HAL Id: hal-02402443
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02402443
Submitted on 10 Dec 2019
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access
archive for the deposit and dissemination of
sci-entific research documents, whether they are
pub-lished or not. The documents may come from
teaching and research institutions in France or
abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est
destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
publics ou privés.
Phenotypic Noise and the Cost of Complexity
Charles Rocabert, Guillaume Beslon, Carole Knibbe, Samuel Bernard
To cite this version:
w(z) is convex w(z) is concave w(z) is convex Inflection points Log-fitness plateaus 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 -2 0 2 Phenotype z Ab so lu te fi tn ess w (z)
Generalized fitness function: w(z) = (1-β)exp⎡⎣ − αzQ⎤
⎦ + β 0 5 10 15 20 25 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Phenotypic complexity (n) R el at ive co nve rg en ce ti me
Gaussian-shaped fitness function
A -1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Phenotypic complexity (n) R el at ive co nve rg en ce ti me
Rescaled fitness function
B Phenotypic noise mutation rate 1) Lower 2) Equal 3) Higher 4) No noise
Phenotypic Noise and
the Cost of Complexity
Charles Rocabert
1,2, Guillaume Beslon
1,3,
Carole Knibbe
1,4, Samuel Bernard
1,51. Inria, France 2. Synthe2c and Systems Biology Unit, BRC, Szeged, Hungary 3. CNRS UMR5205 LIRIS, INSA Lyon, France 4. INSERM U1060 CarMeN, INSA Lyon, France 5. CNRS UMR5208 Ins2tut Camille Jordan, Univ Lyon 1, France This work was supported by the European Commission 7th Framework Programmes 659 (FP7-ICT-2013.9.6 FET ProacFve: Evolving Living Technologies), and EvoEvo Project 660 (ICT-610427)
• B
ACKGROUND
Theory predicts that phenotypic noise is posi2vely selected under direc9onal selec9on because it increases the mean fitness value, and counter-selected under stabilizing selec9on (1).
It has been suggested that under direc2onal selec2on, the fitness gain provided by phenotypic noise also promotes adap9ve evolu9on (2), while the link is unclear. Evolu2on on mul2ple phenotypic characters suffers from the cost of complexity (3). The impact of phenotypic noise in mul2dimensional phenotypes is less understood.
• M
ETHODS
We used a quan2ta2ve model to study the adap2ve evolu2on of organisms with mul2ple phenotypic traits under selec2on and evolvable phenotypic noise (4) in a generalized fitness landscape.
• R
ESULTS
Phenotypic noise promotes adapta2ve evolu2on under direc2onal and/or stabilizing selec2on if the logarithmic fitness plateaus. For mul2ple phenotypic characters under selec2on, the phenotypic noise evolves to a one- dimensional noise aligned with the direc2on of the fitness op2mum.
• C
ONCLUSION
Phenotypic noise can decrease the cost of complexity and promotes adap9ve evolu9on in flat regions of the fitness landscape.
1. P
HENOTYPIC
NOISE
EFFECT
ON
FITNESS
DEPENDS
ON
THE
SHAPE
OF
THE
FITNESS
LANDCAPE
(
SINGLE
CHARACTER
)
3. P
HENOTYPIC
NOISE
DIMENSIONALITY
REDUCTION
4. P
HENOTYPIC
NOISE
PROMOTES
ADAPTIVE
EVOLUTION
AND
DECREASES
THE
COST
OF
COMPLEXITY
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 0 1 2 3 4 Mean phenotype µ Ma xi ma l σ Mean population trajectory A 0.8 0.9 1.0 0 500 1000 1500 Generations Ma xi ma l σ co nt rib ut io n Phenotypic noise flattening B 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 0 500 1000 1500 Generations Ma xi ma l σ co rre la tio n
Phenotypic noise alignment with the optimum
C Phenotypic noise shape D 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Phenotypic character 1 Ph en ot yp ic ch ara ct er 2
• Phenotypic noise: variability in phenotypes of isogenic organisms in constant environment, aka developmental noise, phenotypic heterogeneity, cellular noise, biological noise, intra-genotypic variability, ...
• Direc9onal selec9on: selec2on far from fitness op2mum characterized by a convex (posi2ve second deriva2ve) fitness landscape.
• Stabilizing selec9on: selec2on close to fitness op2mum characterized by a concave fitness landscape. • Adap9ve evolu9on: capacity of increasing mean popula2on fitness as measured by the rate of increase of the log-fitness with respect to the mean phenotype. • Cost of complexity: Reduc2on of the frac2on of beneficial muta2ons when the number of phenotypic characters under selec2on increases. Selected references: (1) Lande (1980); Pal (1998); Kawecki (2000); Paenke et al (2007) ; Zhang et al (2009) Mol Sys Biol 5:299; Bruijning et al (2019) (2) Bódi et al (2017) PLOS Biol 15:e2000644; Duveau et al (2018) Elife 7:e37272 (3) Orr (2000) Evolu2on 54:13-20; Mar2n & Lenormand (2006) Evolu2on 60:893-907 (4) Ito et al (2009) Mol Sys Biol 5:264; Pelabon et al (2010) Evolu2on 64:1912-1925; Viñuelas et al (2012) Prog Biophys Mol Biol 110:44-53; Shen et al (2012) PLOS Gene2cs 8:e1002839; Metzger et al (2015) Nature 521:344-347 (5) Zhang et al (2009) Mol Sys Biol 5:299; Draghi et al (2019); Parameters Q = 2 Q > 2 β = 0 β > 0
Shape of the absolute fitness function concave (curvature < 0) concave (curvature < 0) convex (curvature > 0) convex (curvature > 0) Shape of the log-fitness
function does not plateau plateaus does not plateau plateaus
Does noise increase
mean absolute fitness? No No Yes Yes
Does noise promote
evolution? No Yes No Yes
Stabilizing selection
(close to the fitness optimum) (far from the fitness optimum)Directional selection
β > 0 Q > 2
2. A
MODEL
FOR
PHENOTYPIC
NOISE
EVOLUTION
zopt Ph en ot yp ic ch ara ct er 2 µ = (µ1, µ2) σ1 σ2
Evolvable phenotypic noise for two phenotypic characters
Phenotypic character 1 θ1 Mul9-dimensional phenotypic noise is built from the mutable genotype {μ, σ, 𝚹}: • Mean phenotype μ (mutable), • Variances σ2 (mutable), • Rota2on angles 𝚹 (mutable), • Covariance Σ built from σ2 and 𝚹. • Phenotype z ∼ 𝘕n(μ, Σ) For mul2ple phenotypic characters under direc2onal selec2on, we demonstrate that the best phenotypic noise configura2on is aligned and fully correlated with the direc9on of the fitness op9mum. Example: Simula2on for two phenotypic characters: • Ini2al distance: 4 units, • Popula2on size: 1,000, • Muta2on rate: 1e-3, • muta2on size: 0.01. 0 5 10 15 20 25 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Phenotypic complexity (n) R el at ive co nve rg en ce ti me
Gaussian-shaped fitness function
A
-1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Phenotypic complexity (n) R el at ive co nve rg en ce ti meRescaled fitness function
B
Phenotypic noise mutation rate 1) Lower 2) Equal 3) Higher 4) No noise 0 5 10 15 20 25 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Phenotypic complexity (n) R el at ive co nve rg en ce ti meGaussian-shaped fitness function A -1.00 -0.75 -0.50 -0.25 0.00 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 Phenotypic complexity (n) R el at ive co nve rg en ce ti me