Supplemental Figures
A phenylpropanoid diglyceride associates with the leaf rust resistance
Lr34res gene in wheat
Nandhakishore Rajagopalan
1
, Yuping Lu
1
, Ian W. Burton
2
, Fanny
Monteil-Rivera
3
, Annamaria Halasz
4
, Elsa Reimer
5
, Rebecca Tweidt
6
, Anita
Brûlé-Babel
7
, Hadley R. Kutcher
6
, Frank M. You
8
, Sylvie Cloutier
8
, Miroslava
Cuperlovic-Culf
9
, Colin W. Hiebert
5
, Brent D. McCallum
5
, Michele C.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Intens. [mAU] 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 Wavelength[nm] 315 nm Time [min] 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 0 100 200 300 Intens. [mAU] 20.8
Supplemental Figure S1. Characterization of the P2 metabolite isolated for
Tc+Lr34res flag leaves during LC-MS/MS validation. A) HPLC/UV (310 nm)
chromatogram of P2 sample. B) UV spectrum of the major peak at 20.8 min.
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Intens. [mAU] 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 Wavelength[nm] 315 nm Time [min] 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5 0 100 200 300 Intens. [mAU] 20.8
A
B
Supplemental Figure S2. 1D NMR data arising from the P2 (CFG) metabolite
sample. A) 1D proton NMR spectrum. B) 1D carbon NMR Spectrum
C -9 C -13 C -19 C -4 C -5 C -7 C -15 C -17, 21 C -1 C -16 C -2 C -18, 20 C -3 C -8 C -14 C -6 C -11 C -12 C -10 C -22
A
B
H22 – C5
H10 – C9 H12 – C13 H17,21 – C19
Supplemental Figure S3 A & B. 60 ms HMBC spectrum used in confirmation of the
final structure of the P2 (CFG) metabolite A) Annotated 60 ms HMBC spectrum
showing primarily 3-bond correlations B) Structure of the P2 9CFG) metabolite
showing key HMBC correlations.
H7 – C9 H15 – C13 H8 – C1 H14 – C16 H8 – C9 H14 – C13 H18,20 – C19 H10 – C12 H12 – C10 H10,12 – C11 H11 – C10,12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 21
A
B
H3 – C5 H3 – C4 H2 – C7 H2 – C4 H6 – C7 H6 – C4 H17,21 – C15 H17 – C21 H21 – C17 H15 – C17,21 H6 – C2 H2 – C6 H7 – C2 H7 – C6 H3 – C1 H18,20 – C16 H18 – C20 H20 – C18
Supplemental Figure S3 C. 60 ms HMBC spectrum used in confirmation of the
final structure of the P2 (CFG) metabolite. Expansion of aromatic and vinyl region
of HMBC.
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) Lines_tested 1 4.16 4.16 5.560 0.022499 * Infection_condition 1 33.23 33.23 44.372 2.43e-08 *** DPI 3 7.22 2.41 3.216 0.030934 * Lines_tested:Infection_condition 1 1.16 1.16 1.550 0.219138 Lines_Tested:DPI 3 0.95 0.32 0.422 0.737917 Infection_condition:DPI 3 17.62 5.87 7.842 0.000233 *** Lines_tested:Infection_condition:DPI 3 1.51 0.50 0.674 0.572391
Supplemental Figure S4: Summary of multifactorial ANOVA analysis of the accumulation
of CFG in Tc versus Tc+Lr34res (RL6058)/ Tc+Lr22a / Tc+Lr67res lines infected and
uninfected with leaf rust over time. * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** < 0.001.
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Lines_tested 1 0.683 0.683 1.715 0.19654 Infection_condition 1 13.253 13.253 33.292 5.62e-07 *** DPI 3 1.198 0.399 1.003 0.39959 Lines_tested:Infection_condition 1 1.095 1.095 2.752 0.10366 Lines_tested:DPI 3 0.550 0.183 0.461 0.71096 Infection_condition:DPI 3 6.519 2.173 5.459 0.00261 ** Lines_tested:Infection_condition:DPI 3 0.526 0.175 0.441 0.72488
Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
Lines_tested 1 0.004 0.004 0.007 0.933220 Infection_condition 1 15.092 15.092 27.911 3.05e-06 *** DPI 3 9.694 3.231 5.976 0.001515 ** Lines_tested:Infection_condition 1 0.644 0.644 1.190 0.280712 Lines_tested:DPI 3 2.565 0.855 1.581 0.206186 Infection_condition:DPI 3 10.839 3.613 6.682 0.000734 *** Lines_tested:Infection_condition:DPI 3 0.713 0.238 0.440 0.725558