with two restriction enzymes, AluI and Tsp509I (Fermer and Engvall, 1999).

12

Campylobacter isolates were genotyped using Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism 13

analysis (AFLP) as described by Duim (Duim et al., 1999). After electrophoresis, the AFLP 14

patterns were recorded and evaluated with Gene Scan software (PE Applied Bio systems).

15

Densitometric values were transferred to the Bionumerics 3.5 software (Applied Maths, Sint- 16

Martens-Latem, Belgium), and gels were normalized using an internal size standard that was 17

added to each lane. A similarity matrix was created by determining the Pearson product 18

moment correlation coefficient (r). The unweighted pair group method using average linkage 19

(UPGMA) was used to cluster the patterns. A cut-off level of 90% homology was used to 20

discriminate different genotypes.

21 22

Results 23

Statistical analysis of the AFLP results of 451 isolates from 40 Campylobacter positive stools 24

(34 dogs and 6 cats) showed the different Campylobacter species forming distinct clades

25

(8)

Accepted Manuscript

correlating with the patterns from reference strains and this was confirmed by the results of 1

the species identification by PCR-RFLP (data not shown).

2

Of the 34 examined dogs, three were shown to be colonized with more than one 3

Campylobacter genotype per species while this was found in four of the six cats. In samples 4

with multiple genotypes, next to a predominant genotype, other genotypes of the same 5

Campylobacter species were present at a lower frequency as identified by AFLP. In canine 6

samples, C. upsaliensis was represented by three AFLP genotypes in sample P1 and by two 7

genotypes in sample N3. C. jejuni showed two different genotypes in one sample (D12) 8

(Table 1a). In four of the six stool samples from cats, strains of distinct Campylobacter 9

species showed variation in genetic fingerprints. This involved C. jejuni (K1, K2) and C.

10

helveticus (K3, K5) (table 1b).

11

A total of 48 unique AFLP genotypes (showing less than 90% homology) were recovered as 12

shown in Figure 1, represented by C. upsaliensis (U1-U25), C. jejuni (J1-J16), C. lari (L1- 13

L2), C. helveticus (He1-He4) and C. hyointestinalis (Hy1). Occasionally, isolates with 14

identical or closely related AFLP patterns (90-100% homology) were isolated from 15

epidemiological unrelated animals as shown in Table 1a and 1b. This included three C. jejuni 16

genotypes (J1, isolated from sample N15 and sample D17; J3, isolated from samples D12 and 17

K2; and J11, from samples N3, N4, N5 and D14) and one C. lari genotype (L1, isolated from 18

samples N5 and N1).

19

The use of multiple isolation methods improved the detection of genetic diversity. In samples 20

with multiple genotypes, variants were distributed over different media, rather than being 21

limited to a single method (data not shown).

22

No correlation was demonstrated between the occurrence of strain variation and clinical 23

status, age of the host or the time interval between sampling and processing of the samples.

24

25

(9)

Accepted Manuscript

Discussion 1

We isolated 48 unique Campylobacter genotypes from 40 stool samples (Figure 1). Analysis 2

of the genotypic results indicated that the Campylobacter population in the studied dogs and 3

cats is genetically highly diverse, which is in agreement with studies performed elsewhere 4

(Hald et al., 2004; Moser et al., 2001; Shen et al., 2001; Stanley et al., 1994).

5

Four homologous Campylobacter genotypes were isolated from multiple samples; C. lari 6

genotype 1 (L1) was isolated from two epidemiologically unrelated, clinically healthy dogs.

7

In three cases, homologous genotypes of C. jejuni (J1, J3 and J11) were isolated from 8

epidemiologically unrelated samples. J1 and J11 were isolated from both diarrheic and 9

healthy dogs, while J3 was cultured from two clinical samples from a dog and a cat.

10

Interestingly, in three cases of animals sharing the same household, each individual animal 11

shed Campylobacter with distinct genotypic patterns, or even different Campylobacter 12

species (samples N1+N3, N7+N8 and K2+K3) as is shown in Figure 1. This may indicate that 13

either no animal to animal transmission of strains occurs or that strains alter during prolonged 14

colonization in different individuals.

15

The genetically diverse population shown by most Campylobacter species like C. jejuni, C.

16

coli, C. lari and C. upsaliensis is affected by the occurrence of natural transformation and 17

intragenomic rearrangements. In the present study, in 3 of the 34 (9%) canine samples, more 18

than one genotype of the same Campylobacter species was present, while strain variation was 19

detected in four of the six feline samples. Co-colonization of strains within one host may lead 20

to an increase in the genetic diversity if DNA exchange takes place and new chimeric strains 21

can develop. Both in humans, and in animals like chickens (Boer et al., 2002; Hanninen et al., 22

1999), pigs (Weijtens et al., 1999) and dogs (Hald et al., 2004) time related differences in 23

molecular fingerprints have been described.

24

(10)

Accepted Manuscript

It has been shown that host species differ with regard to strain variation within a single host.

1

Mixed infections of Campylobacter in human patients are considered unusual (Richardson et 2

al., 2001; Steinbrueckner et al., 2001) in contrast to the situation in poultry and pigs (Camarda 3

et al., 2000; Jensen et al., 2006; Schouls et al., 2003; Weijtens et al., 1999). However, the 4

mechanisms behind these differences in host-microbe interaction remain largely unidentified.

5

We found no obvious correlation between clinical status and the shedding of multiple strains 6

of Campylobacter. Little data is available on the nature and duration of immunity after 7

Campylobacter colonization in pets, but long term infection and reinfection with different 8

strains without clinical symptoms (Hald et al., 2004; Stanley et al., 1994) in dogs and in cats 9

(Bender et al., 2005) indicates a lack of protective immunity.

10

Although the number of positive cats in this study is limited, the results suggest that 11

Campylobacter strains in feline fecal samples possess a higher degree of genetic diversity 12

than those found in dogs, as strain variation was detected in four of the six samples whereas in 13

canine samples Campylobacter species were generally represented by a single genotype 14

(Table 1a, b). This difference cannot be explained by technical factors such as differences in 15

time interval between sampling and processing of samples or age of the animals. It may 16

indicate that cats are subject to a higher infection pressure than dogs or that there may be 17

differences in host immune responses or colonisation dynamics. Due to the limited number of 18

samples, this warrants further investigation.

19

The detection of genetic diversity was enhanced by the use of multiple isolation methods, but 20

none of the employed methods was superior in detecting different species or genotypes. For 21

routine diagnosis the use of multiple media is not practical and unnecessarily expensive.

22

However, for specific epidemiological studies, the use of multiple media is strongly 23

recommended.

24

25

(11)

Accepted Manuscript

Conclusions 1

We conclude that genetic diversity among isolates of C. jejuni and C. upsaliensis within one 2

host occurs, and that the degree may differ in dogs and cats. In all cases in which strain 3

diversity was detected, one genotype dominated, which means that co-colonization can be 4

missed even if multiple colonies are analyzed. This may frustrate epidemiological, 5

aetiological and pathogenetic studies of Campylobacter in dogs and cats, particularly in 6

relation to zoonotic issues.

7 8

Acknowledgements 9

The help of the technicians from the Veterinary Microbiological Diagnostic Center of the 10

Veterinary Faculty is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank Martine Carrière from the 11

Ermelo Animal Clinic for kindly providing us with fecal samples.

12 13

References 14

Bender, J.B., Shulman, S.A., Averbeck, G.A., Pantlin, G.C., Stromberg, B.E., 2005.

15

Epidemiologic features of Campylobacter infection among cats in the upper midwestern 16

United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 226, 544-547.

17

Boer, P., Wagenaar, J.A., Achterberg, R.P., Putten, J.P., Schouls, L.M., Duim, B., 2002.

18

Generation of Campylobacter jejuni genetic diversity in vivo. Mol Microbiol 44, 351-359.

19

Camarda, A., Newell, D.G., Nasti, R., Di Modugnoa, G., 2000. Genotyping Campylobacter 20

jejuni strains isolated from the gut and oviduct of laying hens. Avian Dis 44, 907-912.

21

Duim, B., Wassenaar, T.M., Rigter, A., Wagenaar, J., 1999. High-resolution genotyping of 22

Campylobacter strains isolated from poultry and humans with amplified fragment length 23

polymorphism fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 2369-2375.

24

(12)

Accepted Manuscript

Fermer, C., Engvall, E.O., 1999. Specific PCR identification and differentiation of the 1

thermophilic campylobacters, Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis. J Clin 2

Microbiol 37, 3370-3373.

3

Fox, J.G., Moore, R., Ackerman, J.I., 1983. Campylobacter jejuni-associated diarrhea in dogs.

4

J Am Vet Med Assoc 183, 1430-1433.

5

Hald, B., Madsen, M., 1997. Healthy puppies and kittens as carriers of Campylobacter spp., 6

with special reference to Campylobacter upsaliensis. J Clin Microbiol 35, 3351-3352.

7

Hald, B., Pedersen, K., Waino, M., Jorgensen, J.C., Madsen, M., 2004. Longitudinal study of 8

the excretion patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in young pet dogs in Denmark. J 9

Clin Microbiol 42, 2003-2012.

10

Hanninen, M.L., Hakkinen, M., Rautelin, H., 1999. Stability of related human and chicken 11

Campylobacter jejuni genotypes after passage through chick intestine studied by pulsed-field 12

gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 2272-2275.

13

Jensen, A.N., Dalsgaard, A., Baggesen, D.L., Nielsen, E.M., 2006. The occurrence and 14

characterization of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli in organic pigs and their outdoor 15

environment. Vet Microbiol 116, 96-105.

16

Koene, M.G., Houwers, D.J., Dijkstra, J.R., Duim, B., Wagenaar, J.A., 2004. Simultaneous 17

presence of multiple Campylobacter species in dogs. J Clin Microbiol 42, 819-821.

18

Marshall, S.M., Melito, P.L., Woodward, D.L., Johnson, W.M., Rodgers, F.G., Mulvey, M.R., 19

1999. Rapid identification of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, and Helicobacter isolates by PCR- 20

restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the 16S rRNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 21

37, 4158-4160.

22

Moser, I., Rieksneuwohner, B., Lentzsch, P., Schwerk, P., Wieler, L.H., 2001. Genomic 23

heterogeneity and O-antigenic diversity of Campylobacter upsaliensis and Campylobacter 24

helveticus strains isolated from dogs and cats in Germany. J Clin Microbiol 39, 2548-2557.

25

(13)

Accepted Manuscript

Richardson, J.F., Frost, J.A., Kramer, J.M., Thwaites, R.T., Bolton, F.J., Wareing, D.R., 1

Gordon, J.A., 2001. Coinfection with Campylobacter species: an epidemiological problem? J 2

Appl Microbiol 91, 206-211.

3

Sandberg, M., Bergsjo, B., Hofshagen, M., Skjerve, E., Kruse, H., 2002. Risk factors for 4

Campylobacter infection in Norwegian cats and dogs. Prev Vet Med 55, 241-253.

5

Schouls, L.M., Reulen, S., Duim, B., Wagenaar, J.A., Willems, R.J., Dingle, K.E., Colles, 6

F.M., Van Embden, J.D., 2003. Comparative genotyping of Campylobacter jejuni by 7

amplified fragment length polymorphism, multilocus sequence typing, and short repeat 8

sequencing: strain diversity, host range, and recombination. J Clin Microbiol 41, 15-26.

9

Shen, Z., Feng, Y., Dewhirst, F.E., Fox, J.G., 2001. Coinfection of enteric Helicobacter spp.

10

and Campylobacter spp. in cats. J Clin Microbiol 39, 2166-2172.

11

Stanley, J., Jones, C., Burnens, A., Owen, R.J., 1994. Distinct genotypes of human and canine 12

isolates of Campylobacter upsaliensis determined by 16S rRNA gene typing and plasmid 13

profiling. J Clin Microbiol 32, 1788-1794.

14

Steinbrueckner, B., Ruberg, F., Kist, M., 2001. Bacterial genetic fingerprint: a reliable factor 15

in the study of the epidemiology of human Campylobacter enteritis? J Clin Microbiol 39, 16

4155-4159.

17

Weber, A., Lembke, C., Schafer, R., Seifert, U., Berg, H., 1983a. Demonstration of 18

Campylobacter jejuni in fecal samples from dogs. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 96, 232- 19

234.

20

Weber, A., Schafer, R., Lembke, C., Seifert, U., 1983b. Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni 21

in cats. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 96, 48-50.

22

Weijtens, M.J., Reinders, R.D., Urlings, H.A., Van der Plas, J., 1999. Campylobacter 23

infections in fattening pigs; excretion pattern and genetic diversity. J Appl Microbiol 86, 63- 24

70.

25

(14)

Accepted Manuscript

Wolfs, T.F., Duim, B., Geelen, S.P., Rigter, A., Thomson-Carter, F., Fleer, A., Wagenaar, 1

J.A., 2001. Neonatal sepsis by Campylobacter jejuni: genetically proven transmission from a 2

household puppy. Clin Infect Dis 32, E97-99.

3

(15)

Accepted Manuscript

Table 1a Genotyping results by AFLP from Campylobacter positive samples from dogs

1

(16)

Accepted Manuscript

Table 1b Genotyping results by AFLP from Campylobacter positive samples from cats

1

(17)

Accepted Manuscript

Figure legends 1

2

Figure 1. Representative AFLP patterns of Campylobacter species from individual samples 3

isolated from fecal samples of dogs and cats. The black line indicates the cut-off level (less 4

than 90 % genetic similarity) for pattern differentiation. Epidemiologically related animals - 5

by sharing the same household - are indicated by symbols (■,▼,‡).

6

(18)

Accepted Manuscript

Table 1a Genotyping results by AFLP from Campylobacter positive samples from dogs

C. upsaliensis C. jejuni C. lari C. hyointestinalis

P1 11 U21 (3), U22 (1), U25 (6) Hy1 (1) 8 no 9 months

N3* 11 U1 (6), U2 (1) J11 (3) L2 (1) 4 no 3 years

N5* 18 U15 (14) J11 (3) L1 (1) 4 no 10 years

N4* 10 U18 (1) J11 (9) 4 no 2 years

N9* 23 U4 (18) J2 (5) 4 no 4 years

N8* 19 U16 (19) 4 no 4 years

N10* 18 U7 (18) 4 no 7 months

N11* 7 U8 (7) 2 no 9 months

N12* 9 U17 (9) 2 no 3 years

P2 12 U20 (12) 8 no 9 months

D2 27 U19 (27) 12 yes 3 years

D4 13 U14 (13) 36 yes 4 months

D9 17 U9 (17) 36 yes 1 year

D10 2 U10 (2) 36 yes 3 years

D11 12 U11 (12) 12 yes 3 months

D13 33 U24 (33) 36 yes 6 months

D15* 5 U13 (5) 36 yes 5 years

D16* 3 U23 (3) 36 yes 3 months

G57* 9 U12 (9) 60 no adult

G61* 4 U5 (4) 108 yes adult

G70* 6 U6 (6) 60 no adult

D12 9 J3 (8), J10 (1) 36 yes 5 months

N2* 2 J16 (2) 4 no 7 years

N7* 8 J11 (8) 4 no 4 years

N15* 2 J1 (2) 6 no 7 months

D3 2 J7 (2) 60 yes 10 years

D6 12 J5 (12) 84 yes 2 months

D7 21 J6 (21) 12 yes 1 year

D8 24 J8 (24) 12 yes 1 year

D14 4 J11 (4) 84 yes 6 months

D17* 8 J1 (8) 6 yes adult

G50-1 6 J4 (6) 60 no adult

G48* 7 J12 (7) 108 no adult

N1* 2 L1 (2) 4 no 2 years

* Speciation of the isolates by PCR is described in Koene et al, 2004

time interval sampling- processing

(hours)

diarrhoea age sample ID

No of isolates

tested

AFLP-type isolated (number of isolates)

Table 1a

(19)

Accepted Manuscript

Table 1b Genotyping results by AFLP from Campylobacter positive samples from cats

C. upsaliensis C. jejuni C. helveticus

G44-1

6

U3 (6) 48 no adult

K1

21

J13 (1), J14 (20) 36 yes 6 weeks

K2

13

J3 (11), J9 (2) 12 yes not reported

K7

21

J15 (21) 36 yes 3 months

K3

2

He1 (1), He4 (1) 12 yes not reported

K5

12

He2 (1), He3 (11) 12 yes 3 months

diarrhoea age

sample ID No of isolates tested

AFLP-type isolated (number of isolates) time interval sampling- processing

(hours)

Table 1b

(20)

Accepted Manuscript

Pearson correlation (Opt:1.00%) [0.0%-100.0%]

AFLP ABI373 GC

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

AFLP ABI373 GC

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

C.

jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni jejuni helveticus helveticus helveticus helveticus hyointestinalis lari lari upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis upsaliensis

D17.4 N9.10 K2.8 G50Dj6 D6.5 D7.10 D3.2 D8.17 K2.2 D12.24 N7.9 G48.3 K1.5 K1.14 K7.5 N2.1 K3.2 K5.1 K5.13 K3.1 P1.5 N1.15 N3.13 N3.2 N3.15 G44.5 N9.9 G61.3 G70.3 N10.3 N11.3 D9.10 D10.1 D11.5 G57.4 D15.2 D4.7 N5.2 N8.1 N12.5 N4.1 D2.10 P2.7

J1 J2 J3 J4 J5 J6 J7 J8 J9 J10 J11 J12 J13 J14 J15 J16 He1 He2 He3 He4 Hy1 L1 L2 U1 U2 U3 U4 U5 U6 U7 U8 U9 U10 U11 U12 U13 U14 U15 U16 U17 U18 U19 U20

species sample genotype

Figure 1

Références

Documents relatifs

species level using whole cell protein profile analysis in 1D SDS-PAGE 127.. (Zanoni et al., 2007) and biochemical characterization (see

Third, we included the set of regular and irregular nouns that Gordon used, but augmented it in three ways: (a) Both the singular and the plural forms of each noun were used as

Recently reported studies on isolated feline mucosal lymphocytes have shown that the percentage of CD4 + CD25 + T cells is greater in both IEL and LPL from random source compared

Comparison of the SR device and the AT device used by a veterinarian demonstrated that the SR device was signifi- cantly quicker for removal of the tick (P<0·05), was

In this case, the involvement of JMJD3 is no longer needed, which highlights the existence of non-genomic pathways in the regulation of the BCL2 gene by EZH2, whereas JMJD3 is able

Quels sont les triangles superposables au triangle  par glissement puis

L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE

From these two quantities one can distinguish two extreme cases: the free boundary condition where vertical displacement and rotation are free at the edge, represented in Figure 1