• Aucun résultat trouvé

Using RCMs for case studies of European temperature extremes

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Using RCMs for case studies of European temperature extremes"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Using RCMs for case studies of European temperature extremes

. . . From PhD

European temperature extremes: mechanisms & responses to climate change

Julien Cattiaux

PhD: LSCE (IPSL), with Robert Vautard & Pascal Yiou.

Jan 2011: CNRM/GMGEC/VDR (post-doc EUCLIPSE), with Hervé Douville.

March 28, 2011

(2)

European temperatures extremes?

Years

Tobs anomalies in degC

1948−2009 European seasonal temperature anomalies

1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

2007

−2

−1 0 1 2

−2

−1 0 1 2

2003

−2

−1 0 1 2

−2−1 0 12

2006

−2

−1 0 1 2

−2

−1 0 1 2

2006

−2

−1 0 1 2

−2

−1 0 1 2

MAM

JJA

SON

DJF

Densities

ECA&D stations

(3)

Summer 2003: the most popular case study

Summer 2003: public & scientific awareness.

High impacts on societies & ecosystems.

Firstreal outlier: signature of climate change?

Understanding the summer 2003. . .

1 Statistical analysis:

I How extreme? +3.2σ(e.g., Beniston, 2004).

I Associated features? Persistent anticyclonic blocking (e.g., Black et al., 2004).

I Any idea why? Dry soils in early summer (e.g., Seneviratne et al., 2006)?

2 Model experiments: soil–atmosphere feedback (e.g., Vautard et al., 2007; Zampieri et al., 2009).

3 Future projections? amplification (e.g., Fischer and Schär, 2009).

Years ISI Publi's topic: 'Temperature extreme'

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

ECA&D stations

(4)

Autumn 2006

(5)

Autumn 2006: statistical analysis

Days after September 1 2006 SON06 TG anomaly over Europe

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

−6

−4

−2 0 2 4 6

September October November

E-OBS gridded

NCEP reanalysis

∆T ∼+2.3°C (+3.2σ) over Western Europe.

∆Z500: persistent northerly flow (dipole L–H)⇒ ∼50% of the temperature anomaly.

(see also Beniston, 2007; Cattiaux et al., 2009; Luterbacher et al., 2007; Shongwe et al., 2009; van Oldenborgh, 2007; Yiou et al., 2007).

(6)

SST contribution to autumn 2006? Some stats

SON06 SST anomaly (NCEP)

(Cattiaux et al., 2009)

Mechanism

1 Exceptionally warm North-Atlantic SST.

2 Increased LH & SH fluxes from ocean

⇒warmer and wetter upper-air masses advected over the continent.

SON06 LHd anomaly (NCEP)

SON06 SHd anomaly (NCEP)

See also: M.E. Shongwe et al. (2009), Energy budget of the extreme Autumn 2006 in Europe,Climate Dynamics, pp. 1–12. DOI:10.1007/s00382-009-0689-2

(7)

SST contribution to autumn 2006? RCM experiments

Model details (same as Vautard et al. (2007) and Zampieri et al. (2009)) MM5! . . . RCM from NCAR/PSU,aka WRF’s big brother.

Non-hydrostatic,σvertical coordinates, 32 vertical levels.

Microphysics: Reisner 2, Cumulus: Grell, Boundary Layer: MRF, Radiation:

RRTM (Mlawer), LSM: Noah (4 layers).

Boundary conditions & nudging (when applied): ECMWF 4×daily re-analyses.

Experimental set-up (Cattiaux et al., 2009)

Runs over September – October – November 2006.

Twin simulations, CTL & WNC, only differing from SST forcing (autumn 2006 vs climatological).

Domain: Europe+North-Eastern Atlantic, Resolution: Mercator 0.5° (∼51 to 21km).

Large-scale dynamics nudged, not thermodynamical fields.

(8)

SST contribution to autumn 2006? RCM results

CTL−WNC T2m SON06

(Cattiaux et al., 2009)

∆T2m response=0.8°C (∼30%), consistent with statistical estimate.

Advected water vapor enhances local greenhouse effect, consistent with Shongwe et al. (2009).

CTL−WNC LHd SON06

CTL−WNC LWd SON06

Limit

Difficulty to interpret sea–air fluxes in SST-forced experiments (Barsugli and Battisti, 1998).

(9)

Winter 2009/10

(10)

Winter 2009/10: statistical analysis

Ouzeau et al., subm. GRL

ERA-Interim+ECA&D

∆T ∼ −1.3°C (−0.9σ) over Western Europe.

∆Z500: extremely persistent NAO−.

(see also Cattiaux et al., 2010; D’Arrigo et al., 2011; Seager et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2010).

(11)

Snow contribution to winter 2009/10? Some stats

Not a temperature extreme. . . But! Record-breaking reduced diurnal range.

DJF Tx−Tn (ECA&D) 1949–2010 DJF Tmax−Tmin (Cattiaux et al., 2010)

Associated with a positive anomaly of snow cover (only few stations. . . ).

DJF Snow C (ECA&D)

1949–2010 DJF Tmax−Tmin

(12)

Snow contribution to winter 2009/10? RCM experiments

Model details (still the same. . . )

MM5! . . . RCM from NCAR/PSU,aka WRF’s big brother.

Non-hydrostatic,σvertical coordinates, 32 vertical levels.

Microphysics: Reisner 2, Cumulus: Grell, Boundary Layer: MRF, Radiation:

RRTM (Mlawer), LSM: Noah (4 layers).

Boundary conditions & nudging (when applied): NCEP 4×daily re-analyses.

Experimental set-up

Runs from January 4 to January 28 of 2008, 2009 and 2010 (75 days).

Twin simulations, CTL & TRS, only differing from ground-snow albedo (normal vs transparent).

Domain: Western Europe, Resolution: Mercator 0.5° (∼40 to 20km).

Large-scale dynamics nudged, not thermodynamical fields.

(13)

Snow contribution to winter 2009/10? RCM results

Averaged linear fit:

∆ T215h−T23h

= ∆T215h−∆T23h∼ −0.5SCCTL

⇒Extra snow cover contribution to the winter 2010 reduced diurnal temperature range: ∼10%.

Some limits (among others. . . )

Only the albedo effect is taken into account.

Poor observational dataset.

(14)

Concluding remarks

Summer heatwaves: Northern propagation of soil moisture deficits in early summer.

Autumn 2006: Advection of heat and water vapor from the anomalously warm North Atlantic ocean.

Winter 2009/10: Minor contribution of extra snow cover to the unprecedented reduced temperature range.

RCMs useful for investigating physical processes.

Main limit of sensitivity tests: physics must be broken somewhere.

Multi-model experiments needed for estimating uncertainties.

Plausability of mechanisms assessed from observations.

Thanks for your attention. Questions?

(15)

Summer 2003: statistical analysis

Days after June 1 2003 JJA03 TG anomaly over Europe

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

−2 0 2 4 6

June July August

E-OBS gridded

NCEP reanalysis

∆T ∼+3.4°C (+3.6σ) over Western Europe.

∆Z500: persistent blocking.

(see also Beniston, 2004; Black et al., 2004; Cassou et al., 2005; Ferranti and Viterbo, 2006; Fischer et al., 2007; Stott et al., 2004; Trigo et al., 2005; Vautard et al., 2007, among others. . . ).

(16)

Summer heatwaves need dry soils? Some stats

Vautard et al. (2007)

Vautard et al., pers. comm.

Summer heatwaves preceeded by rainfall deficits (overallr∼0.55).

Wet⇒few hot days / Dry ⇒surprise!

(see also Black et al., 2004; Ferranti and Viterbo, 2006; Fischer et al., 2007;

Hirschi et al., 2010; Zampieri et al., 2009, among others. . . ).

(17)

Summer heatwaves need dry soils? RCM experiments

Model details

MM5! . . . RCM from NCAR/PSU,aka WRF’s big brother.

Non-hydrostatic,σvertical coordinates, 32 vertical levels.

Microphysics: Reisner 2, Cumulus: Grell, Boundary Layer: MRF, Radiation:

RRTM (Mlawer), LSM: Noah (4 layers).

Boundary conditions & nudging (when applied): ECMWF or NCEP 4×daily re-analyses.

Experimental set-up (Vautard et al., 2007; Zampieri et al., 2009)

Selection of the 10 hottest summers over 1948–2003 (Vautard et al., 2007).

Runs initialized at June 1, ending at August 7 of each hot summer.

Twin simulations, WET & DRY, initialized with climatological±1σsoil moisture south of 46°N.

Domain: Western Europe, Resolution: Lambert 36km.

No nudging applied.

(18)

Summer heatwaves need dry soils? RCM results

DRY−WET T2m June/July

DRY−WET T2m July−June

(Zampieri et al., 2009)

DRY−WET Z500 June/July

Mechanism

1 Higher SH fluxes⇒local warming.

2 Limited LH fluxes⇒drier air (less clouds).

3 Lesser convection⇒upper-air anticyclonic circulation.

(see also Ferranti and Viterbo, 2006; Vautard et al., 2007, among others).

Références

Documents relatifs

Based on the findings that dyslexics may have deficits in pitch 98 processing (Baldeweg et al., 1999) and may also be impaired, 99 compared to controls, when stimuli are part of

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

the thermal and time-dependent stability of magnetic properties, (iii) increasing the corrosion resistance of Nd-Fe-B magnets which may be of equal importance.. in

The main structure exists in every weld seam, but not an individual etchant could reveal all the mentioned structures; each etchant contrasted a specific structure, also depending

Río Negro Santa Fe Tucumán Chubut Tierra del Fuego Corrientes Catamarca La Pampa Mendoza Misiones Formosa Neuquén San Luis Entre Ríos

strength of interface and tests were performed in temperature range from RT up to 1200°C. For the compressive shear fracture, the slant shear test was carried out

Also, as the culture time passed, IBs showed strong binding with Congo red and Thioflavin-T (suggesting more amyloid content), and they became more resistant to proteolysis

Toutes les participantes au Programme de dépistage du cancer du sein de la région de Montréal ayant obtenu, entre le 19 février et le 9 juin 2003, un résultat anormal de