• Aucun résultat trouvé

Draft report of Committee I: prepared by the rapporteur geodesy and hydrography

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Draft report of Committee I: prepared by the rapporteur geodesy and hydrography"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

UNITED NATIONS

ECONOMIC

AND SOCIAL COUNCIL

/

23 September 1966

Originals ENGLISH

ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR AFRICA Second United Nations Regional

Cartographic Conference for Africa

Tunis (Tunisia), 12-2U September 1966

DOCUMENTS OFHCH

I L E til

■> TO BE TAKEN OUT

DRAFT REPORT OF COMMITTEE I

prepared by the Rapporteur GEODESY AMD HYDROGRAPHY

TU-137

\.

(2)

DR&FT REPORT OF COMMITTEE I prepared by the Rapporteur

GEODESY AND HYDROGRAPHY - -■ --

1. The terms of reference of the.Committee I were to study, item 13 of.the

agenda: Technical questions on basic mapping with particular reference to (a)

geodesy and (b) hydrography.

2. The Committee elected the following, officers:

,Vice-President: Mr. M.A- Kengebele (Congo Kinshasa)

Rapporteurs Mr. R.J. Simpson (Ghana)

3. The Committee considered the technical papers and held discussions on the following subjects: flare triangulation and satellite triangulation; airborne methods, conventional geodetic surveying, connexion of national levelling networks and common geodetic datum for Africa.

Geodetic flare triangulation

k* The Committee considered the following papers:

(a) Geodetic flare triangulation (France) - E/CN ,ll|/CART/l56

(b) Geodetic connexion between France and North Africa by simultaneous

sighting of the Echo I artificial satellite (France) - E/ON.ll|/CART/l£7

(c) Satellite triangulation (USA) - E/CM .11±/CART/191

(d) Ihe U.S. Army sequential collation of range geodetic satellite

system (USA) - E/CM .llt/CART/195

(e) SECOR electronic satellite tracking system (USA) - E/CN.lVCART/221

5. With regards to Flare triangulation it was reported that this method had been successfully used in Denmark and in Norway in summer and early spring,

and in the Azores. The American Geodetic Survey employed the metho'd in the

(3)

E/CM.li;/CART/C.l/2

Page 2

Bahamas - Florida connexion, but the precision obtained was not satisfactory.

It was pointed out that the method was best suited to an extensive area under favourable conditions if it was to be economical and accurate.

Conventional Geodesy

6. The Committee considered the following'papers:

(a) Astro-geodetic activities in the "Institut fur Angewandte

Geodasie" (Germany) - E/CN .iVCART/201

(b) Scale checking in first-order triangulation nets (Germany) -

E/CH.3V CART/202 " '

(c) Simultaneous determinations of longitude and latitude in

Africa with the prismatic astrolabe (Germany) - E/dl .lii/CART/203 (d) Electromagnetic distance measurement in the US Geological Survey •

(USA) - E/CH.lli/CART/206

(e) Survey instruments and methods in the United States of America

(USA) - E/OI.m/CART/215

(f) Possibilities for establishing horizontal control over

considerable areas (USSR) - E/CM.lVCART/225

7. The Committee concurred that traditional methods of geodesy were still good and economical for geodetic work at national level. Electro-magnetic distance measurers could cover extensive areas with.adequate controls at reasonable cost. It also noted that there were still many areas where, die to dense forest, only conventional methods could provide practical

solutions.

Airborne methods

8. The Committee considered two papers:

(a) Mapping from airborne electronic control (USA) - E/CN .li;/CART/l9U (b) Aerodist - The flying chainman (Canada) - E/CN .ll|/CART/20 7

It was noted that airborne methods had been successfully employed by the USA

and Canada,

(4)

e/cn.iVcart/c.i/2

Connexion of* national levelling networks

9. The Committee considered the background paper on the subject (E/CN .li^/CART/173)

and heard the difficulties often encountered in carrying out such work. The Committee believed that arrangements for co-operation should be made through the national services concerned to facilitate the formal agreement between the

governments o

Common geodetic datum for Africa

10. The Committee heard that the choice of a common datum for Africa was a complicated problem for geophysical reasons. Africa, not having a homogeneous block, several cross traverses would need to be run to derive the necessary information and that the new concepts of geodesy based on dynamics might lead

to the necessary information being obtained without recourse to the traditional

methods,

FTdro. --'•■■ :J"'~V ' " \

11. The Committee heard a report by U.S.A. on their African charting programme

(E/CN.lii/CART/190) and considered a technical paper on hydrographic surveys, a necessary complement to photogrammetry for topographic mapping

(E/CN.l)±/CART/l8O) and received an information paper on Dissemination of information on changing conditions affecting the safety of navigation

12* The attention of the Committee was drawn to the importance of a common levelling datum and the determination of ^czxi sea level. Attention was also drawn to the enormous work involved in keeping hydrographic records up-to-date and to the need for the co-operation of all concerned.

Références

Documents relatifs

CART/214) and survey instruments and methods in tho United States of America (E/CN.14/CJ\RT/215) (submitted by the United States).. 14/c/u,T/227) (submi tted by the USSR) The

various countries (Chad, France, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, Uganda, USSR, etc,) the Committee pointed out that it was always desirable for specialists such as

'.!he Committee emphasized the importance of proper transcription and transliteration of geographical names that is as exact arrl standardized as possible;

The Rules of Procedure for the Meetings of the Executive Directors of the IBRD were "adopted" by the Executive Directors and "accepted" by the Board of Governors of

• Promote an enabling environment for the development of a science and technology information system in Africa that can enhance private partnerships and accelerate economic

Meetings should take place a few weeks before important international meetings (like meetings of ECOSOC, the General Assembly and meetings of the Assembly of African Heads of State

economic indicators, financial leakages, role of small and medium scale businesses, balance of payments constraints in Africa, coordination of the public and private sectors, and

ECA was called upon to provide further support in implementing and assessing the policy implications of its tools , to support member States in integrating