HAL Id: hal-02722707
https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02722707
Submitted on 1 Jun 2020
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Mathematical analysis and comparison of growth
fluctuations of the aerial system of young Terminalia
superba, Englers et Diels (Combretaceae)
Pascale Maillard, Marie Agnes Jacques, Emile Miginiac, B. Millet, . Inra, .
Universite
To cite this version:
Pascale Maillard, Marie Agnes Jacques, Emile Miginiac, B. Millet, . Inra, et al.. Mathematical
analysis and comparison of growth fluctuations of the aerial system of young Terminalia superba,
Englers et Diels (Combretaceae). Annales des sciences forestières, INRA/EDP Sciences, 1989, 46
(suppl.), pp.202s-205s. �hal-02722707�
Mathematical
analysis
and
comparison
of
growth
fluctua-tions of the aerial
system
of young Terminalia
superba
Englers
et
Diels
(Combretaceae)
P.
Maillard
1
M. Jacques
1
E.
Miginiac
B.
Millet
2
1 Institut de
Physiologie Vegetale (Phytotron),
CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, 9!90, and2Laboratoire de
Botanique,
Institut des Sciences Naturelles,pl.
Leclerc,Besangon,
25030, FranceIntroduction
Under natural
conditions,
Terminaliasuperba
is atropical
forest tree which shows fluctuations ingrowth
rate and influshing
behavior(Groulez
andWood,
1984).
This behavior andparticularly
theperiodic
growth
cessations werecon-comitant with the
dry
season. Thisrhyth-mical
growth pattern
ends in amonopodial
main axis and aparticular
stratified branchsystem
as describedby
Halle andOlde-man
(1970)
in Aubreville’s model.In climate chambers at
Phytotron,
Gif-sur-Yvette,
we determined the bestgrowth
conditions for young T.
superba (Maillard
etal.,
1987).
Under these conditions(27°C,
16h),
we noted fluctuations in the aerialgrowth.
Thereafter,
the purpose of our work was the detailedstudy
of theearly
developmental stages
of this tree.Growth fluctuations were
analyzed
on young T.superba
using
the Fourier method andrhythmical
components
ofgrowth
were evaluated. Thegrowth
rela-tionships
between shoot and branchesand their effects on tree architecture have been
investigated.
Materials and Methods
Materials
T.
superba
seedsoriginating
from Sibiti(Congo),
obtained from the CentreTechnique
Forestier
Tropic:al,
Nogent-sur-Marne (ref.
C.T.F.T., 82/3808
N),
were used for theexperi-ment. Measurements were made over 1 yr, on 3
mo old
seedling:;
in a controlled and condi-tionedglasshouse (27°C,
16 hphotoperiod
and 70%humidity)
atPhytotron,
Gif-sur-Yvette.The Fourier method
We used the method of Assaad
(1985).
The fluctuations of individualgrowth
curves obtained fromweekly
data were studied: thepolynomial
regression
curve, which represents the fittedgrowth
curve, was calculatedby
the least squares method. Thesignal
without trend wasobtained and a subtraction
point by
point
be-tween thispolynomial
curve and the data curverevealed the
growth
oscillations. Then, thesignal
without trend and the estimation of therhythmical
parameters
(amplitude, period)
wereResults
General observations
At the end of the
experiment,
the mainstems of the
plants
were vertical withgreat
variations in thelength
ofconstitu-tive internodes.
Generally,
in short inter-noderegions, single
or groups of 2 or 3lateral branches arose from the axil of
adjacent
leaves. These branches werecomposed
of a series ofsympodial
unitsfirst unit arose alone
directly
from anaxillary
bud on theprincipal
axis.Individual
patterns
ofplant
main axiselongation
showed atime-lag during
thefirst 11 wk
(Fig. 1
Then, growth
occurredin the
following
21 wk with successiveflushes.
During
the last weeks of theex-periment,
theelongation
of the main axisslowed and entered a low
growth
phase
with many rest intervals. The number of these intervals varied withplants
but wasusually
3 or 4.The
development
of the firstaxillary
branches occurred from the llth to the l6th wk after the start of the
study
(Fig.
1
).
These branchesappeared
from the axil of leaves in an area between the 30th and the 55th leaf. The dates of branch initia-tion on theprincipal
axis showedclearly
thataxillary
buds were able todevelop
only
when theprincipal
axis entered lowgrowth
phases
orduring
restperiods (Fig.
1
The
subsequent
development
of initi-ated branches was madeby apposition
ofnew
sympodial
units thatappeared
atquite regular
intervals,
regardless
of theperiodic
elongation
of the main shoot(Fig.
1
For
eachplant, weekly
measurements of the extension of allaxillary
brancheswere used to establish a cumulative
elon-gation
curve(Fig. 2).
These curves show-ed numerous andpronounced
variations over the 61 wk of thestudy.
Thesevaria-tions
corresponded
to the appearance andthe
growth
of newplagiotropic
units or thegeneral growth
stoppage
of the wholebranches.
Mathematical
analysis
The nature of fluctuations observed from the aerial
growth
has been examinedby
Fourieranalysis.
Results shown in Table I revealed a wide range in theperiod
of thegrowth
rhythm presented by
the main axis.The values of the
period
varied from 12 to 20 wk andimplied
that an 8 wktime-lag
exists between restperiods
and theresumption
of theactivity
of the main axis.This wide range was also seen in the
amplitude
of thegrowth rhythm.
Conse-quently,
the characteristics of thisrhythmi-cal
phenomenon
were derived from the individual behavior andproperties
ofplants.
The
growth
of allplagiotropic
branches alsoappeared
to berhythmic
andunder-went
periods
of flushes andstoppages.
The estimated
period
remainedgenerally
about 15 wk(Table I).
Theamplitude
ofthe cumulative
growth rhythm
showedvariations for each
plant.
For the 61 wk of the
experiment,
com-parison
ofsignals
without trend of theprin-cipal
axis and those ofaxillary
branchesrevealed a gap between the two
rhythms
whoseperiod
was notalways
verydif-ferent.
Consequently,
these organs did not reach their maximalgrowth
rate at the same time.Conclusion
Our results on the 1 st year of the
develop-ment
present
the young T.superba
as amonopodial
axis withplagiotropic
bran-ches,
bothundergoing
successive flushes. These resultssupported
thepreliminary
description
of adultTerminaliaplants
esta-blishedby
Halle and Oldeman(1970).
This discontinuous
development
occurred under non-seasonal conditions and itsunderlying
mechanism could be due to the tree itself. The Fourieranalysis
usedmade the
rhythmical
characteristics of theaerial
growth prominent
and allowed theestimation of
rhythmical
parameters
under the environmental conditions used. A secondtype
ofanalysis (for example,
the modernspectral analysis
employed by
Assaad
(1985))
could be necessary tocompare and to confirm the
reliability
of the estimated values ofrhythms.
Ourobservations indicate that the
rhythmical
branching growth
wasdirectly
related tothe main axis flushes. In
fact,
the young branches were initiated as often as thegrowth
of the main stembegan
to de-crease. Such a behavior was also noted inTerminalia
by
Tomlinson(1976)
andprobably
indicated correlative influencesnotably
exerted betweenaxillary
and ter-minal buds.Finally,
the stratified branchsystem
borne on asingle
trunk of young T.superba
with these sub-verticills of lateral branches waspartly
explained by
this discontinuous
growth
pattern.
Acknowledgments
The C.T.F.T., the
forestry
department
of the C.I.R.A.D.(France),
isduly
acknowledged
for its financialparticipation.
References
Assaad C.
(1985)
Organisation
temporelle
de la tomate(Lycopersicon
esculentum Mill. cv.Ace)
au cours de sa croissance et de son d6velop-pement. Ph.D. Thesis, Université FrancheComt6, France
Groulez J. & Wood P.J.
(1984)
In:Monogra-phie
du Terminaliasuperba.
G.T.F.T., C.F.L, Ed.Frangaise,
pp. 85Halle F. & Oldeman R.A.A.
(1970)
Essai surI’ar-chitecture et la
dynamique
de croissance des arbrestropicaux. Monogr.
Bot. Biol.Vdg.
Mas-son, Paris, pp. 178Maillard P.,
Jacques
M. &Miginiac
E.(1987)
Croissance dejeunes
Terminatiasuperba
enconditions contr6l6es. Ann. Sci. For. 44, 67-84
Tomlinson P.B.
(1976) Branching
and axis dif-ferentiation intropical
trees. In:Tropical
Treesas
Living Systems. (Tomlinson
P.B. &Zimmer-man M.H.,