HAL Id: jpa-00208530
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208530
Submitted on 1 Jan 1976
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
The effect of permanent dipoles on the nematic-isotropic phase transition
J.G.J. Ypma, G. Vertogen
To cite this version:
J.G.J. Ypma, G. Vertogen. The effect of permanent dipoles on the nematic-isotropic phase tran- sition. Journal de Physique, 1976, 37 (11), pp.1331-1333. �10.1051/jphys:0197600370110133100�.
�jpa-00208530�
1331
THE EFFECT OF PERMANENT DIPOLES ON THE NEMATIC-ISOTROPIC
PHASE TRANSITION
J. G. J. YPMA Solid State
Physics Laboratory University
ofGroningen,
The Netherlandsand G. VERTOGEN Institute for Theoretical
Physics University
ofGroningen,
The Netherlands(Reçu
le 5 mai 1976,accepté
le17 juin 1976)
Résumé. 2014 On étudie l’influence de
dipôles
moléculaires permanents sur la transition nématique- isotrope enajoutant
une interactionpolaire simple
au modèle deMaier-Saupe.
Ce nouveau modeleest traité suivant
l’approximation
de Bethe-Peierls pour tenir compte de l’ordre à courte distance.La
possibilité
d’un ordre (anti) ferroélectrique à longue distance a été considérée, il peut avoir une forte influence sur la stabilité de laphase.
Abstract. 2014 The influence of permanent
dipoles
on the nematic isotropic transition is studied by adding asimple polar
interaction to theMaier-Saupe
model of nematic liquid crystals. The modelis treated in the Bethe-Peierls approximation in order to account for short range order. We have also included the
possibility
of (anti) ferroelectriclong
range order. This ferroelectric order stronglyaffects the
stability
of the nematicphase.
LE JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE TOME 37, NOVEMBRE 1976, :
Classification Physics Abstracts
7.130
One of the characteristic
properties
of nematics is theindistinguishability
of states with director n and- n. When individual molecules carry a permanent electric
dipole moment, just
as manydipoles point
upas down. Otherwise the system would be ferroelectric.
Ferroelectric nematics
have,
as yet, not been found[1].
There are a number of
nematogenic
materials[2]
which do not carry a
permanent dipole
moment, i.e.the influence of
permanent dipoles
inestablishing
nematic order cannot be dominant. In the model of Maier and
Saupe [3]
the Van der Waals interaction betweenmutually
induceddipole
momentsgives
riseto a
phase
transition from theisotropic
to the nematicphase.
The interaction energy can be written aswhere ; specifies
the orientation of thelong
axis of amolecule i,
andP2
denotes the secondLegendre polynomial.
In the mean fieldapproximation,
asused
by
Maier andSaupe,
the energy of a molecule isgiven by
where y
is the number of nearestneighbours,
andS =
( p 2 (aiz) >
is thelong
range order parameter,to be determined self
consistently.
In two recent papers
[4]
we studied the interaction(1)
in the
approximation
of Bethe and Peierls in order to account for short range order. Thelong
range pro-perties appeared
to be very similar to Maier andSaupe’s
mean field results. Thedescription
of pre- transitional effects in theisotropic phase, namely
themagnetically
inducedbirefringence
and thescattering
of
light by
orientationalfluctuations,
wasimproved considerably.
Although
permanentdipoles
shouldplay a
minorrole in
establishing
nematicorder,
the effects of apolar
interaction on the transition temperature, the
jump
in the order parameter, etc., is still open to
question.
If we add a
polar
interaction in itssimplest form,
the interaction energy reads
The first term could result from the interaction between permanent
dipoles which,
forcylindrically symmetric molecules, point effectively along
thelong
molecularArticle published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0197600370110133100
1332
axis.
Krieger
and James[5]
studied this model in themean field
approximation. They
showed that thesystem
can exist in threephases :
anisotropic phase (Pl
=P2
=0),
an evenphase,
which we would callthe nematic
phase (Pl
=0, j52 :0 0)
and a mixedphase with (anti)- ferroelectric long
range order(P1 = 0, P2 =1= 0). P1
andP2
are thelong
range orderparameters Pl(aiz) > and P2(aiz) >,
which aredetermined self
consistently.
Infigure
1 we haveFIG. 1. - Transition temperatures between the isotropic, nematic
and (anti) ferroelectric phase as a function of J1/J2, in the Bethe
approximation (solid line) and the mean field approximation (MF, dashed line).
drawn the transition
temperatures
between the threephases
as a function ofJ1/J2,
as found in the mean fieldapproximation (dashed line).
It shows that anematic
phase
cannot exist forJ1/J2 >
0.35. Allproperties
of the nematicphase, except
for itsstability,
are
independent
ofJl,
thestrength
of thepolar
interaction. This is a consequence of the mean field
approximation,
whichneglects
short range order.In any
approximation
that accounts for localorder,
there
might
be an effect of thePi type
of short range order on the characteristics of thenematic-isotropic
transition. We studied this
question
in theapproxi-
mation of Bethe and Peierls. We remark that Madhu- sudana and Chandrasekhar
[6]
treated theproblem
in a
mathematically
much morecomplicated
versionof the Bethe
approximation. They obtained,
inaccurateresults
however,
e.g. the order parameter at thenematic-isotropic
transition is too lowby nearly
afactor of two. Whether their version of Bethe’s method
can
give
accurateresults,
is open toquestion.
In Bethe’s
approximation [4, 7]
a cluster of y + 1 molecules isconsidered,
one of which isregarded
asthe central one with orientation ao,
being
surroundedby
y nearestneighbours
with orientationsThe
weight
of agiven configuration
of the cluster isgiven by
where Z is a normalization constant
and fl
=1 /kT.
In this
expression z(ai)
accounts for the influence of thesurroundings
on the cluster and isgiven by
where we included the
possibility
ofP1
type oflong
range order
(h1 = 0).
Thestrengths h1
andh2
of theeffective
fields,
which actonly
on the nearestneigh-
bours of the central
molecule,
are determinedby
thecondition that the average orientations of the central molecule and its
neighbours should
beequal :
and
The thermal averages, denoted
by ( >,
have to beevaluated with the distribution function
(4).
Therelations
(6)
and(7)
form a set of twocoupled
transcen-dental
equations
inh1
andh2, which,
with someeffort,
can be solved
numerically.
We find a similar behaviour of the transition
temperatures
as a functionof JIIJ2
as in the mean fieldapproach (see figure 1,
solidline).
The wholediagram
is
only
shifted to lower temperatures and thetriple point
lies at aslightly higher J,IJ2 value,
which alsodepends
on y.Since
(anti)
ferroelectric nematics have not beenfound, Ji/J2
has to be chosen such that a reaso-nable width of the nematic
temperature region results, something
like 0.1 times thenematic-isotropic
tran-sition temperature. This
implies J, IJ2
0.3. Onecould
imagine
that thehypothetical
transition from the nematic to the mixed(ferroelectric) phase
is thenhidden
by
the transition to thecrystalline
or a smecticphase,
which would takeplace
earlier.Although
thisprocedure
is somewhatartificial,
we ihink it morelegitimate
than toignore completely
thepossibility
of
p 1 type
oflong
range order. The lastapproach
isfollowed
by
Madhusudana and Chandrasekhar[6].
They
consider thenematic-isotropic
transition also in the casesJ1/J2
= 0.5 andJ1/J2
=3.2,
where the nematicphase
isalways
less stable than the ferroelectricphase.
We remark thatchanging
thesign
ofJ1’
pro- duces anantiferroelectric
instead of ferroelectric mixedphase (Pi - - Pi).
We studied the effect of ferroelectric short range order on the
nematic-isotropic
transition in the Betheapproximation
for valuesof J1/J2
between 0 and 0.3.Our results can be summarized as follows :
1333
1)
The transition temperatureT,
forJ1 =I
0 issomewhat raised as
compared
to the caseJ 1
= 0.The
change
is at most a few percent for y = 3 and less forhigher
values of y. The latent heat of the tran- sitionchanges
in the same way(see
TableI).
TABLE I
Change of
the transition temperature andof
thelatent heat
of
thenematic-isotropic
transition in thecase
J1
= 0.3J2
ascompared
withJ1
=0, for
variousnumbers
of
nearestneighbours
y.2)
The nematiclong
range order parameter S= P2(ao,- ,) >
as a function ofTITc,
isindependent
of
Jl. (The variations
are less than 0.01%.)
3)
The ferroelectric short range order parameter 6p= P, (ao. a,) >
increasessteadily
as a functionof
J1/J2.
This short range order isresponsible for
thesmall variations in the transition temperature, the latent heat and the
specific
heat.4)
The nematic short range order parameterUS
= P2(aO.a1) >
isindependent
ofJl. (The
varia-tions are less than 0.01
%.)
This short range order determines the valueof (Tc - Tc*)Tc
for themagnetic birefringence
and thescattering
oflight
in theisotropic phase [4].
As aresult,
thedescription
of these pre- transitionalphenomena
is notchanged by adding
apolar
interaction of the form -J1 P1(a1.aj)
to theoriginal Maier-Saupe
interaction(1).
Acknowledgments.
- We wish to thank Prof. A.J. Dekker for many
helpful
discussions. This work is part of the research program of the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter(F.O.M.).
References
[1] DE GENNES, P. G., The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Oxford, University Press) 1974.
[2] VAN DER VEEN, J., DE JEU, W. H., GROBBEN, A. H. and BOVEN, J., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 17 (1972) 291.
[3] MAIER, W. and SAUPE, A., Z. Naturforsch. 14a (1959) 882.
[4] YPMA, J. G. J. and VERTOGEN, G., Solid State Commun. 18
(1976) 475 and J. Physique 37 (1976) 557.
[5] KRIEGER, T. J. and JAMES, H. M., J. Chem. Phys. 22 (1954) 796.
[6] MADHUSUDANA, N. V. and CHANDRASEKHAR, S., Pramãna Suppl. 1 (1975) 57.
[7] BETHE, H. A., Proc. R. Soc. 149 (1935) 1.