• Aucun résultat trouvé

On instability for the cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "On instability for the cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-00127816

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00127816

Submitted on 29 Jan 2007

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

On instability for the cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation

Rémi Carles

To cite this version:

Rémi Carles. On instability for the cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation. Comptes ren- dus de l’Académie des sciences. Série I, Mathématique, Elsevier, 2007, 344 (8), pp.483-486.

�10.1016/j.crma.2007.03.006�. �hal-00127816�

(2)

hal-00127816, version 1 - 29 Jan 2007

ON THE INSTABILITY FOR THE CUBIC NONLINEAR SCHR ¨ ODINGER EQUATION

R´ EMI CARLES

Abstract. We study the flow map associated to the cubic Schr¨ odinger equa- tion in space dimension at least three. We consider initial data of arbitrary size in H

s

, where 0 < s < s

c

, s

c

the critical index, and perturbations in H

σ

, where σ < s

c

is independent of s. We show an instability mechanism in some Sobolev spaces of order smaller than s. The analysis relies on two features of super-critical geometric optics: creation of oscillation, and ghost effect.

1. Introduction

We consider the Cauchy problem for the cubic, defocusing Schr¨odinger equation:

(1.1) i∂ t ψ + 1

2 ∆ψ = |ψ| 2 ψ, x ∈ R n ; ψ

|t=0

= ϕ.

Formally, the mass and energy associated to this equation are independent of time:

Mass: M [ψ](t) = Z

Rn

|ψ(t, x)| 2 dx ≡ M [ψ](0) = M [ϕ], Energy: E[ψ](t) =

Z

Rn

|∇ψ(t, x)| 2 dx + Z

Rn

|ψ(t, x)| 4 dx ≡ E[ψ](0) = E[ϕ].

Scaling arguments yield the critical value for the Cauchy problem in H s ( R n ):

s c = n 2 − 1.

Assume n > 3, so that s c > 0. It was established in [3] that (1.1) is locally well- posed in H s ( R n ) if s > s c . On the other hand, (1.1) is ill-posed in H s if s < s c

([4]). Moreover, the following norm inflation phenomenon was proved in [4] (see also [1, 2]): if 0 < s < s c , we can find (ϕ j ) j∈

N

in the Schwartz class S( R n ) with

(1.2) kϕ j k H

s

−→

j→+∞ 0,

and a sequence of positive times τ j → 0, such that the solution ψ j to (1.1) with initial data ϕ j satisfy:

kψ j (τ j )k H

s

−→

j→+∞ +∞.

In [2], this was improved to: we can find t j → 0 such that kψ j (t j )k H

k

−→

j→+∞ +∞, ∀k ∈ s

1 + s c − s , s

.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 35B33; 35B65; 35Q55; 81Q05; 81Q20.

Support by the ANR project SCASEN is acknowledged.

1

(3)

2 R. CARLES

Note that (1.2) means that we consider the flow map near the origin. We show that inside rings of H s , the situation is yet more involved: for data bounded in H s , with 0 < s < s c , we consider perturbations which are small in H σ for any σ < s c , and infer a similar conclusion.

Theorem 1.1. Let n > 3 and 0 6 s < s c = n 2 − 1. Fix C 0 , δ > 0. We can find two sequences of initial data (ϕ j ) j∈

N

and ( ϕ e j ) j∈

N

in the Schwartz class S( R n ), with:

C 0 − δ 6 kϕ j k H

s

, k ϕ e j k H

s

6 C 0 + δ ; kϕ j − ϕ e j k H

σ

−→

j→+∞ 0, ∀σ < s c , and a sequence of positive times t j → 0, such that the solutions ψ j and ψ e j to (1.1), with initial data ϕ j and ϕ e j respectively, satisfy:

kψ j (t j ) − ψ e j (t j )k H

k

−→

j→+∞ +∞, ∀k ∈ s

1 + s c − s , s

(if s > 0), lim inf

j→+∞ kψ j (t j ) − ψ e j (t j )k

H

s

1+sc−s

> 0.

The main novelty in this result is the fact that the initial data are close to each other in H σ , for any σ < s c . In particular, this range for σ is independent of s.

Remark 1.2. Like in [1, 2], we consider initial data of the form ϕ j (x) = j

n2−s

a 0 (jx),

for some a 0 ∈ S( R n ) independent of j. The above result holds for all a 0 ∈ S( R n ) with, say 1 , ka 0 k H

s

= C 0 , and ϕ e j (x) = (j

n2−s

+ j)a 0 (jx) (see Section 2).

Considering the case s = n 4 , we infer from the proof of Theorem 1.1:

Corollary 1.3. Let n > 5 and C 0 , δ > 0. We can find two sequences of initial data (ϕ j ) j∈

N

and ( ϕ e j ) j∈

N

in the Schwartz class S( R n ), with:

C 0 − δ 6 E[ϕ j ], E[ ϕ e j ] 6 C 0 + δ ; M [ϕ j ] + M [ ϕ e j ] + E[ϕ j − ϕ e j ] −→

j→+∞ 0, and a sequence of positive times t j → 0, such that the solutions ψ j and ψ e j to (1.1) with initial data ϕ j and ϕ e j respectively, satisfy:

lim inf

j→+∞ E[ψ j − ψ e j ](t j ) > 0.

2. Reduction of the problem: super-critical geometric optics We now proceed as in [2]. We set ε = j s−s

c

: ε → 0 as j → +∞. We change the unknown function as follows:

u ε (t, x) = j s−

n2

ψ j

t j s

c

+2−s , x

j

. Note that we have the relation:

kψ j (t)k H ˙

m

= j m−s u ε j s

c

+2−s t ˙

H

m

.

With initial data of the form ϕ j (x) = j

n2−s

a 0 (jx) + ja 1 (jx), (1.1) becomes:

(2.1) iε∂ t u ε + ε 2

2 ∆u ε = |u ε | 2 u ε ; u ε (0, x) = a 0 (x) + εa 1 (x).

1 Provided that we choose j sufficiently large.

(4)

We emphasize two features for the WKB analysis associated to (2.1). First, even if the initial datum is independent of ε, the solution instantly becomes ε-oscillatory.

This is the argument of the proof of [2, Cor. 1.7]. Second, the aspect which was not used in the proof of [2, Cor. 1.7] is what was called ghost effect in gas dynamics ([6]): a perturbation of order ε of the initial datum may instantly become relevant at leading order. These two features are direct consequences of the fact that (2.1) is super-critical as far as WKB analysis is concerned (see e.g. [2]).

Consider the two solutions u ε and u e ε of (2.1) with a 1 = 0 and a 1 = a 0 respec- tively. Then Theorem 1.1 stems from the following proposition, which in turn is essentially a reformulation of [2, Prop. 1.9 and 5.1].

Proposition 2.1. Let n > 1 and a 0 ∈ S( R n ; R ) \ {0}. There exist T > 0 indepen- dent of ε ∈]0, 1], and a, φ, φ 1 ∈ C([0, T ]; H s ) for all s > 0, such that:

ku ε − ae iφ/ε k L

([0,T];H

sε

) + k u e ε − ae

1

e iφ/ε k L

([0,T];H

sε

) = O(ε), ∀s > 0, where

kf k 2 H

εs

= Z

Rn

1 + |εξ| 2 s

| f(ξ)| b 2 dξ,

and f b stands for the Fourier transform of f . In addition, we have, in H s : φ(t, x) = −t|a 0 (x)| 2 + O(t 3 ) ; φ 1 (t, x) = −2t|a 0 (x)| 2 + O(t 3 ) as t → 0.

Therefore, there exists τ > 0 independent of ε, such that:

lim inf

ε→0 ε s ku ε (τ) − u e ε (τ)k H ˙

s

> 0, ∀s > 0.

3. Outline of the proof of Proposition 2.1

The idea, due to E. Grenier [5], consists in writing the solution to (2.1) as u ε (t, x) = a ε (t, x)e

ε

(t,x)/ε , where a ε is complex-valued, and φ ε is real-valued. We assume that a 0 , a 1 ∈ S( R n ) are independent of ε. For simplicity, we also assume that they are real-valued. Impose:

(3.1)

 

 

∂ t φ ε + 1

2 |∇φ ε | 2 + |a ε | 2 = 0 ; φ ε (0, x) = 0.

∂ t a ε + ∇φ ε · ∇a ε + 1

2 a ε ∆φ ε = i ε

2 ∆a ε ; a ε (0, x) = a 0 (x) + εa 1 (x).

Working with the unknown function u ε = t (Re a ε , Im a ε , ∂ 1 φ ε , . . . , ∂ n φ ε ), (3.1) yields a symmetric quasi-linear hyperbolic system: for s > n/2 + 2, there exists T > 0 independent of ε ∈]0, 1] (and of s, from tame estimates), such that (3.1) has a unique solution (φ ε , a ε ) ∈ C([0, T ]; H s ) 2 . Moreover, the bounds in H s ( R n ) are independent of ε, and we see that (φ ε , a ε ) converges to (φ, a), solution of:

(3.2)

 

 

∂ t φ + 1

2 |∇φ| 2 + |a| 2 = 0 ; φ(0, x) = 0.

∂ t a + ∇φ · ∇a + 1

2 a∆φ = 0 ; a(0, x) = a 0 (x).

More precisely, energy estimates for symmetric systems yield:

ε − φk L

([0,T ];H

s

) + ka ε − ak L

([0,T];H

s

) = O(ε), ∀s > 0.

(5)

4 R. CARLES

One can prove that φ ε and a ε have an asymptotic expansion in powers of ε. Consider the next term, given by:

 

 

∂ t φ (1) + ∇φ · ∇φ (1) + 2 Re aa (1)

= 0 ; φ (1)

t=0 = 0.

∂ t a (1) + ∇φ · ∇a (1) + ∇φ (1) · ∇a + 1

2 a (1) ∆φ + 1

2 a∆φ (1) = i

2 ∆a ; a (1)

t=0 = a 1 . Then a (1) , φ (1) ∈ L

([0, T ]; H s ) for every s > 0, and

ka ε − a − εa (1) k L

([0,T

];H

s

) + kΦ ε − φ − εφ (1) k L

([0,T

];H

s

) 6 C s ε 2 , ∀s > 0 . Observe that since a is real-valued, (φ (1) , Re(aa (1) )) solves an homogeneous linear system. Therefore, if Re(aa (1) ) = 0 at time t = 0, then φ (1) ≡ 0.

Considering the cases a 1 = 0 and a 1 = a 0 for u ε and u e ε respectively, we obtain the first assertion of Prop. 2.1. Note that the above O(ε 2 ) becomes an O(ε) only, since we divide φ ε and φ by ε. This also explains why the first estimate of Prop. 2.1 is stated in H ε s and not in H s . The rest of the proposition follows easily.

Remark 3.1. We could use the ghost effect at higher order. For N ∈ N , assume e

u ε

|t=0

= (1 + ε N )a 0 for instance. Then for some τ > 0 independent of ε, we have lim inf

ε→0 ε s ku ε (τ) − u e ε (τ)k H ˙

s

× ε 1−N

> 0, ∀s > 0.

Back to the functions ψ, the range for k becomes:

k > s + (s c − s)(N − 1) 1 + s c − s ·

For this lower bound to be strictly smaller than s, we have to assume s > N − 1.

References

[1] N. Burq, P. G´ erard, and N. Tzvetkov, Multilinear eigenfunction estimates and global existence for the three dimensional nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Ann. Sci. ´ Ecole Norm. Sup. (4) 38 (2005), no. 2, 255–301.

[2] R. Carles, Geometric optics and instability for semi-classical Schr¨ odinger equations, Arch.

Ration. Mech. Anal. (2007), to appear ( doi:10.1007/s00205-006-0017-5 ).

[3] T. Cazenave and F. Weissler, The Cauchy problem for the critical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in H

s

, Nonlinear Anal. TMA 14 (1990), 807–836.

[4] M. Christ, J. Colliander, and T. Tao, Ill-posedness for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger and wave equa- tions, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Anal. Non Lin´ eaire, to appear. See also arXiv:math.AP/0311048 . [5] E. Grenier, Semiclassical limit of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation in small time, Proc.

Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1998), no. 2, 523–530.

[6] Y. Sone, K. Aoki, S. Takata, H. Sugimoto, and A. V. Bobylev, Inappropriateness of the heat- conduction equation for description of a temperature field of a stationary gas in the continuum limit: examination by asymptotic analysis and numerical computation of the Boltzmann equa- tion, Phys. Fluids 8 (1996), no. 2, 628–638.

Universit´ e Montpellier 2, Math´ ematiques, UMR CNRS 5149, CC 051, Place Eug` ene Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier cedex 5, France

2

E-mail address: Remi.Carles@math.cnrs.fr

2

Present address: Wolfgang Pauli Institute, Universit¨ at Wien, Nordbergstr. 15, A-1090 Wien

Références

Documents relatifs

Recently we have treated the linear case of this renewal model with diffusion (see [1]), we proved the existence, uniqueness and positivity of the solution, and we showed that for

The main idea to prove the convergence of the solutions to the scaled Boltzmann- Fermi equation toward a solution of the incompressible Euler equation is to study the time evolution

They observed that the lack of uniform continuity on bounded set of the flow-map associated with some canonical focusing dispersive equations, including the cubic focusing

Miller, Semiclassical nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with potential and focusing initial data, Osaka J.. Cazenave, Semilinear Schr¨ odinger equations, Courant Lecture Notes

However, the local well-posedness proved in [16, 7] provides more information on the solutions, for instance, one knows that the global solutions to the defocusing (INLS) satisfy u ∈

Using the same idea as in [15], the profile decomposition of bounded sequences in H 2 and H s (0 &lt; s &lt; 1) were then established in [29, 30] to study dynamical aspects of

In the super-critical case, the WKB analy- sis provides a new phenomenon for the (classical) cubic, defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation, which can be compared to the loss

We prove global internal controllability in large time for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on a bounded interval with periodic, Dirichlet or Neumann conditions.. Our