• Aucun résultat trouvé

Considerations for mass gathering events and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Considerations for mass gathering events and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Considerations for mass gathering events and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV)

Interim guidance

Updated May 2018

WHO/MERS/MG/15.1 Rev.1

Purpose

This document presents organizers and hosts of international mass gatherings with proposed steps to improve public health preparedness to prevent, contain, and mitigate the impact of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV). This document is based on current evidence generated among scientific disciplines, operational research, and academic networks related to mass gatherings.

This document has been reviewed in light of the latest information available on MERS-CoV. The original guidance was dated 3 June 2014 and updated in August 2015. The latest review concluded that minor changes are required to the recommendations contained in the previous guidance, dated 5 August 2015.

Updates for travelers are available on the WHO International Travel and Health website at

http://www.who.int/ith/en/. More information on MERS-CoV can be found at http://www.who.int/emergencies/mers-cov/en/.

Introduction

Mass gatherings are characterized by the concentration of people at a specific location for a specific purpose over a set period of time, and which has the potential to cause strain on the local health system should a public health event occur.

Public health authorities planning for mass gatherings should develop surge capacity plans for local health facilities and systems. Surveillance and detection systems, laboratory capacity, and treatment facilities may all be impacted by a potential increase in the number of people entering the health system during the mass gathering event.

However, maintaining surge capacity for an extended period of time puts additional strain on public health systems and should be carefully considered.

Public health authorities in host countries preparing for mass gatherings should ensure that all recommendations and guidance issued by WHO with respect to MERS-CoV have been appropriately adopted into plans and made accessible to all concerned officials. Implementation and improvement of International Health Regulations (IHR) 20051 core capacities remains a priority.

This document proposes elements of planning to be considered to prevent, contain and mitigate MERS-CoV infections during mass gathering events in the following areas: 1) Enhanced surveillance; 2) Command and control arrangements that link actions across agencies; 3) Travel health planning; 4) Clinical management of confirmed MERS-CoV cases; 5) Infection prevention and control; and 6) Risk communication.

Further WHO guidance on mass gatherings can be found at http://www.who.int/ihr/publications/WHO_HSE_GCR_2015.5/en/

Risk assessment

The decision to proceed with, restrict, modify, postpone, or cancel a mass gathering should be based on a thorough risk assessment of the mass gathering event overall and a rapid risk assessment to assess the situation- processes which are specific, documented and transparent. Risk assessments should be undertaken in partnership with local, national, and international authorities as well as mass gatherings experts.

Risk assessments should take into account:

1. Latest information on the epidemiology of MERS-CoV infection;

2. Characteristics of the mass gathering that may impact the likelihood or consequences of potential MERS-CoV infection (location(s), size, country of origin of

participants, climate, season, etc.)

3. Strengths and vulnerabilities of current systems, capacities and plans put in place for the mass gathering.

See Annex 1 ‘Characteristics of a mass gathering and potential impacts/consequences of MERS-CoV’ for further information to inform the health risk assessment.

Planning considerations for mass gatherings

In order to prevent, or if necessary manage, MERS-CoV infections during a mass gathering, public health authorities may consider the following planning elements:

1. Enhanced surveillance

The ability to rapidly detect MERS-CoV infection during a mass gathering is a public health imperative. With a greater volume of people arriving for the mass gathering, additional capacities for MERS-CoV diagnosis (clinical and laboratory) should be considered. Health staff in contact with mass gathering participants (including at points of entry) should also need to be sensitized to the relevant signs and symptoms.

For the duration of the event, syndromic surveillance may alert public authorities to increased respiratory illness among mass gathering participants. Indicator based surveillance and event-based surveillance of national and international media for MERS-CoV or clusters of unknown respiratory disease, particularly in countries from which mass gathering participants are expected, may alert organizers of possible importation risks.

(2)

2. Command and control arrangements that link actions across agencies

Command and control structures should be put in place to collect and compile information, to make decisions and to communicate with relevant stakeholders. It will often require coordination with different agencies and departments with overlapping responsibilities and at different levels of government.

If a MERS-CoV infection is detected during the mass gathering, a rapid risk assessment – taking into account the likelihood of the impact and possibility for onward

transmission – should lead to a cooperative risk management strategy. The role of public health authorities in the

decision-making process for different countries varies;

therefore, the risk assessment should be clearly documented and transparent in order to allow decision-makers to understand the public health risks and how to best manage them.

Public health authorities should consider the use of scenario- based exercises to test the command and control structure during preparations for the mass gathering. Possible scenarios might include variable such as the risk of MERS- CoV exposure, route of importation and spread.

3. Travel health planning

If the risk assessment identifies a significant threat of exposure to MERS-CoV for participants in the mass gathering, public health authorities should:

 Educate all participants on the risk of transmission and symptoms of MERS-CoV infection.

 Collaborate with travel and tourism sectors to place educational materials at strategic locations (e.g. airports, public transport stations, travel agent offices).

Alternative media can also be used such as signage at international points of entry and announcements on planes, ships and public radio. Travel advice should include current information on MERS-CoV and how to avoid illness while travelling.

 Advise participants that persons with pre-existing medical conditions (e.g. chronic diseases such as diabetes, chronic lung disease, immunodeficiency) are more likely to develop severe infection.

All participants should be advised to consult a health-care provider before travelling in order to review their risk and to assess whether traveling is advisable. Organizers should ensure that participants are aware of the general health system structure and how to access health care services.

4. Clinical management of confirmed MERS-CoV cases

If the mass gathering risk assessment identifies a significant risk of individuals presenting for care with MERS-CoV infection, medical facilities should be adequately prepared according to WHO guidelines. This includes:

 Infection prevention and control practices in hospitals and clinics in both triage, care areas and isolation2;

 Review of clinical management guidelines, including the training of clinical staff in identification of cases and their clinical management3;

 Preparations for the possibility of severely ill patients;

 Identification and maintenance of surge capacity.

5. Infection prevention and control

Routine infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are important tools in reducing the transmission of MERS-CoV.

Suboptimal infection prevention and control in health care settings have been observed to contribute to large numbers of secondary cases. Plans for ensuring and maintaining adequate IPC activities during the mass gathering should be developed. A robust IPC strategy includes communicating the following to mass gathering participants:

 Regularly perform hand hygiene and respiratory hygiene practices e.g. covering mouth and nose when coughing or sneezing; washing hands after contact with

respiratory secretions; performing frequent hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rubs; and keeping a distance of one metre from other persons when ill.

 Adhere to good food safety practices such as: avoiding raw meat, dairy and animal products; avoiding undercooked meat or food prepared under unsanitary conditions; properly washing fruits and vegetables before eating them; and performing hand hygiene before eating. For mass gathering events held in the Middle East, where dromedary camels are considered to be the main source of MERS-CoV, people should also avoid drinking raw camel milk or camel urine.

 People with diabetes, renal failure, chronic lung disease, and immunocompromised persons are considered to be at high risk of severe disease from MERS-CoV infection.

Therefore, for mass gathering events held in the Middle East, these people should avoid close contact with animals, particularly dromedaries, when visiting farms or markets, in areas where the virus is known to be potentially circulating. General hygiene measures, such as regular hand washing before and after touching animals and avoiding contact with sick animals, should be adhered to.

Public health authorities should ensure that sufficient hand- hygiene stations (with soap and running water or alcohol- based hand rubs) are available to mass gathering participants and food handlers. Public health authorities should also work with food safety authorities to ensure safe food

preparation processes and adequate training of food handlers.

6. Risk communication

Mass gatherings by their very nature draw a great deal of attention and political pressure. Organizers should consider additional measures to ensure clear and proactive messaging around public health advice.

Public communications related to MERS-CoV and mass gatherings should be led by the Ministry of Health (or equivalent) in order to avoid confusion and contradictory messaging. The Ministry of Health may consider preparing messages prior to the mass gathering and sharing these messages with organizers to facilitate clear and rapid communication in the event that MERS-CoV is detected.

The Ministry of Health may also consider coordination and collaboration with the media – building this relationship should start as early as possible. WHO risk communication guidance (http://www.who.int/ihr/risk_communications/en/) and Disease Outbreak News

(http://www.who.int/csr/don/archive/disease/coronavirus_infections/en/) may also assist ministries in messaging.

(3)

Public health authorities should ensure that

recommendations and guidance issued by WHO with respect to MERS-CoV have been provided to the participants prior to the entry in the country.

If MERS-CoV is suspected among a participant of a mass gathering event, mass gathering hosts should inform the participant’s country of residence to ensure appropriate patient follow-up, testing, clinical care, and risk management in the host country and upon return to the participant’s home country.

Public health authorities should advise returning participants on the symptoms of MERS-CoV infection, as well as protective measures. Returning participants should be informed that if they develop acute respiratory illness with a fever and cough (severe enough to interfere with usual daily activities) during the two weeks after their return, they should:

 seek immediate medical attention and inform health care workers of their recent travel;

 practise respiratory hygiene when coughing or sneezing (see section 5);

 minimize contact with others to prevent the spread of infection.

Public health authorities in countries with returning participants of mass gatherings should make this guidance available to local health practitioners and facilities. Early communication with WHO when MERS-CoV is suspected is strongly recommended.

References

1. International Health Regulations (2005), 3rd edition.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007

(http://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/246107, accessed 10 May 2018).

2. Infection prevention and control during health care for probable or confirmed cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection: interim guidance. Updated 4 June 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (WHO/MERS/IPC/15.1;

http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/174652, accessed 10 May 2018).

3. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infections when Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection is suspected:

interim guidance. Updated 2 July 2015. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015 (WHO/MERS/Clinical/15.1;

http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/178529, accessed 10 May 2018).

© World Health Organization 2018

Some rights reserved. This work is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO;

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).

Under the terms of this licence, you may copy, redistribute and adapt the work for non-commercial purposes, provided the work is appropriately cited, as indicated below. In any use of this work, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organization, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. If you adapt the work, then you must license your work under the same or equivalent Creative Commons licence. If you create a

translation of this work, you should add the following disclaimer along with the suggested citation: “This translation was not created by the World Health Organization (WHO). WHO is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this translation. The original English edition shall be the binding and authentic edition”.

Any mediation relating to disputes arising under the licence shall be conducted in accordance with the mediation rules of the World Intellectual Property Organization.

Suggested citation. Considerations for mass gathering events and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): Interim guidance, Interim Guidance (WHO/MERS/MG/15.1 Rev.1). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) data. CIP data are available at http://apps.who.int/iris.

Sales, rights and licensing. To purchase WHO publications, see http://apps.who.int/bookorders. To submit requests for commercial use and queries on rights and licensing, see http://www.who.int/about/licensing.

Third-party materials. If you wish to reuse material from this work that is attributed to a third party, such as tables, figures or images, it is your responsibility to determine whether permission is needed for that reuse and to obtain permission from the copyright holder. The risk of claims resulting from infringement of any third-party-owned component in the work rests solely with the user.

General disclaimers. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement.

The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WHO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.

All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall WHO be liable for damages arising from its use.

(4)
(5)

Annex 1. Characteristics of a mass gathering and potential impacts/consequences of MERS-CoV

Characteristic Impact on mass gathering Potential impacts/consequences of MERS-CoV

Type or purpose of event (sporting, festival, religious, political, cultural, etc.)

• The type or purpose of event influences the population profile of participants and impacts how participants seek health care or behave if they are symptomatic; e.g. people may be reluctant to postpone travel to a mass gathering or may not self-report if requested.

• Decreased ability to detect, treat and effectively manage MERS infected cases.

• Increased transmission among attendees.

Size of event (likely numbers of participants, crowd density, nature of contact between participants)

• Mode of transmission combined with size and density of the event and related features of the mass gathering may affect the magnitude of spread and the likelihood of importation.

• Decreased ability to detect and treat cases of MERS due to an increase in population volume.

• Inadequate information on the specific modes of

transmission of MERS-CoV limits evidence-base of efforts to mitigate spread among mass gathering participants.

Duration • The duration of the mass gathering impacts the opportunity for transmission. Shorter events minimize the likelihood of spread and the likelihood that cases (infected before or during the mass gathering) will display symptoms during the mass gathering.

• Longer events require maintenance of health system surge capacities. Systems should be sustainable at an appropriate level of alert throughout the duration of the mass gathering event.

• Participants may present with MERS at any time if they are exposed to MERS-CoV before travelling. However, the longer the event, the more likely that newly infected cases will develop symptoms and be detectable in the mass gathering host area.

• Symptomatic patients may present upon return and should be anticipated, as incubation can take up to 14 days.

• Communication with returning travelers is needed, particularly with regard to self-reporting. See WHO’s International Travel and Health website.

http://www.who.int/ith/en/

Animals or animal product exposure

• Certain activities during mass gatherings (e.g.

consumption of animal products that are fresh, uncooked, or have not been properly cleaned or prepared) may increase exposure to an infectious reservoir.

If animals, particularly dromedary camels, play a role in the mass gathering, there may be an increased risk of MERS- CoV infection.

Timing of the mass gathering • Seasonal fluctuations in infectious disease may contribute to morbidity/mortality at the mass gathering.

• There have been peaks in incidence in the northern hemisphere autumn and spring, largely resulting from human-to-human transmission in health care settings. To determine seasonality, more information on the incidence of primary infections, i.e. infections resulting from direct or indirect contact with the animal reservoir, is required.

Demographics • Age and other demographic characteristics of participants influence the medical risks and interventions that may be needed during the mass gathering.

• A higher proportion of severe cases of MERS-CoV have been reported among individuals over 60 years old.

• The participation of an older population in the mass gathering may increase the likelihood and severity of MERS during the mass gathering and complicate their clinical management.

Comorbidities • Certain comorbidities or health conditions (such as diabetes or heart disease) may affect individual susceptibility to infectious disease.

• A higher proportion of severe cases of MERS have been reported among people with certain comorbidities (e.g.

diabetes, renal failure, hypertension, obesity).

• The participation of people with comorbidities in the mass gathering may increase the likelihood and severity of MERS during the mass gathering and may complicate their clinical management.

International participation • International participation increases the possibility of importing or exporting communicable diseases.

• May impact health-care-seeking behavior due to culture or unfamiliarity with the host country’s health-care system.

• International participation will also make communicating health messages more difficult as a result of language and cultural differences.

• Mass gathering participants who fall ill may choose not to seek medical care or may do so in a way that does not result in detection of MERS cases by surveillance.

• Countries of participants’ origins may not be prepared to identify and treat MERS patients. This has implications for clinical management and global surveillance.

Common modes of travel taken to reach a mass gathering and other activities not related to the mass gathering.

• Potential for exposure to cases during travel to or from the mass gathering.

• Participants attending a mass gathering often use the opportunity to undertake other activities; e.g. tourism.

Exposure to any hazard, therefore, may not be related to participation in the mass gathering.

• In case of air travel, passengers sitting in the same row, 2 rows in front and 2 rows back, as well as cabin crew who was (were) designated to look after the ill traveler on board aircraft

• Currently there is no clear consensus on contact investigation among travellers found to be infected with MERS-CoV via other modalities.

• Exposure to MERS-CoV may not occur at the mass gathering, if the participants engage in other activities while travelling. Enhanced surveillance may need to cover other locations than that of the mass gatherings, particularly in areas with dromedary camels.

Références

Documents relatifs

Therefore, asymptomatic health-care workers who are RT- PCR positive for MERS-CoV should be isolated and should not return to work until two consecutive upper respiratory

ABSTRACT This study aimed to measure the level of awareness of faculty members, staff and students in a female Saudi Arabian university community towards Middle East

(b) develop guidance and tools to improve performance at various levels of the Organization and within States Parties, examples include infectious hazards risk mapping to

Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection when Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) infection is suspected..

The current WHO case definition (42) identifies probable cases as having fe- brile acute respiratory illness with clini- cal, radiological or histopathological evidence of

(2) to collaborate with and assist States Parties through health ministries as well as all other relevant ministries and sectors in the mobilization of technical support and

The goals of the plans are to strengthen the NFPs in each State Party; reinforce public health preparedness and response systems; accelerate IHR implementation through review

A scientific meeting such as this, where almost all the global health experts working on the virus are assembled, can also take stock of what new scientific evidence has emerged