A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
C. J. B URDEN
L. J. T ASSIE
The De Broglie fusion method applied to quarks at the ends of strings
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 38, n
o3 (1983), p. 199-213
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1983__38_3_199_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1983, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
199
The De Broglie Fusion method applied to quarks
at the ends of strings
C. J. BURDEN (*) L. J. TASSIE Department of Theoretical Physics, IAS,
Research School of Physical Sciences, The Australian National University, P. O. Box 4,
Canberra, A. C. T. 2600, Australia
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 3, 1983, Physique ’ théorique. ’
ABSTRACT. - Wave
equations
are found fordiquarks
restricted to aworld line traced out
by
the end of a relativisticstring.
The method used involvescombining
two restricted Diracequations using
a variant of the deBroglie
fusion method. Theequation describing
thespin
0diquark
isthe Klein-Gordon
equation
restricted to the world line. However, thespin
1diquark equation
differs from the restricted Proca-deBroglie equation.
RESUME. - Nous trouvons les
equations
d’ondes pour undiquark
lie a la courbe decrite par l’extrémité d’une corde relativiste. La methode consiste a combiner deux
equations
de Diracrestreintes,
en utilisant unevariante de la « methode de fusion » de de
Broglie. L’equation qui
decritIe
diquark
despin
0 est celle deKlein-Gordon,
restreinte a la courbe.Cependant, 1’equation
pour Iediquark
despin
1 n’est pas la même que1’equation
de Proca-deBroglie
restreinte.1. INTRODUCTION
In 1943 a method was devised
by
deBroglie [1] ] to couple
two or morefree Dirac fields to
produce higher spin
fields.By coupling
two free Dirac(*) Present address: Dept of Physics, Weizmann, Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A-Vol. XXXVIII, 0020-2339/1983/199/5 5,00/
cÇ) Gauthier-Villars 9
200 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
fields,
-deBroglie’s
« fusion method »produces
the scalar Klein-Gordon and vector Proca-deBroglie equations.
In this paper we
apply
the deBroglie
fusion method to two Dirac fields which have been restricted to a world line. Theprocedure
ofrestricting
free fields to world lines was
developed by
Bars and Hanson[2] to
enablethem to model fermionic
quarks following
the world lines traced outby
the ends of a relativistic
string. By using
the fusion method one can extend thestring
model to include hadrons in whichstrings
terminate indiquarks [3 ].
In §
2 we reviewprevious
workconcerning
the restriction of the Dirac field to a worldline, emphasising
inparticular
the case of the world line of aparticle executing
uniform circular motion.In §
3 the fusion method isapplied
to two Dirac fields to determine theequations describing
thefield of a
diquark
restricted to anarbitrary
world line. Theparticular
caseof uniform circular motion is dealt with
in §
4. Theequations
are inter-preted
as those ofspin
0 andspin
1diquarks.
Our conventions
regarding
notation areexplained
inAppendix
1.2. THE DIRAC FIELD ON A WORLD LINE
By demanding
that the field derivatives normal to agiven
submanifold of Minkowski4-space vanish,
Bars and Hanson[2] give
arecipe
for res-tricting
a free classical field, describedby
alagrangian density,
to thatsubmanifold. In
particular,
if a field withlagrangian density 2( t/J,
is to be restricted to the world line then the
following algorithm gives
a
lagrangian L( t/J,
definedonly
on the world line : .The
subscript
T stands forBy applying
thisrecipe
to the free field Diracequation,
Bars and Hansondetermine the contribution to the action for
quarks
at the extremities of arelativistic
string.
For eachquark, varying
the action with respect to the field for thatquark gives
the restricted Dirac fieldequation
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
In
(2)
the parameter 1" has been setequal
to the proper time salong
theworld line. Dots indicate differentiation with respect to s, and the slash has its usual
meaning, viz. ~
=These results have also been obtained
by
Kikkawa and Sato[4] using
an
approach
from lattice gaugetheory.
In their treatment thequark Held ~
is a Grassmann
algebra valued a
number. When the full colour- flavour symmetry isincluded,
the Grassmannalgebra
formalism serves the purpose ofensuring
thatonly totally antisymmetric
states survive. Since we areonly
concerned with thespin
states, it is sufficient for our purposes to considercomplex
valued solutions of(2).
Equation (2)
has been solvedby
Kikkawa et al.[5] ]
for theparticular
case when the world line is that traced out
by
apoint executing
uniformcircular motion about the
origin
in the x - yplane. Setting
Lequal
tothe co-ordinate time
x°,
this world line isgiven by
where p is the radius of orbit and OJ the
angular frequency. By defining
ocsuch that pcv = sin a, the four
linearly independent
solutions can be writtenas
(using
a similar notation to reference[2] with s
== 1" cos a = propertime)
where
are
positive
energyspinors
and1
are ’
negative
’ energyspinors.
Thespin
S takes values:t"2 corresponding
£to the
subscripts 1
and 2respectively.
Thespin
matrix is definedby
and the third component of
spin,
S 3 ==S 12 ,
takes the values S sec ex.Vol. XXXVIII, n° 3-1983.
202 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
The four component
spinors
ul, u2, vl and v2 aregiven by
3. THE FUSION METHOD ON AN ARBITRARY WORLD LINE
We return to the restricted Dirac
equation (2)
where is any arbi-trarily specified
world line. Inpractice,
if we aredealing
with astring
hadronwith
quarks
orantiquarks
at the free ends of thestring
segments, the world line traced outby
eachquark
will be determinedby
the condition that the rate ofchange
of momentum of thatquark
isequal
to thestring
tensionat the end of the
string.
Ingeneral,
then, we can think of asbeing arbitrarily specified, keeping
in mind that energy and momentum are not conserved for the individualquark
field.Consider the tensor
product
of the space of solutions to the restricted Diracequation
with itself.Any
element of this tensorproduct
space can be realized as a 4 x 4 matrix of the form_ _
where ’ the form a
complete linearly independent
set of solutions to Annales de 1’Institut Henri Poincare-Section Athe linear
equation (2).
Wesplit
T intosymmetric
andantisymmetric
parts and
respectively
andexpand
in terms of the 16independent products
of Dirac matrices I, 6uv, 03B3 03B35 and y5, and thecharge conjugate
matrix C as follows :
The
quantities
etc. are to bethought
of as the state vectors of the twocoupled
Diracparticles.
If
~~ 1 ~
and are any two solutions of(2)
then we haveSince
(10)
is linear we canreplace
from(8). Writing
theexpansions (9)
morecompactly 03C6a03B3aC
where a is ageneric
labelfor the indices ,u, etc., we have
Using
theproperties
of thecharge conjugate
matrix andmultiplying
on the
right by gives
Setting
the coefficient ofeach ya equal
to zerogives
a set of first ordercoupled
differential
equations.
From theantisymmetric
part of 03A8 we haveand from the
symmetric
partWe shall deal first with the
antisymmetric
part. Ingeneral
there will be fourlinearly independent
solutions to(2).
Concealed within( 13)
is theinformation
pertaining
to the sixpossible linearly independent antisymme-
tric tensor
products
of these solutions. To extract this information it isVol. XXXVIII, n° 3-1983.
204 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
useful to divide into its parts
parallel
to and normal to the world line.We define
where and
P1v
are operatorsprojecting
onto theparallel
and normalsubspaces
to the world line at eachpoint.
Writing
the fieldequations (13)
in terms of~, x1 and x
we can elimi-nate ~~
entirely leaving
the threeuncoupled equations
Equation (16c)
can berecognised
as the Klein Gordonequation,
restrictedby
therecipe ( 1 ),
to anarbitrary
world line. We therefore assume that thefield X is to be associated with
antisymmetric spin
zero states. In the nextsection we consider the
particular
world line describedby (3)
and show that, for this worldline,
X is in fact thespin
zerodiquark
andantidiquark
field. We shall also
interpret
theremaining
fieldequations (16a)
and(16b)
as
descriptions
of boundquark-antiquark
states.Consider next the
symmetric
states, which are describedby
the fieldequations (14).
Theseequations
contain informationpertaining
to the tenlinearly independent symmetric
bound states. As for theantisymmetric
case it is useful to define an alternate set of fields
parallel
to and normal to the world line. We setBecause 03C6 03BD
isantisymmetric
in itsindices
and v it is easy to see that8f
is in fact normal to the world line.
Equations (14)
can now be written in terms of the new fields(17)
togive
Equations {18a)
and(18b)
are obtainedby contracting {14a)
on the leftby
the operatorsPII
andrespectively. Equation (18c)
is obtainedby applying Pjj
to(14b)
on theright,
and( 18d ) by applying
to( 14b)
on boththe left and
right
hand sides.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
We can eliminate
81
from(18b)
and(18c)
andmultiply
on the leftby
thenormal
projection
operatorP1
togive
asingle
second orderequation
in1>’1
only :The
symmetric coupled
states are nowfully
describedby
theuncoupled equations (18a), (18d)
and(19).
In the next section we shallinterpret
theseequations
for the world line describedby (3).
For thisparticular
worldline the field
cpf
will be seen to represent thesymmetric spin
1diquark
and
antidiquark
states, while( 18 a)
and( 18d )
will beinterpreted
as des-criptions
ofsymmetric qq
states.4. SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS
We return to the case where the world line is that of a
point executing
uniform circular
motion, given by (3). Combining
the fourindependent
states
(4)
two at a time one forms 10symmetric
and 6antisymmetric
boundstates. In this section we associate these bound states with the solutions to the field
equations
foundin §
3. Inparticular
we show that the fieldequations ( 16c)
and( 19)
describefully
thespin
0 andspin
1diquark
andantidiquark
states.For any
particular
state, the functions~a
can be foundby inverting
theexpansion (9)
togive
where ~
==(yj
1.Substituting
the solutions(4)
into(20 gives
where is a rotation of about the z-axis in the
representation
ofthe Lorentz group
appropriate
to the indices a and b.Because of the presence of the factor
Ab,
any solution~a
with a certainorientation to the world line at s == 0 will maintain that orientation to the world line for all s.
Therefore,
to determine which statescorrespond
to which of the
equations
found in section 3 it is sufficient to consider the functionsgiven by (21)
at s = 0, i. e.and examine their orientation to the world line.
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 3-1983.
206 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
In order to evaluate the
expression (22)
for all cases of interest moreeasily
we transform to the rest frame at s = 0. We show inAppendix
2that the four
spinors given by
theexpressions (7a)
to(7d)
becomein this frame. In tables 1 and 2 we list the results of
substituting
thesespinors
into
(22)
for allpossible antisymmetric
andsymmetric
combinations of solutions to the restricted Diracequation.
Since we areworking
in therest
frame,
for which x~‘ _(1,
0, 0,0),
it is easy torecognise alignment
ofstates
parallel
to or normal to the world line.Consider first the
antisymmetric
states in table 1, which we compare TABLE 1. - The quantities4>(0), x(0)
and calcutatedfrom
thefor-
muta
(22)
in the restframe for
antisymmetric combinationsof
solutions tothe restricted Dirac
equationA.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
TABLE 2. - ,
(22)
in the rest
frame
,for
symmetriccombinations of
solutions to , the restricted it
equationA.
with the solutions of the field
equations (16b)
and(16c) from §
3. Forthe
diquark
andantidiquark spin
zerosinglets only
the fields Xand ~~
areVol. XXXVIII, n° 3 -1983.
208 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
non-zero. We can therefore associate these states with the two
independent
solutions of
(16c),
which involvesonly
x. It follows from(13)
and(15)
that XII satisfies an identical
equation.
Theremaining antisymmetric
states,namely qq
states, are describedfully by
theprojection xf
ofx~‘
normal tothe world line. We therefore
identify
these states with the solutionsof ( 16b).
Equation ( 16a)
is redundant.Next we consider the
symmetric
states, which are listed in table 2. These states are to be associated with solutions to the fieldequations ( 18a), ( 18d )
and( 19). Examining
table 2, we see that thespin
1diquark
and anti-diquark triplets
areequally
well describedby
theprojection cpf
ofnormal to the world line or the field defined
by ( 17d ) from 03C6 03BD.
Wetherefore associated these states with solutions of the field
equation ( 19).
If one chooses to eliminate the field
cpf
from(18b)
and(18c)
instead ofe1,
an
equation
identical to(19)
results withcpf replaced by 91.
Finally
we note that thesymmetric q - q
states in table 2 arefully
described
by
thefields ~ (i,j
=1, 2, 3).
Because we areworking
in theinstantaneous rest
frame,
these arejust
the fields 03B8 03BD definedby (17c).
We therefore associate these states with the field
equation (18d)
and notethat the
remaining equation, ( 18a)
is redundant.So far we have determined that the
bound q - q
states are solutions toparticular
fieldequations
foundin §
3 when the world line is thatgiven by (3). Conversely,
we can find acomplete
set of solutions for theequations
found
in §
3 for thisparticular
world line in thefollowing
manner :guided by
the formula(21 )
we seek solutions of the formSubstitution of this function into the differential
equation
willgive
a matrixequation
in which and K are unknown but can be solved for. Weapply
thistechnique
to thespin
1diquark equation (19)
to show that thereare no solutions other than the three
positive
energy and threenegative
energy solutions which have been attributed to this
equation.
Substituting
theappropriate
version of(24)
into(19)
andmultiplying through
on the leftby gives
the matrixequation
In the rest frame at s == 0 we have
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
giving
the matrixequation (25)
asThe
only
solutions to this matrixequation
aregiven by
the vectorsin table 2
corresponding
todiquark
states. Thecorresponding
values forthe
frequencies
K agree with those foundby adding
thefrequencies ki
ofthe constituent
quarks.
We note in
passing
that thespin
1diquark equation ( 19)
obtained from the fusion method differs from theequation
obtainedby restricting
thefree field Proca de
Broglie
field to the world line. The free fieldlagrangian density
for the vector field ~~‘ of mass 2m isRestricting
to the world lineaccording
to the formula( 1 ) gives
thewave
equation
which we compare with
( 19).
CONCLUSION
We have found field
equations governing
the evolution of bound states of two Dirac fields restricted to a world line. As aparticular application,
we are interested in
describing
bound states of twoquarks
at the extremities of a relativisticstring.
When the world line is that of a
point executing
uniform circular motion,the
spin
0diquark
at the end of astring
is describedby ( 16c).
Werecognise
this
equation
as the Klein-Gordonequation
restricted to a world line.The
spin
1diquark
for this world line is describedby
the fieldequation ( 19).
This
equation
differs from that obtainedby restricting
a free Proca-de Bro-glie
field to a world line.Vol. XXXVIII, n° 3-1983.
210 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
Bound states of a
quark
and anantiquark
are describedby
equa- tions( 18d )
forspin-symmetric
states and( 16b)
forspin-antisymmetric
states. From the
point
of view of thestring
model there isnothing
topreclude
the
possibility
of astring terminating
in a qq state,provided
the statebelongs
to a colour octet.If,
forinstance,
the other end of thestring
ter-minates in the
conjugate
state, we have an exotic meson.Although
we haveinterpreted
the fieldequations
in terms of qq, qqand qq
states for aparticular
worldline,
the fieldequations apply
for arbi-trary world lines as
descriptions
of bound states of solutions to the restrictedDirac
equation.
Annales de Henri Poincare-Section A
APPENDIX 1
NOTATION
We use the metric = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) and set = c = 1. Where a particular representation of the Dirac matrices is required, we take
We also have
The charge conjugate matrix, C = satisfies where T = transpose.
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 3-1983.
212 C. J. BURDEN AND L. J. TASSIE
APPENDIX 2
THE SPINORS (7)
IN THE INITIAL REST FRAME
Transforming from the « laboratory » frame to the rest frame at s = 0 is effected by the
matrix
that is, = ( 1, 0, 0, 0). It is required to find the Dirac spinor representation (i. e.
the
( 0, - )
@1 , 2 0 )
representation) of this transformation.The matrix (A 1) can be written as
where = 2014 g 03C3g03BD03C1 are the generators of the homogeneous Lorentz group in the vector
(~, ~)
representation and u is defined byThe equivalent generators of the Dirac representation of the homogeneous Lorentz group
are
so the Dirac representative of the matrix (A 1) is
Applying ’ this matrix to the laboratory frame ’ four-spinors (7) gives the equivalent four- spinors (23) in the rest frame ’ at s = 0.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare-Section A
REFERENCES
[1] L. DE BROGLIE, Théorie générale des Particules à Spin (Méthode de Fusion), p. 93-116.
Paris, Gauthier-Villars, 1943.
[2] I. BARS, A. J. HANSON, Phys. Rev., t. D 13, 1976, p. 1744.
[3] C. J. BURDEN, L. J. TASSIE, Nuc. Phys., t. B 204, 1982, p. 204.
[4] K. KIKKAWA, M. SATO, Phys. Rev. Lett., t. 38, 1977, p. 1309.
[5] K. KIKKAWA, T. KOTANI, M. SATO, M. KENMOKU, Phys. Rev., t. D 18, 1978, p. 2606.
(Manuscrit reçu le 24 mars 1982)
Vol. XXXVIII, n° 3-1983.