HAL Id: jpa-00247142
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00247142
Submitted on 1 Jan 1995
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Temporal Coding in Realistic Neural Networks
S. Gerasyuta, D. Ivanov
To cite this version:
S. Gerasyuta, D. Ivanov. Temporal Coding in Realistic Neural Networks. Journal de Physique I, EDP
Sciences, 1995, 5 (10), pp.1367-1374. �10.1051/jp1:1995203�. �jpa-00247142�
Classification Physics Abstracts
87.10+e 87.22Jb
Temporal Coding in Realistic Neural Networks
S-M-
Gerasyuta
and D.V. IvanovDepartment of Theoretical Physics, St. Petersburg State University 198904, St. Petersburg, Russia
(Received
18 April 1995, accepted 20 June1995)
Abstract. The modification of realistic neural network model have been proposed. The
model diifers from the Hopfield mortel because of the two characteristic contributions to synaptic eliicacious: the short-time contribution which is determined by the chemical reactions in the synapses and the long-time contribution corresponding to the structural changes of synaptic
contacts. The approximation solution of the realistic neural network model equations is obtained.
This solution allows us to calculate the postsynaptic potential as function of input. Using the approximate solution of realistic neural network model equations the behaviour of postsynaptic potential of realistic neural network as function of time for the diiferent temporal sequences of
stimuli is described. The various outputs are obtained for the different temporal sequences of the given stimuli. These properties of the temporal coding can be exploited as a recognition
element capable of being selectively tuned to diiferent inputs.
1. Introduction
Recently
some models fortemporal
association in networks of formai neurons bave been pro-posed [1-5]. Investigation
into the behaviour of these neural nets have revealedimportant
informationconcerning
how an ensemble ofinteracting
elements cancooperatively
solve com- putation associated with memonzation of recall of information [6].Realistic neural networks are
dynamical
systems withcomplex lime-dependent
character- istics. One source oftemporal
variation for these nets emerges fromdynamical properties
ofmembrane
potentials.
Another source arises fromdynamical properties
ofsynaptic
connections between neurons. Inaddition, synaptic dynamics
manifest two differentphysiological
processesone associated with
depression
and the other associated with potentiation which can oc-cur at different time
scales, resulting
in the formation of acomplex
synapticstrength
limehistory
[7].W~j(t)
denote the synaptic eilicacious for the information transport from j toneurons. It is at the synapses where information is
stored,
in that eachsynaptic eilicacy
ischanged
in a way thatdepends
upon a piece of correlationinformation, namely,
on whether thepresynaptic
neuron bas contributed tofiring
tl~epostsynaptic
neuron or not.In our paper the realistic neural network model has been
developed.
This model differsfrom the
Hopfield
model[ii
because of tl~e two cl~aractenstic contributions to tl~e synaptic© Les Editions de Physique 1995
1368 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°10
eilicacious
W~j(t):
the short-lime contribution which is determinedby
chemical reactions in the symapses and thelong-lime
contributioncorresponding
to the structuralchanges
of thesynaptic
connections.Short-time alterations of intemeural connections
W~j(t)
are describedby
the two differentpresynaptic
processes:depression
a decrease of connectioneiliciency
afterspiking
of thepresynaptic
neuron, and potentiation an increase ofeiliciency
afterspiking
of thepresynaptic
neuron. Each of the above mentioned processes
decays
with a different time constant, thusproviding
acomplex dynamics
of connectioneiliciency.
Tl~e realistic neural networkequations
are found in tl~e framework of
dynamical simplified
neural network.Using
tl~eapproximate
solution of tl~eseequations
we bave described the bel~aviour of the membranepotential
as the function of time for the differenttemporal
sequences of the stimuli. The outputs for the varioustemporal
sequences of thegiven
stimuli are obtained. The presentstudy
allows us to suggest that tl~e appearence oftemporal coding
is determinedby
the short-time alterations ofsynaptic
eilicacious.
In Section 2 is
given
the approximate solution of the realistic neural network model equations.Section 3 is devoted to the calculations of the membrane
potentials
and thesynaptic
eilicacious in this model. In the conclusion, the status of the considered model is discussed.2.
Approximate
Solution of Realistic Neural Network ModelEquations
In our paper a
practical
treatment of realistic neural network model has beendeveloped.
Eachneuron is connected to many other neurons of the network via
synaptic
connections, which arecharacterized
by
theirsynaptic
eilicaciousW~j(t).
Thepresynaptic
neuron j has contributed tofiring
thepostsynaptic
neuron1 or not. This model takes into account two characteristic contributions of thesynaptic weight W~j(t).
Thesynaptic weight
can be considered as a function of two different processes:synaptic potentiation
Xi(t)
andsynaptic depression X2(t).
Our approximation of the synaptic
weight
is defined as follows:W<lt)
=
lJ<o
+J<lt))lXijlt)
+X2jlt)
+Cj) Ii)
Here
Cj
represents the constant part of thesynaptic strength,
J~jo isanalogous
to theHop-
field matrix [11. Tl~esynaptic weigl~t
also indudes tl~edynamical synaptic
eilicaciousJ~j(t)
wl~ich
correspond
to tl~e structuralchanges
of thesynaptic
contacts. Tl~esynaptic activity
isNj(t)
=
8(Pj(t) hj),
where8(x)
= 1, x > 0,
8(x)
= 0, x < 0.
hj
is the threshold of membranepotential Pj(t).
Thesynaptic activity
isequal
to one if the sum overW~j(t)Nj(t)
is positive, and equal to zero otherwise.
Xij (t)
andX2j(t)
are defined as follows:xi~jt
+i) xi~jt)
=-Aixi~jt)
+BIN~ jt) j2)
x~~jt
+i) x~~jt)
m-A~x~~jt) B~Njjt), j3)
Xij(0)
=Xijo, X2j(0)
=
X2jo
here1, j
are labels of the neurons and range between and n.Nj(t)
is the neuron variable and is 1 forfiring,
0 fornon-firing
neurons.Xijo
andX2jo
are the initialsynaptic potentiation
anddepression correspondingly.
Equation(2)
describes tl~e potentiation process and equation(3)
describes tl~e
depression
process.Every spike
of apresynaptic
neuron increases(potentiates)
the
synaptic eiliciency by
some amount Bi Thispotentiation
can beinterpreted
as a short-lasting pl~enomenon
witl~ a time constant1/Ai Simultaneously
witl~potentiation,
tl~espike
of thepresynaptic
neuronproduces
a decrease of thesynaptic eiliciency by
some amount 82.Thus the
phenomenon
is calledsynaptic depression. Similarly,
thedepression
is ashort-lasting
phenomenon
with a different time constant1/A2. Together
these two processes canproduce
several types of rather
complex
behaviour underappropriate parametrization.
The
synaptic weight
also indudes thedynamical synaptic
eilicaciousJ~j(t)
which are deter- minedby
the time constant1/A. Jjj(t)
are defined as followsJujt
+i) Jj~jt)
=
-AJ~jt)
+BN~jt)Njjt), j4)
where B is the model parameter.
The difference form of the
equations
for the membranepotential cil)
can be considered asp~jt
+i) p~jt)
=-ap~jt)
+f w~ jt)N~11) j5)
-pN~jt)
+s~jt)
Here t denotes time, a and
fl
are the characteristics ofdynamical properties
of menlbranepotentials. S~(t) corresponds
to trie externat stimulus.The
approximate
solution of thesuggested equations using
theanalytical
method is calcu- lated. We can propose the recurrence for the solution of the differenceequations.
Forsimplicity
this method isexplained
for thefollowing
equationxjk
+lj
=axjkj
+yikj, 16j
where
x(k)
andy(k)
arearbitrary functions,
cx is a parameter, kcorresponds
to the time. If the substitutionx(k
+ii
=cx~+~z(k
+1)
isused,
that we obtainzlk+i)
=
zlk)+a~~~~vlk)
zlk)
=zlk i)
+a~~vlk i) Ii)
zli)
=
z1°)
+a~~vlo)
Summarizing equations ii)
we havezlk
+ 1) =z1°)
+O~~~~vlm)
18)The function
x(k
+ 1) in triefollowing
form is constructedk
x(k
+1)
=cx~+~x(0)
+£ cx~~~y(m) (9)
m=0
Using
theproposed
method the dioEerence form ofequations (2)-(5)
for the realistic neural networks in the form(10)-(14)
are obtained:Pj(k
+1)
=il cx)~+~P~(0)
+j~ Il cx)~~~
x
(10)
m=o
x
If
WVlm)Nj lm) flN~lm)
+
ilm)j
J=1
1370 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°10
WV
lm)
=
lJvo
+Jv lm))lXij lm)
+X2jlm)
+Cj) Iii)
m-i
Xij(m)
=
Il Ai)~Xij(0)
+£ Il
Ai)~~~~~BiNj(1) (12)
1=o
x~~jm)
=
ji-A~)mx~jjo)+f~ji-A~)m-i-iB~N~ji) j13)
imo m-i
J~j
(m)
=
Il A)~J~j(0)
+£ Il A)~~~~~BN~(1)Nj il) (14)
1=o
By
ananalogous
method theequations
for thesynaptic
activitiesN~(k +1)
are obtainedNj(k
+ 1)= 8
iii
cx)~+~l~(0)
hi +j~ Il cx)~~~ (15)
m=o
x
É
WVlm)Nj lm) flN~lm)
+S~lm))
Here the
synaptic
eilicaciousW~j(m)
define the kernel of thisequation. Equation (10)
issimplified by
help of the 8-function projection properties(here Nj (m)
=
8(Pj (m) -hj )). Using
the smoothness of
positive
functions W~j(k)
and the restricted functionsNj (k)
we can calculate themultiple
sums inequation (10).
Each neuron can be describedby
its meanfiring
jate fj (the
new parameters which
correspond
to thelong
time average activitiesf
=
£ Nj (m)).
k + 1
_~
These parameters are not
dependent
on the time and thereforethey
can betakÎ1out
ofthe
sum
symbols.
Then themultiple
sums are calculated. At firstby
this method thesynaptic
eilicaciousW~j(k
+ 1) are obtainedw~jk
+i)
m
iii Ai)k+i xi~jo)
+ii A~)k+i x~~jo)
+c~+ j16) +lli Ii Ai)~~~)( Ii Ii A2)~~~)()fz)x
~IJZJO +
( Ii Ii A)~~~)ÀfJl'
The
dependence Wjj(k +1)
of the initial chemicalstrengths Xij(0)
andX2j(0) disappears
at k - cc. For theasymptotic
limit thesynaptic
eilicacious W~j differ from theHopfield
matrixJjjo
because of the two contributions: one is determinedby
chemical reactions in the synapses and the other corresponds to the structuralchanges
of synaptic contacts,Wv
=lJvo
+(Lfj) (Cj
+() ))
fj)
,(ii)
where
fi
is the meanfiring
rate of the neuron.Using
thesynaptic
eilicacious W~j(m)
we can obtain the membranepotential P~(k +1)
now:P~ik
+i)
=
ii a)~+~P~io)
+Lixijio)inJvo li
+( in nA)f~)+ i18)
+X2j(0)(Y2J~jo
+~(Y2
Y~~)f~)
+Cj(YoJ~jo
+(fi
Y~~)f~)+
+()(Yo h) )(fi Y2))Jjjo+
1 2
+
Ii
(Yo Yo~ + Yi~
Yi) (~
(Yo Yo~ +(~ Y2)) fi )fj
1 2
k
-fl fiYo
+~j Il OE)~~~S~(fil)
m=o
~?
~~~i/~~li/~~ll~-il~-i~~~~
~~~~~
~~~~~Î~~
~~
~~~~~ ~~~~~
~~~~~ Î
~~~~~~~~~
fi "
~~
°~~~~
(22)
cx
p=1,2
In the solution of
(18)
we setJ~j(0)
= 0.Using
the solution(18)
we can seeobviously
that neural network remembers its"history",
1-e- the membranepotentials
are definedby
the inputsSj(k)
for the whole time intervals.3. Calculation Results
Using
the approximate solution of the realistic neural network equations we have descnbed thedynamical
behaviour of the membranepotentials
and the synaptic eilicacious for the differenttemporal
sequences of the st1nluli. The various outputs for the differenttenlporal
sequences of thegiven
stimuli are obtained. We confined ouranalysis
to the dass offully
interconnectednets with elements that were
homogeneous
andisotropic [8,9].
The membrane
potential
in the case of the short-time alterations ofsynaptic
eilicacious can be considered as:P~(k
+ii
=
P~(0)(1
cx)~+~ +II (Xi (0) ~
Yi +X2(0)
+))
Y2+1 2
+
(C
+) )) Yo)~n flG)f
+
£ Ii a)~~~slm), 123)
1 ~
~
~
~ # OE
Î ~ Jdo
Z>J"i
If the
long-time
alterations ofsynaptic
eilicacious are alsomduded,
then the nlembrane po- tentialP~(k +1)
has thefollowing
form:P~lk
+ 1) "P~lk +1)
+Xi1°) )) In Yfl)+
124)
1372 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°10
lfK)
Fig.16.o 5.o 4.0
~
3.0
/
Z-o i.o o-o
K
P(K)
6.o 5.o 4.0
~ '
3.0 2.o o D.D
K
S(K)
4.0 3.0
Z-o '
I.Ù '
Ù-Ù
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 K
Fig. 1. The temporal coding properties of realistic neural networks.
a)
The menlbrane potential mcluding only trie short-time alterations of synaptic eliicaciousP~(k
+ 1),b)
trie membrane potentialwith trie long-time alterations of synaptic eliicacious
P~(k +1),
c) The mput stimuliS(k +1).
The parameters descnbing the membrane potential are as follows: a = 0.1, p = 0.1, Ai = 0.01, A2= 0.02, Bi = 0.02, 82 " o.01, C = o.02, ~n = o-1, n = 50, f
= o.2.
+
lx21°)
+il
iY~ Y~~) +
lC
+t il in Yo~))nf~
Analogously
triesynaptic
eilicaciousW~(k +1)
andW~(k +1)
are obtained:W~(k +1)
=
iii Ai )~~~Xi(0)
+Il A2)~~~X2(0)
+ C +(25)
+
((1 Il Ai)~~~)
~~ (l Il A2)~~~) (~) f)~
i 2
W~(k +1)
=~
W~(k
+ 1)(~
+~
(l il A)~+~) f~) (26)
~ A
In trie case m
question
we believed that there are sortie short-time alterations ofsynaptic eilicacious,
which are determinedby
the chemical reactions in the synapses and thelong-t1nle
alterations of
synaptic
eilicacious are definedby
the structuralchanges
of thesynaptic
contacts.The calculation shows that the neural network
forgets
most of the information obtained for the time kmJ 40 since the moment when the input
disappears.
We take in consideration threetime constants
1/cx 1/Ap
IIA
= 10 100. Our choice is based on theexpenmental
Î'fÎ()
Fig.Z6.0 5.o 4.0
r
~
3.o Z-Ô I.o Ô.Ô
K
Î~ÎK)
o
K
S(K)
4.o 3.o
r
Z-o I.o O.o
o 5 la 15 20 25 30 K
Fig. 2. Trie model parameters correspond to Figure 1, but the mean firing rate is f = 1
data I?i and allows us to consider trie correlation between trie short-time and the
long-t1nle
alterations for the realistic neuron networks. When thetemporal coding
properties of realistic neural networks in oufapproach
areobserved,
the functionsW~(k +1)
andW~(k +1)
aredecreased
monotonically
with the lime for the different parameters of trie model. Thevelocity
of thedecreasing depends
on the three paranletersAi, A2,
A.The
dynamical
behaviour of theP~(k +1)
andP~(k +1)
as the function of time for the differenttemporal
sequences of the stimuli is shown inFigures
and 2. In the first case thefollowing
model parameters are chosen:cx = o-1,
fl
=
o-1, Ai
=0.01,
A2 "0.02,
Bi "0.02,
82 "0.01,
C=
0.02,
A =0.lAi,
B =0.lBi,
~n =o-1,
n = 50,Xi
(0)
= 1,X2(0)
= 1,
P~(0)
= 1,
f
= 0.2
In the other case
(Fig.2)
we setf=1.
InFigure
1 thedynamical
behaviour of the membranepotentials P~(k +1)
andP~(k +1)
arecompared.
We can see that the various outputs aredetermined
by
the differenttenlporal
sequencesofinputs (in
our caseonly
two stimulipresented
in the different order are
considered).
As shows in theFigure
1 triedynamical
behaviour ofthepotentials P~(k
+1)
and that ofP~(k +1)
are similar and definedby
the converted stimulus£
kil cx)~~~S(m).
The parametersAp, Bp
and others can determineonly
the deformationsm=0
in
shape.
1374 JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE I N°10
In
Figure
2 the differences between the short-time and thelong-time
alterations ofsynaptic
efficacious are shown. Trietemporal coding
properties are lost for thelong-time
case. Thedynamical
behaviour of the membrane potential P~(k+1)
is determinedby
thesynaptic efficacy
parameters A and B, which aredependent
on the structuralchanges
of synaptic contacts for the meanfiring
ratef
= 1.
4. Conclusion
In our
approach
the short-time alterations of interneural connections are describedby
the two differentpresynaptic
processes:depression
a decrease of connectioneiliciency
afterspiking
of thepresynaptic
neuron, andpotentiation
an increase ofeiliciency
afterspiking
of the
presynaptic
neuron. Each of these processesdecays
with a different time constant, thusproviding
acomplex dynamics
of connectionelliciency.
Thesynaptic weight
indudes also thedynamical synaptic
eilicaciousJjj(t)
whichcorrespond
to the structuralchanges
ofsynaptic
contacts. These synaptic eilicacious are determined
by
thelarge
time constant1IA.
Thepresent
study
allows us to suggest that the appearence oftemporal coding
is determinedby
the short-time alterations ofsynaptic
eilicaciousWjj(t)
The behaviour of realistic neural networks is considered in the franlework of
approximate
solution of the set ofcoupled
nonlinear difference form ofequations.
We have usedonly
somecorrect
suppositions
and theapprox1nlate
solution(18)
issuiliciently
motivated. We canpoint
ont that the our realistic neural network has the
properties
of thetemporal coding.
We believe that thetemporal coding
is maintained for the different realistic neural network models.Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Yu. D.
Kropotov
and Yu. M. Pismak for useful discussions.This work was
supported by
the Comission of theEuropean
Commumties in the fratrie of EC-Russia Collaborations under the Contract ESPRIT P9282 ACTCS.References
[1] Hopfield J. J. Froc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79
(1982)
2554.[2] Amit D.J., Gutfreund H. and Sompolinsky H., Phys.Reu. A 32
(1985)
1007.[3] Buhmann J. and Schulten K., Europhys. Lett. 4
(1987)
1205.[4] Sompolinsky H. and Kanter I., Phys. Reu. Lett. 57
(1986)
2861.[SI Nakamura T. and Nishimori H., J. Phys. France 23
(1990)
4627.[6] Freeman J-A- and Skapura D.M., Neural networks: Algorithms, applications and programming
technique, Addison-Wesley Publishing
Company (New
York,1991).
[7] Kropotov Yu.D. and Pachomov S-V-, Sou. lfuman. Physiologylo
(1984)
813.[8]
Engel
A.K. et ai., Trends in Neurosciencels(1992)
218.[9] Gutfreund H. and Mezard M., Phys. Reu. Lett. 61