• Aucun résultat trouvé

1 Neutrino masses and BSM physics 7

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "1 Neutrino masses and BSM physics 7"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Contents

Remerciements i

Abstract (English/Français/Deutsch) iii

Introduction 1

1 Neutrino masses and BSM physics 7

1.1 Neutrino oscillations . . . . 8

1.1.1 Puzzles from neutrino fluxes . . . . 8

1.1.2 Theory of neutrino oscillations . . . . 8

1.1.3 Experimental framework . . . 10

1.2 Non-oscillation experiments . . . 12

1.2.1 Ø-decay . . . 12

1.2.2 Neutrinoless double Ø-decay (0∫2Ø) . . . 13

1.2.3 Cosmology . . . 13

1.3 Neutrino mass, effective Lagrangian and Seesaw mechanisms . . . 14

1.3.1 Effective Lagrangian and new physics . . . 15

1.3.2 Type-1 Seesaw mechanism . . . 17

1.3.3 Type-2 Seesaw mechanism . . . 19

1.3.4 Type-3 Seesaw mechanism . . . 22

1.4 Dimension-6 operators and CLFV processes . . . 22

1.5 Inverse Seesaw models . . . 24

1.6 SO(10) GUT and L-R symmetry motivations for Seesaw models . . . 26

1.6.1 SO(10) GUT group . . . 26

1.6.2 L-R symmetric model . . . 27

2 Muon to electron conversion in nuclei in type-1 Seesaw models 31 2.1 Type-1 Lagrangian in the mass eigenstate basis . . . 31

2.2 Charged Lepton Flavor Violation processes . . . 34

2.2.1 Experimental status . . . 35

2.2.2 Theoretical status in the Seesaw models . . . 38

2.3 µ ! e conversion rate for type-1 Seesaw models . . . 39

2.3.1 General expression of the conversion rate and approximations . . . 40

2.3.2 Methodology . . . 47

2.3.3 Computation of the rate in type-1 Seesaw models . . . 48

vii

(2)

2.4 Predictions and constraints : degenerate case . . . 53

2.4.1 Ratios of rates involving one same flavour transition . . . 54

2.4.2 Large mass regime (m

N

m

W

) and constraints on the mixing parameters . . 57

2.4.3 Low mass regime (m

N

m

W

) and constraints on the mixing parameters . . . 59

2.4.4 Comments . . . 63

2.5 Ratios of rates involving one same flavor transition : non degenerate case . . . 64

2.5.1 Casas-Ibarra parametrization . . . 64

2.5.2 n

N

= 2 non-degenerate right-handed neutrinos . . . 65

2.5.3 n

N

= 3 non-degenerate right-handed neutrinos . . . 69

2.6 Comparison between the different types of Seesaw . . . 69

2.6.1 Type-2 Seesaw ratios and maximum scales . . . 70

2.6.2 Type-3 Seesaw ratios and maximum scale . . . 71

2.6.3 Distinction between the Seesaw . . . 73

2.7 Summary . . . 75

3 The Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe and standard leptogenesis 79 3.1 Experimental determination of the baryon density . . . 81

3.1.1 From the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) . . . 82

3.1.2 From Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) . . . 82

3.2 Needed ingredients for baryogenesis . . . 83

3.3 Baryogenesis possibilities . . . 85

3.3.1 Electroweak baryogenesis . . . 85

3.3.2 GUT Baryogenesis . . . 86

3.3.3 Sphalerons and baryogenesis through leptogenesis . . . 86

3.4 Basics of Leptogenesis : the unflavored type-1 Seesaw case . . . 88

3.4.1 Lagrangian and interactions . . . 88

3.4.2 Unflavored statement and general scenario . . . 89

3.4.3 Tree-level decay rate . . . 90

3.4.4 Evaluation of the C P -asymmetry . . . 91

3.4.5 Boltzmann equations . . . 93

3.4.6 Analytical solutions to the Boltzmann equations . . . 97

3.4.7 Some results of successful leptogenesis . . . 99

3.5 Flavor issue in type-1 leptogenesis . . . 101

3.6 Flavored type-1 leptogenesis . . . 104

3.6.1 Tree-level decay rates . . . 104

3.6.2 Evaluation of the C P -asymmetry . . . 105

3.6.3 Boltzmann equations . . . 105

3.6.4 Analytical solutions to the Boltzmann equations . . . 106

3.6.5 Some results of successful leptogenesis . . . 107

3.7 Additional scattering processes . . . 109

4 Type-2 Seesaw leptogenesis 111 4.1 One-flavor approximation of the type-2 leptogenesis . . . 113

4.1.1 Lagrangians and interactions . . . 113

4.1.2 One-flavor approximation statement . . . 114

(3)

4.1.3 Tree-level decay rates . . . 114

4.1.4 Evaluation of the C P-asymmetry . . . 116

4.1.5 Boltzmann equations . . . 117

4.1.6 Analytical resolution of the Boltzmann equations and maximum B ° L asym- metry reachable . . . 122

4.1.7 Some results of successful leptogenesis . . . 127

4.2 Flavor issue in type-2 leptogenesis . . . 130

4.2.1 Flavor regimes . . . 131

4.2.2 Parameter space of the flavor regimes . . . 133

4.3 Flavored type-2 leptogenesis . . . 136

4.3.1 Tree-level decay rates . . . 137

4.3.2 Computation of the C P -asymmetries . . . 138

4.3.3 B/3 ° L

Æ

asymmetries and chemical equilibrium conditions . . . 141

4.3.4 Flavored Boltzmann equations . . . 145

4.3.5 Formal integration of Boltzmann equations . . . 146

4.4 Summary : leptogenesis procedure to follow in any given type-2 Seesaw model . . . 150

4.5 Purely Flavored Leptogenesis . . . 151

4.5.1 Mechanism . . . 152

4.5.2 PFL scenario efficiency . . . 155

4.5.3 Minimal and maximal B ° L asymmetry . . . 161

4.6 General triplet flavored leptogenesis . . . 164

4.6.1 Efficiency-like parameter . . . 164

4.6.2 Successful leptogenesis . . . 168

4.7 Compatibility with CLFV processes . . . 168

4.8 Summary . . . 169

5 Asymmetric dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model 173 5.1 Generalities . . . 174

5.1.1 Evidences for dark matter . . . 174

5.1.2 DM properties . . . 174

5.2 Models for dark matter . . . 175

5.2.1 Scalar singlet. . . . 175

5.2.2 The Inert Doublet Model (IDM) . . . 177

5.2.3 Other possibilities . . . 178

5.3 Dark matter detection and constraints . . . 179

5.3.1 Direct Detection . . . 180

5.3.2 Indirect Detection . . . 181

5.3.3 Collider constraints . . . 183

5.4 Dark matter production mechanisms . . . 184

5.4.1 Symmetric production and WIMP miracle . . . 184

5.4.2 Asymmetric production . . . 188

5.5 Inert Scalar Doublet Asymmetry as the origin of dark matter . . . 189

5.5.1 Asymmetric production and depletion of the H

2

density . . . 191

5.5.2 Final inert scalar relic density . . . 200

5.5.3 Failure of the asymmetric IDM scenario . . . 201

ix

(4)

5.5.4 Reprocessing the inert doublet asymmetry into a lighter particle DM relic

density . . . 204

5.6 Summary . . . 207

General conclusion 209 A Units and conversion factors 213 A.1 Natural units . . . 213

A.2 Parameters and constants . . . 213

B µ to e conversion in atomic nuclei 215 B.1 Some useful identities . . . 215

B.2 Feynman rules . . . 215

B.3 Feynman diagrams and associated amplitudes . . . 217

B.3.1 Methodology . . . 217

B.3.2 Photon Penguin contribution . . . 218

B.3.3 Z Penguin contribution . . . 222

B.3.4 W boxes contribution . . . 225

B.4 Summary . . . 228

B.5 Integrals . . . 232

C Tools for leptogenesis and dark matter genesis 235 C.1 Thermodynamics of the early Universe : definitions and conventions . . . 235

C.1.1 Bosons . . . 235

C.1.2 Fermions . . . 236

C.1.3 Maxwell-Boltzmann . . . 237

C.1.4 Gas properties in the early Universe . . . 237

C.1.5 Equilibrium . . . 239

C.2 Sphalerons . . . 239

C.3 Boltzmann equations or chemical equilibrium conditions ? . . . 240

C.4 Boltzmann equations formalism . . . 241

C.4.1 Generalities . . . 241

C.4.2 Method . . . 242

C.4.3 Example : the type-1 leptogenesis . . . 243

C.5 Chemical equilibrium conditions . . . 244

C.5.1 Generalities and usual chemical equilibrium conditions . . . 244

C.5.2 Temperature regimes and chemical equilibrium conditions for type-1 Seesaw leptogenesis . . . 246

C.5.3 Relation between the baryon, lepton and B ° L asymmetries . . . 249

D Type-2 Seesaw leptogenesis 251 D.1 Tree-level decay rates . . . 251

D.1.1 Leptonic channel . . . 251

D.1.2 Scalar channel . . . 252

D.1.3 Total decay width . . . 253

D.2 C P -asymmetries . . . 253

(5)

D.2.1 Pure scalar triplet case . . . 253

D.2.2 Mixed type-1+2 scheme . . . 255

D.3 Scattering rates . . . 256

D.4 Boltzmann equations . . . 257

D.5 Chemical equilibrium conditions . . . 259

E Asymmetric Dark matter in IDM 265 E.1 Scattering rates . . . 265

E.2 Analytical resolution of the Boltzmann equations . . . 266

E.3 Landau Pole . . . 267

Bibliography 269

xi

Références

Documents relatifs

Preliminary studies of this improved analysis looking for neutrino produced by annihilation of Dark Matter inside the Sun performed on the ANTARES data set collected between 2007

Limit on the LKP-to-proton cross section as a function of the mass of the LKP B (1) particle obtained from the search of neutrino events produced by Dark Matter annihilation

Figure 1 (right) presents the expected sensitivity of ANTARES with the data collected in 2007-2008 to the flux of neutrino-induced muons produced by annihilations of Dark Matter

Grâce à mon outil de recherche, j’ai constaté qu’au sein des blocs opératoires, l’appareil de radiologie est fréquemment utilisé et ce dans pratiquement toutes

Tout d’abord, il convient de replacer le problème de la sécurité face au risque d’inondation dans le contexte plus vaste de l’ensemble du bassin versant de l’Ill, au travers,

À travers l’activité en formation, c’est l’activité cible qui est visée (le travail, dans le cas d’une formation professionnelle) : on espère donc que la perturbation

Overall, the preferred study type was RCTs with randomization of manuscripts for four interventions (adding an expert, use of reporting guidelines check- list, results-free peer

biomarqueurs trophiques (analyses en isotopes stables (IS) et composition en acides gras (AG) des lipides de réserve et en stérols ào tàd a o dà t àutilis sàafi àdeà a a t