C AHIERS DE
TOPOLOGIE ET GÉOMÉTRIE DIFFÉRENTIELLE CATÉGORIQUES
M AREK G OLASI ´ NSKI
D ACIBERG L IMA G ONÇALVES
Equivariant Gottlieb groups
Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques, tome 42, no2 (2001), p. 83-100
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CTGDC_2001__42_2_83_0>
© Andrée C. Ehresmann et les auteurs, 2001, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Cahiers de topologie et géométrie différentielle catégoriques » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme
EQUIVARIANT GOTTLIEB GROUPS by
MarekGOLASI0144SKI*
andDaciberg
LIMAGONÇAL
VESCAHIERS DE TOPOLOGIE ET
GEOMETRIE DIFFERENTIELLE CATEGORIQUES
Volume XLII-2 (2001)
R6sum6
Nous
d6veloppons
lediagramme
de groupes de GottliebGn (X)
etGn (X ),
pour n > 1, et X un espace dediagrammes
et X un espaceequivariant respectivement.
Nous donnonsquelques-unes
de leurspropri6t6s,
6tendant celles du casnonequivariant. Ensuite,
au moyen de la G-fibration universelle Poo :Eoo -+ Boo,
nous 6tablissons unlien entre
Fn(F)
et leshomomorphismes
de connexion d6termin6s par une G-fibration E -+ B de fibre F.Classification A.M.S. :
Primary 55P91; secondary 54H15,
57Sl7.Key
words andphrases: complex
of groups,diagram
of spaces, Got- tlieb groups,EI-category, G-fibration, G-homotopy,
G-CW space,k-space.
Introduction
The Gottlieb groups
Gn(X)
of a connectedpointed space X
weredefined in
[7, 8];
firstG1(X)
and thenGn (X )
for all n > 1. As aresult of
[7],
the groupG1 (X ) plays
a central role in thestudy
ofJiang subgroups applied
in fixedpoint theory.
In[16],
P.Wong
considered aconcept
ofequivariant Jiang subgroups
whichplay a
relevant role in theequivariant
Nielsentheory
forequivariant
maps. Thehigher
Gottliebgroups
Gn (X)
are related in[8, 9]
to theproblem
ofsectioning
fibrations*This work was initiated during the visit of the first author to the Departamento
de Matematica - USP - Brasil,
August
1998. This visit has been supported byFAPESP-Sao Paulo-Brasil.
with fibre X. For
instance,
if the Gottlieb groupGn (X )
is trivial then there is ahomotopy’
section for every fibration over thesphere Sn+,,
with fibre X.
The
objectives
of this paper include thedevelopment
of anequivari-
ant concept of Gottlieb groups which will extend the relation with the
Jiang subgroups
to theequivariant
case as well asallowing analyses
ofsectioning
forequivariant
fibrations. Section 1 serves as an introduc- tion for the rest of the paper. We recall the definition of Gottlieb groups and examine therelationship
between evaluationsubgroups Gn(X)
andGn (X)
for any space X and n > 1. Inparticular,
we show that for anyk-space
X the Gottlieb groupGn (X)
isisomorphic
to the evaluationsubgroup Gn (X)
for all n > 1.By [4]
thehomotopy
category ofG-spaces
isequivalent
to the homo-topy category of
diagram
spaces indexedby
the canonical orbitsO(G)
and in
[3, 11] diagram
of spaces indexedby different categories
arestudied.
Therefore,
we have firstdeveloped,
in Section2,
thediagram
of Gottlieb groups
Gn(X) corresponding
to anH-diagram
of spaces X and n >1,
and present some of theirproperties extending
those in[7, 8].
We note that if II is anEl-category
then thediagram Gn(X)
gives
rise to acomplex
ofgrbups (Remark 2.1).
Thus the all results oncomplexes
of groupspresented
for instance in[2]
can be used tostudy
these
diagrams Gn(X)
of groups.Then,
wegeneralize (Proposition 2.4)
the result
presented
in[8] by relating G1 (X)
with thediagram TT1(X)
of fundamental groups for a
diagram
X ofaspherical CW-spaces.
For an
equivariant
spaceX, diagrams
of Gottlieb groupsGn(X)
de-termining
acomplex
of groups are discussed in Section 3. We presenttwo
equivalent
definitions of thosediagrams,
relate them with the Got- tlieb groups of some orbit spaces and theequivariant Jiang
groups devel-oped
in[16].
The categoryO(G)
of canonical orbits is anEI-category
for any group G. Thus we deduce that the
diagram Gn (X) gives
riseto a
complex
of groups for anyG-space
X. At theend,
someexamples
of those
diagrams
are stated.Section 4 indicates how to extend Gottlieb’s results
presented
in[9, 12]
to theequivariant
case. We make use of the universal G-fibration Poo£oo
-+Boo
constructed in[15]
to enunciate(Theorem 4.1)
a relationbetween
Gn(F)
andconnecting homomorphisms
determinedby
a G-fibration E -> B with fibre F. We also
investigate
thediagram G1 (Boo)
and deduce
(Theorem 4.3)
thatGI(43,,,,)
is trivialprovided
that the fibreof poo
£00 -> Boo
is anequivariant Eilenberg-MacLane
spaceK(7r, n).
We have included certain results
interpreted
forcomplexes
of groups.Although
these are not central to ourprincipal applications
we feelthey
are
suggestive
of a link that deserves furtherstudy.
The authors are
extremely
indebted to T. Porter for his many valu-able
suggestions.
1 Nonequivariant backgrounds
Throughout
this section spaces will be connected andpointed.
Then-th Gottlieb group
Gn(X)
of a spaceX,
defined in[7, 8]
for n >1,
isthe
subgroup
of the n-thhomotopy
group7rn(X) containing
all elements which can berepresented by
a map a : Sn - X from then-sphere
Snand such that a V
idx :
S’ V X -> X extends(up
tohomotopy)
toa map F : Sn x X -> X. The map F : sn x X --t X is called an
associated map for a : Sn-- X . If CX is the space of all
self-maps
of the
space X (with
the compact-opentopology)
then the evaluation map ev : CX -> X at the basepoint
iscontinuous,
and one can formthe group
Gn(X)
= Im(evn : 7rn(CX, idx)
-7rn(X)). Certainly,
bothgroups are
isomorphic
if X islocally
compact.Now compare the groups
Gn(X)
andOn(X)
for any space X.First,
recall some facts on
k-spaces (see
e.g.[6, Appendix]).
A subset A CX is said to be
compactly closed,
if for every compact space C and mapf :
C -3 X thepreimage f -1 (A)
is closed in C. A space is saidto be a
k-space
whenever all itscompactly
closed subsets are closed.The
property
ofbeing
ak-space
ispreserved by
closedsubspaces
andidentifications. All metric spaces and
CW-spaces
arek-spaces.
For anarbitrary space X
there is ak-ification kX,
the spacehaving
the sameunderlying
setas X,
but with thetopology given by taking
as closedsets the
compactly
closed sets with respect to thetopology
of X. Notethat the
identity
map kX -- X is continuous and a weakhomotopy equivalence. Moreover,
if Y is ak-space
then a mapf :
Y -4 X iscontinuous if and
only
if’ the mapf :
Y - kX is continuous. If X andY are
k-spaces
then theirproduct
X x Y(in
the category ofk-spaces)
is
given by k (X. xc Y),
where Xx c Y
is the Cartesianproduct (endowed
with the
product topology).
If at least one of the spaces X or Y islocally-compact
Hausdorff then X’x Y = X x, Y. Thecategory
of k-spaces is both
complete
andcocomplete,
and also hasmapping
spacessatisfying
theexponential
law. Moreprecisely,
for anyk-spaces
X andY,
themapping
spaceL(Y, X)
=k(C(Y, X)),
whereC(Y, X)
is thespace of all continuous maps Y - X with the
compact-open topology.
Proposition
1.1(1) If X is
ak-space
then there is anisomorphism
(2) If
X is any space then there existmonomorphisms
(3) If X
is aHav,sdorff
space then there is a commutativediagram
o f monomorphisms f or
any n > 1.Proof:
(1)
is a direct consequence of theexponential
law in thecategory
of
k-spaces.
(2)
For a map a : Sn -> X there is itslifting
a : sn --tkX,
since thesphere
S’ is compact. If F : SnXX -> X is an associated map for a thena
lifting
F : Sn x kX --+ kX of thecomposite
map S’ x kX - S" xX 4
X is an associated map for d.
Thus,
a mapGn(X) ---+ Gn(kX)
has beendefined.
Note that the canonical map kX --+ X
yields
anisomorphism
7rn (kX) 7fn(X)
and thediagram
commutes, where the vertical maps are
given by
inclusions.Hence,
the
top
mapGn(X) -> Gn(kX)
is amonomorphism. Analogously,
one can define a map
Gn (X ) -> Gn (kX)
and show that this is also amonomorphism.
(3)
If the space X is Hausdorff then an associated map F : Sn x X -a X for a : Sn -+ X determines anadjoint
map F : Sn --t CX and the rest follows from(2).
O
For
k-spaces X
and Y and a mapf :
X ->Y,
the evaluation mapev :
L(Y, X)
-> X at the basepoint
yo in Y induces ahomomorphism
for
any n >
1. Thesubgroups J(Y, X; f )
=eVl(1rl(L(Y,X),j)),
calledthe
Jiang subgroups
off
inL(Y, X), play
animportant
role in fixedpoint theory.
If X is a
CW-space
thenby [1]
there is a universal fibrationPoo :
Eoo
eBoo
with fibreF 00 homotopy equivalent
to X. Letaoo: 1rn+1(Boo) -+ 7r.(F.)
be theconnecting homomorphism
from thehomotopy
exact sequence of the fibration pm. Thefollowing
result ispresented
in[8].
Theorem 1.2
(1) If X
and Y arek-spaces
there there is an inclusionfor
any n >1,
a mapf
inL(Y, X)
and the basepoint
yo inY;
(2) If
X is aCW-space
thenGn(Foo)
=aoo(7rn+1 (Boo)) . Thus, for
any
fibration
8(7rn+l(B))
9Gn(X),
where 8 :7rn+1{B)
->1fn(X)
is theconnecting homomorphism frorri
thehomotopy
exact sequenceof
thisfibration.
Consequently, if Gn (X )
=0,
then every fibration over thesphere Sn+1
with fibre
X,
has ahomotopy
section. The groupGn(X)
is the intersec- tion of allsubgroups
of1fn(X)
which are theimage
of ahomomorphism
induced
by
an evaluation map. The groupGn(X)
is also the union of allsubgroups
of7rn(X)
each of them is theimage
of theconnecting
ho-momorphism arising
in thehomotopy
exact sequence of a fibration with fibre X.2 Gottlieb groups of diagrams
If o, : I e X is a
path
in X witho(0)
= xo andu(i)
= x, thenby [8]
the inducedisomorphism
ofhomotopy
groups a. :7rn(X, xl)
-+7r,,(X,xo)
restricts to anisomorphism a. : Gn(X, X1) Gn(X, xo).
Unfortunately,
as was shown in[8],
it is not true that any mapf :
X -+Y of spaces induces a map from
Gn(X)
toGn(Y).
Let now
rl(X)
be the fundamentalgroupoid
of the space X andGpd
the
category
of groups.Thus,
in thelight
of the resultabove,
onegets
a local coefficient system
such that
Gn(X)(x)
=Gn (X, x)
for allpoints x
in the space X andn > 1.
Let I be a small
category
with the set Ob(I)
as itsobjects
andX a contravariant functor from R into
k-spaces,
called anI- diagram
of spaces. The notions of
well-pointing, path-connectivity,
extensionproperty
and others can beeasily
extended from spaces into1-diagrams
of spaces in an obvious way and the
homotopy theory
of1-diagrams
. has been
developed
in[14].
Theobject-wise product
X x Y of twoII-diagrams
X and Y forms thecategorical product.
Observethat,
forthese two
1-diagrams,
the "hom-set"Nat (Y, X )
in thecategory
of I-diagrams
is contained in theproduct TIiEob (II) L(Y(i), X (i))
ofk-spaces.
Endow Nat
(Y, X)
with the k-ification of the inducedtopology
from theproduct TIiEOb(II) L(Y(i), X (i)). Moreover,
any setyields
ak-space
withrespect
to the discretetopology.
Define theTnapping I- diagram L (Y, X) by taking
for any
object
i inOb (1)
and in the obvious way onmorphisms
inI,
where
I(-, i)
is the Yoneda functor determinedby
i in Ob(1). Then,
for
1-diagrams X,
Y andZ,
there is abijection
natural in X and Y .
Consequently,
thecategory
ofIt-diagrams
is carte-sian closed and the evaluation map exp : Y X
L(Y, X)
-> X can bederived,
for any1-diagrams
X and Y.Given an
1-diagram X
of spaces, one can form the associatedfunda-
mental
category..II(U, X)
studied forexample
in[11,
p.144]
for the orbitcategory I = O(G)
of a group G and thengeneralized
in[14]
for anysmall
category
1. For a mapf :
X ->Y,
letrI (f ) : 11 (1, X) -> rI (1, Y)
be the induced functor. Our aim is to define a
II(II, X)-diagram
ofgroups
If Sn is the
n-sphere
with abase-point
so and A : Sn x X -3 X amap of
1-diagrams
such thatA |S0 X :
X -> X ishomotopic
to theidentity idx,
then for anyobject
i in Ob(II) and xi
inX (i),
onegets
an associated mapA(i) :
Sn xX(i) -+ X(i)
for the map ai : Sn ->X(i)
given by ai(s)
=A(i)(s, Xi)
for all s in sn. LetGn(X(i), Xi)
be thesubset of the
homotopy
group7rn(X (i), xi) containing
all elements whichcan be
represented by
those maps ai : S n ->X (i). Say
that A is anI-associated map. It is easy to see that
Gn(X (i), xi)
is asubgroup
not
only
of7rn(X(i), xi)
but also of the Gottlieb groupGn(X (i), xi).
If(cp, Q) : (i, xi)
-->(j, xj)
is a map inIT(II, X)
then there is an induced mapa) Gn(X(j), Xj) -+ Gn(X(i), Xi).
Thus one obtains aH (R, X)- diagram Gn(X)
of groupsgiven by Gn (X) (i, xi)
=Gn (X (i), xi)
forany
object (i, xi)
inIl (1, X).
Recall that a small
category
is called anEI-category ([11])
if anyendomorphism
in I is anisomorphism.
Note that for anyEl-category I
and an
I-diagram
X of spaces a skeletonIT’ (I, X)
of the associated fun- damentalcategory Il(ll, X)
is acategory
withoutloops. Then,
accord-ing
to[2],
thegeometric
realizationBll’ (I, X)
of the nerve ofIT’ (I, X) (called
theclassifying
space ofil’ (I, X))
is an orderedsimplicial
cellcomplex.
Thus one mayeasily
checkRemark 2.1 If I is an
EI-category
and X anII-diagram
of spaces then the restriction of the11(1, X)-diagram
to the skeleton
rl’(1, X) gives
rise to acomplex
of groupsG’n(BII’(I, X))
(see [2]
for thedefinition)
on the orderedsimplicial
cellcomplex
Brl’(1, X).
For an
II-diagram
Y of spaces, fix yi inY(i)
for any i inOb (1).
Then the
exponential
map exp :Y
XL(Y, X ) ->
Xgives
rise to anevaluation map
Any
mapf :
Y - X of1-diagrams composed
with theprojection Y x II (-, i)
--> Yyields
an element inL(X, Y)(i)
for any i in Ob(1)
andconsequently,
onegets
a basepoint
in themapping diagram L(X, Y)
denoted also
by f . Thus,
the inducedhomomorphism
occurs for any n > 1 and i in Ob
(I).
Thearguments given
forPropo-
sition 1.1 and the results
presented
in[8, Proposition
1-4 and Theorem1-7] generalize
without muchdifficulty
to the case of1-diagrams,
forinstance:
Theorem 2.2
(1) If X
and Y aTe1-diagrams of
spaces then there is aninclusion
for
any n >1, a
mapf :
Y -> Xof 1-diagrams
and apoint
yi inY(i)
with i in Ob
(1);
(2) If
r : Y - X is ahomotopy
retractof well-pointed
andpath
connected
II-diagrams
then there is a naturaltransformation
In
particular, if f :
Y -> X is ahomotopy equivalence of
well-pointed
andpath-connected 1-diagrams
with g : X - Y ahomotopy
inverse then there are
equivalences of diagrams
and
Proof:
(1)
It is astraightforward
extension ofProposition
1.1 to I-diagrams.
(2)
Let ai be inGn(X (i), xi)
with i in 1.By
thewell-pointness property
ofY,
one may assume that theimage r * ( ai)
of ai is in7rn(Y(i), r(xi)).
Set A : Sn x X -> X for an I-associated map to ai. Then define a map
by letting A’(s, y)
=r A (s, t(y)),
where t : Y -> X is aright homotopy
inverse to r : X -> Y. Then one can mimic the
proof
of[8, Proposition 1-4]
and use the extensionhomotopy property
of the inclusion * x Y -4 Sn x Y to find an associated map forr*(ai)
and show thatT*(ai)
is inGn(Y(i), r(xi)).
The rest of the
proof
goes over from thenonequivariant
case[8,
Theorem
1-7]
verbatim.0
Given
1-diagrams
X and Y of spaces theprojection
maps p : X X Y - X and q : X x Y -> Y determine a functor(II(p), Il(q)) : 11(1, X
XY) -> rI (1, X)
xrl (1, Y). Therefore,
one can concludeCorollary
2.3If X
and Y areII-diagrams of
spaces then there is anequivalences of diagrams
Gottlieb has shown in
[8]
thatG1(X)
93(7Ti(X)),
the center of thegroup
7f1(X),
for any space X andG1 (X)
=3(7ri(X)),
if X has thehomotopy type
of anaspherical CW-space
X. Note that an element ain
7Ti(X)
isin 3(7r1(X))
if andonly
if the map p : Z x7rl(X) -+ 7fl(X)
given by cp(n, g)
=a"g,
for(n, g)
in Z x7r1(X)
is ahomomorphism
ofgroups, where Z denotes the
integers.
Let now7r1 (X)
be theIT(R, X)- diagram
of fundamental groups, for an1-diagram
X of spaces. Thusone has the
following
extension of Gottlieb’s result.Proposition
2.4(1) If
X is anII-diagram of
spaces then any H- associated map A :81
x X -+ Xgives
a rise to a mapof II(II,X)-diagrams restricting
to theidentity
on7r1 (X);
(2) If
Xis.
an1-diagram of aspherical CW-spaces
then any mapÀ : Z x
7ri (X) -> 7r1 (X) of rl(l, X) -diagrams restricting
to theidentity
on
7r1 (X) gives
a rise to an I-associated map3 Gottlieb groups of equivariant spaces
Let now G be a finite group and X a
G-space.
For asubgroup
H C
G,
letX H
be thefixed-point subspace.
Then one can form thefollowing
indexcategory O(G, X) (called
in[3,
p.72]
the orbitcategory over X ;
the associated discretecategory no(G, X ),
called thecomponent category
overX,
has been studied in[3,
p.73]
and[11,
p.99]):
(1)
the setOb(O(G, X))
ofobjects
consists ofpairs (G/H, x)
withH a
subgroup
of G and x inX H,
(2) morphisms (G/H, x)
->(G / K, y)
aregiven by G-maps § : G/H --> G/K
such thatØ(Y) =
x,with § : X K -> X H
as the induced map of thefixed-point subspaces.
Consider the
O(G, X)-diagram X
of spaces such thatX(G/H, x) _ Xf
withXH
as thepath-connected component of XH consisting
of thepoint
x. IfrI(G, X)
denotes the fundamentalcategory rI(O(G, X), X)
studied
already
in theprevious
sectionthen,
inlight
of thatsection,
onegets n(G,X)-systems
of Gottlieb groupsGn(X)
for all n > 1.On the other
hand,
if Sn is then-sphere
with abase-point
so and the trivial action ofG,
and A : Sn x X - X aG-map
such thatAlsoxx : X --+ X
isG-homotopic
to theidentity
mapidx
then forany
subgroup
H C G and x inX H
onegets
an associated mapAH :
Sn x
X H -> X H
for the mapaH :
Sn -X H given by oH(S) = A H (S, X)
for all s in S n. Let
Gn(X H, x)
be the subset of thehomotopy
group7rn(X H, Xi) containing
all elements which can berepresented by
thosemaps
aH :
Sn -3XH.
It is easy to see thatGn(XH, X)
is asubgroup
notonly of 7rn (XH, x)
but also of the Gottlieb groupGn(XH,x),
and thereis a map
Gn(XH,x)
-->Gn (X, x)
determinedby
the inclusionXH
C X.Let
CGX
be the space(with
the compact-opentopology)
of all selfG-maps
of theG-space
X . Given asubgroup
H C G and apoint x
in
X H
consider the evaluation map evH :(CGX, idx)
->(X H, x) given by evH( f )
=f H (x)
for anyf
inCGX,
withfH
as the induced self map of thefixed-point subspace XH.
ThenGn(XH,x) = Im((evH)* : 7fn(CeX,idx)
--Y7fn(XH,x)) provided
that X is ak-space.
Observethat there is an
isomorphism 7fn(CeX,idx) = 7rn(auteX,idx)
for anyn > 0 and the monoid
autGX of
selfG-homotopy equivalences
of theG-space
X.Finally,
one obtains theII(G, X)-diagram Gn(X) given by
Gn (X) (GIH, x) =Gn(XH,x)
for anyobject (G/H,x)
inII(G,X).
Observe that the
category O(G)
of canonical orbits is an EI-category
andconsequently 0(G,X)
is also such acategory,
for anyG-space
X.Hence,
Remark 2.1yields
Remark 3.1 For any
G-space
X theII(G,X )-diagram Gn (X) gives
rise to a
complex
of groupsG’n(BII’(G,X))
on theclassifying
spaceBIl’ (G, X)
of a skeletonII’(G, X)
of thecategory n(l, X).
As may
readily
be seen, Theorem 2.2 .andCorollary
-2.3 can be re-formulated for
G-spaces
as well.Moreover,
forG-spaces
there is anappropriate
version ofProposition
2.4 and one may also stateProposition
3.2If X is
a G-CW space then there is anisomorphism of rl (G, X) diagrams Gn(X) = Gn(X) for
all n > l.Proof: Let X be a
G-CW-space
and X the associatedO(G, X)- diagram
of spaces. Then anyG-map
A : S’ x X -> Xdetermines,
in an obvious way, an
O(G, X)-map
A : Sn x X - X . ThenA(G/H, x) (s, x)
=AH (s, x)
for any s in S’ and x inX H. Consequently,
one
gets
a natural transformationBy
virtue of the Elmendorfclassifying
functor[4],
anO(G, X)-map
A : S’ x X -> X
yields
aG-map
A : S’ x X -X,
where A and A arerelated as above.
Thus,
onegets
a natural transformationwhich is an inverse to (D.
For a
G-space X,
apoint x
in X and the trivialsubgroup
E CG,
let
Gn (X, x) = Gn (X E, x)
for all n > 1. One caneasily
mimic thenonequivariant
case to shown that the groupG1(X, x)
coincides with theG-Jiang subgroup JG(X, x) (of
theidentity
map onX )
studiedby
P.Wong
in[16]
for Xbeing
a connected G-ENR. If H C G is asubgroup
of G then there is an action of the
Weyl
group WH =NH/H
on thefixed-point subspace XH
of aG-space
X. IfX/G
is its orbit space thenthe
quotient
map p : X ->X/G
restricts to pH :XH --t X H /W H.
Then one can prove the result.
Proposition
3.3(1) If X
is aG-space
thenfor
anysubgroup H
C Gthere is an inclusion
for
any n > 1 and x inX;
(2) If X is
aHausdorff
space with afree
G-action thenfor
any n > 1 and x in X . Thus there is anisomorphism
for
all n > 1.Proof:
(1)
isstraightforward
toverify.
To prove
(2)
one has to check theopposite
inclusion. For n > 1 it follows from the fact that thequotient
map p : X -X/G
is acovering.
For n =
1, take
an element a in the group p.7r,(X, x)flG1 (X/G, p(x))
and an associated map F :
S’
xX/G -> X/G.
If F’ : I xX/G - X/G
is the
corresponding cyclic homotopy
then alifting
F" : I x X -4 X of thecomposite
map F’ o(id,
xp) :
I x X -4X/G
is alsocyclic,
sincethe element a is in
p* 1f1 (X, x).
To
complete
theproof
one has to show that F" : I x X -> X is aG-map.
Take apoint (t, x)
in X xI,
anelement 9
in G and apath
Q : I -> X such that
Q(0)
= x andQ(1)
= gx. From alifting
of thecomposite
map F’ o(id | [o,t]
xp)
o(id | [o,t]
xu) : [0, t]
x I -X/G
theresult follows. D
Some calculations of
G1 (X)
for a free G-action on anacyclic
spaceX and its
relation
withequivariant
fixedpoint theory
werepresented
in
[5].
At the end of thissection, Proposition
3.2 is used topresent Example
3.4(1)
Consider the 2-dimensional torusT2
with a free ac- tion of thecyclic
groupZ/2.
Its orbit space is the KleinBottle,
K.Then,
as it was shown in[7], G1(K) = 3(7r1(K))
= Z the group ofintegers
and7r1 (’f2) n G1 (K)
= Z.By
virtue of the lastproposition
onegets
thatG1(T2)
= Z. On the other handG1(T2)
= Z x Z.(2)
J. Pak and M.H. Woo considered in[13]
thegeneralized
lensspaces
L2n+i (p)
to prove thatif n =
0, 1, 3,
for any other n.
Hence
G2n+1(S2n+1) = G2n+1(L2n+1(P))
(3)
Consider theproduct ’d’2
x I with I the unit interval and the mapø: T2 -+ T 2 given by O(x, y) = (x,00FF)
for(x, y)
inT2,
where 2 is theconjugation
of z as an element in the field ofcomplex
numbers. Take thequotient space X = T2
xI/
-, where theequivalent
relation isgiven by (x,
y,0) - (x, y,1)
for all(x, y)
inT2.
The involutions : T2 xI -4 T2 x I given by s(x,
y,t)
=(x, y,1 - t)
for(x, y)
in’Jr2
and t in I determinesa semi-free action of the
cyclic
groupZ2
on the space X. ThenXZ2
=T2
x{ 1/2 } U { [ ( 1, 1, 0)] -, [(- 1,1, o)]-, [( 1, -1, 0)], [(-1, -1, 0)] -}
and onegets
a fibre sequenceConsequently,
the space X isaspherical,
the canonical mapG1 (XZ2, x)
-G1 (X, x)
is amonomorphism
and the induced short exact sequence 0 - Z e Z -->7r1 (X, x)
- Z -> 0splits
with x as a basepoint
inT 2
x{1/2}. Thus,
the group 1fl(X, x)
is a semi-directproduct
of Z ED Zwith the
cyclic
groupZ,
where the action of Z on Z fl3 Z isgiven by g(m, n) = (- m, - n)
for any(m, n)
in Z EÐ Z and thegenerator g
of Z.The
presentation
of the group
7rl(X,X) yields
that thecyclic group (0, 0, g2)
> is con- tained in the center3(7rl (X, x)).
On the otherhand,
if(m,n,gk)
is in3(7fl(X, x)) then,
inparticular, (0, 0, g - 1) (m,
n,gk)(0, 0, g) = (m,
n,gk).
Therefore,
m = n = 0 and k is even since(0, 0, g)
is not in3(7r1 (X, x))
and,
in view of[7],
one can say thatG1(X,x) -
2Z.Finally, G1(XZ2,X) =
0 as asubgroup
of the trivial groupG1(XZ2,X)
nG1(X,x) = 0,
sinceG1(XZ2,x)
= Z EÐ Z.4 Gottlieb groups and equivariant fibra-
tions
For a finite group
G,
one refers to[15]
to recall some notions. Anequivariant fibrations
over aG-space
B is aG-map
p : E -> B which satisfies theG-covering homotopy property.
AG-map
p : E --+ B is aG- fibration
withfibre
F if for each 6 in B there is an action on the space F of theisotropy subgroup Gb
of b such thatp-1 (b)
isGb-homotopy equivalent
to F withrespect
to thegiven
action. For a G-fibrationp : E - B and a
subgroup H
CG,
in virtue of[9, Corollary 1] (cf.
also[12,
Theorem2.2])
there is an inclusionâ7rn+l(BGb,b)
CGn(FGb,X)
forall n > 1 and x in
p-1 (b),
where 8 is theconnecting homomorphism.
Moreover,
if1rn+1(BGb,b) g 7fn+l(BGb,b)
is thepreimage
of the sub- groupG, (F Gb, X)
9Gn(FGb,X) by
the map8,
then there is also aninclusion
a7rn+1(BGb,b)
gGn(FG6, x).
If F is a
compact CW-space
with some collection of actions on F ofsubgroups
of Gthen,
from[15,
Section2],
there is a G-fibration Poo :E00 -> Boo
with fibre Fbeing
universal for all G-fibrations with fibre F and over a "suitable" baseG-space. Moreover, pointed
G-fibrationsgive
rise to a
homotopy
functor. Then one mayapply
the sametechniques
as in
[1]
to derive(by
means of Brown’srepresentability result)
theexistence of a universal G-fibration Poo :
E00 -> Boo
for G-fibrations with fibre Fbeing
apointed CW-space.
Inparticular,
forpointed
G-fibrations with the trivial G-action on base spaces, the space
Boo
has thehomotopy type
of theclassifying
space B(autGF)
of the monoidautGF
of self
G-homotopy equivalences
of F.From now, let F be a
G-CW-space
with the collection of restrictedactions of all
subgroups
of G and pm :£00 --> Boo
thecorresponding
uni-versal G-fibration.
Then,
one has anequivariant
version of[9,
Theorem2].
Theorem 4.1
If
F is acompact G-CW -space
thenGn(PH, x) - U Im(8 : 7rn+ 1 (BH, p(x))
-1fn(FH,x)) for
anysubgroup
H C G and apoint x
inFH,
where the union runs over allG- fi brations
F ->E -4
B with Bsatisfying
theproperties
stated in[15].
Proof: From Section
3,
one knows that there is anisomorphism
Gn(FH, x) = Im((evH)* : 1fn(GGP,idF)
->1fn(FH,x)
for any n >1,
a
subgroup
H C G and apoint x
inF H
whereCGF
is the space of selfG-maps
of theG-space
F and evH :(CGX, idx)
-(X H, x)
the evaluation map at the
point x
inX H. But,
from the construc-tion of the universal G-fibration Poo :
£00 --t Boo
it follows that1fn+1(Boo, Poo(x)) = 1fn(CcF, idF).
Every
G-fibration F -E -4
B is obtainedby pulling
back theuniversal G-fibration poo
£00 -> Boo
via aclassifying G-map
B -Boo.
The
pullback provides,
inparticular,
a commutative squareTherefore,
anyconnecting
map a factorsthrough
the universal one and theproof
iscomplete.
D
For a
subgroup
H CG,
letp00H : EHoo
->BHoo
be the fibrationgiven by fixed-point subspaces and q :
E - B the fibration induced frompHoo : EHoo
-L3H
via a map cx : B -tBHoo .
Follow[9, 10]
togeneralize
some notations. For
k-spaces A
and B letL(A, B)
be the associatedmapping
space studied in Section 1 andL(A, B; Ø)
itspath
componentcontaining
amap
A - B. LetL*(E, EHoo, a)
be the space of fibrepreserving
maps/ :
E ->.6 H
which carry each fibreof q
into a fibreof
p§Hoo by
ahomotopy equivalence
and cover mapsf :
B -tL3Hoo
arehomotopic
to a : B --BHoo. By [9],
there is a continuous mapLemma 4.2
If
Poo :£00 --> Boo
is aG-fibration
universalfor
G-fibrations
withfibre
F and a: B -->L3’
a map with asubgroup
H C Gthen the
homotopy
groups7rn (L* (E, g’; a))
are trivialf or
all n > 1.Proof: As in the
proof
of[9,
Lemma2],
let X be acompact
CW-space and
g :
X ->L* (E, EHoo, a)
aquasi-continuous
map. Then thecommutative
triangle
with 0 = 4?g gives
rise to the commutativediagram
ofG-spaces
In the rest, one makes use of the
adjointness
of the functors(-)H
and- x
G/H
and then theproof
of[9,
Lemma2]
goes over to this caseverbatim.
D
Let
F(£Hoo)
denote thesubgroup
ofhomotopy
classes ofhomotopy equivalences f :
F - F which extend to fibrehomotopy equivalences
f : £Hoo - £Hoo. Then,
one can make use of theprevious
lemma andmimic the
nonequivariant procedure presented
in[9,
Section5]
to proveTheorem 4.3
If
Poo :£00 -> Boo is
aG-fibration
universalfor
G-fibrations
withfibre
F then there is anisomorphism G1 (BHoo, b)
=6(£Hoo)
for
anysubgroup H
C G.Let now
0(G)
be thecategory
of canonical orbits associated with the group G and 7r an0(G)-diagram
of abelian groups.Then, by [4],
for any
positive integer n > 1,
there is aG-space K((7r, n)
such thatthe
subspace K(7r, n)H
offixed-points
is anEilenberg-Maclane
space of type(7r (G / H), n) .
Let Poo :
6,,
-Boo
be a universal G-fibration for G-fibrations with fibre F =K(7r,n). Then,
in view of Theorem 4.2 and[9],
the Gottlieb groupsG1(BHoo, b)
are trivial for allsubgroups
H C G and b inBl.
Onthe other
hand,
there is an inclusionG1 (B’, b) 9 G1 (B’, b). Thus,
onehas shown an
equivariant
version of[9, Corollary
1 in Section5].
Corollary
4.4If
Poo :£00 -> Boo is a
universalG-fibration for
G-fibrations
withfibre
F= K(7r,n)
then theO(G, 8,,0) -system G1(Boo) of
Gottlieb groups is trivial.
References
[1]
G.Allaud,
On theclassification of fiber
spaces, Math. Z. 92(1966),
110-125.
[2]
M.Bridson,
A.Haefliger,
MetricSpaces of non-positive curvature,
Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften319, Springer- Verlag,
Berlin(1999).
[3]
T. tomDieck, Transformation Groups,
Walter deGruyter,
Berlin-New Your
(1987).
[4]
A.Elmendorf, Systems of fixed point
sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.277
(1983),
275-284.[5]
P.L.Fagundes,
D.L.Gonçalves,
Fixedpoint
indicesof equivariant
maps
of
certainJiang
spaces,Topol.
Methods Nonlinear Anal.14,
no. 1
(1999),
151-158.[6]
R.Fritsch,
R.A.Piccinini,
Cellular structures intopology,
Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge (1990).
[7]
D.H.Gottlieb,
A certainsubgroup of
thefundamental
group, Amer.J. of Math. 87
(1965), 840-856.
[8]
Evaluationsubgroups of homotopy
groups, Amer. J.of Math.
91 (1969), 729-756.
[9]
2014 , Onfibre
spaces and the evaluation map, Ann. of Math.87
(1968),
42-56.[10]
2014, Correction to "Onfibre
spaces and the evaluationmap",
Ann. of Math. 87(1968),
641-642.[11]W. Lück, Transformation
groups andalgebraic K-theory,
Lect.Notes in Math.
1408, Springer-Verlag (1989).
[12]
J.Oprea,
Gottlieb groups, groupactions, fixed points
and rationalhomotopy,
Lecture Notes Series29,
Seoul(1995).
[13]
J.Pak,
M.H.Woo,
Gottlieb groupsof
lens spaces, Bull. Korean Math. Soc.36,
no. 3(1999),
621-627.[14]
Y.Shitanda,
Abstracthomotopy theory
andhomotopy theory of functor category,
Hiroshima Math. J. 19(1989),
477-497.[15]
S.Waner, Equivariant classifying
spaces andfibrations,
Trans.Amer. Math. Soc. 250
(1980),
384-405.[16]
P.Wong, Equivariant
Nielsennumbers,
Pac. J. Math. 159(1993),
153-175.
Faculty
of Mathematics and Informatics NicholasCopernicus University
Chopina 12/18,
87-100 Torun Polande-mail:
marek@mat.uni.torun..pI Department
of Mathematics-IMEUniversity
of Sao PauloCaixa Postal 66.281-AG. Cidade de Säo. Paulo 05315-970 Sao
Paulo,
Brasile-mail: