• Aucun résultat trouvé

pk(n), ASYMPTOTIC PARTITION FORMULAE. III. PARTITIONS INTO

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "pk(n), ASYMPTOTIC PARTITION FORMULAE. III. PARTITIONS INTO"

Copied!
49
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

ASYMPTOTIC PARTITION FORMULAE. III.

k-th P O W E R S . 1 BY

E M A I T L A N D W R I G H T of OXFORD.

PARTITIONS INTO

I n t r o d u c t i o n .

I . I . I n a well-known memoir 2 Hardy and Ramanujan obtained the asymp-

totic expansion of p(n), the number of unrestricted partitions of n, by applying Cauchy's Theorem to the generating function

o o a r

H (I - - xl) - 1 - - - I "~- Z 2 ) ( T ~ ) X n . (I. I I)

1-- 1 n = l

My object here is to find the asymptotic expansion of

pk(n),

the number of partitions of n into k-th powers. 3 The result is to some extent a generalisation of theirs, and part of this paper consists of an ~pplic~tion of their method to the new generating function

f ( x ) = H ( I - - X l k ) - - i = I -~ Z p k ( . ) X n.

/=1 n = l

1 T h e p r e v i o u s p a p e r s of t h i s series are

I. P l a n e p a r t i t i o n s . Quart. J. of Math. (Oxford series), 2 (193~), I 7 7 - - 1 8 9 . II. W e i g h t e d p a r t i t i o n s , t)roc. London Math. Soc. (2), 36 (I933) , I I 7 - - I 4 I . T h e p r e s e n t p a p e r m a y be read i n d e p e n d e n t l y of t h e s e .

s London Malh. Soc. (2), I7 (I918), 7 5 - - I I 5 . T h e r e a d e r will find it i n t e r e s t i n g to c o m p a r e t h e m e t h o d s a n d r e s u l t s of t h i s p a p e r w i t h m y w o r k here.

T h e p r o b l e m w a s s u g g e s t e d to m e b y P r o f e s s o r H a r d y , to w h o m m y t h a n k s arc also d u e for m u c h v a l u a b l e advice in t h e c o u r s e of t h e i n v e s t i g a t i o n .

(2)

144 E. Maitland Wright.

B e f o r e we can use this m e t h o d , however, we h a v e to solve t w o subsidiary p r o b l e m s which are m u c h m o r e c o m p l i c a t e d f o r g e n e r a l k t h a n in t h e p a r t i c u l a r case k ~ i c o n s i d e r e d by H a r d y a n d Ramanu.]an. I t is obvious t h a t f ( x ) i s r e g u l a r f o r I x ] < I a n d t h a t every p o i n t of t h e c i r c u m f e r e n c e I x ] = I is an e s s e n t i a l s i n g u l a r i t y of t h e f u n c t i o n . W e m u s t k n o w the n a t u r e of t h e singul- arities of f ( x ) a t t h e r a t i o n a l p o i n t s

2pzi x : e q

or, w h a t is t h e s a m e thing, t h e b e h a v i o u r of f ( x ) as x a p p r o a c h e s such a Point.

T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n is c o n t a i n e d in a c e r t a i n t r a n s f o r m a t i o n f o r m u l a .

W h e n k ~ I , f ( x ) is, a p a r t f r o m a t r i v i a l factor, t h e r e c i p r o c a l of a n elliptic m o d u l a r f u n c t i o n , a n d t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n t h e o r y follows a t once f r o m t h e pro- p e r t i e s of such functions. F o r g e n e r a l k this is n o t t h e case, a n d we h a v e to develop t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n t h e o r y of f ( x ) e n t i r e l y a f r e s h . This w o r k t a k e s up t h e whole of P a r t I of this paper. W e s t a t e t h e r e s u l t i n g f o r m u l a as a t h e o r e m ; it is a p p a r e n t l y new a n d possibly of s o m e i n t e r e s t in itself, a p a r t f r o m the a p p l i c a t i o n w i t h which we are h e r e chiefly concerned.

W e find t h a t as x a p p r o a c h e s I, f ( x ) b e h a v e s to a first a p p r o x i m a t i o n like

w h e r e l"(t) a n d ~(t) are t h e o r d i n a r y G a m m a a n d R i e m a n n - z e t a f u n c t i o n s . This b r i n g s us to o u r second s u b s i d i a r y p r o b l e m , n a m e l y t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of an a u x i l i a r y f u n c t i o n w i t h an i s o l a t e d s i n g u l a r i t y of t h e t y p e (I. 12) at x = I . I n a r e c e n t n o t e ~, I i n t r o d u c e d a g e n e r a l i s e d Bessel f u n c t i o n to e n a b l e m e to c o n s t r u c t such an a u x i l i a r y f u n c t i o n , a n d discussed its properties.

W e write

a ~ ] , I b - - k + I I , j = j (k) : o (k even),

j .... j ( k ) _ ( 7 I)1"2;k~1)i-(~_ i)~(k + i ) ( ~

o d d ) . 2

1 Journal London Math. Soc., 8 (I933), 7I-7-79.

l R'eaders familiar with tile memoir of Hardy and R~manujan 2 If k = I, then j - 24"

referred to a b o v e will recollect t h e a p p e a r a n c e of t h e n u m b e r . . . . I 24

(3)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 145 Then the a p p r o p r i a t e generalised Bessel f u n c t i o n h e r e is

c o

,-0, (,o_;)

and our simplest result, f o u n d by e x a m i n i n g in detail the singularity o f f ( x ) at x =: I, is c o n t a i n e d in t h e following theorem.

T h e o r e m 1. We. have

whel'e

lb.(n) -- (n

+,}')-~'-(2 7v)-i~:q~ {l'(I 4 a)~(I + a)(n +3")"} +

O(e('t-")n"),

/Jr "--(~:~- I ) { a l ' ( I ~-a)~(I ~-a)} l-b, of = . ( k ) > O.

Using the k n o w n a s y m p t o t i c expansion ~ of q~(z) we can deduce the expan- sion of pk(n) in t e r m s of e l e m e n t a r y f u n c t i o n s of ~.

T h e o r e m 2.

w h e l ' e

We have

9 { (-(, +' )" flfj

J)k(??) = n O ( " ' + j ) b - 3 e xl(n+j)b I + ~Z_.,,j I ~-

j k'~ 1

and b,,, is a function of k a n d m only, which may be calculated with st(fficient labour for a~y given values of k and m; in particular

I i k e + I l k + 2 bl --: 24k,4 "

H a r d y and R a m a n u j a n (loe. cir. p. I I I ) give the result z ed n b

w i t h o u t proof. This is e q u i v a l e n t to T h e o r e m 2 with M:--: I, b u t w i t h o u t any s t a t e m e n t as to the o r d e r of t h e e r r o r term. A p a r t f r o m this, T h e o r e m 2 is, [ believe, new.

I I , e l n m a 33"

1 9 - - 3 4 1 9 8 . Acta mathematica. 63. I m p r i m 6 ]e 20 juin 19349

(4)

146 E. Maitland Wright.

I. 2. W e shall, however, go m u c h f u r t h e r t h a n T h e o r e m I.

C a u c h y ' s T h e o r e m

f f(,O d :~"

p k ( n ) = 2 J r i j x '~'l '

.1"

W e h a v e by

w h e r e

I"

is a circle w i t h centre at x = o a n d r a d i u s less t h a n unity. W e shall t a k e t h e r a d i u s of F very n e a r l y unity. T h e n t h e d o m i n a n t t e r m o f p k ( n ) given in T h e o r e m I arises f r o m t h e i n t e g r a l a l o n g t h e p o r t i o n of F in t h e i m m e d i a t e n e i g h b o u r h o o d of x = I . E v e r y p o i n t of t h e c i r c u m f e r e n c e of t h e u n i t circle is an essential s i n g u l a r i t y of

f ( x ) ,

as we saw, b u t t h e s i n g u l a r i t y at x = I is the

>>heaviest>>. W h e n we consider t h e n e x t >>heaviest>> singularities, a n d also find a b e t t e r a p p r o x i m a t i o n t h a n (I. I2) f o r

f(x)

n e a r x : = t, we can find f o r any e > o an e x p a n s i o n f o r pk(n) w i t h e r r o r only O(e~"~).

T h e n u m b e r s k a n d q are positive integers. T h e n u m b e r p is also a n integer,

f o r t h e q ==

qlq~:

s a t i s f y i n g t h e conditions

I < - - p < q ,

e x c e p t t h a t , w h e n q - - I , p = o only.

all such values of p f o r t h e least positive i n t e g e r

W e define dh by

also

(p, q) - - I, (I. 2I)

W e use ~ , to d e n o t e s u m m a t i o n over

P

p a r t i c u l a r value of q in question. W e w r i t e qt- such t h a t

qlq~.

T h e n

qllq

a n d we m a y write

ph ~ ' ~ d h ( m o d q ) ,

O - - < . d h < q ;

COp, q

top, q =- I (k even),

,,,<,

,

)l

= e x p , ~ / ~ z ~ h d,, - - 4 (q - - q~) (Z,

o,ld),

t \q"/,=1 exp \ q /

q

SI, 't = ~, e,,(lh'k),

h :-- 1

l i p , q = =

q ) n = l I I l i + l l '

Cq, o - ~ I ) / l p , q,O ~ " ~ p , q .

(5)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. ili. Partitions into k-th Powers. 147 For values of t > o, Cq, t is a q-th r o o t of unity, d e p e n d i n g on k, q a n d t, and Av, q, t is a f u n c t i o n of k, p, q and t. F o r any p a r t i c u l a r values of these para- meters, Cq, t and _/lv, q,t m a y be calculated, b u t the process is in g e n e r a l very tedious. T h e m e t h o d of calculation wilt be described l a t e r (see w 9.4). T h e n our full r e s u l t is

T h e o r e m 3. ~ b r any e > o, lhere exist an integer qo ~ qo( k, t) and integers

Tq, t ~- T(k, q, e), such that

Tq,

p~ (n) = (n + j ) - ~ ~, ~_~ Cp, q eq (-- p n) ~,, Cq,, 9o (//v, q,t(u + j)a) + 0 (e' ,,b).

q<--qo P t--O

W h e n k ~ I, t h a t is, in the case of u n r e s t r i c t e d partitions, we have

I f we write

we have

I 7g 2

J - - 24 ql q, Tq, ~ o , zip, q - - 6 q

~o 3

~ = 0 F ( / + I ) F l - - ~r~ t f l

(

. l D O n

a n d so the expansion becomes

1 D @n

p , ( u ) - :- d _ _

2 y ~ ] / r 2 q _ q o d n ( qn J p t%,qeq(--pn) + O(e~'e).

H a r d y and R a m a n u j a n o b t a i n e d the last result. I n fact, t h e y went f u r t h e r ; t a k i n g q0 an a p p r o p r i a t e f u n c t i o n of n , t h e y made the e r r o r t e r m only O ( n ' ~ ) . I f we a t t e m p t to make a similar i m p r o v e m e n t f o r pk(n), we find t h a t we can choose q o = q0( k, n) so t h a t t h e e r r o r t e r m is O(end), where d < b. This is n o t so good as the result f o r k--~ I, and, in view of the h e a v y analysis r e q u i r e d f o r this f u r t h e r ~tep, I am c o n t e n t to prove T h e o r e m 3. :

(6)

148 E. Maitland Wright.

Part I. Transformation of the Generating Function.

2. i. O u r f i r s t step is to find t h e t l : a n s f o r m a t i o n f o r m u l a f o r f ( x ) f o r g e n e r a l ]c, which will e x h i b i t its b e h a v i o u r n e a r t h e r a t i o n a l p o i n t s on the c i r c u m f e r e n c e ] x ] = I. O u r r e s u l t includes t h a t f o r ]c ~ I , which m a y also be d e d u c e d f r o m t h e t h e o r y of m o d u l a r functions. F o r g e n e r a l ]c no such deduc- t i o n is possible.

B e f o r e s t a t i n g t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n f o r m u l a , we m u s t define c e r t a i n symbols.

T h e n u m b e r s p , h, s a n d 1 are integers.

tions (I. 22) a n d

I ~ h ' ~ q , I -~-8 ~ ~, I f d,~ r o, we write

Of these, p satisfies t h e condi- l>__o.

dh (s odd), ~ , ~ - - q - & (s even).

tth, s - - q q

I f d h - - o , we t a k e #h,~ = I. H e n c e a l w a y s q~th.,~ > I.

I n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h a n y p a r t i c u l a r vMues of p a n d q we write X = x e q ( - - p ) ~ e -~J, y ~_ q k y ,

a n d we t a k e y real a n d positive w h e n X is real ~nd o < X < I. W e write also

w h e r e Y~ is t h a t k-th r o o t of Y which is regl a n d p o s i t i v e when Y is real a n d positive,

g ( h , l, 8 ) ~ - exp {2~vi ( / + lzh,s)ats} eq(-- h)

[ ( 2 7 g ) l Z c a ( ], @" #h,s) e . . . 2

= e x p ~ ... qy~ q I'

a n d finally

q k oo

p , , ~ = H I [ I l l / ~ - ~(h, ~, ~)/-'.

h : l g = l l~O

W e are n o w in a position to s t a t e o u r t r a n s f o r m a t i o n t h e o r e m .

(7)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 149 T h e o r e m 4. I f ~ ( y ) > o, then Pv, q is convergent and

[2/lP' q l .Pp, q. (2. I I ) 1

f(x) = f ( e Yeq(p))= Cv, qy:eYVexp \ ya !

I n t h e case k = I , (2. I I) r e d u c e s to t h e m o d u l a r f u n c t i o n t r a n s f o r m a t i o n u s e d by H a r d y a n d R a m a n u j a n . 1 T h e s e a u t h o r s also s t a t e d T h e o r e m 4 in t h e p a r t i c u l a r case k = 2, q = I , p - - o, w i t h o u t proof.

To p r o v e T h e o r e m 4 we n e e d t w o l e m m a s . L e m m a 1. I f C is any positive number and i f

~(y) > c l y l ~+a, (~. ~=)

then P•, q is uniformly convergent with respect to y.

L e m m a 2. I f y is real and positive, then (2. I I) is true.

F r o m these t w o l e m m a s it follows by the" principle of a n a l y t i c c o n t i n u a t i o n t h a t (2. IX) is t r u e w h e n (2. I2) is satisfied. B u t f o r a n y p a r t i c u l a r value of y such t h a t ~(y) > o, we c a n choose C so t h a t (2.12) is satisfied. H e n c e T h e o r e m 4 is an i m m e d i a t e c o n s e q u e n c e of L e m m a s 1 a n d 2.

2 . 2 . P r o o f o f L e m m a 1.

L e m m a 3. I f

I I I

- ~ < ~ < ~, ~ ( ~ + ~ ) < a - < ~ ( 3 - ~ ) ,

2 ~ ~ - ~

then

2 a

--< - - cos 4 .

7g

I + a ) - a ~ , c o s -

1 W h e n k = I , m y d e f i n i t i o n of wp, q differs in f o r m f r o m t h a t a p p e a r i n g in t h e t r a n s f o r m a - t i o n u s e d b y t h e s e a u t h o r s . T h e l a t t e r d e f i n i t i o n does n o t i n v o l v e t h e s u m

q--1

hdh.

h = l

t t . R a d e m a c h e r (,,Zur T h c o r i e d e r M o d u l f u n k t i o n e n , , Journal f u r Math., 167 (I932), 3 1 2 - - 3 3 6 ) o b t a i n e d t h e m o d u l a r f u n c t i o n t r a n s f o r m a t i o n for f ( @ w h e n k ~ I w i t h t h e f o r m of wp, q t h a t I u s e here. T h e s a m e a u t h o r s h o w e d (Journal London Math. Soc., 7 (I932), I 4 - - I 9 ) b y a n ele- m e n t a r y m e t h o d t h a t t h e t w o d e f i n i t i o n s are e q u i v a l e n t ,

(8)

1 5 0

E. Maitland Wright.

We have

I I 37~,

- ~ < I ( ~ + a ) _ a ~ _ < a _ a ~ _ < ~ ( 3 _ ~ ) _ a ~ <

2 2

and so

Also

COS

Since

we have

(2. 21)

H) I

O ~ (t 7 r ~-~ 2 ~ ,

sin {a ( ~ z - [~)[)} > 2a (~ -- z - - [~0[) ;> 2asin- (i 2 z - - [~]) = - - e o s ~ 9 . 2a (2. 23) The lemma follows from (2.2I), (2.22) and (2.23).

Lemma 4. I f (2. *2) is satisfied and if

then

4 ~ C ( 2 ~ ) ~

CI = ql +a '

[g(h, l, s)[ ~ e -c,(l+l/' .

Let us write y = l y l e i ~ , where ~O has its principal value. Since ~){(y)> o, have I ~ [ < ; z and since i - - ~ s ~ k , the number a = - z a ( z s + k - - i )

I

w e '

satisfies the condition of Lemma 3. Hence, when

~(y) > (:[~ql ,+.,

we have

(9)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae.

COS und so

since

Iii. Partitions into k-th Powers.

{ I .a(28 _{_ /r i) __ a,iD} < -- - - - 2a -- COS I/1 -~- 2 a ~ ( y ) ' <_ ~ . c l u l 9

[ aI }]

I g (h, l, s) l - e x p

!2g)l+a(l'~ fib, s) C0S{-2:ffa(23-]- k - - I ) - - a ~ ) qlyl" 7

-~ e x p { - - 2 a

C'(27~)1+a(1 +

= exp {-- Clqa(1 + #h, 8) a} ~ e-C,(t+a) ~,

q (1 + tth, ~) >-- 1 + q#h,8 >-- 1 + i.

151

To prove L e m m a I, it is sufficient to show t h a t

. lg(h,l,s)l

l~O

is u n i f o r m l y convergent with respect to y.

since

E e--Cl (/+1) a l=O

But this follows from L e m m a 4,

is convergent and the terms are i n d e p e n d e n t of y.

Proof of Lemma 2.

3" I. The remainder of P a r t I is devoted to the proof of L e m m a 2.

work is necessarily somewhat l e n g t h y and complicated.

W e take y real a n d positive and write

-- ~:h-- - , v = vh = exp (2~itth, 1) = h eq(dh) = eq(ph~'),

q

or

) E eq

(/~IT~ a hk) ,~h = F ( I + a

m=l and, if k is odd,

jh =,)'h(q, k) -- ( - i)89 + ' "~ eq(mh),

The

(10)

152

while, if k is even, We write also

E. Maitland Wright.

j h =-= O~ O'h ~ O .

~<>;,

= ~ l o g / , 71 - ~,,, c,:p

( - ) "

(1 + ~,,)~)/,

l -0 k as

S,:

= ~ ,

.~

log { I - - g (h, l, 8 ) } , s = l / = 0

where t h e l o g a r i t h m s h~ve t h e i r p r i n c i p a l values.

Now we have

x(<~t t f,)~" __ e<~ (pl/:) X (qt+h)~ == vhe,--r(l+~h )~, and so

Also, by definition,

q ~o q

--logf(x) : .,~ ,~_..~ log (,

- - x (<~+h/:) = ~_~ Sh,

h 1 l- 0 It ~ 1

?" I

f ( x ) = e,~p - ~ s,,~.

#l 1 ;

h " - 1

W e take Q a small number, real, positive ~md less t h a n 2' and r a large positive integer. W e use D to d e n o t e a positive n u m b e r , n o t always the same at each occurrence, d e p e n d i n g at most on k,p, q and y. I n P a r t I, the symbol 0 ( ) refers to the passage of (J to zero and of r to infinity, and tile c o n s t a n t implied is of the type D .

3.2. Certain differences arise between the cases k odd trnd k even, but we shall t r e a t the two cases t o g e t h e r . Most of the differences are covered by t h e n o t a t i o n ; thus, when k is odd, the functions j , j h , at, and Wp, q have various m o r e or less complicated values, while, when k is even, j , jh and ah all vanish and ,os, ~ = I. W e see t h a t the tr~msformation (2. II) has a slightly simpler f o r m w h e n k is even.

Apar~ from this, we have to consider t h r e e separate cases arising from different values of h. T h e s e are:

(11)

A s y m p t o t i c P a r t i t i o n Formulae. i I I . P a r t i t i o n s into k-th Powers.

(i) I f h = q, we h a v e ~ h - ~, #h = I , ~ h = I , a n d

oo

Sq --- ~., log' (I e-Y~i").

/:=1

153

(ii) I f h k ~ o (rood q), b u t h ~ q, we h a v e o < ~h < I , tth, s = I , i' h = I a n d

Sh = ~ log" ( I - - e - - Y i l + ' ) k ) . / = 0

(iii) I f h k ~ o (mod q), we h a v e o < ~h < I , a n d ~h r I .

I n eases (ii) a n d (iii) w e s h a l l t r e a t & a n d Sq-~ t o g e t h e r . S i n c e h k ~ o ( m o d q) i m p l i e s t h a t (q - - h) k ~- o (rood q), h a n d q - - h a p p e a r in t h e s a m e case.

Also, i n t h e s e t w o eases,

Th -~ Tq--h ~ I ;

if k is even, w h i l e if k is o d d

~th, ~ ~ ,ttq--h, s ~ ?2h --: ~q--h

~th, s - ~ - ~ t q - - h , s = I , ~h ~q--h = I ( e a s e ( i i ) ) ,

~th, s @ ~tq--h, s = I , ~h ~q--h = I ( e a s e ( i i i ) ) .

I f ~ " d e n o t e s s u m m a t i o n o v e r t h o s e v a l u e s o f h f o r w h i c h h k ~ o (rood q), w e h a v e , w h e n k is odd,

: Z H ( I - - 2 / - t h , 1) ( I - - - 2Th)

v ! ,.;

~ ~ " I - - 2 ~ ~ h , l - - 2 ~ " ~ h + 4 ~ ~h~h, 1

-- " ~ " I

- - 4 2 ~hlth, 1 - - q--1

_ 4 y h a , , - ( q - q , , ) q h=l

T h e n , w h e n k is o d d or even, w e h a v e

1 1 ,,

fDp, q = e ~ p t 4 z i ~ a h ) .

2 0 - - 3 4 1 9 8 . Acta mathematica. 63. I m p r i m 6 le 21 j u i n 1934.

(3-2x)

(12)

154

4" I. Case (i): h = q.

L e m m a 5. We h a v e ~

E. Maitland Wright.

W e

singularities tions

, I s

S~l - S<l = ~ l o g Y - - ~ k l o g 2 ~ + + j Y . W e write

Zl(U ) .... ]C ~uk--1 log (_Im C2~!'a) ]~ ~ U k-1 log (x - - e - 2 ~ )

e " ~ + - I , z ~ ( u ) . . .e Yv'k - - . I .

shall define the value of t h e logarithms precisely at a later stage. The of Zl(U) a n d of Z.2(u) in the u-plane are at the roots of the equa-

e Y u k ~ - i , e 2:~iu ~ i .

The functions have simple poles at the points

u ~ l a ts ( 8 = 1 , 2 . . . . 2k; l = 1 , 2 , . . . ) ,

and for a given value of s the poles lie along a semi-infinite s t r a i g h t line from

axis. I f k is odd, two of these lines coincide w i t h the upper and lower halves of the i m a g i n a r y axis respectively. The only other singularities of Zl(U) and of Z2(u) are logarithmic singularities at the points

u = l ( 1 - . - 2 , - - i , I , 2 , .)

on the real axis, and a singularity at the origin of a slightly more complicated character.

W e shall take q subject to the additional condition

Q<

I

It~l,

2

so t h a t the only singularity of Zl(u) or of Z.2(u) for which l u l ~ 2Q is the one at the origin. W e write R = r + I_ and choose L an integer such t h a t

2

1 I f q = I , Shen /p ~ o, ~ Y = y , h = q, a n d

S q = - - l o g f ( x ) , S q f ~ - - l o g P o , i ,

so t h a t T h e o r e m 4 f o l l o w s a t once f r o m L e m m a 5. T h i s e n a b l e s u s to s h o r t e n o u r w o r k consider- a b l y if o u r o n l y o b j e c t is t h e proof of T h e o r e m 2 (see w I 2 . 2 ) .

(13)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. 1II. Partitions into k-th Powers.

_/_i~'i" < n < (2-}~-~)~ Y -- [.

2 J [ 2:zt: 2

1 5 5

This is a l w a y s possible f o r r g r e a t e r t h a n some n u m b e r D . T h e n we write

R'=:,l.y ~ L + 2] / We see that R < R ' ~ 2R.

W e n o w define several contours. T h e c o n t o u r a~ is c o i n c i d e n t w i t h t h e real axis f r o m u = - : 0 to ~ l = R except n e a r u .... 1 , 2 , . . . r ; n e a r such a p o i n t a].

passes r o u n d a small semi-circle above t h e point. T h e c o n t o u r fl~ consists of the i m a g i n a r y axis f r o m u = - i Q to u : i l ? ' ; if l~ is odd, Z~(~l) has poles on t h e i m a g i n a r y axis a n d fl~ is d e f o r m e d so as to pass to t h e Ic.fl of these poles.

T h e c o n t o u r 7~ has t h r e e 1)arts 7',, 7',', 7',"- On 7', we h a v e . u - - l ~ e ~

, , , , ,

a n d o ~ 0 - - < ~a~v; on 7,, u = v e ~ " ' ~ a n d l t - < - t , < - - 1~'; on 7~, u - - B ' d ~ a n d 4

I I

a z ~ 0 ~ - ~ c . Finally, 61 is t h e q u a d r a n t of t h e circle I,,l: e on which

4 2

O--~ 0--~ I 7~, a n d I" 1 is t h e closed c o n t o u r f o r m e d by c o m h i n i n g c~j, fl~, 7~ a n d 6~.

2

T h e c o n t o u r s a.~, flo, 7~, &-, a n d I'., are t h e reflexions of al, ill, 71,61 ~nd 1"~ in the real axis, except t h a t , if k is odd, ft._, passes to t h e r i g h t of t h e poles on the r e a l axis, so t h a t F~ excludes these poles.

W e t a k e t h e positive directions of a , , a.,, fl~ a n d ,3. 2 o u t w a r d s f r o m t h e origin, of 7~, 7-~, 61 a n d &2 c o u n t e r c l o c k w i s e r o u n d the origin a n d of F 1 a n d 1%

counterclockwise. T h e n we h a v e

F 1 - - cq - - fll + ;q - - dl, 1% . . . . a.~ + fl.~ + 7"., - - 6~.

(4. ii) (4. 2)

L e t us consider t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n z - - c '-,'~i". So long as u does n o t pass outside I'~, z will n o t pass outside a c o n t o u r in t h e z-plane consisting of t h e c i r c u m f e r e n c e of t h e u n i t circle i n d e n t e d a t z = : l , this i n d e n t a t i o n c o r r e s p o n d i n g to t h e i n d e n t a t i o n s of a~ at t h e points u = - I , 2 , . . . Then, if l o g ( I - - Z ) b e t a k e n z = - - I ( c o r r e s p o n d i n g to u = -I2), tile loo'arithm will h a v e its p r i n c i p a l

/

real a t

value so l o n g as z r e m a i n s within or on t h e contour. H e n c e , if we t a k e

(14)

156 E. Maitland Wright.

I e 2 .~ i *~)

l o g ( 1 - - e ~'~i") real at u - = - on I'1, l o g ( I - - has its principal value ~nd

2

Z,(u) is one-valued at any point on or in the interior of Ft.

I f we take log (I - - e

-2'flu)

real at u . . . . I on I',,, a similar a r g u m e n t shows

2

t h a t this logarithm has its principal value at every point on or within 1~.

W e write

l(r,)--- f z,(.)du

"

i ;

] (r,,) = j' z..(,,)d. == -

G

1(.,) -- ~(i~,) + 1 ( 7 , ) - I(,h),

i ( a 2) + I(,L) + I(7., ) -- I ( & ) .

A little calculation shows t h a t I', includes the poles of Zt(u) at the points

u-=l"ts

( I - ~ 8 - < I ( k + 2 I); I-<.-/--<L),

while 1".2 includes the poles of Z.o(u) a.t the points u " l"tk+~

Then if k is even, by Cauehy's Theorem,

~k L

s-=l l ~ l

k .L

1(1"2) -= 27vi ~, ~_~ lo,,,, {I -- exp (-- 2~ril~tk+.,)},

~ = l k + 1 /-=1

while, if k is odd,

~ ( k + l ) L

. / ( I ' , ) . - -

27ri Z Z tog

{ I - - e x p

(2~il~'t~)},

s = l l ~ l

k L

I(1"0) =-: zTri ~, ~_~ log {I -- e x p ( - - 2~.~il"t,:+~)}.

1 . . 3) l- -1

s--2(kT

I n either case, since t~+.~----t.~, we have

(15)

A s y m p t o t i c P a r t i t i o n Formulae. i I I . P a r t i t i o n s into k-th Powers. 157

t~ L

I ( r , ) + I ( F 2 ) =

z z i ~ ~

l o g { I - - e x p

(2~il"

t.)}

S ~ I l--1 k L--1

~ i F Y, log {, - ~ ( q , t, s)}.

S ~ I / = 0

(4. I3) All t h e a b o v e l o g a r i t h m s h a v e t h e i r p r i n c i p a l v a l u e s .

4. 2. L e m m a 6.

W e h a v e

I f l is any positive integer, and ~p any real number, then u = I e~(~+ ~) ei~ - - , I > D

I f

t h e n

I f

t h e n

U 2 = i --2e-n(21+l)sinWeos

{~v(2/+

I) e o s ~ ) } + e - 2 z ( 2 / + l ) s i n ~ p I - - e - - g ( 2 / + l ) s i n w ) 2.

I

2 ( 2 / + I) ~

1 U ~ >_ (, - e - 1 " ( 2 ~ + ! ) ~ ) ~ > O

I - - I ~ s i n ~p ---

2 ( 2 l + I) 89

1

U 2 ~ (e 1~(2/+1)~ - - I ) 2 : > D .

T h e r e r e m a i n s t h e e a s e

I f cos ~p > o ,

I f cos ~p -<- o ,

I I

< sin ~ --< - -

2 ( 2 / + I) 1 - 2(21+ I) 89

I ~ COS ~J --- sin ~ tp

I -P COS ~2 < sin" ~p --< I 4(21 + I)

I + cos tp - - sin ~ ~p

I -- cos ~p < sin~ ~p _< I

4(21 + I)

H e n c e , in e i t h e r c~se,

(16)

158

a n d so

T h e r e f o r e

F. Maitland Wright.

e o s ~ - - - -t- ! + 4 ( 2 / + i ) ' - - I --<~--< I ,

e o s { 7 , ( 2 [ +

i)eoslD} ---eosI+

(2l-[- I) a ~Tt:}

i

_ _ T E p

(1)

. . . COS ~Jr < O.

U e - - I - - 2 4 - - " ( 2 1 § {7r(2l + I)COS ~]J}-}-e--2~("'l~l)'~inV' > I . H e n c e , f o r all v a l u e s o f s i n ~ , we h a v e U 2 > D , a n d so U > D .

L e m m a 7. I f r > D , we have

I ] ( n ) l <

-Uc-Dr,

I [ G ) I < .Do.-,,,.. (4.21)

(i) L e t .u lie on ;,'~ t h a t is, l e t .u = B d ~ o < 0 < - - - -- " I a 7 ~ . .

4

a n d , f o r R > D ,

B y L e m m a 6,

H e n c e a n d T h e n

.~)~( Y d ' ) - : ] : ' I F cos kO > Y i P c o s I ~ > D R k, 4

[e Y n ~ : - I [ > e D R 1 : - I > D 6 I)Rk

- - , " = " > D . D < [ i - - e~'i" [ < 2,

I l o g (I - e ~ " ; " ) I < / ) .

~'!

T h e n we h a v e

(ii) L e t u lie on 7 , , t h a t is, let u - v e ~I"~':, R _ < v _ < R ' < 2 R I T h e n

!1~ ( Y a ~) = Yr cos - ~ > D I F . I 4

(4.22)

(17)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae.

Hence, for /1 > D ,

Also

and s o

H e n c e

III. I'artitions into k-th Powers. 159

[e r'd: -- I [ >- e *~ze~- I > De Dl:~'.

'2:'riu] . (2--'2xrsin l et.-~ < t3--l) l:

I l o a (i - e~-'~'") I < De -l'j:.

I ( Z~(u) du] < l)l(a'c-Dle-Dr'~'<

7 1

(iii) L e t u lie on 7,,"' that is, let I, -

~ ' e i~ and I a e r < O ~ _.I

4 2

e~,, ~ - - , = e r , " k , ,';~ ' ' " - - , = e'-'.~'( L~ ',)~.~,~" __ I ,

where ~ p = : k O - - - r g , and so by L e m m a 6 I

2

l ( 'Yuk - I l > D.

Also

and

[ e,_,.i,, ] _<_ e-'.,.-, s' ~i,, I,,,~ <

~-me',

[ l o / ( I --

e~'i")[ < De - D w

Zl(") d , < DR'a'e-i'1r < De-*'".

*it

H e n c e

;r. Then

and (4.24).

4-3-

(4. ~3)

( 4 . 2 4 )

, t a l i t

Since 71 = 7', + 7t § 7 , , the first part of (4.2I) follows h'om (4.22),

(4. 23)

The second par{ may be proved in the same way.

L e m m a 8.

We have

I kTr, i (log

1(de) =:: ~ k e d (log

2 ~ + l o ~ e - - I ) 9 4 ~ + O ( q l o g . o ) ,

, )

2 ~ + logq + 4~r 4- O(ologq). (4.32)

(4.3~)

These results are a m a t t e r of simple calculation and we omit the proof.

(18)

160 E. Maitland Wright.

L e m m a 9. IVe have

I(r - - 1 (fl,) .... 2 ~eij Y + 0 (d: log Q) + 0 (e-~)1~). (4.33) W e replace u in I(fl~) by - - u ; t h e n fl~ becomes ill.

at once

I(,G) = I(//x), J = o,

I f k is even, we have

so t h a t (4.33) is true, t h e r i g h t h a n d side being in f a c t zero:

I f k is odd, we have

Since

we have

flu k-1 lo~ (I --

e ''~')

I % ) = ( - - ~ ) ~ k Y e_,:i~.- - " --du

fl,

--- k Y ; uk 1 l o g ( J - - e "-~i'')

I - - e - - y.k d u .

J

I I

I - - ( ' - - ] ' u k e ) ' a k - - I

- - - I ,

i R ' .

~-= k Y f u ~'-1 log (I -- e2'~i~')du,

i0

for the i n t e g r a n d has no singularities on the i m a g i n a r y axis between u - - i Q and u : - - i R ' , and so //1 m a y be d e f o r m e d into this p o r t i o n of the i m a g i n a r y axis.

I f we p u t u = i v , we have

R r

I(fl~.) -- [(//~) --- k:

ri,: f ,,,:-i

log

(,

- ~-,~,~,,)a,

o

=-: k Y i k f d :-1 log (, --- e-~

0

+ o(Q~log(,)+

o(~-,,R').

(4.34)

(19)

Also

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 161

oe

o

r162 r

. . . . v k - - l e - - 2 n v d l )

0

. . . (2 zr)k . . . (4. 3 5 )

T h e n (4-33) follows f r o m (4. 34), (4.35) a n d t h e definition of j . 4.4- L e m m a 10. We have

z ( ~ , ) - ~ ( , , , ) = 2 ~ i & + 2~iz,, y - ~

+ ~vilog(Y,o k) + O(,ologo) + O(e-J'"), ( 4 . 4 I ) where log Sq and l o g ( Y Q ~) are real.

W e t a k e l o g ( i - e -Y"k) real on t h e positive h a l f of t h e real axis a n d write

~1 (~r - - - " 2 2 l ; ' i log (I - - e - y,,k) 2 ~ i log (I -- e - r,,~)

I - e - ' ~ '~ ~ ' ; . . . . ' ~,., ( u ) - e '~ "~ ~ " - 1

T h e n we see t h a t

H e n c e

I(.1)--~

- f

c q

---f

c t t

Similarly 21 --34198.

d { l o g ( i e - Y u k ) (I e2niu)}

d , , - - lo,.,. - = z , ( u ) +

~,(.),

d {log (I - e -l''tk) l o g (I - - e-2~iu)} = 7.2(,4) -}- ~2(?r du

f z (")du

~1 (u) d u + log 2 log ( I - - e - Y R~) __ log ( I - - e - Ye~) log ( I -- e 2 ~ i,o)

Aeta mathematlca. 63. Imprim6 Io 21 juin 1934.

(20)

162 E. Maitland Wright.

a n d S O

N o w

(~.,

+ o(e -~.~) 4- o(eloge);

I(,.,)--I(~)= f s.~(.,,)d,,-- f ~l(.)d,,

+ ~i log(Ye ~) + o(e lo,,, e)+ o(e-~~).

l - 1

r (zl

(4.4:)

by C u u e h y ' s T h e o r e m . Since the l o g a r i t h m s have t h e i r

H e n c e

Also

a l l ( 1

principal value, we have

r

I'~, ~ lo~ (, - ~-,,k) I

/=-1

l - r - i 1 I - - r : I

9 f

j ~ , ( . ) d . - ~,Odd.---o~-:S,, + o(,~-'~).

f 1~.~(.)- ~,(,.)} d . = I lo~ (i --,,-~"~)d,.

R

= j " lo,,, ( I - e - )"'~')d u

0

l

= log ( i -- e - v,,.~:)d u + 0 (q log O) + 0 (e- D,.),

L

o

log ( I - - e - r,,k) d u I e - m l ' u k d l ~ ,

I) 0

(4.43)

(4. 44)

(21)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 163 7

--'-- I ~ a ~ ( I -}-

a)ff

e--'~kdu

0

= "-- r - - a I ~ ( I -I- a)~(I -}- a ) = - - ~ , q [ y - a . (4.45)

Then (4.4I) follows from ( 4 - 4 2 ) t o (4.45).

4.5. W e can now prove L e m m a 5. By (4. II) and (4. I2), I ( r , ) + I ( F ~ ) = I(cq) - I(,~) + I(3~) - - I(fl,)

-~ I(rl) Av J~Cy~)- !({~l)- I({~2).

I f we substitute the results of L e m m a s 7, 8, 9 and IO, we have 2 ~ i { I ( r , ) + I ( ~ ) 1 = s , + z~ y - o + J Y I

-~- 2Ilog ~/~-- 2I ]clog2r 0(~logQ) -~- O ( e - - D r ) .

Now let r - - ~ t h r o u g h positive integral values and let Q--~o. Then L - , ~ , and, by (4-I3),

s'~ = s~ + 2~ Y - . + j y + ! log r - ~ k log (2 ~).

2' 2

This is L e m m a 5.

5. I. Case (ii): h # q , h k--~o (modq). Here we have h ~ o (modq~).

L e m m a 11. I f h # q and h k ~ o (modq), we have

SPh @ S'q--h - - Sh - - S q - - h ~ (,~,h -~- ,~,q h) y - a _}_ (jh + j(,-,,) Y

I k {log (2 sin ,h~r)+ :log (2 sin ~q--h Jr)}.

2

The result is symmetrical in h and q - - h ; it is therefore sufficient to prove it when h < - - q . I Then we have

2

I 0 ~ x ~ ~ h ~ - 9

2

W e now t a k e

R ~ r - + - + r /~_~"~r + - - - ~ , 2

(22)

164 E. Maitland Wright.

and choose L so t h a t

- - R k Y < L ~- (2R")k Y I

2 ~ 2 ~ 2

which is clearly possible for r > D . W e write

Then

B " < R < R ' < 2 R " < 2 R .

The contour a~ is coincident w i t h the real axis from ~ to R , except t h a t it passes above the points

U = l + * ( / - ~ - O, I , 2, . . . r ) ,

while a~ is coincident with the real axis from --t~ to - - R " , except t h a t it passes above the points

u = - - l q - ~ ( l = I, 2 , . . . r ) . The contours % and % are the reflexions of a 1 and a 4 in the real axis.

W e t a k e /~ a n d r as before, except for the change in the value of R';

fls coincides with /~.,, and fl~ with fl~. The contours dl, &2, d~, d4 are the quadrants of the circle [u[ = Q on which, if u ~ Qe '~

I I I I

~ --2-7r176 --~r----_O~--2-~v, - ~ < _ 0 ~ < ~ , 2

respectively. The contours 71 and 7,2 are defined as before in terms of the new values of R and R'. The contour 73 consists of the three parts 7':~, 7~, 7~'; o n

, I ,,, l ~ , e i O I

78, u = R " e i ~ and - - - z ~ < O - - < - ~ + - a ~ , on 78, u ~ and - - ~ + - a ~ - - <

4 4

~ _ . 0 < I ,,

_ - - - - ~, and 7~ is the appropriate segment of the s t r a i g h t line

2

0 = - - z c + - a z . I

4 Finally, 74 is the reflexion of 73 in the real axis.

The positive directions of the a and the fl contours are outwards from the origin, and of the 7 a n d the d contours counterclockwise ~bout the origin.

Then we write

(23)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 165

W e now write

I f k is even, while, if k is odd,

F I --- {Xl - - fll -It- 71 - - (~i'

k Y u ~-1 loft (l - - e 2~i(~*-*))

z , ( u ) - e r ~ - I

Z,~(u) k Y u I~-' l o g ( I - - e - 2 ~ i ( . . . . ) ) . Y u k - - I

z~(u)=z~(u), z d - ) = z , ( . ) ,

(5.

i,)

We take log

( I -

e 2zi(u-z)) real at u = . + i on F~, and log ( 1 - e -2~(~'-*)) real

2

at u ~ z + - on F2. I W e can t h e n show t h a t l o g ( I - - e 2~i(~-~)) has its principal

2

value on or w i t h i n F 1 and F~, and similarly f o r t h e o t h e r , l o g a r i t h m and the o t h e r contours.

T h e z-functions have poles at the points

ts ~a (I <_s <_ 2 k , 1 >_ I)

and at t h e origin, and l o g a r i t h m i c singularities at t h e points

W e write also

u = * + l ( I = . : . - - 2 , - - I , 0 , I , 2 , . . . ) .

~,(.)

= 2 ~ i i o g (, -

~- "~)

I - - e - 2 z i ( u - v )

e 2 a i ( u - ~ ) - - I

where l o g ( I - - e - Y~k) is real on the positive half of t h e real axis. I f k is even, we take ~8(u) a n d ~4(u) of t h e same f o r m as ~(u) a n d ~,(u) respectively, b u t t h e l o g a r i t h m is now to be t a k e n real on t h e n e g a t i v e h a l f of t h e real axis. I f k is odd, we t)ake

(24)

166 E, Maitland Wright.

2 ~ i lo.o. ( r eY'~') ' 2 7~ i log (I ~- e Y'~)~

where the l o g a r i t h m is real on the negative h a l f of the real axis.

F u r t h e r , we write

= f

1"1

a n d so on.

= I ( ~ , ) - I(~'1) + I ( z , ) - I ( ~ , ) ,

5.2. L e m m a 12. For r > D, we have

I ICr,)I < D e - " , (5.2i)

and similarly for I(7~) , /(7+), I(7~).

T h e m e t h o d of p r o o f of these results is clear from t h a t of L e m m a 7 . L e m m a 13. We have

rot) ~k~,ilog(,-e-~'")+ o(e),

2

I(~.~1 = ~ k ~ i lo~. (i - e '~,:~) + o(~),

2

I(d~) - - ~ k ~ i l o g (~ - e ~ " ) + 0 (0),

2

z ( , ~ ) .... ~ z ~ i l o ~ (, - e - ~ , " , ) + o (~).

2

( 5 . 2 2 )

where the logarithms have their principal values.

Since t h e s i n g u l a r i t y of every Z(u) at t h e origin is now a simple pole, these results are i m m e d i a t e consequences of well-known t h e o r e m s in the t h e o r y of residues,

L e m m a 14. We have

and

I ( 3 ~ ) - I(~1) .... 2 ~ ( i ~ , - , , r + o ( e ~) + O ( e - " ) , .(5.23) (5 . 24)

(25)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. ili. Partitions into k-th Powers9 I f k is even,

I ( f l ~ ) - I(fl~), /(fla)=-I(fl2), j , , = . ] , , ,, o ,

i

and t h e result is obvious. I f k is odd, we have

Since

- - f ( e ~ , ~ _ I)Zi(u)du

t

* U k - 1 ( I e 2 zci( . . . . ) ) d u

= k Y log - -

= k Y r '~-1

log (I - =

e-2~(~§

0

+ o (e ~) + o (ey'R').

f

co V k - i log (I - - e ~ ( ~ + i ~ ) ) d v

0

c~

- ~ - - ]~ Z e - - 2 n m i ' r

v >- l e - 2 ~ m ~ d v = ( - -

m = 1 ~ "

0

(k--~)

2 ~?q--h,

we have (5.23), a n d (5.24) m a y be proved in the same way.

5.3. L e m m a 15. W e h a v e

I(%) -- I(%) + 1(%) -- I(%)

= 2 ~ i { Y-~(Z~ + Z~_,,) + & + &_,,) + 0 (q loo. O) + 0 ( e - > ) .

W e have

/log (~ - e ~'r lo0' (, - e ' ~ % / = Z,(") + ~,("),

d u ~ "

i67

(5.31)

a n d so on. H e n c e

(26)

i68 E. Maitland Wright.

s(o,) -- _ f ( u l d . _ ,og (i -- e -2"'*) log (Yt) k) + E,,

(z 1

s(~D = -- f ~(~)Uu - log (~ - ~ - - ) log ( ~ 1 + E~,

~2

s(%)

= - j ~(uld.

- l o g (~ -- ~ " D log (~0 ~) + S~,

~3

I(a4) = - - f f4(u) d u - - log (I - - e -2'~i') log ( Y o k)

a4

w h e r e E l , E~., Ea, E 4 are n u m b e r s of t h e t y p e 0 (t~ loo. q) + 0 (e--S~rk).

T h e n we have

S(a~) - - S(a~) + S ( @ -- S ( @

ct~ ~4 61 aB

+ o (e log e) + o ( e - ' , ) . Now, as before, we find t h a t

f~du--f~,du

= 2 ~ i S h + 2 ~ i Y--a C(I + a)~(I -I- a)

+ o (Q log ~) + o (e-',,).

I n the same way, w h e t h e r k is odd or even,

(X3 if4

+ G ,

~4d?~ = - - 2:w.i S q _ h - - 27~.i ~ r - a / ' ( I 2- a)~(I --t- t/) + 0 (~ log ~) + 0 ( ~ - - , r ) .

Since h ;r o (rood q), we have

eq(mph':) ~- I, e q ( m p ( q - - h ) k) = I, z,~ = zq_~ = r (i + ~) ~ (~ + ~), a n d t h e l e m m a follows at once.

(27)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 169 5.4. By Cauchy's Theorem,

lira I : {1(/11) + I(F2) + I(F3) + I(12~)}

o-*0, r ~ ~ 2 :rg ?~

- S~', + S '

- - q h* ( 5 . 4 1 )

But by (5. II) and Lemmas I2, I3, 14 and 15, we see t h u t this limit is equal to

Now

Sh + Sq-h + (s + Zq-h) Y - " + (j~, + jq-h) Y

- - ~ k { l o g ( I - - e 2~t*) + l o g ( I - - e - 2 Z i * ) } . ( 5 . 4 2 ) 2

I ]C log {(I e 2uiz) (I - - e -2zi*)} = t]g log (4 s i n '~ z z )

2 2

2 (5.43)

since ~ h = ~ a n d ~ q - h = I - - ~ . L e m m a I I follows from (5.4I), (5.42) and (5.43)- 5.5. Case (iii).

take now

I f k is even, we write

but if k is odd

We have still to consider the case h k ~ o (rood q). W e

~I(U) = vk Y u k-~ log (I -- e 2~(~-*)) vk Y u ~-1 log (I -- e -2hi(u--z))

e Y U k _

z 3 ( u ) =

These functions have poles ~t the points

u = t, (z + (i <_s.<_ 2k; l>_o)

and logarithmic singularities at the points

u = l + ~ ( l ~ . . . - - 2 , - - I , O , 1 , 2 , . . . ) ,

but the functions are regular at the origin.

22--34198. A c t a m a t h e m a t i c a . 63. Imprim6 le 22 juin 1934.

(28)

170 E. Maitland Wright.

W e n e e d n o t give t h e n e w f o r m s of t h e ~ functions. W e r e m a r k only t h a t in ~ , f o r e x a m p l e , we t a k e t h a t value of l o g ( I - ~'e -Yuk) which tends to zero as u - ~ + ~ a l o n g t h e r e a l axis.

T h e c~ a n d fl c o n t o u r s are t h e s a m e as before, while t h e ~ c o n t o u r s are u n n e c e s s a r y h e r e ; we m a y p u t Q ~ o a t once, as t h e f u n c t i o n s are all r e g u l a r at t h e origin. T h e 7 c o n t o u r s h a v e to be modified to avoid the s i n g u l a r i t i e s of the g-functions a n d to' e n a b l e us to prove a r e s u l t of t h e t y p e of L e m m a s 7 a n d I2.

T h e details of t h e w o r k will be sufficiently clear f r o m t h e f o r e g o i n g , a n d we c o n t e n t ourselves w i t h s t a t i n g L e m m a 16.

L e m m a 16. I f h k is not a m u l t @ l e o f q, we have

Sp t I

,~ + s~_~ - s ~ - s~_~ = y-~(z~ + z~_h) + r(.]~ + .i~-,,) + 4 ~i(o~ + ~_,,).

T h e t e r m - z i ( a h + aq-h) arises f r o m I

4

f {Z~ (u) + ff~ (u)} d u - - - - log (I -- v) log (, -- e 2~i~) + 0 (e -DR)

a n d t h e t h r e e s i m i l a r expressions. I f k is even, t h e s u m of t h e f o u r is zero.

5~ 6. P r o o f o f L e m m a 2. W e n o w c o m b i n e L e m m a s 5, I I a n d I6. L e t

~ ' d e n o t e s u m m a t i o n o v e r t h o s e values of h f o r which h ~ - o (mod q) a n d h ~ q, a n d ~ " s u m m a t i o n o v e r those values of h f o r w h i c h h k ~ o (mod q). W e h a v e

q q q q

rEjh+- lo T

h ~ l h = l h = l " h = l 2

[ k l o g 2 z + I - z i ~ " a h - - I k ~ ' l o g ( z s i n z h ~ ) ,

2 4 2

t h e l o g a r i t h m s on the r i g h t h a n d side b e i n g real.

N o w

2 sin 1 ~ :== q2,

h = : l \

a n d so

q2--1

2 ' l o g 2 s i n q t=l q~.

(29)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers.

Also

Y-~ ~, A = ...

h : 1 q u a m-~- 1 ~/l+a T h e value of t h e stun

q h=l

L/p, q . ya

171

is q or o according as m is, or is not, ~ multiple of q. H e n c e , if k is odd,

and so

I f k is even,

Also, by (3.2I),

q

" ~ e ~ ( m h )

~ j h = ( - ~){('+')y r (k + i)q,,

h=l ( 2Tg)k+l m:lZ h~lZ osk+l

=jy.

q

~Zj~ o=jy.

h--I

I ~pt log ~op, q = - ~ i ah.

4 H e n c e we have

T a k i n g positive.

log f ( x ) - - log Pp, q = _dp, q y - a + j y + 2 I log y + log wp, q + 2 k (log q - - log q~ I log 2 ~).

e x p o n e n t i a l s a n d n o t i n g t h a t q = qlq2, we have (2. i1) f o r y r e a l a n d This is L e m m ~ 2, a n d t h e p r o o f of T h e o r e m 4 is t h u s complete.

Part II. The Asymptotic Expansion of

pk(n).

6. W e now t u r n to the p r o o f of T h e o r e m s I, 2 and 3. W e shall first prove T h e o r e m 3, f r o m which t h e others m a y be readily deduced. W e first define t h e m e a n i n g of certain f u r t h e r symbols.

(30)

172 E. Maitland Wright.

W e t a k e e an a r b i t r a r y positive n u m b e r , a n d 6 a positive n u m b e r whose choice is s u b s e q u e n t to t h a t of k a n d e. N is a p o s i t i v e n u m b e r which is u l t i m a t e l y chosen as a f u n c t i o n of k; n a n d ~. T h e n u m b e r s ~ a n d 6 are to be t h o u g h t of as small, while n a n d N are to be t h o u g h t of as large. W e write

C ~ 2 k - 1 .

A a n d B are positive n u m b e r s , whose values varies f r o m one occurrence to a n o t h e r . I n a n y p a r t i c u l a r occurrence, A w i t h o u t a suffix is a n a b s o l u t e c o n s t a n t , while B d e p e n d s at m o s t on k. I f , however, A a n d B d e p e n d on o t h e r p a r a - m e t e r s t h e s e are i n d i c a t e d explicitly by suffixes, f o r e x a m p l e ,

= = B ( k , q ,

T h e c o n s t a n t i m p l i e d in t h e 0 ( ) n o t a t i o n is h e n c e f o r t h of t h e t y p e B , , e x c e p t in L e m m a 33.

I n t h e c o m p l e x x-plane, 1" is t h e circle

1

I x l = e

of o r d e r N 1-b of this circle a n d consider t w o W e t a k e t h e F a r e y dissection

k i n d s of a r c s : - -

(i) M a j o r arcs, ~)~ or ~J~p,,l, such t h a t q--< N b, (ii) M i n o r arcs, m or rap, q, such t h a t N b < q--< N i-b.

T h e r e s t r i c t i o n y r e a l a n d positive is n o w r e m o v e d and, in c o n n e c t i o n w i t h every p a i r of values of p a n d q, we write

H(_//) = exp _/1 , U (A, X) - U (A, e-") = y~- e~' H (A),

1

w h e r e y , y ~ , y a are real a n d positive f o r X real a n d o < X < I . W h e n x lies on F , we write

Y = ~ g - - i O , I

a n d f o r x on ~ p , q or on mp, q we h a v e

-Op, q <_O<_Op,~, t

w h e r e

< ' < q~T--;, ' q N~--b < 0~,, q < - - q-N1- b - - Op, q

2 ~

q Nl-b

(31)

Asymptotic Partition Formulae. III. Partitions into k-th Powers. 173 U p p e r B o u n d f o r

I logf(x)l

on t h e M i n o r A r c s .

7. I. I f k = I , t h e n b = - = 1 - - b I a n d there are no m i n o r arcs. H e n c e

2

we need only consider t h e case k--> 2 in this section.

W e take l o g f ( x ) = o at x = o. T h e n l o g f ( x ) is one-valued f o r every value of x within t h e u n i t circle, f o r f ( x ) has no zeros within the u n i t circle.

L e m m a 17. I f 7 > o, k >-- 2 and x lies on rnp, q, then

Ilogf(x) l

< B r N a-',c+r. (7. I i ) W e use [u] to denote t h e i n t e g r a l p a r t of u and write

W e have

.2.

~ = k + 3 ' ~'~=

T ( v ) ~ - W ( v , p , q , m ) = ~_j eq(plk~,).

~o ov ~0

/ = 1 / = 1 m = l 9 n

= Z E § 2; E + Y,Z

mNNb / = 1 m<Nb 1=%n+1 m>N bl.-1

= Z~ + Z2 + Z3.

L e m m a 18. On the whole circle 1",

(7. i2)

I f ~ > o ,

I Z~ I < B, log _N, Iz~l < B2r

E e-~lk ~- e--~Ukdu = ~--a e , l ~ k d u = B ~ - a .

1=1 o o

Also, on I ' , [x[--~ e ~v, a n d so

lkm a I

< BNa(l-b) -- B N ~.

(32)

174

A g a i n

H e n c e on F

E

l~cunt + I

E. Maitland Wright.

- - lkm J " e - m u k e " Y - < - I + ~v d u

(o m-F 1

PT/

"~ I -]- \ Wl ] C-- 'tk (] lt

Y' f

<--

~ + \ m I e-1'-' .,,k

0

{ Nlae__l,_ (2"l~'~

. - I + B \ m l - ~ i < I ~ 3 .

- < B~,loo. N . I

Iz,~l <- B~ Y, ,.

m "~ N b

du

Lemma 19. On a mi~zor

arc

ll1,,,q, 7~ k--~ 2,

I Z~] < BTN ~-t'~'t

W e w r i t e

p m _ p,,

q q,,

T h e n

'::, [ ( F ]

w h e r e eqm(p~, ) is a p r i m i t i v e q,~-th r o o t of u n i t y . N o w a - c; also

N b ~ q -~. N 1-~' , q,,~ ~ q ~

mqm.

H e n c e , if v --< m a~,, we haw~

L L a n d a u , V o r l e s u n g c n iiber Z a h l e n t h e o r i e , I, (I,eipzig, x927) , Satz 257.

Références

Documents relatifs

The goal is to compute the minimum levels of implica- tion of the clauses that are used during the detection of the generalized local autarkies modulo unit propagation.. A level can

However, it is useful to practice Darboux sums.... However, it is useful

Nicolas, “On practical partitions,” Collectanea Math.. Ramanujan, “Asymptotic formulae for the distribution of integers of various

Les entérobactéries sont de plus en plus résistantes aux antibiotiques et l’augmentation de l’incidence des infections liées à des entérobactéries productrices

Key words : Partitions, periodic sequences, order of a polynomial, orbits, 2-adic numbers, counting function, Selberg-Delange formula... 2000 MSC : 11P81, 11N25, 11N37. [14], [5])

Concerning the approximability of related problems, Hassin and Rubinstein, [9] pro- posed a generic algorithm to approximate MaxW P 4 Packing in complete graphs on 4n vertices

Indeed, as by the strong Markov property, the increments τ j − τ j−1 of the first passage time process in a downward skip free random walk are i.i.d., the combination of (1) and the

This paper is organized as follows: in the next section, we will briefly present previous related work about the hardness of solving bounded-size-path packing problems; then, the