C OMPOSITIO M ATHEMATICA
A. J. V AN DER P OORTEN
A note on the zeros of exponential polynomials
Compositio Mathematica, tome 31, n
o2 (1975), p. 109-113
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=CM_1975__31_2_109_0>
© Foundation Compositio Mathematica, 1975, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Compositio Mathematica » (http:
//http://www.compositio.nl/) implique l’accord avec les conditions géné- rales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infrac- tion pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
109
A NOTE ON THE ZEROS OF EXPONENTIAL POLYNOMIALS
A. J. van der Poorten
Noordhoff International Publishing
Printed in the Netherlands
1. Introduction
In a recent paper The Zeros
of Exponential Polynomials [1],
C. J.Moreno gave
precise
information as to the location of thestrips
con-taining
the zeros ofexponential
sums of theshape
In
particular
he showed that the realparts
of the zeros ofexponential
sums of the
shape (1)
are dense in the intervals of the real line which lieentirely
inside astrip
of zeros. Morenoconjectured
that theappropriate generalisation
of thisdensity
result would hold forexponential
sumswith
complex frequencies
al , ..., am . He remarks that it seems difficult to obtaingeneralisations
of his result forexponential polynomials
It is the purpose of this brief note to describe how the ideas
employed by
Moreno in[1]
can beapplied
to obtain thegeneralisation
of theresults of
[1]
forexponential polynomials F(z)
of theshape (2).
Forbrevity
we avoid a detailedrepetition
of the results of[1]
and also refer the reader to[1]
for references to the relevant literature.2. A
simplification
of thegeneral
caseIt will be sufficient to suppose that we may write
110
Our remarks therefore
apply
to a somewhat wider class of functions(2)
than
just
the class withpolynomial
coefficients.We now recall the well-known
result 1
that zeros of(2)
withlarge
absolute value lie in
strips
in thecomplex plane
where at least two ofthe terms
Pk(z)e0152kZ, PI(z)e0152ZZ,
are of similarsize, dominating
the size of theremaining
terms. Indeed suchstrips
lieperpendicular
to the convexhull determined in the
complex plane by
thepoints ocl, a2, am,
the
complex conjugates
of thefrequencies.
For convenience write
for j
=1, 2,..., m
We make our remarK
precise
as follows :All but
finitely
manyof
the zerosof (2)
lie inlogarithmic strips of
theshape
where, 0,
0 ~ 0 2n and c are such that :(a)
there existk,
1(k =1= 1) in ( 1, 2,..., ml
such thatand
Write
We write
1 See, say, the survey article R. E. Langer on the zeros of exponential sums and integrals ;
Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 37 (1931), 213-239. A more recent source is D. G. Dickson, Asymptotic distribution of zeros of exponential sums; Publ. Math. Debrecen, 11 (1964),
295-300.
With k as
above,
we now writeand observe that
by
virtue of theinequalities (4)
and(5)
ifthen
Ibk(Z)1
~ 0 as t ~ oo.Similarly,
forl ~ S03B8,c
andz ~ I03B8,c
asabove,
we see
by
virtue of theequations (4)
and(5)
and somesimple manipulation
that
where
lvl(z)l
~ 0 as t ~oo.Recalling
thatIGI(Z)I
- 0 asIzi
~ oo and henceas t ~ oo, we can summarise the situation as follows:
Write
Then
for every ô
> 0 there is a to =t,(ô)
suchthat for
t > to,~0 ~ ~1,
where the
p,
aregiven by
pl expi(03BCl - 03BCk)03B8
sothat |p’l| = Ip, 1,
and asimple
calculation shows that the
03B2l
aregiven by
where
tyl(t)
~ 0 as t ~ oo .3. Main result
It is now convenient to state the main result of this note.
112
THEOREM: Let al , a2, ..., am be distinct
complex
numbers andan
exponential polynomial;
suppose that thepj(z)
areof
exactdegree
J1jrespectively
withleading coefficient
pj. Let0,
c and the index k bedefined by
the conditions(a)
and(b) of
section 2. Let the numberslyl -’Xkl,
1=1= k,
1 E
So, c
be irrationalslinearly independent
over 0. Then a necessary andsufficient
conditionfor F(z)
to haveinfinitely
many zeros near any curveis that
REMARKS :
(a)
Thelinear independence
condition onthe 03B1j
is stronger than isrequired
for the truth of thetheorem;
but it avoidsdegenerate
cases.(b) By
’a zero near any curveC,9,,,,,,
we mean that if x e R satisfies(8)
then
given
any e > 0 there exists a x’satisfying
x - 03B5 x’ x + 03B5 and a t’ > to such thatPROOF: We can
apply
our argument to the functionFk(z) = Z-03BCke-03B1kzF(Z)
which has the same zeros asF(z)
in theregion
underconsideration. Our
proof
consists ofindicating
that theproof
of[1],
pages
73-74,
can beapplied
mutatis mutandis to this case. For thesufficiency
argument we notice that the lemmaof [1],
pages73-74, requires only
a reformulation toapply
to the functionFk(z)
and to thecurves
Co, c, x
within thelogarithmic strips I03B8,c
mentioned in section 2.Moreover in section 2 we
’simplified’ Fk(Z)
to show in(6)
thatFk(z)
behaves on the curves
CO,c,x
like theexponential
sumWe may therefore
apply
theKronecker-Weyl
theorem so as to constructa sequence
{tn} with tn
~ ~ as n ~ oo so that the sum(9)
~ 0 as n ~ o0when we
replace
tby tn
in(9);
it follows thatas n ~ oo as
required.
The linearindependence
conditionguarantees
therequired
linearindependence
of thefli
asgiven by (7).
The
necessity
argument of[1],
page73, applies similarly
sinceby (6) Fk(Z)
can vanishinfinitely
many times near the curveCo,c,x only if
thesum
(9)
isarbitrarily
small for some t > to forall to sufficiently large.
Finally,
thesufficiency
argumentrequires
thatFk(z)
be bounded belowon segments of the curves
C03B8,c,,x
andagain
we canapply
theargument
of [1]
page 76 to the sum(9). Alternatively
the bound is availabledirectly
for
F(z)
from the results ofTijdeman [2].
4. Remarks
The theorem of course includes the assertion of section 2
since,
in all butdegenerate
cases,(8)
will be satisfiedby
x in some intervalsxo x x 1. We have also
proved
theconjecture of [1],
page71,
to the effect that when the coefficients
pj(z)
are constants pj then near every lineparallel
to the sides of astrip
of zerosof F(z)
lieinfinitely
manyzeros
of F(z).
Indeed the statement of the theorem is the naturalgeneralisa-
tion of this
conjecture
to the case of coefficientspj(z) satisfying (3).
1 am indebted to R.
Tijdeman
and M. Voorhoeve for some remarks that assisted in the construction of section 2 of this note.REFERENCES
[1] C. J. MORENO: The zeros of exponential polynomials (1). Comp. Math. vol. 26 (1973)
69-78.
[2] R. TIJDEMAN : An auxiliary result in the theory of transcendental numbers. J. Number Th. 5 (1973) 80-94.
(Oblatum 23-X-1974 & 26-V-1975) Mathematisch Instituut
Rijksuniversiteit Leiden Wassenaarseweg 80 Leiden, Nederland.