• Aucun résultat trouvé

Correction to: decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Correction to: decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

Correction to: decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

BUCHER, Hans Ulrich, et al. & Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group

Abstract

After publication of the original article [1], the corresponding author noticed the given names and family names of the members included in the Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group were incorrectly reverted.

BUCHER, Hans Ulrich, et al . & Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group. Correction to:

decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses. BMC Pediatrics , 2018, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 226

DOI : 10.1186/s12887-018-1204-x PMID : 29986696

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:107777

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

1 / 1

(2)

CORRECTION Open Access

Correction to: decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and

opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses

Hans Ulrich Bucher

1*

, Sabine D. Klein

1

, Manya J. Hendriks

1,2

, Ruth Baumann-Hölzle

3

, Thomas M. Berger

4

, Jürg C. Streuli

2

, Jean-Claude Fauchère

1

and on behalf of the Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group

Correction

After publication of the original article [1], the corre- sponding author noticed the given names and family names of the members included in the Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group were incorrectly reverted. The correct version of the Acknowledgements section has been included in this Correction and includes the cor- rect presentation of names for the members included in the Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group.

Acknowledgements

The Swiss Neonatal End-of-Life Study Group includes the following local coordinators (listed in alphabetical order of study site): Aarau: Neonatal Unit, Dept. of Paediatrics, Kantonsspital Aarau (Philipp Meyer, MD)–Basel: Neonatal Unit, University Children’s Hospital Basel UKBB (Roland Neumann, MD; Renate Itin) –Bern: Neonatal Unit, University Children’s Hospital, Inselspital (Mathias Nelle, MD; Liliane Stoffel)–Chur: Neonatal Unit, Dept. of Paediatrics, Kantonsspital Chur (Brigitte Scharrer, MD; Kai Roloff)–Geneva: Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Dept. of Paediatrics, University Hospital HCUG (Riccardo Pfister, MD)– Lausanne: Division of Neonatology, Dept. of Paediatrics, University Hospital CHUV (Matthias Roth-Kleiner, MD; Magali Contino)–Lucerne: Neonatal Unit, Children’s Hospital, Kantonsspital Luzern (Thomas M. Berger, MD; Ulrike Schlegel)– St. Gallen: Neonatal Unit, Children’s Hospital, Kantonsspital St. Gallen (Gudrun Jaeger, MD; Ruth Dutler)–Zurich: Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich (Jean-Claude Fauchère, MD; Barbara Dinten).

Author details

1Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland.2Institute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.3Dialogue Ethics Foundation, Interdisciplinary Institute for Ethics in Health Care, Zurich, Switzerland.4Neonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Reference

1. Bucher HU, et al. Decision-making at the limit of viability: differing perceptions and opinions between neonatal physicians and nurses. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18:81.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1040-z.

* Correspondence:buh@usz.ch

1Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland

© The Author(s). 2018Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Bucheret al. BMC Pediatrics (2018) 18:226 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1204-x

Références

Documents relatifs

Instead, he proposed what he called the “common currency model”, according to which words, and proper names in particular, are continuants, constituted by stages

While this seems adequate for some domain-specific uses of “type” that are shorthand for quantification of tokens sharing certain properties, 15 it will not do for the broader notion

[r]

With the above procedure we obtained two data sets 8 : The secret evaluation data set containing for each test user the two left out (i. e., ENTER SEARCH) names and the public

The Weight PoF approach first ignores the contextual information in the data (in our case, the month and the city from each access) and applies a traditional algorithm (e.g.,

We discuss relationships of attribute implications to various tools in com- puter science and artificial intelligence: functional dependencies, horn theories, emer- gent

In order to quantify the level of alignment of the linguistic categories across the population, we monitor (Fig. 2 C and D) the emer- gence of the average pairwise match (see

Dans cet article, nous présentons les résultats d’une recherche qui tente de mettre en lumière les éléments sur lesquels des élèves de CM2 et de sixième prennent appui pour