HAL Id: jpa-00246370
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00246370
Submitted on 1 Jan 1991
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Transport mechanisms in MoTe2-x single crystals
A. Bonnet, A. Conan, Y. Tregouet, M. Zoaeter, M. Morsli
To cite this version:
A. Bonnet, A. Conan, Y. Tregouet, M. Zoaeter, M. Morsli. Transport mechanisms in MoTe2-x single
crystals. Journal de Physique I, EDP Sciences, 1991, 1 (5), pp.779-787. �10.1051/jp1:1991169�. �jpa-
00246370�
classification Physics Abstracts
72.20D 72.20P 71.25R 71.30
Transport mechanisms in MoTe~_~ single crystals
A. Bonnet (~), A. Conan
('),
Y.Tregouet ('),
M. Zoaeter (2) and M. Morslif) (')
Laboratoire dePhysique
Cristalline, I-P-C-M-, 2 rue de la Houssinidre, 44072 Nantes Cedex 03, France(2) Laboratoire de
Physique
des Matdriaux etComposants
del'Electronique,
Facultd des Sciences et desTechniques,
Universitd de Nantes, 2 rue de la Houssinidre, 44072 Nantes Cedex 03, France(Received
4 October J990, revised J4January
J99J,accepted 25January J99J)
Rksumk. Los mesures des coefficients de transport
(conductivitd dlectrique, pouvoir thermodlectrique,
effet Hall ont dtd effectudes sur des monocristaux deMoTe~_~ (x
=
0,040 et
0,045)
dans une gamme dtendue detempdrature.
Les rdsultatsexpdrimentaux
sontinterprdtds
surla base d'un moddle de semi-conducteur
compensd
de type p fi niveauxdlargis d'origine
lacunaire.A basse
tempdrature,
les mdcanismes de conduction sontprincipalement gouvemds
par des sauts activdsthermiquement
des porteurs dans le niveau accepteurdlargi.
Aplus
hautetempdrature,
lacontribution des dtats dtendus doit dtre
prise
en compte.MoTej,~w
etMoTej,~ss prdsentent
un comportement de typequasi mdtallique
associd h la ddlocalisation dlevde des dtatsdlectroniques
dans les niveauxdlargis.
Abstlract. Transport coefficient measurements (electrical conductivity, therrnoelectric power, Hall effect) have been
performed
onsingle crystals
of MoTe~_~ (x= 0.040 and 0.045).Experimental
results areinterpreted
on the basis of acompensated
p-type semiconductor model where donor and acceptor lacunar levels broaden in two energy bands. At low temperatures, theconduction mechanisms are
mainly
governedby
a thermalhopping
of carriers in these bands. Athigher
temperatures, the contribution of the extended states must be taken into account.MoTei.9w
etMoTei
9ss exhibit a
quasi
metallic behaviour which reflects thehigh
delocalization of the electronic states in the broadened levels.1. Introduction.
The
crystalline
semiconductorMoTe2 belongs
to thelarge family
oflayer-like compounds (MX2 type)
whosecrystal
structure results from thestacking
of sheets ofhexagonally packed
atoms in the sequence
Te-Mo-Te,
Te-Mo-Te. As a consequence,they
can be usedsuccessfully
in intercalation
chemistry [1, 4].
Theparticular photoelectrochemical properties
of transition metaldichalcogenides
enable alarge variety
of newapplications
to beexplored.
One of theimportant advantages
associated with these materials over otherchalcogenides
and III-V semiconductors is that for the former case thephotogenerated
holesbelong
to anon-bonding
d-orbital state and hence cannot
participate
in corrosion reactions[5, 6].
In order tostudy
the780 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I M 5
electrical
properties
of thesubsequent compounds,
the behaviour of thetransport
coefficients electricalconductivity,
thermoelectric power, Hall effect of the hostcompound
in a widetemperature
range is ofgreat
interest.In a recent paper
[7],
measurements of the electricalconductivity
wand thermoelectric power S have beenperformed
onMOTe~
~
(x
=
0.01 and
0.015) prepared by
a based Te flux method[8]. Experimental
results have beeninterpreted
on the basis of acompensated
p-typesemiconductor model. For the
compound
whichpresents
thelarger departure
fromstoichiometry (x
=
0.015),
it has been shown that the donor andacceptor
levels broaden intwo narrow energy bands :
at low
temperatures,
conduction mechanisms aremainly govemed by
thermalhopping
of small
polarons
in thesebands,
at
higher temperatures,
the contribution of the extended states must be taken into account.Then,
it seemed to usinteresting
to undertake a continuation of these studies in othercompounds
for which the Te content is smaller and the band structure model would be built ina continuous way.
In order to do so, the electrical
conductivity
and the thermoelectric power ofMOTe~_~ crystals (x
=
0.04 and
0.045)
were measured within alarge
range of temperatures(7T650K).
It is observed thatMoTej_~~o
andMoTej_~55 compounds
exhibitquasi~metallic
behaviour
(«
= 5 Q~ ' cm~ ' and S
=
30
~V/K
at roomtemperature). Then,
it isclearly put
in evidence that theincreasing departure
fromstoichiometry
favours the delocalization of the states in the narrow bands whichoriginate
from the donor and acceptor levels. These bandsparticipate
to the conduction in the form ofphonon
assistedhopping
between nearestneighbours.
2.
Experimental
results.Non-stoichiometric
MoTej_~~o
andMoTej_~55 crystals
have been obtainedby decreasing,
in a controlled way, the Te content inMoTe2 compounds.
The determination of thecomposition
value 2 x is in average within an accuracy of about I fb.
It must be noticed that
X-ray
diffraction pattems,performed
in a Guinierchamber,
arepractically unperturbed by
the Te decrease.The electrical
conductivity
« and the thermoelectric power(T.E.P.)
S ofMoTej,~~o
andMoTej_~55 crystals
have been measured between 77 and 700 K in thehexagonal planes.
Severalexperimental
measurements have beenperformed
on eachsample.
Agood reproducibility
is obtained andexperimental
data arealways
within the error bars determined for eachtechnique, I.e.,
=
2 9b for
conductivity
and= 5 9b for T.E.P.
[9].
The
experimental
varitations of In «(Q~
' cm~')
and S(~V/K)
versus10~/T
areplotted
infigures
I and 2 forMoTej,~~o
andMoTej,~55.
The electrical
conductivity
is found to be of the order of 9.4 Q~ cm~ '(7.4
Q~ ' cm~')
atliquid nitrogen
temperature. It decreasesslowly
down to a minimum 4.2Q~'cm~' (3.3 Q~' cm~')
which is reached at about 500K. Forhigher temperatures,
the intrinsicregime
occurs and « increasesrapidly.
In thistemperature
range, a thermal activation energy of 0.4 eV can be evaluated.The behaviour of the T.E.P. coefficient
S,
which ispositive
over the wholetemperature
rangeinvestigated,
is very characteristic and different from that observed onMoTe~ [10]
andMoTej_~~ [7].
At low temperatures, Sslightly
increases fromapproximately
zero to 25~V/K (45 ~V/K)
at 250 K.Then,
it has arelatively
small variation up to 350 K. Athigher
temperatures, Sdrops drastically
down to 7~V/K (25 ~V/K)
at 670 K. Thesevariations,
~JE _SJ
~Q
~
a
>
1
ig. I. -
xperimental
ariations
are
as
full lines.t
~
0.4
>
8
8
1
, 1
T
are drawn
as
hich
ontributions to
phenomena.
Allthese results
are
loseto
what
is
observed inMOTe~_~ in powder form [I1].
782 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I M 5
The room temperature value of the Hall coefficient
R~
which has been obtainedby
d.c.Hall coefficient measurements is
positive
andnearly equal
to0.scm~/C
for the twocompounds.
This value has to becompared
with that obtained in stoichiometricMoTe~
(=
400cm~/C), MoTej
~~j
(
= 240
cm~/C)
andMoTej
~g5
(=
10.5cm~/C).
3. Theoredcal
approach.
The
experimental
resultsreported
here can be well fittedusing
aslightly
modified model derived from thatdeveloped
forMoTej_~g5
in[7].
The semiconductor iscompensated
and therandom
potential
due tocharged
acceptors and donors induces abroadening
of thecorresponding
levelsE~
andE~
into narrow bands. As a consequence, these bandsparticipate
to the conduction
through
thermal activatedhopping
mechanisms.Hopping
conduction can be written in thegeneral
form[12, 13]
:«~=
«oexp(-2aR-pW)
where a is the
damping
factor of the wavefunction,
R is thehopping
distance between nearestneighbours,
W is thehopping
energy andp
stands forI/kT.
In order ot make a
comparison possible,
it must be recalled that a thermalhopping
of smallpolarons
has been assumed to takeplace
inMoTej,~g5 [7]
: as a consequence, apolaron
termW~(T)
and a disorder termJJ§
were included in W.On the
contrary,
the electric states arequite
delocalized forMoTej,~~o
andMoTej,~55
and thehopping
energy has been takenequal
to W~ which isT-independent [12, 13].
The
conductivity
«~ due tohopping
between nearestneighbours
sites is therefore written :~2
p
"H ~ ~
$
~~~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~
where v is a
jump frequency
add c is the relativequantity
ofparticles
for whichhopping
canoccur :
c =
(ND N] )/ND
or N j/N~
W~ represents
any energy difference whichmight
exist between the initial and final sites due to variations in the localarrangements
of ions. The term v is assumed toobey
the law :I~
~
~Ph
~/2
d
where I is the transfer
integral
between sitesseparated by
R and v~~ is aphonon frequency.
In this case, where the kinetic energy of the carriers is
negligible,
thethermopower
isgiven by
the well~known Heikes formula[14]
:S=kleIn (~).
At low
temperatures,
the conduction mechanisms aremainly governed by
the thermalhopping
in the narrow bandE~.
Athigher temperatures,
the contribution of the extendedstates must be taken into account. Holes are excited in the valence band where
they
areexpected
to interact with both ionizedimpurities
addlong wavelength
acousticphonons.
At muchhigher temperatures,
the main contribution to conduction mechanisms is that of excitedelectrons in the conduction band where
they
interact with acoustical vibration modes.The associated electrical
conductivity
and thermoelectric power areexpressed
as followsjn -3/2
NI~
jn 3/2~~
~~~~
1~0
~~
~~~~
~I
1~0~~'' ~
~'(P
f + PiI
= pep
~
"
nepn
l~~~'~
~ ~o
~
= nep ~~
~
(fl (EF Ey)
+2j
'
~e
~~ ~~F Ey)
+ 4' ~~ ~~c EF)
+2)
where n, p,
N~
=N(
+Nfi
are the concentrations inelectrons,
holes and ionizedimpurities.
The
f
and I indices are related to the collision mechanisms with the lattice and with the ionizedimpurities respectively
whereas the 0 index denotes room temperature.On the whole
temperature
rangeinvestigated,
the electricalconductivity
is therefore the summation of thefollowing
termsW=Wy,I+W#+Wi+W~
and S
=
«4 54
+«4 Sk
+ OnSn
+~~ II 1/~ /«
RH
can be calculated in thefollowing approximation [15]
which is usable close to roomtemperature
:R~
m
(«~ p~
«~ p~)/«~.
As shown in
figures
I and2,
agood agreement
is obtained betweenexperimental
and theoretical results for bothconductivity
and T-E-P-The contribution of electrons and holes to the
conductivity
and T-E-P- arerepresented
infigures 3a,
b et4a,
b.It is shown that
hopping
conduction in the broadenedacceptor
level is the maincontribution to the
conductivity
below 500 K. Athigher temperatures,
conduction of holes in the valence band must be taken into account. On the contrary, the main contribution to the T.E.P. comes from holes in the valence band in the whole temperature rangeinvestigated,
whereas that of the donor level becomes
significant
on T-E-P- above 250 K.The Hall coefficient value at room
temperature
leads to anequivalent density
of states in the valence bandNy~
=6 x 10~~
cm~~
at 300 K inMoTej_~~o (I
x10'~ cm~~
inMoTej_~55).
The values of the
physical
parameters whichgive
the best fit to theexperimental
curves are listed in table1.4. Discussion.
Comparison
can be made with the results which have been obtained onMoTe~ [8], MoTej
~~j and
MoTej_~g5 [7].
It appears that the concentration of the donor andacceptor
sites increases as the Te content decreases in thecompound. Moreover,
theN~/N~ compensation
remains close to 0.5.
Obviously,
theorigin
of the donor and acceptor levels islacunary.
Therandom
potential
of donor and acceptorcharged
centers induces abroadening
of thecorresponding EA
andE~
levels into narrow bands whichparticipate
in the conductionby
thermally
activatedhopping
between nearestneighbours.
784 JOURNAL DE
PHYSIQUE
I M 5o
a
~ ~' 5 ~'
ldlT
(a)
(b)
Fig.
3. Electricalconductivity
contributions: a)MoTei9w, b) MoTei.9ss.
1) «,2)
«1~,3) al, 4)
at,, 5) «~.
~
~m
~
©3
~
io
i
(a) b)
Fig.
4.
~i~il~, 5) ~n/~.
Table I.
MoTej,~w MoTej_~~~
A
(ev~
0.66 5.4 x 10-4 T 0.60 5.4 x10~4
TNv~ (cm~~)
6 x10'7
x10'8
Nc~ (cm~~)
3 x10'8
3 x10'8
E~ Ey (mev)
5 4N~ (cm~~)
6.7 x 10'8 6.7 x10'8
ED EA (mev)
130 135N~ (cm~
~) 3.3 x10'8
3.3 x10'8
pf (cm ~/V/s)
60 60pi (cm ~/V/s)
15 10p
f (cm ~/V/s)
426 426i§j (mev)
5.5 4.5Wfl (mev)
5.5 4.5p( (cm~/V/s)
7.5 6p
f (cm ~/V Is)
10 7The acceptor broadened level is found to be very close to the valence band
m
5 mev to be
compared
with the values130,
60 and 28 mev obtainedrespectively
onMoTe~, MoTej_wj
andMoTej_~g5).
This result is not
unexpected
and is characteristic of the increase of themacroscopic
static dielectric constant with thestoichiometry
deviation. Anapproximate
value has been found for s~by
thecapacitive
method at roomtemperature (s~
=
45).
Moreover,
the energy differenceEA Ey
varies as the effective mass of thedensity
of statesm~
of the holes in the valence band which can be deduced from theequivalent density
of statesNv~ (respectively
6 x10'~
and10'8
cm~ ~ forMoTej_~w
andMoTej_~55)
:m~
is found to beequal
to0.08m~
inMoTej,~w
and0.12m~
inMoTej_~55
to becompared
with therespective
values 0.55 m~ inMoTe~, 0.52m~
inMoTej_~~j
and 0.28 m~ inMoTej_~g5.
This modification of the curvature of the valence band can be attributed to theincreasing
interaction between the valence band and the broadened
acceptor
levelE~
with thedecreasing
energy differenceE~ Ey.
Furthermore,
the decrease of the energy gapwidth,
I.e.respectively
0.66 and 0.60 eV at 0 K to becompared
with the values 0.98[8],
0.99 and 0.83 eV[7], clearly puts
in evidence asoftening
of valencebondings.
It must be noticed
that,
in a firstapproach,
the smallpolaron
modelproposed
inMoTej_~g5
has been tested in order theinterpret
the results obtained onMoTej_~~o
andMoTej_~55.
The fityielded
to a value of the transferintegral
I which did notsatisfy
the criteriaof
validity
of the smallpolaron
model : the calculatedpolaron
radiusr~ (r~
=RI/W~)
wasfound to be of the same order as the intersite distance R.
In
fact,
the electronic states in the broadened levelsE~
andE~
are muchhighly
delocalized and the electricalconductivity
has been assumed to follow the classical Mott law[12]
for thehigh
temperature range.In order to estimate the aR term, an
approximate
value of the intersite distance can be obtained from the site concentration(
= 40
A).
If we put v~~ =10'~ Hz,
thehopping mobility
values(
= 7
cm~/Vs)
allow us to calculate a value of a Rnearly equal
to 0.9. This value as wellas the
hopping
energy ones(=
5mev~
are consistent with the assumedtype
of conduction.786 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I M 5
At
least,
it appears thatMoTej_~55
whichpresents
thelarger departure
fromstoichiometry
exhibits values of electrical
conductivity
lower than that observed onMoTej_~~o
whereas its T-E-P- value at roomtemperature
is 60 9bhigher.
These results have to be
compared
with those obtained onMoTe~
~
in
powder
form[9]
andon
MoTe~_~~n type single crystals doped
with bromine[16]: transport
coefficients(«, S,
Halleffect,
thermalconductivity)
variations versus Tedepletion
present anoptimum
atx =
0.04 for which a
quasi-metallic
behaviour is observed. An ordered defect structure for thisparticular departure
fromstoichiometry
mayexplain
this fact : it must be noticed that a carefulstudy
of thecrystalline
structure allows us to prove thepossible
theoretical existence of an ordered structure of lacunar sites in Te at x = 0.04.5. Conclusion.
In this paper we have
clearly given
evidence of the roleplayed by
anincreasing departure
fromstoichiometry
inMoTe~_~ single crystals
:electronic states in the acceptor and donor broadened levels become more and more delocalized. Conduction
hopping
mechanisms takeplace
in these bands with asignificantly
small
hopping
energy for x close to 0.04 ;the decrease
(by
a factor of more than 10relatively
to the stoichiometriccompound)
of theequivalent density
of states in the valence band has to be associated with deformations of thecrystalline
structure which affect the extension of the valence orbitals. However thesedeformations are too weak to affect
X-ray
diffraction measurements ;the decrease of the gap width indicates a
softening
of the valencebondings
the
departure
fromstoichiometry
appears to be crucial at x= 0.04 : the
quasi~metallic
behaviour is the most
significant
onMoTej_~~o
which may exhibit apartially
ordered defect structure.The electrons
participate only
athigh temperatures,
so the electronmobility
and theequivalent density
of states in the conduction band are very littledependent
upon theE~
andE~
bands and have been assumed to be constant andequal
to those determined for n~type MoTe2 single crystals [16].
The lattice
mobility
values calculated at 300 K are found to be lower(by
a factornearly equal
to10)
than those observed onMoTe2
this result seems to suggest somedependence
of thephononic
spectrum of thecrystal
upon the Te content decrease.On the other
hand,
the decrease of theimpurity mobility namely
reflects theincreasing
concentration of ionized sites
Ni
andN[.
Moreover,
it must be noticed thatexponents
in mobilities as well as kinetic terms in the thermoelectric power arepractically
similar to their theoretical values.For the theoretical
fitting,
the activationenergies
which have been found are those whichcan be
directly
deduced from theexperimental
curves. Theroom-temperature
Hall coefficient and electricalconductivity
have been used to scale the carrier concentrations andmobilities, respectively.
Thenonly
themobility
and concentration ratios have beendirectly
deduced from the fit.To
conclude,
we canemphasize
thegood
agreement betweenexperimental
and theoretical results over a widetemperature
range, withoutusing
anyasymptotic
behaviour for thecalculation of the carrier densities. This confirms the
validity
of thesimple
model which has been retained.References
[1] SCHOLLHORN R., Intercalation
chemistry, Physica
MB(1980)
89.[2] ROUXEL J.,
Phys.
Cheat.Layered
Mater. D. Reidel Ed.(Publishing
company,Dordrecht)
6(1979)
201.
[3] ScHoLz G., JOENSEN P., REYES J. M., FRINDT R. D.,
Physica
10sB(1981)
214.[4] YOFFE A. D., Ann. Ch1nl. Fr. 7
(1982)
215.[5] TRIBUTSCH H., Solar
Energy
Mater. 1(1979)
257.[6] CHANDRA S., PANDEY R. K.,
Phys.
Status Solidi(a ) 72(1982)
415.[7] BONNET A., CONAN A., SPIESSER M., ZOAETER M., J.
Phys.
France 49(1988)
803.[8] SPIESSER M., ROUXEL J., C. R. Acad. Sci. II
(1983)
328.[9] BONNET A., SAID P., CONAN A., Revue
Phys. Appl.
17(1982)
701.[10] CONAN A., BONNET A., AMROUCHE A., SPIESSER M., J.
Phys.
France 4s(1984)
459.[I Ii
CONAN A., GOUREAUX G., ZOAETER M., J.Phys.
Cheat. Sol. 36(1975)
315.[12]
Mom N. F., DAvis E. J. A., Electronic Processes in Non Cristalline Materials. 2nd Edition(1979)
Clarendon Press, Oxford.
[13] EFROS A. L., SCHKLOVSKIJ B. I., Electron interaction in disordered systenls. A. L. Efros and M. Pollak Eds.
(Elsevier
Sciencepublischers
B-V-, 1985).[14] HEIKES R., Buhl International
Conference
on Materials. E. R. Schatz Ed.(Gordon
and Breach, NewYork, 1974).
[15] NAGELS P., CALLAERTS R., DENAYER M., DECONINCK R., J. non-cryst. Solids 4
(1970)
295.[16] CONAN A., BONNET A., ZOAETER M., RAMOUL D., Phys. Status Solidi(b) 124