A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
S. K. S RINIVASAN R. V ASUDEVAN
Stochastic kinetic equations and particle statistics
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 10, n
o4 (1969), p. 419-429
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1969__10_4_419_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1969, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
419
Stochastic kinetic equations
and particle statistics
S. K. SRINIVASAN
R. VASUDEVAN
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India
Institute of Mathematical Sciences, Madras, India
Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Vol. X, n° 4, 1969, ]
Section A : . Physique théorique.
ABSTRACT. - The kinetic
theory
ofparticles
distributed invelocity
space is formulated in terms of stochastic
theory
of continuousparametric systems. Using
themultiple-point product densities,
the kineticequations
are derived for
particles obeying
differenttypes
of statistics.1.
INTRODUCTION
The
equilibrium properties
of ideal gases both classical andquantum
are described
by
different distribution functions for the number ofparticles
in each energy
region
orvelocity
interval in thephase-space.
In the classicalcase, the well known Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution which is
independent
of the character of the
system depend only
on theparameters
like thetemperature
anddensity
of thesystem.
Inquantum
statistics there are twopossible
forms of theequilibrium
distribution dictatedby
thesymmetry
of the wave functions of theparticles
involved. Theexperimental
resultsdecisively
prove thatelectrons, protons
and neutrons are describedby
420 S. K. SRINIVASAN AND R. VASUDEVAN
Fermi-Dirac distribution and assemblies of
photons, pions
andHe4
mustfollow the Bose-Einstein distribution. There are a number of alternate ways in which the choice of the statistics of a
particle
may beexpressed.
A
system
of Nparticles
distributed over the energy space can be describedby
a set ofnumbers ni corresponding
to each energy level.Anti-symmetry
condition on the wave function demands
that ni
can be either 0 or 1only
and
symmetric
wave functionscorrespond
to any of the values0, 1, 2,
... Of course, theSchrodinger equation
for theN-body system
allowsa host of solutions other than
symmetric
oranti-symmetric.
In terms ofoccupation numbers,
some of the solutionscorrespond
to intermediatepossibility that ni
assumonly
one of the values0, 1, 2,
..., or p. These arecalled intermediate statistics.
Ingenious
combinatorial methods[1]-[3]
have been devised to derive theequilibrium
distributioncorresponding
to thesesituations.
However,
there is analtogether
differentapproach
to arrive at theequi-
librium distribution
reflecting
the different symmetry conditionsby
consi-dering
the detaileddynamics
of theproblem.
This is achievedby considering
the collision term in the Boltzmann
equation,
whichyields
thechange
inthe
occupation
number of agiven
state in detailaccording
to thetype
of theparticles.
Thus we can derive theequilibrium
distributions assu-ming microscopic reversibility
for the cross-sections for collisions. Suchan
attempt
has been madeby Moyal [4]
who has obtained the energyspectrum
of theparticles
on theassumption
that the energy levels over which theparticles
are distributed are discrete.Moyal attempted
thisproblem by assuming
that theparticles
are distributed in discrete levels of energy and took into account the fulldynamics
of theproblem. However,
as
pointed
out in a recent contributionby
one of us[5]
theE-space
orvelocity
space over which theparticles
are distributed is a continuum andas such there does not exist any
comprehensive probability
distribution functioncapable
ofdescribing
thesystem adequately.
Thus we are natu-rally
led to theproduct density [6]
formulation fordescribing
thesystem.
Moyal
himself haspointed
out in one of the discussions in[4],
that theapproach
of thetype
used here should be moreappropriate
to discussthe case where the energy
spectrum
is continuous. This ispossible
nowdue to introduction of
multiple product
densities which comenaturally
in the
description
of different types of statistics.However,
aslight depar-
ture from the mode of
description
of reference[5]
is necessary to introduce the statistics of thephysical systems.
This is doneby dealing
with therandom variables
dN(v, t)
themselves rather than theproduct
densitie swhich stand for the
expectation
value of one or more of the variablesdN(v, t).
421 STOCHASTIC KINETIC EQUATIONS AND PARTICLE STATISTICS
In section
2,
we define theproduct
densities andmultiple
densities thatare necessary for the
description
of different occupancy conditionsrelating
to our
problem.
The characteristic functionals of the stochastic variablesare then introduced.
In
section3,
the Maxwell distribution is derivedusing
the characteristic functionals. Othertypes
ofequilibrium
distri-bution for different occupancy conditions are also arrived at
using
the Boltz-mann
equations
for the stochastic variablesdN(v, t)
themselves and thedynamics
of the collision processes. The final section deals with omegeneral
results and thepossible
connection toparastatistics.
2. PRODUCT DENSITIES
As has been
emphasised
in reference[5],
thetechnique
ofproduct
densi-ties is a
powerful
method ofdescription
of statistical mechanicalsystem.
Though
theimportance
of the notion ofproduct
densities has beenamply
realised in the cascade
theory
of cosmis ray showers[7],
it has not beenvery much used in statistical mechanics until very
recently.
The basic idea is that since the
particles
are distributed in acontinuum,
it is
fairly
easy to deal with the random variabledN(x, t) denoting
the numberof
particles
withparametric
values in the elemental range(x, x
+dx)
at t.Here t stands for the continuous
parameter
withrespect
to which the process progresses or evolves. One of the characteristic features of the random variabled N(x, t)
is that thesignificant
contributions to theprobability magnitudes
arise fromonly
two of the valuesnamely
0 and 1 assumedby dN(x, t).
This factsuggests
that thedescription
in terms ofdN(x, t) might
be useful fordynamical systems obeying
Fermi-Dirac statistics.To describe other
types
of occupancy it is found necessary to deal with anextended definition of the
product
densities formulatedby
us(see
refe-rences
[8]
and[9])
in connection with the solution of the statisticalproblem
of
population growth
in which « twins )) and «multiples
)) arise. Thisleads us to the
concept
ofmultiple point product
densities which can bedefined with reference to the random variable
d Nk(x, t) representing
thenumber of «
k-tuples
» in the range(x, x
+dx).
We aregenerally
inte-rested in the total number of
particles
anddenoting
thisby dN(x, t)
we findwhere the summation over k is to be extended
upto
the maximum order of thetuple
that is allowed. It is to be understood that the different mul-tiple points
in the x-space are to be treated as differentspecies
and that422 S. K. SRINIVASAN AND R. VASUDEVAN
the variables
dNk(x, t); k
=1, 2,
...,enjoy exactly
the sameproperties
as the
original dN(x, t)
does. Thus we can define themultiple point
pro- duct densitiesby
where
dxi
anddx2
do notoverlap.
We can also relate this to the total pro- duct densities definedby
where the summation over i
and j
are over the admissiblemultiplicities.
We wish to
emphasise
here that the occurrence ofa j-tuple
is to be viewedas a
single multiple point
and as such it has aprobability proportional
to dx while the occurrence of two
multiple points
whose orders of multi-plicity
addto j
is of a smaller order ofmagnitude
ascompared
to dx.3. ENERGY SPECTRUM OF PARTICLES
OBEYING DIFFERENT SYMMETRIES
We shall
present
in this section adynamical
method ofarriving
at theequilibrium
distribution functioncorresponding
toMaxwell-Boltzmann
,Fermi-Dirac,
Bose-Einstein and intermediate statistics. The distributioncorresponding
to the first threetypes
ofsymmetries
have been obtainedby Moyal
for discrete energy andvelocity.
We shallpresent
a realistic method ofarriving
at the energyspectrum taking
into account the conti-nuous nature of the
dynamical
variables and also extend these results toparticles obeying
intermediate statistics. LetdN(v, t)
be the number ofparticles
in therange dv
at time t.Clearly dN(v, t)
is the random variableenjoying
theproperties
mentioned in section 2. We can set upgeneralised
Boltzmann
equation
for theproduct
densities in anexactly
the same manner as in reference[5].
Thechanges
in the distribution are causedby binary
collisions in which two
particles
with velocities in the ranges(u,
u +du),
(v, v
+dv) acquire
velocities in the ranges(r,
r +dr), (s, s
+ds)
with theprobability
If theparticles obey
Maxwell-Boltzmannstatistics,
STOCHASTIC KINETIC EQUATIONS AND PARTICLE STATISTICS 423
there is no restriction on the number of
particles
for the occupancy of eachvelocity
range dv.Thus n
can take allpositive integral
values in the caseof Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics and hence is
composed
ofmultiple points
in v-space of all orders :
Thus the
probability
of collision that carries over the twoparticles
one ofwhich is in the range
(v, v
+dv)
the otherbeing
in(u,
u +du)
into theranges
(s, s
+ds), (r, r
+dr)
isproportional
to theproduct
of thedN(v, t)dN(u, t).
In the case of Bose-Einsteinstatistics,
any number ofparticles
can occupy aparticular range dv
as in the case of Maxwell-Boltzmann
particles. However,
the collisionprobability
willdepend
on the number of
particles
that occupy the ranges(r,
r +dr)
and(s, s
+ds).
If,
on the otherhand,
theparticles obey
Fermistatistics, d N(v, t)
can takethe values 0 and 1
only
and hence mean valuesof d N(v, t)
and theirproducts
will lead to
simple product
densities.Apart
fromthis,
the collisionproba- bility
will also contain additional factors to ensure that in abinary collision,
the
particles acquire
velocitiesonly
in those ranges which are notalready occupied.
We nowproceed
to write down thedynamical equations.
a)
Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.It is clear that we have to deal with individual
dN;(v, t)
rather than the totald N(v, t)
and then composedN;(v, t)
withappropriate weights
to formd N(v, t).
Eventhough dN;(v, t)’s
are randomvariables,
there is a certainregularity
in thedynamics
of collisions due to the conservation ofproba- bility. Using
the same notation of section 2 to denote theexpectation
values of the random variables
dN;(v, t)
andstudying
thechanges
that occurin the time interval
(t, t
+A),
we obtain(1)
03BBuv,rs
- rs,uvANN. INST. POINCARÉ, A-X-4 28
424 S. K. SRINIVASAN AND R. VASUDEVAN
From the above chain of
equations,
it is easy to obtain theequation
for thetotalfl(v, t)
asWe assume
complete
« Stosszahlansatz » andimpose
theprinciple
of micro-scopic reversibility.
These areexpressed by
Equation (3.6)
expresses a validassumption
for rarefiedsystems
or gases without anylong
range interaction whileequation (3.7)
is moredeep
and has
something
to do with thesymmetry
of thedynamics
of collisionprocesses. Thus we have
or
The
equilibrium configuration
is obtainedby setting ~- equal
to zero ;we then find
425
STOCHASTIC KINETIC EQUATIONS AND PARTICLE STATISTICS
The above functional
equation coupled
with the energy conservation at each collisionyields
where A
and /?
can be identified with the familiar constants of the Boltz-mann distribution.
b)
Fermi-Dirac statistics.In a similar
fashion,
we can write the differentialequation
forproduct density fl (u, t)
in the case of Fermi-Diracparticles assuming
thatd N(u, t)
can be
only equal
todNi(u, t)
whichcorresponds
to the occupancy of 1 or 0particles only
of the duregion
invelocity
space. To accord with the fact that the presence of aparticle
in aregion dr
inhibits otherparticles going
into it the
density
of states isrepresented by [1 - By
thesame token for a Bose gas with unlimited occupancy of each
velocity
range to accord with the fact that the existence ofparticles
in eachregion
faci-litates other
particles going
into theregion,
the increaseddensity
of statescan be
represented by [1 + dr.
For the Fermi-Dirac particles
we obtain
where )
denotes theexpectation symbol. Proceeding exactly
as in thecase of Maxwell-Boltzmann
particles,
we findIf we
impose
energy conservation in each collision and take into account the total energy andparticle
number of thesystem,
we arrive atwhich can be identified with the Fermi distribution
by
a proper choice of A andfl.
426 S. K. SRINIVASAN AND R. VASUDEVAN
c) Intermediate
and Bose-Einsteinstatistics.
We next take the case of
particles
whose occupancy in anyregion
ofvelocity
space is restricted to 0 or 1 or 2. Thedensity
of states is takento be of the Bose
type.
Hence the total number in each infinitesimalrange dv
isgiven by
The
equations
for the rate ofchange ofdN1(v,t)anddN2(v, t)
aregiven by
where factors
[ 1
-dN2]
have been used to indicate that the total occu-pancy is limited to 2.
Imposing microscopic reversibility,
we obtain427 STOCHASTIC KINETIC EQUATIONS AND PARTICLE STATISTICS
At the
equilibrium configuration
the left hand side of(3.17)
is zero. Pro-ceeding
asbefore,
we obtainTaking
into account energy conservation in eachcollision,
we see thatthe above can be satisfied if
and
Thus the total
product density
isgiven by
which is in accordance with the distribution for the intermediate statistics
or Gentile statistics
[2]
withhighest
occupancy for each statebeing only
2.The above result can be
generalised
to the case when themaximum
numberof
particles
that can occupy a state is p. In this case, we have to writeequations
similar to(3.17)
fordNi(v, t), dN2(v, t),
...,dNp(v, t)
and thefactors
[1
-dN2(r, t)], [1
-dN2(s, t)],
etc., whichmultiply
the classicalcollision
probability
should bereplaced by [1
-dNp(r, t)] [1
-dNp(s, t)],
etc.to ensure that no more
than p particles
can occupy anyelemental velocity
range. In this case, the total
product density
isgiven by
If, however,
there is no limit for thehighest
occupancy of any state and if thendensity
of each state dv isgiven by [1 + as in equa-
tions
(3 .15), (3 .16),
we can write a sequence ofequations
fordN1
...dNi
...similar to
(3.17) except
that now the factor[1
-dNp(r, t)]
nolonger
multi-plies
the transitionprobability
since there is no limit or constraint for the428 S. K. SRINIVASAN AND R. VASUDEVAN
occupancy of each state.
Adding
up all theseequations,
we arrive at theequilibrium
conditionThis leads us
(for
the usual energyconserving collisions)
to the Bose-Einstein distribution :Alternatively
we can obtain the Bose-Einstein distribution from(3.22) by letting p
tend toinfinity.
4. DISCUSSION
In
conclusion,
we have topoint
out that theequations (3.22)
lead toparafermi
statistics of order p; wenaturally
arrive at Bose statistics if weallow p ~
oo : if we restrict p to beunity only,
we have inequations
of(3 .17)
the factors
[1
-t )~ 1
+ which because of theproperty
dNî = dNi
becomes1 2014 dNIO, t)
which occurs in(3 . I I)
in thedensity
of states factor. It is
interesting
to note that ananalogous
idea has beenput
forwardby
Schweber[12].
The action of the annihilation and creationoperators
on anassembly
of fermions is describedby
Thus the matrix element for
increasing
the occuration number in agiven
state
by
one isproportional
to( 1 - ~,)(1
+ni)
= 1 - n;.The
principal
aim of this short note is topoint
out that thistype
of kineticapproach
which was initiatedby Moyal [4]
on the basis that the number ofparticles
are distributed in discrete energy states can be made morerealistic
by taking
into consideration the continuous nature of v. Thedescription
of the kineticchanges
should be in terms of the stochastic variablesthemselves, leading
toproduct
densities under theaveraging operations. However,
thespectral
distributioncorresponding
to differentstatistics
including parastatistics,
can be achievedelegantly by
theexplicit
use of
multiple product
densities.429 STOCHASTIC KINETIC EQUATIONS AND PARTICLE STATISTICS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors deem it a
great pleasure
toacknowledge stimulating
discus-sions with Professor Alladi
Ramakrishnan,
Professor E. C. G.Sudarshan,
Dr. N. R.
Ranganathan
and Dr. K. Venkatesan.[1] L. D. LANDAU, Statistical Physics. Pergamon Press, London, 1960.
[2] D. TER HAAR, Physics, t. 18, 1952, p. 199.
[3] A. M. GUENAULT and D. K. C. MCDONALD, Molecular Physics, t. 5, 1962, p. 524.
[4] J. E. MOYAL, Jour. Roy. Statist. Soc., t. 11 B, 1949, p. 150.
[5] S. K. SRINIVASAN, Zeit. Phys., t. 193, 1966, p. 394.
[6] A. RAMAKRISHNAN, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., t. 46, 1950, p. 595.
[7] S. K. SRINIVASAN and K. S. S. IYER, Nuovo Cimento, t. 33, 1964, p. 273.
[8] S. K. SRINIVASAN, Zastosawania Mathematyki, t. 6, 1961, p. 209.
[9] A. RAMAKRISHNAN, S. K. SRINIVASAN and R. VASUDEVAN, Journ. Mathl. Phys. Sci.,
t. 1, 1967, p. 270.
[10] T. E. HARRIS, The theory of branching processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1963.
[11] S. K. SRINIVASAN, N. V. KOTESWARA RAO and R. VASUDEVAN, Nuovo Cimento, 1969 (to be published).
[12] S. S. SCHWEBER, Relativistic field theory. Harper, New York, 1962, p. 139.
Reçu le 25 mars 1969.