• Aucun résultat trouvé

Public participation in environmental stewardship after MOOCs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Public participation in environmental stewardship after MOOCs"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Workshop on Integrated Learning Analytics of MOOC Post-Course Development. Workshop at the 7th In- ternational Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, 13-17 March 2017, p. 122-124.

Copyright © 2017 for the individual papers by the papers' authors. Copying permitted for private and acade- mic purposes. This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors.

Public Participation in Environmental Stewardship after MOOCs

Yue Li1, Marianne Krasny1, Yuan Wang2, Lei Zhang3

1 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

2 Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

3 Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

yl983@cornell.edu; mek2@cornell.edu; elle.wang@columbia.edu;

lei-zhan14@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn

ABSTRACT. The proposed research is to examine MOOC students’ environ- mental stewardship practice in a long term after the course and how they influ- ence people around them to join practice in different cultural and language con- text. The research is based on an environment related MOOC which will be of- fered on edX in the US and XuetangX in China, and use social media including Facebook and WeChat as an informal discussion platform for students to interact.

We propose to use mixed-methods including surveys, interviews, content analy- sis and social network analysis to measure post-course effect. The results will help us understand the long-term impact of environment related MOOCs on stu- dents’ environmental stewardship practice after and beyond the course, and how the practice differs across culture and language.

Keywords: Massive open online courses; interactive learning; social media;

post-course practice; environmental behavior

1 Introduction

In the context of global environmental change and climate change in particular, engag- ing the public in environmental stewardship practice is especially important to address equity, climate change, and other social and environmental issues. A Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) on civic ecology provides an opportunity to engage individ- uals and communities in environmental stewardship [1] globally. Thus, Cornell Uni- versity is offering a civic ecology MOOC on edX and xuetangX, and uses social media such as Facebook and WeChat as an informal discussion platform for students to share ideas and practice. The MOOC project is based on the hypothesis that social influence through networking plays a key role in forming individuals’ behavior [2]. However,

(2)

123

little is known how students change their practice in a long term after the course and how they influence people around them to join environmental stewardship.

Online courses provide an opportunity for students exchange ideas and practices through interactions. The online interactions can be categorized into participant-con- tent, participant-participant and participant-instructor interactions [3]. Such online in- teractions could lead to formation of online communication networks [4] and offline collaboration networks [5] among students. Through these interactions, communities of practice [6] may form for students to exchange information about their practices. For example, research found that environmental education professionals in an online course adapted or intend to adapt learned ideas into their environmental education practice [7], and some professionals changed their practice to some extent by the end of the course [5]. In addition to course platforms, social networking sites such as Facebook and Twit- ter encourage interactions among students. Research has found that such informal in- teractions could enhance the learning experience and provide a space to post personal feelings or reflections on learning [8]. Further, the influence of these interactions may vary depending on cultural [9] and language background [10]. Much research has fo- cused on students’ learning process and short-term outcomes. Recently research started exploring post-course development such as learning transfer beyond the course [11]

and career advancement [12].

2 Research Questions

The proposed research is to examine MOOC students’ environmental stewardship prac- tice in a long term after the course and how they influence people around them to join practice in different cultural and language context. The specific research questions in- clude: 1) How do MOOC students apply learned theoretical principles to environmental stewardship practice? 2) How do MOOC influence peers to join stewardship practice?

3) How do environmental stewardship practices differ between the US and China?

3 Methods

We propose three approaches to measure long-term impact of MOOC on students’ en- vironmental stewardship. First, we will conduct content analysis to examine students’

posts and comments on course discussion board and social media (Facebook and WeChat). We will also analyze students’ final project report to identify application of learned principles to their practice. Further, we will conduct social network analysis to examine students’ interactive learning process on different platforms and social media, and post-course networks through which students exchange ideas and practice. Then we will conduct Simulation Investigation for Empirical Network Analysis (SIENA) to examine peer-effect [13]. Third, we will conduct surveys and interviews to examine students’ environmental stewardship practice after taking the MOOC, and will monitor social media (Facebook and WeChat) after the course to investigate students’ activities beyond the course. The results of the study will not only advance our knowledge of

(3)

124

online learning, but also help us understand how civic ecology principles work in dif- ferent cultural and language contexts. Further, the study will provide strategies to en- gage public in environmental stewardship practice through participating in MOOCs.

4 Acknowledgements

The massive open online course that is the subject of this research was supported by funds from Cornell University. We thank edX and xuetangX for providing platforms for running the courses in the US and China.

5 References

1. Krasny, M. E., and Tidball K. G. 2015. Civic Ecology: Adaptation and Transformation from the Ground Up. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

2. Friedkin, N. E., and E. C. Johnsen. 1999. Social Influence Networks and Opinion Change.

Advances in Group Processes. 16:1-29.

3. Moore M. G. 1989. Editorial: Three Types of Interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education 3(2): 1-7.

4. Kellogg, S. B., Booth, S., & Oliver, K. 2014. A Social Network Perspective on Peer Sup- ported Learning in MOOCs for educators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 263-289.

5. Li, Y. 2017. Professional Networks and Practice Change in Environmental Education. Doc- toral Thesis. UMI Order No. 10168353. Cornell University.

6. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

7. Li, Y., Krasny, M. E., and Russ, A. 2016. Interactive Learning in an Urban Environmental Education Online Course, Environmental Education Research, 22(1), 111-128. DOI = http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.989961.

8. Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Kang, J., Harron, J., & Liu, S. 2016. Examining the Use of Facebook and Twitter as an Additional Social Space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Edu- cation, 30(1), 14-26. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1120584.

9. Liu, Z., Brown, R., Lynch, C., Barnes, T., Baker, R., Bergner, Y., McNamara, D. 2016.

MOOC Learner Behaviors by Country and Culture: An Exploratory Analysis. In Proceed- ings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, 127-134.

10. Colas, J. F., Sloep, P. B., & Garreta-Domingo, M. 2016. The Effect of Multilingual Facili- tation on Active Participation in MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4).

11. Chen, G., Davis, D., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.J. 2016. Learning Transfer: Does It Take Place in MOOCs? An Investigation into the Uptake of Functional Programming in Practice. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, 409-418.

12. Wang, Y., Paquette, L., Baker, R. 2014. A Longitudinal Study on Learner Career Advance- ment in MOOCs. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(3), 203-206.

13. Snijders, T. A. 2001. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological methodology, 31(1), 361-395.

(4)

125

Références

Documents relatifs

Certainly the time limits and kinds of projects students develop do not al- low them to go practically through all the management activities and artifacts considered in

The present experi- ment is designed to test how long after death DNA can still be obtained with routine DNA amplifications when picking dead for- aminifers instead of living ones

This could be associated with “auspicious selection” of land into the Scheme, with greater “value for money” provided by the higher entry of land with lower agricultural

To evaluate these hypotheses our empirical research focuses on Scheme selection allowing both for the impact of spatially differentiated payment rates (reflecting

Secondly, despite the dominance of the biodiversity stewardship tool in South Africa, the practice of stewardship appears to be shifting to align with the most

An agreement was finalized between Federica and the International Association of Political Science Students (IAPSS) in October 2018, setting out plans to consolidate

Weighing the pros and cons, we conclude that, as long as the signaling function is not wiped out, the overall impact of controversy on sustainability

and their related diversity metrics to the data curation strategy, we used the variance of each diversity 283. estimate, obtained across the 256 community matrices and for