• Aucun résultat trouvé

Smectic-A flexo-, piezo- and ordo-electricity

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Smectic-A flexo-, piezo- and ordo-electricity"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: jpa-00247687

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247687

Submitted on 1 Jan 1992

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Smectic-A flexo-, piezo- and ordo-electricity

J. Fournier, Geoffroy Durand

To cite this version:

J. Fournier, Geoffroy Durand. Smectic-A flexo-, piezo- and ordo-electricity. Journal de Physique II, EDP Sciences, 1992, 2 (5), pp.1001-1006. �10.1051/jp2:1992103�. �jpa-00247687�

(2)

Classification Physics Abstracts

61.30G 61.308

Short Communication

Smectic-A flexo-, piezo- and ordo-electricity

J-B- Fournier and G. Durand

Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Universit4 Paris-Sud, Bitiment 510, 91405 Orsay, France

(Received 17 December 1991, revised 20 January 1992, accepted 11 February 1992)

Rdsumd. L'existence de distributions de charges inhomogbnes le long des mo14cules de cristaux liqnides donne naissance I des contributions purement smectiques £ la flexo-, piezo- et

£ une nouvelle ordo-electricit4, proportionnelles au carr4 du paramktre d'ordre smectique.

Abstract. Inhomogenous charge distributions along mesogenic molecules of liquid crystals give contributions of a pure smectic origin to flexo-, piezo- and a new ordo-electric polarization

which

are proportional to the square of the smectic order-parameter.

Non ferroelectric liquid crystals such as nematics or smectics [ii present the inversion sym- metry. In the presence of a slow deformation, this symmetry can be broken and strain-induced

polarizations may appear. For nematics, the well-known flexo [2, 3]-polarization is created by gradients of the director field n. Gradients of the order-parameter S, e-g- surface rough-

ness induced melting, are responsible for the ordo [4]-polarization. In the case of smectics-A, since the smectic layers are perpendicular to the director, flexo-electricity corresponds to layer

curvature. One can also define a piezo-polarization [ii associated with the gradients of the

smectic layer spacing. In the past [5], for smectics-A, nematic-like contributions to the flexo- and ordo-polarizations have been considered. In this paper we discuss the elsects of a charge modulation along the mesomorphic molecules. Coupled to the smectic ordering, this modula- tion is shown to give pure smectic contributions to the smectic-A flexo-, piezo-electricity and

a new ordo-electricity. This new ordo-electric elsect is proportional to the squared modulus of the smectic order-parameter as expected from a pure symmetry basis.

In usual thermotropic smectics-A, rod-like molecules are segregated inside equidistant planes of molecular spacing a

~- 30 Ji. In addition to this unidimensional (quasi) ordering, the molecules are aligned almost parallel to each other, the common direction (nematic direc- tor n, n~

= 1) being normal to the smectic layers. The de Gennes-Landau order-parameter [I]

is defined as the (complex) amplitude of the spatial modulation associated with the smectic

ordering. Let us call ks = 21rla the layer wave vector, and z the piling direction (smectic

(3)

1002 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°5

planes along z, y). Since we consider smectics-A, we will strictly restrict ourselves to n locally perpendicular to the layers (parallel to z in the ground state). The mass density modulation,

for instance, written as

bm = bmo

~fi cos k~(z + u) (1)

defines the complex order parameter ~fiexp(ik~u). The amplitude of the modulation (bmo( is defined by the normalization condition

~fi = for a saturated smectic. As a convention, we

assume &mo > 0 if the mass excess is localized near the center of the molecules. Hence from

(1), the amount of order is described by

~fi and the displacement of the layers by u, which may also exhibit slow spatial variations ~fi(r) and u(r). In this case the new smectic layers, defined by z + u(r) = Cte, are generally tilted and dilated. The local wave vector modulus (k( and the

local normal to the layers n become then, to first order in u and its derivatives,

~ul

(k( ~- k~(i + a~u)

,

n ~- o~u j2)

In smectics, all physical quantities are in principle modulated and proportional to ~fiexp(ik~u)

at lowest order. Since usual mesogenic molecules bear permanent electrical dipoles and

quadrupoles, it is reasonable to introduce a net electrical charge modulation:

Plr) = Poll(r) COSkS(z + u(r)) (3)

Let us estimate po for a standard molecule of length a

~- 30 Ji, width w

~- 5 Ji, polarizable

core length z

~- 10 Ji and quadrupolar density e(

~- 3 x 10~ cgs (nematic quadrupolar flexoelectricity [6]). For the elongation of a charge q over the core, we expect (-e)

~- qz~law~

and po '~ qlaw~. Then po is found to be of order po '~

(-e)/z~

~- -3 x 10~° cgs, which corresponds to the fraction II10~~ of one electronic charge over the molecular volume. po is an intrinsic molecular quantity, defined as the amplitude of the fundamental charge modulation along the molecules. Comparing ii) and (3), as the mass excess is usually at the center of the

molecules, po has the sign of the excess of charges near the core.

In the same way, the polarizability tensor is expected to be written as

a;j = ajj + baij

,

bajj jr) = ba)j (r) ~fi(r) cos k~(z + u(r)). (4)

Where j is the background nematic contribution and da( the amplitude of the smectic modulation measuring the dilserence between the molecule cores and tail polarizabilities. Note that ba)j jr) can be slowly space dependent as will be shown later on. ba)j should be large

since aromatic groups are much more polarizable than aliphatic chains. As such groups are frequently close to the core of the molecules, ba)~ is usually positive. From uniaxial symmetry,

ba)j is given by ill, I referring to the layer piling direction kn)

b~lj(~) " b~l(~) biJ + (b~)(~) b~l(~)) ~i(~)~Jl~) (5)

where bj; is the Kronecker symbol. In (5) both baj, do[ (the difference of which is propor- tional to the nematic order S(r)) and the normal to the layers n(r) have been assumed space

dependent.

Let us first calculate the electrical field modulation associated with p(r). We shall then build the strain-polarizations by coupling this wave with the polarizability wave. As the density p

(4)

arises from molecular charges, it is convenient to treat them as dielectric internal charges.

Then in the absence of an external field, there is no electric displacement, I-e- D = 0, and the internal electrical field E is given by the vacuum Maxwell equations: div E = 41rp, curl E

= 0.

Note that p and E, although varying rapidly across the layers, are in fact quasi-macroscopic quantities, since they are averaged over large distances inside the layers. In the reciprocal

space, the components of E are simply related to the components of p:

4gr k

~~ " @~~M ~~~

For a uniform smectic with

and u constant, E reduces to a sine wave along z of amplitude 41rp/k, where p

= polfi and k

= ks. In general pk has non zero components in the vicinity of k = ~ks ~ q, q « k~ being the inverse length-scale of the slow gradients of ~fi(r) and

u(r) defined in (3). Following our quasi-macroscopic analysis, we can write the field-induced polarizations as

pi = ai; E; (7)

It is important to stress that we are looking for electrical effects giving rise to polarizations which

are macroscopic, I-e- which occur at the gradient wave vector q. As long as & is assumed uniform, such gradients induce components of the electrical field E at + k~ ~ q and the corre- lated polarizations also appear at ~ ks ~ q. These electrical elsects are not truly macroscopic

due to the rapid oscillation across the layers. To find macroscopic polarizations, we must take

into account the non-zero polarizability modulation in (4). Now ai;(r)E;(r) is given in the

reciprocal space by

Pi,k " £ aij,

k-k' E;, k' (8)

~,

For instance, &k, couples with E-k,+q to build pq macroscopic. Since both &k, and E-k,+q

are proportional to ~fi, pq is proportional to ~fi~. Further coupling can give rise to components at wave vectors ~ nk~ ~ mq of higher orders in

~fi(n, m integer). To derive the strain-polarizations corresponding to flexo-, piezo- and ordo-electricity, it is possible to calculate E~k, and E~k,~q explicitly, and to couple them at lowest order in

with &~k, and &~k,+q according to the selection rules giving pq. Then, coming back to the direct space, one can derive the expression

of p(r) directly in function of the strains. Such a procedure, requiring independent calculations for the flexo-, piezo- and ordo-cases, is heavy. The same results can alternatively be obtained,

at lowest order in

and q/ks, in a more transparent way using the Maxwell stress tensor as

we now show.

Consider again the general case with ~§(r) and u(r). Because a linear variation of u cor-

responds to a uniform compression, it cannot give rise to a polarization. It is then more convenient to use the variables k(r) and n(r) defined in (2) instead of u(r). Then ~§, k and n

will enter the formulae at the same order of derivation. Now we wish to derive the electrical

field. It is probably not simple to get it directly from (3) and (6), but it is straightforward to

check that

E(r)= ~po ~fi(r) sin(k(r) r) n(r) + o(1) (9)

where O(1) means terms of order in the derivatives of ~§, k, n, is solution of divE

=

41rp + O(1), with p given by (3) under the aproximations (2). At this order, E is simply the local field function of the local variables. The Maxwell stress tensor, defined as

M,j = ) (E~

bij 2 E, Ej (10)

(5)

1004 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°5

can be calculated with E given by (9). It has a non-zero mean value (locally averaged over a large number of layers)

lmul (r)

=

~)~)()~~

lbij 2 ni(r) nj(r)I + O(i) (11)

Using the proportionality between da;> and p, we can write the macroscopic polarization as

Pi = iba~jE;) = ~)) IPE;) l~~~

Since the density of electrical forces derives from the Maxwell stress tensor, I-e- pE, = -am Mm;, we directly obtain a compact form for P :

Pi = P~~" am (Mm;) (13)

The macroscopic polarization is thus explicitly given by

-Pi = ~rpo &alp am (p~§2 lbm; 2

nmnj)) + O(2) 1i4)

Developing the divergence one directly obtains, the ordo-polarization via am (~fi~), the piezo- polarization via am (1/k~), and the flexo-polarization via am (nmn;). Using (2) and (5), (14)

can be written in a less transparent but more classical way [11:

~~ " ~ll

~ t~~ + ~~~ Ill

+ Ill

+ ~~~Iii

~~~ " ~~ ~ t~~ + ~~~t

fi (~§2) fi2~

~' ~~

by ~ ~~~ 0z0y ~~~~

where eg and ei are two new ordo-coefficients that we introduce, and Aei, Ae~, Ae3 are the smectic contributions of our model to the flexo-piezo coefficients. Aei and Ae3 renormalize in

~fi~ the usual nematic flexo coefficients ei and e3, respectively associated with splay and bend deformations. The piezo-coefficient associated with layer dilation is Ae2. Since ez is exactly

zero in the nematic phase, Ae2 is equal to the e2 coefficient introduced from a symmetry basis by de Gennes [Ii. The flexo-, piezo-, ordo- deformations are shown in figure 1. Calculation of

the coefficients gives:

~

7rPo~~o

II ~$ II

~s

~~ ~ $~~~

6ei " -Ae~ = 2~fi~eg

Ae3 " -4~§~e1 (16)

(6)

a~ b) c)

Fig. i. Slowly varying strains or gradients can give rise to macroscopic polarizations: a) flexo-

electricity associated with layer curvature (liei, lie3)I b) piezo-electricity associated with layer spacing gradient (lie2)I c) the new ordo-electricity associated with smectic order gradient jell, e1).

Only two independent coefficients are in fact required. For instance, a direct measurement of the smectic-A ordo-electricity would allow us to separate the smectic and nematic contributions to flexo-electricity. To estimate the modulation ba°,

we use the relation e

= 1+ 41ra defining

the low frequency dielectric constant of the material. Neglecting the polarizability of the

aliphatic tails (for standard molecules), we can estimatc that ba° compares with the mean

polarizability a. lvith e

r- 10 for usual compounds, we find a r-1 and therefore ba°

r- 1.

With ~fi r- 0.6, po

r- 3 x 10~° cgs and 21r/k r- 30 I, the coefficients are estimated

r-

10~~ cgs.

This is indeed the usual order of magnitude of the neinatic flexo- and ordo-coefficients. The

polarizations we obtain are

r- ~fi~, the self-energy associated is then only

~- ~fi~, irrelevant close to second-order transitions. It seems quite obx,ious that in the absence of charge distributions

along the molecules, no spontaneous strain-polarization can appear. In principle, one should consider higher order harmonics of the charge distribution, linked to the existence of very localized dipolcs or quadrupoles. lIowex~er thesc components are strongly washed out by the

positional disorder inside the layers. Such contributions must only be considered for

~fi very close to unity. Comparing smectic with nematic ordo-electricity, the smectic "magic angle" km

(director tilt angle giving a polarization parallel to the interface which produces the gradient [4]) is defined according to formula (13) as cos~0m

~- 1/2 instead of1/3 for nematics. This reflects the anisotropy of the Alaxwell stress tensor and could in principle be used to separate smectic from nematic order-electric contributions. Finally considering the smectic fluctuations in a nematic phase, our model predicts a contribution ~-< ~fi~ > to the difference ei e3,

analogous to the quadrupolar "surfing" contribution recently introduced [7].

In summary, we have demonstrated the existence of a pure smectic-A contribution to the

flexo-, piezo- and ordo-elcctricity. Our model requires the presence of inhomogenous charge

distributions along the molecules and different polarizabilities between the center and ends of the mesogenic molecules. This is indeed the general case. In the presence of slow spatial strains, the inversion symmetry of the hoiuogenous smectic phase is broken. The strain-induced

polarizations come from the non-linear coupling betP>een two rapidly oscillating smectic waves, the electrical field wave and the polarizability wave. A macroscopic distortion at q builds smectic wave components at ~k ~ q. Their coupling, for instance at k + q and -k, gives

a macroscopic polarization at q. This is a kind of "static rectifying~' indeed very similar to the so-called "optical rectifying" in non-linear optics, where an R-F- n,ave at pulsation w w' if generated from two optical waves at w and w'. Practically, these polarizations can couple directly to external fields. This is probably the best way to test their existence. In principle it

(7)

1006 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE II N°5

is possible (although difficult) to separate nematic from smectic contributions and bulk from surface effects.

Acknowledgements.

We acknowledge stimulating discussions with Pr I. Dozov.

References

[ii DE GENNES P-G-, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974).

[2] MEYER R.B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 319.

[3] PROST J. and MARCEROU J-P-, J. Phys. France 38 (1977) 315.

[4] BARBERO G., DOzOV I., PALIERNE J-F- and DURAND G., Phys. Rev. Lent. 56 (1986) 2056.

[5] BARBERO G. and DURAND G., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 179 (1990) 57.

[6] DOZOV I., MARTINOT-LAGARDE Ph. and DURAND G., J. Phys. Lent. France 44 (1983) 817.

[7] PALIERNE J-F-, presented at OLC'91, Cocoa Beach, Florida, (October 7-11 1991).

Références

Documents relatifs

The permeation boundary layer appears because the pressure gradient normal to the layers can be relaxed by a lateral flow at distance 1 from the membranes. The

tion is condensed (namely the first harmonic p2qo), SA, a smectic A phase in which both the fundamental P qO and the first harmonic p2Qo of the density modulation are

In conclusion, we have developed phenomenological and molecular models, which describe both conventional !layer- contracting&#34; and de Vries smectics C as well as various

in pure BMAOB the longitudinal domains arise for the thicknesses up to 20 J.l, the threshold voltage being practically independent of thickness (Fig. 2).. Further

We see that in compounds of the same length the tendency to form a smectic phase is greater in the case of a less symmetric shape. This conclusion was

These two phases are characterized by a pseudo-hexagonal order within the layers, but they differ from the Sm Bc phases by the direction of the long molecular axes

depends on what kind of fluctuations are present in the smectic A phase : layer undulations or molecular tilt. They could of course, in general, occur

This is qualitatively analogous to the construction of a 3D-crystal surface equilibrium shape with facets being the individual bricks of lowest energy (Fig. 5a)