• Aucun résultat trouvé

Measuring achievement goals: A methodological contribution based on mouse-tracking data

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Measuring achievement goals: A methodological contribution based on mouse-tracking data"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01966803

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01966803

Submitted on 29 Dec 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

Measuring achievement goals: A methodological contribution based on mouse-tracking data

Alisée Bruno, Annique Smeding, Jean-Charles Quinton, Benoit Dompnier, Céline Darnon

To cite this version:

Alisée Bruno, Annique Smeding, Jean-Charles Quinton, Benoit Dompnier, Céline Darnon. Measur- ing achievement goals: A methodological contribution based on mouse-tracking data. 18th General Meeting of the European Association of Social Psychology, Jul 2017, Granda, Spain. �hal-01966803�

(2)

Developing and sustaining students' motivation to learn represents an essential educational challenge for teachers, parents, and policy-makers alike, because this motivation should foster learning and achievement. [1]

Although it has been assumed that the motivation to learn – or mastery (approach) goal endorsement – and to perform better than others – or performance (approach) goal endorsement - predicts learning and achievement, findings are still inconsistent in the literature. One explanation may be related to response biases, and more specifically social desirability bias.

The aim of this research was to develop an implicit measure of mastery and performance goals by recording computer mouse movements. Mouse-tracking allows measuring participants’ hand movements, which reflect underlying cognitive processes, including neural competition involved in decision making dynamics. [2]

In this study, Area Under the Curve (AUC) was used to measure implicit achievement goals. Convergent validity between the implicit measure and achievement goals’ explicit, self-reported equivalent measures was tested.

Participants. Study 1 : 142 psychology students (Mage = 20.3, SD = 3.4) Study 2 : 133 psychology students (Mage = 20.9, SD = 2.78) 1) Pre-test: 10 words for performance goals (COMPETITION) and 10 for mastery goals (COMPREHENSION), χ² (p < .05).

2) Implicit measure (Imp).

3) Self report measure (Exp). 2x2 scale of achievement goals Elliot & Murayama (2008)

Results

Discussion

Figure 1. Sample item

Table 1. Values above the diagonal refer to the Study 1 / values below the diagonal refer to Study 2. * indicate significant correlations. p <.05 *. p <. 001 **.

Appro

ach Avoid

START

COMPREHENSION

START

AUC

Variables Mastery-

Implicit

Mastery- Explicit

Performance- Explicit

Performance- Implicit

AUC_Performance AUC_Mastery

Mastery_Implicit - .14 .08 .05 .15 -.26**

Mastery_Explicit .22* - .13 .09 .01 -.11

Performance_Explicit .03 .26* - .50* -.36** -.23*

Performance_Implicit .17 .17 .54** - -.42** -.44**

AUC_Performance .03 -.08 -.19* -.38** - .34**

AUC_Mastery -.24* -.24* .04 -.13 .50 -

Figure 2. Sample illustration of the AUC

Implicit

measure (AUC)

Measures partially converge

[1] Hulleman, C., Bodmann. S., Schrager, M., Harackiewicz, J. (2010). A Meta-Analytic Review of Achievement Goal Measures: Different Labels for the Same Constructs or Different Constructs With Similar Labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 3, 422–449.

[2] Freeman, J. B. & Ambady, N. (2010). MouseTracker : software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method, Behavior research methods, 42 (1), 226-241.

[3] Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648.

Method studies 1 & 2

Introduction

Self report measure

Implicit indicators appear to partially converge with explicit

measure but not

systematically in the 2 studies for each goal

MT-based indicators are promising for

achievement-goal research, but more

empirical work is

needed to consolidate current findings

My goal is to learn as much as possible in my studies. □ 1 □ 2 □ 3 □ 4 □ 5 □ 6 □ 7

Références

Documents relatifs

Participants in the approach-dominant and high achievement goal orientation groups (who endorsed all 3 types of approach goals) self-reported similar levels of autonomous

’ s (2011) procedure, additional analyses were conducted to compare the fi t of the hypothesized model with a series of ten alternative models: (1) a 2 2 model whereby the

While catalysis very likely takes place at a single-metal center, the afore- mentioned catalysts are in fact quite complex, and the structure of their active sites are not known,

In particular, we defined social norms by introducing desirability operators for rep- resenting preferences about acceptable behaviours and the expectations as a new mental concept

In this paper, we present an approach to systematize the ap- plication of analyses on real-time system models. We propose : 1) to target goals for directing the analyses ; 2) to

Anion channel activity is necessary to induce ethylene synthesis and programmed cell death in response to oxalic acid... Anion channel activity is necessary to induce ethylene

This could happen if either the goal parameter is either particularly easy or difficult to achieve (and hence uniformly high or low scores), or if the practitioners were

An increase of self-approach goal endorsement is expected only for participants in the intrapersonal standard competition condition, and an increase of other-approach