for Assessing Vulnerability to Flood Risk in Urban Area (Case of Casablanca City, Morocco)
Abedlouahed Mallouk, Hatim Lechgar,
Mohamed Elimame Malaainine and Hassan Rhinane
Abstract
Flood risk management, since long based on the hazard control, is increasingly orientated towards an attempt to reduce the vulnerability of territories.
In fact, the dangers of
flood risk on the territory of Casablanca have been the subject of numerous analyzes, whereas studies on the vulnerability of Morocco
’s
first economic city are very rare. This work aims to contribute to the development of methods for assessing the vulnerability of the urbanized watershed area of Oued Bouskoura facing the over
flow of the latter in case of storm
floods. The method- ology of this study is the use of a geographic information system coupled with the hierarchical multi-criteria analysis developed by T. Saaty (Saaty 1980) for the identi
fication and quanti
fication of urban elements lying in the natural course of Oued Bouskoura and are at risk of
flooding.
Keywords
Flood risk Geographic information system Multi-criteria analysis
Vulnerability Watershed Bouskoura valley
1 Introduction
Since time immemorial, man is facing an enemy as powerful as unpredictable: the
floods. In fact,
floods are the most frequent natural disasters [1] and the most dangerous with their magnitude and suddenness [2]. Floods are a natural and
A. Mallouk (&)H. LechgarM.E. MalaainineH. Rhinane
FacultéDes Sciences Ain Chock, UniversitéHassan II, Casablanca, Morocco e-mail: abdelouahed.mallouk@gmail.com
H. Lechgar
e-mail: h.lechgar@gmail.com M.E. Malaainine
e-mail: mohamed.malaainine@gmail.com H. Rhinane
e-mail: h.rhinane@gmail.com
©Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
A. El Oualkadi et al. (eds.),Proceedings of the Mediterranean Conference on Information & Communication Technologies 2015, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 380, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30301-7_27
257
seasonal phenomenon which corresponds to a
flooding of an area usually out of the water.
The causes of these latter have evolved and their consequences are continuing to grow. Unfortunately, there are so far no means that can act upon the devastating effects of
flooding and urban
flooding, the only alternative is to take precautions at best by setting their knowledge at the forefront of policy priorities and intervention strategies [1].
During the last twenty-
five years (1999
–2014), Morocco has experienced a series of major
floods, which affected more than 557,270 people by making 1192 deaths [3]. The damage caused by these
floods hit three billions Dirhams [3]. The city of Casablanca, the economic capital of Morocco has not been spared. In fact, Heavy rainfall in 1996 as well as 2010 had caused extensive damage (collapse of dilapidated houses, electricity failure, paralysis of transport, school closures, and road accidents) and even losses of lives. The metropolis is characterized by the presence of the historical path of Oued Bouskoura that ran through, at the time, the city from east to west. The gradual occupation and urbanization of the major bed of Oued Bouskoura over the last decades and construction in the 80 s of the Eljadidaa road makes of this environment a vulnerable area for the population and infras- tructure there.
The methodology of this study is the use of a geographic information system coupled with the hierarchical multi-criteria analysis developed by T. Saaty (Saaty 1980) for the identi
fication and quanti
fication of urban elements lying in the natural course of Oued Bouskoura and are at risk of
flooding. The result is supplied as a synthetic cartography of the global indicator of vulnerability allowing a clear view of the risk associated with the
flooding hazard. The result is an effective and useful tool for supporting decision-making for decision makers in the context of an integrated management for the areas of Casablanca subject to
flooding.
1.1 Study Area
Casablanca is situated on the Moroccan Atlantic coast, west central Morocco. In geographic coordinates, the city is located about 33° 34
′42.44
″North latitude and 7° 36
′23.89
″West longitude. Casablanca is characterized by a semi-arid climate with normal average temperature (calculated from 1961 to 1990) ranging from 12.7 °C in winter to 21 °C in summer. The average annual rainfall is 427 mm. They may reach values lower than 200 mm or sometimes exceeding 800 mm [4].
Oued Bouskoura is undoubtedly one of the major threats to the city of
Casablanca. The danger lies in the fact that the city is built on the natural bed of
Oued Bouskoura. This gives particular importance to this area that covers three
urban municipalities we have taken as a sample for the application of our model.
This being said, nothing prevents the application of the methodology of this study to be generalized across the area of Casablanca (Fig.
1).1.2 Methodological Approach
The methodology of this study is the use of a geographic information system coupled with the hierarchical multi-criteria analysis developed by T. Saaty (Saaty 1980) for the identi
fication and quanti
fication of urban elements lying in the natural course of Oued Bouskoura and are at risk of
flooding.
The elaborated assessment tool allows analyzing and evaluating local vulnera- bility to urban
flooding in three types of issues: human issues, environmental issues and material issues. Each of these issues is the subject of an analysis and evaluation grid that enables the development of vulnerability indicators from the detailed lists of criteria. The result is supplied as a synthetic cartography of the global indicator of vulnerability allowing a clear view of the risk associated with the
flooding hazard. The result is an effective and useful tool for supporting decision-making for decision makers in the context of an integrated management for the areas of Casablanca subject to
flooding.
Fig. 1 Study area
2 The Use of Multi-criteria Analysis Methods in the Vulnerability Assessment
2.1 Multicriteria Methods for Assessing the Vulnerability of a Territory
The methods of decision support or, more accurately, the multi-criteria methods for decision support are fairly recent techniques and under development [5].
Historically, these methods were used by managers of companies or project man- agers as decision support tools to deal with problems of choice of solution or alternative assessment. In fact, methods of decision support have been developed to facilitate the choice between a number of options available or evaluation in com- plex situations where several qualitative and quantitative criteria come into play [6].
More recently they have been applied repeatedly in environmental issues such as vulnerability assessment of a territory, in terms of
flood risk, industrial risks or risks for transport of hazardous materials [7].
Today, there exist several decision support methods such as comparison criteria, weighted averages, the ordinal method, factor analysis or even multi-criteria approach to decision support AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) [6]. The latter, which is the methodological context of our study, was proposed by Thomas Saaty in the 1980s it consists in ordering solutions based on different criteria while examining the consistency and the logic of judgments about the weight of criterion considered and preferences of decision makers [8].
2.2 AHP Method: Principles and Computation
The process of the AHP method can be summarized in four steps: analyze the problem concerned, build a hierarchical decomposition by declining each objective comparison criteria, determine priorities for targets from expert judgment by checking the consistency of subjective assessments and aggregate at the end the experts
’answers to get the vulnerability functions.
One of the most creative tasks in decision making is to choose the factors that are important for the decision [9]. Using the AHP method is initially based on the decomposition of the problem by performing a qualitative and quantitative accurate census of different criteria (vulnerable targets and vulnerability factors) [6]. This initial analysis is highly dependent on judgments, needs and knowledge of the participants in the process of decision making. Note also that the
fineness of this decomposition depends on the
“wealth
”of the databases used (land use map, urban planning, population census, transportation networks, public facilities, etc.)
The second stage of the AHP method is to build a hierarchical tree composed of
objectives, criteria, sub-criteria and targets in the form of father-son pair. This
hierarchy provides a structured view of the problem studied in offering the user/decision maker better concentration on speci
fic criteria [10].
Each criterion must be identi
fied with its de
finition and intensity [8]. In fact, the weight of each item is determined using the pairwise comparison method. This involves comparing the different criteria son pairwise compared to the initial target (father criteria) to assess their importance. This comparison is done primarily through the collection of expert opinions through a questionnaire in the form of
“
evaluation matrix
”and according to a so-called speci
fic Saaty scale [11] (Table
1).The evaluation matrices are square matrices, the order equal to the number of comparison criteria. The experts pronounce on the importance of criterion c
1of the 1st line with criteria c
2, c
3,
…, c
nappearing successively at the top of each column.
This operation is subsequently performed for each criterion of each line of the matrix. The sum of the weights of all criteria son of the same father criterion is 1.
This weight rule is called
“interdependent relationship.
”In a decision problem, it is absolutely essential to measure the
“degree
”of consistency of judgments that are placed. In fact, the 3rd stage of the AHP method is to check the consistency of binary comparisons from expert judgment and included in the evaluation matrices. The consistency of the answers is estimated using a known ratio: Consistency Ratio (CR) [6]. This ratio is obtained from the eigenvalue of the comparison matrices and which should be less than 10 %.
Calculating the Coherence Ratio is as follows.
Consider C = (C
ij) an evaluation matrix with C
ijthe relative weight of the criterion C
iwith respect to C
jcriterion. C the matrix of order n with:
C
ij6¼0
;C
ij¼1
=C
jie
tC
ii¼1
: ð1
ÞThe matrix is perfectly consistent if the weights C
ijare transitive, that is to say, for all i, j and k has the following equation:
C
ij¼C
ikC
kj: ð2
ÞIn fact, for example, if an expert is pronounced for a greater relative weight for the target (I) relative to the target (K), and to a greater weight of the target (K) relative to (J) logically, the same expert will have to be pronounced for the greater weight of the target (I) relative to (J) [11].
Table 1 The AHP pairwise comparison scale [16]
Numeric value Definition
1 Equal importance of both elements
3 Moderate importance of one element over other 5 Strong importance of one element over other 7 Very strong importance of one element over other 9 Extreme importance of one element over other
2, 4, 6, 8 Intermediate values between two neighboring appreciations
In this case of judgment perfectly transitive, the matrix C can be written as the following vector form: C * V =
λ* V where V is the eigenvector and
λis the eigenvalue of the matrix. In the case of a perfectly consistent matrix the
λvalue is equal to the order n and the rank of the matrix is equal to 1.
However, the weights established in the AHP process are based on human judgments that make it dif
ficult to have a perfect Coherence Ratio (50). In this case, the previous equation is:
C V
¼kmaxV where
kmaxn
: ð3
ÞThe difference between
λmaxand n indicates
“the degree of inconsistency
”of the judgment made [12].
3 Hierarchical Tree and Conception of a GIS Model 3.1 Development of Hierarchical Tree
The elaborated assessment tool developed within the framework of this study allows analyzing and evaluating local vulnerability to urban
flooding in three types of issues: human issues, environmental issues and material issues. Each of these issues is the subject of an analysis and evaluation grid that enables the development of vulnerability indicators from the detailed lists of criteria. The suggested hierarchy is an overall view of the problem in terms of objective, criteria and alternatives.
Human vulnerable targets can be divided into three broad categories: resident population, non-resident population and population with assisted evacuation. Given the high density of population in the cities, using a small-scale measurement is paramount [13]. In our case, the following criteria were considered extremely important to be part of our evaluation criteria of human vulnerability: Total pop- ulation (between 10 and 65, under 10 and over 65) population in the workplace and the reception centers (hotels, summer centers), and
finally the population of hospital centers, schools and pretension centers.
The Material issues are six major types based on land use: residential buildings, industrial and commercial areas, administration and service, leisure and family gardens, transportation and public facilities. These elements are then divided into more detailed targets.
In addition to economic and social damage,
floods in urban areas can also
in
fluence the environment and biodiversity of an ecosystem [14]. To assess the
ecological risk of
flooding, environmental vulnerability is represented by the fol-
lowing: potential contamination, the effect of overland
flow on green landscaped
and agricultural spaces, bare land, forests and zoos. Just like the material issues,
these issues are subdivided and vulnerability factors can be assigned.
3.2 Data Structure According to Conceptual Model
Following the analysis and identi
fication of needs, we identi
fied the spatial data necessary for the completion of this study and completed the conceptual modeling (feature class, subclasses, entities, attributes, sub type of attributes). The data were later collected from different sources (cadastral data, road networks, population, water and sanitation networks, electricity network
…). This model was largely inspired from the Barczack and Grivault model in work
“Geographical Information System for the assessment of vulnerability to urban surface runoff
”[2].
4 Result of Analytic Hierarchical Process 4.1 Sectorization of the Study Area
According to the data dictionary of our conceptual model, the targets are in different geometric shapes and vectors (area, line, and point). Thus, they need to be stan- dardized for their combination [6]. The commonly used generalization technique is the meshing of the study area [7,
15]. The choice of the size and number of meshesused are attributes of the degree of accuracy of the data and space studied itself [6].
We opted for a meshing of about 200 m from the side of each mesh. This makes a number of 4000 mesh to cover the entire study area. Note that we can use a narrower mesh (about 50 m) in a speci
fic sector for further analysis needs.
4.2 Quanti fi cation of Targets
Quanti
fication of human targets was based primarily on statistics of demography by the High Commission for planning municipality. The number of inhabitants per cell (H
m) was calculated from the population of the municipality (P
c) of the total number of housing in the municipality (N
lc) and the number of dwellings in the mesh (N
lm) using the following formula:
H
m¼Nl
mP
c=Nl
c: ð4
ÞUnfortunately, there are no data on the employment potential of each munici-
pality. The population at the workplace (P
asm) was estimated through the total
active population in the city of Casablanca (P
a), the total number of economic
entities by sector (N
ec), the percentage distribution of the workforce by sector (P
as)
and the number of existing economic entities of the same sector in a mesh (N
asm):
P
asm¼P
aP
as ðN
asm=N
ecÞ: ð5
ÞTo quantify the economic and environmental targets, we determined for each areal target corresponding quantization factor (F
qs) using the surface of the target in the mesh (S
m) and the maximum surface of the target in a mesh (S
max) of the study area.
F
qs ¼S
m=S
max: ð6
ÞSimilarly, for linear targets, quantization factors (F
ql) are derived from the length of the target in the mesh (L
m) and the maximum length of the target in a mesh.
F
ql ¼L
m=L
max: ð7
ÞThe comparison matrices containing the expert judgments were the subject of a speci
fic treatment to associate all assessments. Questionnaires that were retained are those with a coherence ratio less than 10 %. The calculation of the eigenvectors of each matrix was used to calculate the overall vulnerability function.
V
global: ¼0
:8064 V
humain þ0
:0322 V
materiel þ0
:1612 V
environnemental: ð8
ÞFig. 2 Materiel vulnerability mapping
4.3 Discussion and Vulnerability Index Mapping
The analysis of the
first results obtained from the evaluation matrices treated shows greater importance given to human vulnerability with 80 %, followed by envi- ronmental vulnerability of 17 % and at the end the materiel vulnerability with only 3 %. The presentation of the results with GIS data processing software leads to vulnerability maps as cited in the following example (Fig.
2).5 Conclusion and Perspectives
The assessment of the vulnerability of urban land by using the AHP method is an exercise that requires a profound technical knowledge, speci
fic resources and ter- ritorial and statistical data. Our research approach is to use a multi-criteria analysis method for the classi
fication of the human, material and environmental stakes in the Casablanca area. The results obtained after using spatial analysis tool are repre- sented as global vulnerability maps.
We must also consider the limitations of the proposed end approach to improve the relevance of results. Indeed, the AHP method was mainly criticized for too subjective aspect of judgments made by the experts. On the implementation side of the results obtained in a GIS, the mesh used as the unit of analysis is based on the assumption of a homogeneous distribution of the land use population within a islet.
The lack of comprehensive, reliable and up to date on the Casablanca area is considered one of the major challenges we faced throughout the process.
This analysis will be enriched gradually by the integration of new matrices of judgment and the consideration of new issues that were not considered in this study.
It would also be important to consider the temporal component, including the calculation of resident population and the workplace.
References
1. Abhas, K.J., Robin, B., Jessica, L.: Villes et inondations, Guide de gestion intégrée du risque d’inondation en zone urbaine pour le XXIe siècle. Résumé àl’intention des décideurs. Banque mondiale. 2012
2. Aleksandra, B., Camille, G.: Système d’information géographique pour l’évaluation de la vulnérabilitéau risque de ruissellement urbain. NOVATECH 2007
3. The international disaster database EM-DAT. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (http://www.emdat.be)
4. Anthony, G.B., Stéphane, H., Salim, R., Asmita, T., Osama, H.: Adaptation au changement climatique et aux désastres naturels des villes côtières d’Afrique du Nord. Banque mondiale, Juin (2011)
5. Sami, B.M.: Introduction aux méthodes multicritères d’aideàla décision. Biotechnol. Agron.
Soc. Environ.4(2), p83–p93 (2000)
6. Renard, F., Chapon, P.-M.: Une méthode d’évaluation de la vulnérabilitéurbaine appliquéeà l’agglomération lyonnaise. L’Espace géographique 1/ 2010 (Vol. 39), pp. 35–50
7. Chloé, G.: Evaluation multicritère de la vulnérabilitédes territoires aux risques de transport routier de matières dangereuses. XLIIIème Colloque de l’ASRDLF, 11–13 juillet 2007 8. Renaud, C.: Analyse multicritère :Étude et comparaison des méthodes existantes en vue d’une
application en analyse de cycle de vie. CIRANO, Série scientifique, Montréal (2003) 9. Thomas, L.S.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res.48,
p9–p26 (1990)
10. Ouma, Y.O., Ryutaro, T.: Urban flood vulnerability and risk mapping using integrated multi-parametric AHP and GIS: methodological overview and case study assessment. Water (20734441)6(6), 1515 (2014)
11. Chloé, G.: Vulnérabilitéet transport de matières dangereuses :une méthode d’aideàla décision issue de l’expertise de la SécuritéCivile. Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Systèmes, Modélisation, Géostatistiques, document 361, mis en ligne le 12 janvier 2007
12. Geoff, C.: Practical Strategy. Open Access Material. AHP: THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS, Introduction. Pearson Education Limited 2004
13. Kubal, C., Haase, D., Meyer, V., Scheuer, S.: Integrated urbanflood risk assessment adapting a multicriteria approach to a city. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.9, 1881–1895 (2009) 14. Apel, H., Thieken, A.H., Merz, B., Bloschl, G.: Flood risk assessment and associated
uncertainty. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.4, 295–308 (2004)
15. Robert, D., Pascale, M.: La vulnérabilitéterritoriale: une nouvelle approche des risques en milieu urbain. Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Dossiers, Vulnérabilités urbaines au sud, document 447
16. Berrittella, M., Certa, A., Enea, M., Zito, P.: An Analytic Hierarchy Process for The Evaluation of Transport Policies to Reduce Climate Change Impacts. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, NOTA DI LAVORO (2007)