• Aucun résultat trouvé

Introduction to Clinical Inquiries: New series by the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Introduction to Clinical Inquiries: New series by the Family Physicians Inquiries Network"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

172

Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien}Vol 66: MARCH | MARS 2020

C O M M E N T A R Y

Introduction to Clinical Inquiries

New series by the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Timothy Mott MD Richard Guthmann MD MPH

W

e are thrilled to be collaborating with Canadian Family Physician (CFP) on the publication of our Clinical Inquiries (CIs) series. Clinical Inquiries are author-formulated questions that are answered with the best available current evidence. Family med- icine residency faculty and their residents write CIs.

These authors have demonstrated success writing other evidence-based reviews for our Family Physician Inquiries Network (FPIN). Editors vet the questions for interest to family physicians and adequacy of avail- able empiric data. A professional medical librarian then searches the medical literature to ensure inclusion of all pertinent references. The authors select the highest- quality evidence to answer their question. They grade each reference using the Oxford Centre for Evidence- based Medicine Levels of Evidence.1 The evidence- based answers provide recommendations labeled with the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy and explicit categorization of the evidence.2 Finally, recommenda- tions from other authoritative sources, when available, offer comparisons of the evidence to the guidelines.

Clinical Inquiries are the longest-lived publication project of FPIN. They have been published in the Journal of Family Practice and American Family Physician for nearly 2 decades. With the launch of CIs in the current issue of CFP (page 186),3 we are exceptionally pleased to appear in another prominent primary care journal and join ranks with our neighbour.

Who is FPIN?

Here is a bit more about who “we” are: FPIN is a non- profit membership organization offering scholarship, edu- cation, and faculty development opportunities for primary care learners and educators. With partial support through a grant from the American Academy of Family Physicians, FPIN was founded in 1998 by Dr Bernard Ewigman in the Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of Missouri–Columbia, with 7 other “found- ing member” university departments. Since then, FPIN has expanded to more than 150 sites, including university programs, community hospital residencies, and military residencies, in addition to adding international programs in Ontario and China.

The primary mission of FPIN is to provide high-quality education and professional development for primary

care clinicians to practise evidence-based medicine and produce scholarly work. Additionally, we envision a pri- mary care work force that thinks critically, communi- cates expertly, and uses the best current evidence to improve the health of patients. We achieve these goals through our dedicated Executive Director, LuShawna Gerdes; her stellar staff; and a largely volunteer work force of tireless editors, many of whom have been involved with FPIN for more than a decade. Through workshops, conference presentations, online modules, and editorial feedback, we train members to produce evidence-based scholarly reviews. More information can be found on FPIN’s website at www.fpin.org.

Growth and new projects

With growth and diversification, FPIN has also developed other peer-reviewed publications, including Help Desk Answers, Priority Updates from the Research Literature, and our newest offering, Good Evidence Matters. Several of these projects are also published in the Journal of Family Practice and American Family Physician in addition to FPIN’s own journal, Evidence-Based Practice.

In the past couple of years and with ongoing growth of our CI project, we needed to find an additional outlet for our content. We were already familiar with CFP as online readers; it was quickly clear from recognizing the similari- ties between CFP and the current journals publishing CIs, and then from reviewing the CFP mission statement, that we should approach CFP’s editorial advisory board for col- laboration. We are so grateful they obliged. We hope CFP readers find these articles topical, useful, and timely.

Dr Mott is Executive Editor and Vice President of Publications and Dr Guthmann is Editor-in-Chief for Clinical Inquiries, both for the Family Physicians Inquiries Network in Columbia, Mo.

Competing interests None declared Correspondence

Dr Timothy Mott; e-mail vppubs@fpin.org

The opinions expressed in commentaries are those of the authors. Publication does not imply endorsement by the College of Family Physicians of Canada.

References

1. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011. Available from: https://www.

cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed 2020 Feb 6.

2. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD, Woolf SH, Susman J, Ewigman B, et al. Strength of Rec- ommendation Taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in the medical literature. Am Fam Physician 2004;69(3):548-56.

3. Clemente Fuentes R, Organ B, Creech J, Broszko CM, Nashelsky J. Acupuncture for low back pain. Can Fam Physician 2020;66:186-7.

Références

Documents relatifs

mainly by non–family physician specialists is poor in family medicine is that CPGs developed primarily for complicated problems do not work well when dealing with the com-

The questionnaire asked graduating family physicians about their exposure to collaboration between physicians and nurse clinicians during their family residency training, as well

More specifically, the goal of our study is to explore the opinions of graduates in family medicine about collaboration with community pharmacists with regard to 3 distinct

Each of them includes one or more areas of special interest within their practices, including mental health, obstetrics, care of children and adolescents,

Treating all members of a family does not necessarily add much to the fundamental relationship in medicine, which is the relationship between doctor and

If the prin- ciple that family doctors should follow all members of a family is perceived as an obligation, doctors will feel compelled to take on patients they

OBJECTIVE To ascertain the opinions of family physicians about medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases and the role of community pharmacists in improving adherence

A ccording to recent qualitative research by Dr Donna Manca, her colleagues, and the College of Family Physicians of Canada (CFPC), Canadian family physi- cians