A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
H ANS T ILGNER
A class of Lie and Jordan algebras realized by means of the canonical commutation relations
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 14, n
o2 (1971), p. 179-188
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1971__14_2_179_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1971, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
179
A class of Lie
and Jordan algebras realized by
meansof the canonical commutation relations
Hans TILGNER Institut für theoretische Physik (I)
der Universitat Marburg.
Inst. Henri Poincaré, Vol. XIV, n° 2, 1971,
Section A :
Physique théorique.
ABSTRACT. - If one introduces the
totally symmetrized
monomialsof
the q
and p as a basis in theWeyl algebra,
which is the associativealgebra generated by
the canonical commutationrelations,
thepolynomials
offirst and second
degree
can begiven
Lie and Jordanalgebra
structureswhich are
isomorphic
to well known matrixalgebras.
As anapplication
the relation between formal real Jordan
algebras,
domains ofpositivity
and
symmetric
spaces is used togive
a classification of the seconddegree Hamiltonians,
which is invariant under invertible linear transformations ofthe q
and p, and has an influence on therepresentation theory
of thesolvable
spectrum generating
groups of these Hamiltonians described in[1]
and[2]. Finally
the relation of theWeyl algebra
to the Cliffordalgebra
over anorthogonal
vector space isgiven,
and the minimal embedd-ing
of anarbitrary
Liealgebra
into theWeyl algebra
is discussed.RESUME. -
Quand
on introduit les monomes totalementsymetrises
des q et p comme base de
l’algèbre
deWeyl, qui
estl’algèbre
associativegeneree
par les relationscanoniques
decommutation,
lespolynomes
dedegre
un et deux ont des structuresd’algebre
de Lie et de Jordanqui
sontisomorphes
a desalgebres
matricielles bien conn ues. Commeapplication,
la relation entre les
algebres
de Jordan formellesreelles,
les domaines depositivite
et les espacessymetriques
est utilisee pour classifier les Hamil-_toniens de
degre
deux. Cette classification est invariante par des transfor-mations lineaires et inversibles des q et p. Elle a des
consequences
pour la theorie desrepresentations
des groupes solubles de ces Hamiltoniensqui
sont decrits dans[1]
et[2].
Finalement on donne la relation del’algèbre
de
Weyl
al’algèbre
de Clifford d’un espace vectorielorthogonal
et ondiscute
l’injection
minimale d’unealgebre
de Lie arbitraire dansl’algèbre
de
Weyl.
1 THE WEYL ALGEBRA
A real
symplectic
r;ector space is apair (E, a)
of a finite dimensional vector space E over the field R and anon-degenerate,
skewsymmetric,
bi-linear form a on E.
Necessarily
we have dim(E)
= 2n. Withoutloss of
generality [1]
we can choose the matrix of a in thespecial
formGiven the associative tensor
algebra
ten(E)
overE,
we denoteby
0its
multiplication, by
1 itsidentity element,
andby (6( x,
the two-sided ideal
given by
all elementsX(a(x,
where x, y E E c ten
(E)
andX,
Y c ten(E).
Then the infinite dimen- sional associativeW eyl algebra weyl (E, a)
is definedby
A basis of
weyl (E, a)
isgiven by
theidentity
element 1 and thetotally symmetrized
monomials of the basis elements qi, ..., qn,pl,
...,p"
of E.For the
proofs
of this statement and thefollowing
ones see[7].
Givenxk E E c
weyl (E, cr)
we write(~
denotes thepermutation
group of iobjects).
Let thesymmetrization
Abe defined first
only
for the monomials and then onweyl (E, a) by
linearcontinuation. Then A is a
mapping
ofweyl (E, a)
ontoitself,
which does notdepend
on the choice of the basis of E. For all choices2n+i-1 the element ... x
i defined by (?)
is an element -of the(2n
+ 1I -I)
dimensional vector space
AWt, spanned by
thetotally symmetrized
mono-A CLASS OF LIE AND JORDAN ALGEBRAS 181
mials of
degree
i. We have the direct vector space sumdecomposition
with
AWo
= R1 and E. One proves that(here [ , ]-
denotes the commutator inweyl (E, cr)),
where the summationover I can be
dropped only
if i or kequals
zero, one or two. We havethe Lie
algebras
~1@ E, AW2,
and Rl@
E @AW2
inweyl (E, a).
From
(3)
and(4)
follows that the center of theWeyl algebra
consists of themultiples
of theidentity
elementonly.
In the form
(1)
theWeyl algebra
wasalready
consideredby
I.Segal [3].
2. THE LIE ALGEBRA
OF SYMMETRIZED POLYNOMIALS OF SECOND DEGREE The commutation relations of the Lie
algebra (AW2, [ , ]-)
are summa-rized in
(5) [xx, zz] -
=4a(x, z)Axz
x,z E E,
since
by polarizing
this twice(i.
e.by substituting
Y I-~ x + y and z H-,; + z)
we get the commutation relations of the
n(2n
+1)
basis elementspipk, Aqipk
ofAW2.
Froma(ad (Axy)v, z)
+a(v,
ad(Axy)z)
= 0 followsthat the 2n x 2n matrices ad
(Z) IE (ad
restricted toE, Z E AW 2)
are inthe
symplectic
matrix Liealgebra,
theunderlying
vector space of whichwe denote
by
ForZ E AW2,
the linearmapping
ad is aLie
algebra monomorphism.
A dimensionalargument
then shows that thismapping
is anisomorphism
of the Liealgebras (AW2, [ , ]-)
and(Ef, [,]-).
So(5)
are the commutation relations of apolynomial
rea-lization of the
symplectic
Liealgebra.
Given any R E the 2n x 2n matrix 5R is
symmetric,
andconversely given
anysymmetric
2n x 2n matrix S we have JS E So the linearmapping
5R is abijection
of the vectorspace ~
onto then(2n
+1 )
dimensional vector
spaced
ofsymmetric
2n x 2n matrices[4,
p.911].
The
composition
S T S’ = SYS’- S’.5S makes ~ a Liealgebra (.91, T)
which,
because ofis
isomorphic
to thesymplectic
Liealgebra.
We may summarize the relation between the various realizations of thesymplectic
Liealgebra by
thefollowing diagram
where the
isomorphism
S will be defined below.3. THE JORDAN ALGEBRA
OF SYMMETRIZED POLYNOMIALS OF SECOND DEGREE The anti-commutator of two elements of
AW2
is not inAW2 again.
To make
AW2
a Jordanalgebra (for
the notion anddescription
of Jordanalgebras
see[5]),
we use the abovediagram :
thesymmetric
matrices forma Jordan
algebra
under anticommutationThe
composition
makes the vector space ~ a Jordan
algebra (J2f, I)
too, which because ofis
isomorphic
to[ , ]+).
Itsidentity
element is - Y.To
get
a Jordanalgebra composition
onAW,
which isisomorphic
to
JL),
wepolarize
+ y and z + z inDefining
then on the generators ofAW2
and
continuating linearly
onAW2,
we get, because ofthe desired
polynomial
realization of the Jordanalgebra
ofsymmetric
A CLASS OF LIE AND JORDAN ALGEBRAS 183
matrices. Its
identity
element isjust
the Hamiltonian of the harmonicoscillator _
with ad
(Ho) IE
= - ~- The relation(8)
is the Jordananalog
of the com-mutation relations
[1 ; (65)]
of the Liealgebra (AW, [,]-). The
abovediagramm
is valid for the Jordanalgebras
as well if one substitutes the Lie bracketsby
thecorresponding
Jordancompositions.
4. REALIZATION OF AN.D
u(n)
INAW2
Sometimes in
physics
a different notation is used[8] [9] [10].
Tc ~~elatethis one to ours we introduce the formal row
(qi,
..., q~,pl, . , . , pn)=zT,
z
being
thecorresponding
column.Using
then matrixmultiplication,
for every Z E
AW2,
defines a 2n x 2n matrix
S(Z),
which issymmetric
andactually equal
to~ ad
(Z) IE.
The linearmapping 2 ~ AW2
gives
the inverse Liealgebra isomorphism
of theisomorphism
ad( ) IE
described in
2,
and the linearmapping / - AW 2
gives
the inverse Jordanalgebra isomorphism
of that one described in 3.The matrix Lie
algebras gl(n,
resp.u(n)
are embedded into the sym-plectic
Liealgebra
matrices of ~by
here G is an
arbitrary,
L an skewsymmetric,
K asymmetric n
x n matrix(i.
e. L + iK is skewhermitic). ( 11 )
definesisomorphisms
of thesealge-
bras
(and
of theirsub-Lie-algebras)
intosub-vector-spaces of A W 2’ spanned
by
thepolynomials Aqipk
resp.qipk - qkpi
and qiqk +[8] [9] [10].
For G skew
symmetric
orvanishing
K in( 13), ( 11 ) gives
amapping
of theorthogonal
matrix Liealgebra
in n dimensions onto the vector space of theqipk -
Moregeneral
weget by ( 11 )
anisomorphism
of any matrixsub-Lie-algebra
from 2 onto somesub-Lie-algebra of AW2.
Ana-logous
results hold for the Jordanalgebras
and themapping (12).
5. CLASSIFICATION
OF SECOND DEGREE HAMILTONIANS
For the
following
we need some facts on Jordanalgebras.
Let[ , ]+
denote the
product
of a Jordanalgebra J,
andL(a)b
=[a, b] +
for a,b E J, P(a)
=2L(a)2 - L(a2). Suppose
J isspecial,
i. e. J can be embeddedinto an associative
algebra
with theproduct being
the anti-commutator.Then
P(a)b
= aba. If J has anidentity
element e, the set of invertibleelements of J
(an
element a of J is invertible iff detP(a) # 0, [5] [11] with
the
multiplication
is a
symmetric
manifold[11,
p.68],
i. e. apair
of a manifold Inv(J)
and acomposition
Inv(J)
x Inv(J)
- Inv(J),
denotedby
adot, fulfilling
thefollowing
identities(a)
a . a = a(b) a - (a - b)
= b(c) a’(~’ c) == (a-b)-(a-c)
.(d)
every a has aneighbourhood
U such that a-b = bimplies b
= afor all b in U.
The
tangential
space in e of the« pointed » symmetric
manifold(Inv (J),., e)
can be identified with J
[11,
p.81].
A Jordan
algebra
is calledformal
real if the bi-linear form traceL([a, b]+)
is
positiv
definit. For such a Jordanalgebra
theconnectivity
compo- nent of Inv(J) containing e
isjust
the domainof positivity
Pos(J),
whichby
definition is exp(J) [12;
p.168].
The structure group of J Struc(J)
is the group of all those invertible linear transformations W of J with
P(Wa)
=WP(a)W ~
where W= is
uniquely
determinedby
W. For invertible a we haveP(a)
E Struc(J).
Thesubgroup
of Struc(J) leaving
Pos(J)
invariant is called Aut Pos(J),
and theautomorphism
group of J isgiven by
the setof all elements A E Struc
(J)
with Ae = e. We have the inclusions Aut(J)
c Aut Pos(J)
c Struc(J).
185
A CLASS OF LIE AND JORDAN ALGEBRAS
Let us now
give
the results for thespecial
case of the formal real Jordanalgebra (d, [ , ]+)
ofsymmetric
2n x 2n matrices. Inv(d)
isgiven by
all invertible
symmetric matrices,
Posby
allpositiv
definit ones.Every
S E Pos(d)
can bedecomposed
into S =QTQ
for someQ
EGI(2n, R)
and
conversely
we haveQTQ
E Pos(d)
for allQ
EGl(2n,
This showsthat Pos
(~/)
itself is asymmetric
manifold under the dotproduct.
Weget
the various otherconnectivity components
of Inv(d) by multiplying
Pos
(j2/) by
one of those22n diagonal
matricesIi having only
± 1 on theirdiagonals.
These matrices form a discretesymmetric
spaceC(22n)
underthe dot
product (the
axiom(d)
has to bedropped)
and we havewhere
(x)
denotes a semidirectproduct
ofsymmetric
spaces, Pos(d) being
the ideal. If Nul(j2/)
denotes the set of zero divisors of(.>1’, [ , ]+)
we have the
decomposition
of ~.
The
automorphism
group of j~ isgiven by
the set of transformations~/ f--+
RTdR
fororthogonal R,
Aut Pos(d)
isgiven by
the same trans-formations with Red
(2n,
and Struc(d)
isgiven by
all W E Gl(j~)
such that + W e Aut Pos
(d).
In addition every W E Aut Pos has thespecial representation P(R1)P(R2)P(S)
withS E Pos (d)
andR1, R2 orthogonal, R12 - R22 = id2n.
Aut Pos(d)
actstransitively
on Pos(d)
and leaves the
decomposition (14)
invariant.Let us now transfer the
decomposition (14) by
means of the isomor-phism (12)
toAW2.
Given Me Struc(AW2),
weapply
S to thedefining
relation of Struc
(AW2),
and get because of S oP(Z)
=P(S(Z))
o S for allZ E AW2,
with the definitionW(M)S(Z)
=S(MZ)
a
monomorphism W(M),
Struc(A W 2) --+
Struc(d).
The abovespecial representation
of Aut Pos(d) (and
therefore of Struc(d) too)
then shows that it is even
surjectiv.
This provesS(MZ) =
+WTS(Z)W
for all Me Struc
(AW2)
and some W E GI(2n, R). Applying (10)
to thisresult we have
This establishes the invariance of the
decomposition (14)
forA W 2
underexactly
the transformations of Aut Pos(AW2),
which are those inducedby
the invertible linear transformations of E.The Hamiltonians of the non-relativistic free
particle (which
was treatedin
[1, § 10])
and the relativistic freeparticle (which
was treated in[2])
areelements of Nul whereas the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscil- lator is in Pos
(AW2).
We expect that therepresentation theory
of thespectrum generating
solvable groups described in[1]
and[2]
differs accord-ing
to whichpart
of thedecomposition (14)
forAW2
the Hamiltonian inquestion belongs
to; for instance in the sense that therepresentations
are labeled
by
a continuous variable if the Hamiltonian is in Nul(AW~),
and
by
a discrete one if it is in Inv(AW2).
6. THE RELATION OF THE WEYL ALGEBRA TO THE CLIFFORD ALGEBRA
The vector space E 3 can be made a Jordan
algebra
too: sincea(fx, y)
is the Euclidean bi-linear form onE,
the definitiongives
the 2n + 1 dimensionalClifford
Jordanalgebra [12 ;
p.171],
theuniversal
enveloping algebra
of which is theClifford algebra
over the Euclidean vector space E
[13,
p.367] [14].
Most results of this article have theiranalog
in the Cliffordalgebra, though
its associativemultiplication
is not related to that one ofweyl (E, a);
for instance the Cliffordalgebra
has zero divisorscontrary
to theWeyl algebra.
7. MINIMAL REALIZATION OF LIE ALGEBRAS IN THE WEYL ALGEBRA
Since every finite dimensional Lie
algebra
has a faithful finite dimensio- nalrepresentation (theorem
ofAdo)
we getby (13)
and themapping ( 11 )
an
embedding
of every Liealgebra
intoAW2.
But ingeneral
this embedd-ing
is not minimal. Take for instance the conformal Liealgebra
in n dimen-sions. It is realized in
weyl (E, 0-) by the ^ 1 n2 + ~ 3 n
+ 1 generators187
A CLASS OF LIE AND JORDAN ALGEBRAS
and
isomorphic
to somenoncompact
form of so(n
+2,
The smallestfaithful
representation
of the conformal Liealgebra
is therefore n + 2 dimensional.Using
then(13)
and(11)
for theembedding
intoAW2,
we need a
2(n
+2)
dimensionalsymplectic
vector space. But( 16)
showsthat
already
a 2n dimensionalsymplectic
vector space suffices if we useE 0
AW2
0A W 3. So, given
anarbitrary
real Liealgebra
2 we may state theproblem
in thefollowing
form: let denote the minimalinteger n
with(I) n
= dim E(II)
2 isisomorphic
to somesub-Lie-algebra
ofweyl (E, cr).
In this form the
problem
was stated firstby
M. Koecher[6,
p.363],
see also
[7], though
for a differentpolynomial algebra.
Theexample
of the conformal Lie
algebra
shows thatm(2)
can be smaller than the smallest dimension of a(symplectic) representation
space.Let us remark that there is a natural
isomorphism
ofweyl (E, 6)
intoan infinite dimensional Lie
algebra
of transformations ofE,
such thatexactly
the elements ofAW2
aremapped
onto linear transformations ofE,
whereas the other elements are
mapped
onto non-linear ones. Thus the aboveproblem
ofminimalizing
the dimension of Ecorresponds
tothe
dropping
of thelinearity requirement
of the transformations. We intend to come back to thequestion
ofnon-linearity
elsewhere.The author is
indepted
to Professor H. D. Dobner and Doctor H. K.Helwig
for usefuldiscussions,
and to Doctor O. Loos for the communi- cation of thedecomposition (14).
This work wassupported
inpart by
the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft.
REFERENCES
[1] H. TILGNER, A class of solvable Lie groups and their relation to the canonical forma- lism. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Section A : Physique théorique, t. 13, n° 2, 1970.
[2] H. TILGNER, A spectrum generating nilpotent group for the relativistic free particle.
Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré, Section A : Physique théorique, t. 13, n° 2, 1970.
[3] I. SEGAL, Quantized differential forms. Topology, t. 7, 1968, p. 147-172.
[4] J. WILLIAMSON, The exponential representation of canonical matrices. Am. J. Math.,
t. 61, 1939, p. 897-911.
[5] M. KOECHER, Jordan algebras and their applications. University of Minnesota notes,
Minneapolis, 1962.
[6] M. KOECHER, Gruppen und Lie-Algebren von rationalen Funktionen. Math. Z.,
t. 109, 1969, p. 349-392.
[7] M. KOECHER, An elementary approach to bounded symmetric domains. Rice University, Houston, Texas, 1969.
[8] J. SCHWINGER, On angular momentum, In Quantum theory of angular momentum.
Edited by L. C. Biedenharn, H. van Dam, Academic Press, New York, 1965.
[9] C. P. ENZ, Representation of group generators by boson or fermion operators.
Application to spin perturbation. Helv. Phys. Acta, t. 39, 1966, p. 463-465.
[10] H. D. DÖBNER and T. PALEV, Realizations of Lie algebras by rational functions of canonical variables. In « Proceedings of the IX. Internationale Universitätswochen für Kernphysik, 1970 in Schladming, Austria ». Springer Wien, to appear, 1970.
[11] O. LOOS, Symmetric spaces, I : General theory. Benjamin New York, 1969.
[12] O. LOOS, Symmetric spaces, II : Compact spaces and classification. Benjamin, New York, 1969.
[13] S. LANG, Algebra. Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass, 1965.
[14] C. CHEVALLEY, The construction and study of certain important algebras. The Inter-
national Society of Japan, Tokio, 1955.
Manuscrit reçu le 21 septembre 1970.
Directeur de la publication : GUY DE DAMPIERRE.
IMPRIMÉ EN FRANCE
DEPOT LEGAL 1795 a. IMPRIMERIE BARNEOUD S. A. LAVAL, N° 6170. 3-1971.