• Aucun résultat trouvé

COVID-19 Symptoms: Longitudinal Evolution and Persistence in Outpatient Settings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "COVID-19 Symptoms: Longitudinal Evolution and Persistence in Outpatient Settings"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Article

Reference

COVID-19 Symptoms: Longitudinal Evolution and Persistence in Outpatient Settings

NEHME, Mayssam, et al. & COVICARE TEAM

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread, causing a worldwide pandemic, and prolonged effects are emerging (1, 2). The term “long COVID” describes illness in persons who continue to report lasting effects after infection (3, 4). To date, little information exists about outpatient settings in this novel disease where 81% of cases are reportedly on the mild end of the spectrum (5). Informing patients and physicians about COVID-19 symptom evolution may help them recognize the time course of the disease, legitimize patients' concerns, and reassure them when possible. Messages around potentially persisting symptoms could also assist in reinforcing public health measures to avoid the spread of infection. Objective: To describe COVID-19 symptom evolution and persistence in an outpatient setting in Geneva, Switzerland, from day 1 through day 30 to 45 after diagnosis.

NEHME, Mayssam, et al . & COVICARE TEAM. COVID-19 Symptoms: Longitudinal Evolution and Persistence in Outpatient Settings. Annals of Internal Medicine , 2020, vol. 174, no. 5, p.

723-725

DOI : 10.7326/M20-5926 PMID : 33284676

Available at:

http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:155430

Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.

(2)

COVID-19 Symptoms: Longitudinal Evolution and Persistence in Outpatient Settings

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread, causing a worldwide pandemic, and prolonged effects are emerging (1, 2). The term“long COVID”describes illness in persons who continue to report lasting effects after infection (3,

4). To date, little information exists about outpatient settings in this novel disease where 81% of cases are reportedly on the mild end of the spectrum (5). Informing patients and physicians about COVID-19 symptom evolution may help them recognize the time course of the disease, legitimize patients' concerns, and reassure them when possible. Messages around potentially persisting symptoms could also assist in reinforcing public health measures to avoid the spread of infection.

Objective:To describe COVID-19 symptom evolution and persistence in an outpatient setting in Geneva, Switzerland, from day 1 through day 30 to 45 after diagnosis.

Methods: From 18 March to 15 May 2020, the Geneva University Hospitals (sole and largest public hospital in Geneva) was 1 of 5 available testing centers and served more than 50%

of patients with COVID-19 in the Geneva canton. Only

Figure 1.Studyflow diagram.

Initial cohort (n = 703)

Ambulatory patients included (n = 669)

Excluded (n = 34) Refused to participate: 31 Living outside Geneva canton: 3

Patients reached days 1–2 (n = 591)

Patients reached days 3–4 (n = 555)

Patients reached days 5–6 (n = 516)

Patients reached days 7–8 (n = 458)

Patients reached days 9–10 (n = 376)

Patients reached

days 30–45 (n = 510) Patients not reached days 30–45 (n = 159) Ambulatory: 150 Hospitalized: 9 Hospitalized (n = 10) Suspended follow-up

Patient declined follow-up: 20 Follow-up discontinued because of clinical recovery: 70 Hospitalized: 9 Suspended follow-up

Patient declined follow-up: 21 Follow-up discontinued because of clinical recovery: 25 Hospitalized: 7 Suspended follow-up

Patient declined follow-up: 27 Follow-up discontinued because of clinical recovery: 13 Hospitalized: 4 Suspended follow-up

Patient declined follow-up: 16 Follow-up discontinued because of clinical recovery: 17 Hospitalized: 10

Out of the initial cohort of 703 participants, 669 ambulatory patients were ultimately included, excluding those who declined to participate (n= 31) or who lived outside the Geneva canton (n= 3). Reasons to sus- pend follow-up during thefirst 10 d were clinical recovery (≥10 d from symptom onset and 48 h without symptoms), patient wish, or hospitali- zation during follow-up. Attempts were made to assess all 669 partici- pants at day 30–45 from diagnosis.

Annals.org Annals of Internal Medicine

Vol. 174 No. 5

May 2021 723

(3)

symptomatic persons were tested during that period. Because many practices were closed, persons who were not hospitalized at baseline could benefit from remote follow-up with an ambu-

latory care center (a process called COVICARE) in case their primary care physician was unavailable for follow-up care (a full description is available at www.covicare24.com). Exclusion Figure 2.Longitudinal evolution of COVID-19 symptoms in outpatient settings (n= 669).

1–2 3–4

Digestive symptoms

Digestive Symptoms

No digestive symptoms

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Hospitalized Not reachable Declined follow-up Discontinued follow-up due to clinical recovery

1–2 3–4

Dyspnea

Dyspnea

No dyspnea

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1–2 3–4

Fever Fever

No fever

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1–2 3–4

Fatigue Fatigue

No fatigue

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1–2 3–4

Loss of taste or smell

Loss of Taste or Smell

No loss of taste or smell

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1–2 3–4

Headache

Headache

No headache

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1–2 3–4

Cough Cough

No cough

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

1–2 3–4

≥1 symptom

≥1 Symptom

No symptoms

5–6 7–8 9–10 30–45

Day

Participants, %

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Forty of the participants were hospitalized during follow-up. Their data were included in the reported symptoms when available (up to hospitalization and again at day 30–45). COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.

(4)

criteria were refusal to provide consent and administrative rea- sons (living outside the Geneva canton).

Most patients were called every 48 hours for thefirst 10 days with a standardized interview inquiring about self- reported symptoms (Supplement, available at Annals.org).

Follow-up during the 10 days was suspended if patients declined follow-up, clinically recovered, or were hospitalized (Figure 1). Participants were called every 24 hours if they reported deteriorating clinical symptoms; those who were unreachable (eligible minus reached) were called again the next day. All patients were then contacted again 30 to 45 days after diagnosis. To address the varying frequency of contacts during thefirst 10 days, we combined assessments into 2-day intervals: days 1 to 2 through days 9 to 10. When 2 measure- ments were available, we included only thefirst observation per assessment interval.

Findings:Of 30 557 persons tested in Geneva during the study period, 18.1% tested positive (n= 5534); 22.2% of these were hospitalized (n= 1229), and 703 enrolled in COVICARE follow-up. Out of the initial cohort, 669 persons were ultimately included (Figure 1). The mean age was 42.8 years (SD, 13.7);

60% of included patients were women, 24.6% were health care workers, and 68.8% had no underlying risk factors. Forty partici- pants were hospitalized during the study period. We included their data when available (up to hospitalization and again at day 30 to 45). Hospitalized patients were significantly older (mean age, 53.2 years [SD, 11.7]); 55% were male, 12.5% were health care workers, and 62.5% had underlying risk factors.

Figure 2presents the proportion of the 669 patients with various symptoms over time. Cough and loss of taste or smell were common early in the clinical course. At 30 to 45 days (mean, 43 days) from diagnosis, at least 32% of the 669 origi- nally included patients reported 1 or more symptoms. Fatigue, dyspnea, and loss of taste or smell were the main persistent symptoms. Participants not reached between days 30 and 45 (n= 159) had similar characteristics to those reached in that pe- riod (mean age, 41.8 years [SD, 14.8]; 58% were female, 25.9%

were health care workers, and 67.9% had no risk factors).

Discussion: Coronavirus disease 2019 can persist and result in prolonged illness. Our study shows persistence of symptoms in a third of ambulatory patients 30 to 45 days after diagnosis even if we assume that those lost to follow-up were all asymptomatic. Fatigue, dyspnea, and loss of taste or smell were the main persistent symptoms. These results are in line with a recent study of 274 participants that reported the persist- ence of symptoms 14 to 21 days after diagnosis (2).

Our study has several limitations, including missing data and ascertainment bias at each assessment interval. Baseline characteristics were similar overall between participants reached and not reached on day 30 to 45.

In conclusion, this study shows that patients with COVID-19 develop an array of symptoms that evolve over time.

Recognizing the persistence of symptoms could legitimize patients' concerns in an unknown and new disease. Adequate communication can provide reassurance, reduce anxiety, and potentially optimize recovery.

Mayssam Nehme, MD*

Olivia Braillard, MD*

Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland

Gabriel Alcoba, MD

Geneva University Hospitals and Medecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland

Sigiriya Aebischer Perone, MD

Geneva University Hospitals and International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland

Delphine Courvoisier, PhD

Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland François Chappuis, MD, PhD

Idris Guessous, MD, PhD

Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

for the COVICARE TEAM†

* Drs. Nehme and Braillard contributed equally to this work.

†For members of the COVICARE TEAM, see theAppendix(available at Annals.org).

Disclosures:Authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest. Forms can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.

do?msNum=M20-5926.

Reproducible Research Statement: Study protocol and statistical code:Available from Dr. Nehme (e-mail, Mayssam.nehme@hcuge.ch).

Data set:Available from Dr. Nehme (e-mail, Mayssam.nehme@hcuge.

ch). Data are made available upon agreement of the data provider and signature of a data transfer agreement.

Corresponding Author:Mayssam Nehme, MD, Rue Gabrielle-Perret- Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland; e-mail, Mayssam.nehme@hcuge.ch.

This article was published at Annals.org on 8 December 2020.

doi:10.7326/M20-5926

References

1. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F; Gemelli Against COVID-19 Post-Acute Care Study Group. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19.

JAMA. 2020;324:603-605. [PMID: 32644129] doi:10.1001/jama.2020.12603 2. Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, et al; IVY Network Investigators.

Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network United States, MarchJune 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.

2020;69:993-998. [PMID: 32730238] doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6930e1 3. Mahase E. Covid-19: What do we know about long covid.BMJ.

2020;370:m2815. [PMID: 32665317] doi:10.1136/bmj.m2815

4. Crosby SS. My COVID-19. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:120-1. [PMID:

32777184] doi:10.7326/M20-5126

5. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

JAMA. 2020;323:1239-1242. [PMID: 32091533] doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648

Annals.org Annals of Internal Medicine

Vol. 174 No. 5

May 2021 725

(5)

A

PPENDIX

: M

EMBERS OF THE

COVICARE TEAM

Members of the COVICARE TEAM who authored this work: Mayssam Nehme, Olivia Braillard, and Delphine Courvoisier (Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland); Gabriel Alcoba (Geneva University Hospitals and M edecins Sans Frontières, Geneva, Switzerland); Idris Guessous and François Chappuis (Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland); and Sigiriya

Aebischer Perone (Geneva University Hospitals and International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva, Switzerland).

Members of the COVICARE TEAM who contributed

to this work but did not author it: Marwene Grira,

Giovanni Innaurato, Jennifer Socquet, Chlo e

Chevallier-Lugon, Luisa Carnino, Bruno Lab, Jose

Sandoval, Silvia Stringhini, Pierre Chopard, Flora

Koegler, and Dan Lebowitz (Geneva University

Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland); Simon Regard and

Agla e Tardin (Cantonal Health Service, General

Directorate for Health, Geneva, Switzerland); and

Camille Genecand (Cantonal Health Service, General

Directorate for Health, and Geneva University

Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland).

Références

Documents relatifs

Cluster analysis (Euclidean distance, UPGMA method), above, and multidimensional scaling (with a stress value of 5%), below, representing the position of different Middle

We present the data integration methodologies implemented by University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG), which promote technical and semantic interoperability for operational

In order to identify arguments in favor of and against the possible implementation of documents certifying immunity of an individual based on serological testing, we developed

At the University of Geneva, urban research is carried out at several departments and institutes, especially the Department of Geography and Environment, the Institute of

Loss of appetite Myalgias Arthralgias Back pain Fever > 38C Cough Dyspnea Chest pain Palpitations Headache Paresthesias Anosmia Agueusia. Odynodysphagia

Strongly inspired by the Ottawa Charter and the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) health policies, the Canton of Ticino has played a pioneering role by introducing the determinants

Development of a Speech Translator for Medical Use : A Joint Project Between Geneva University Hospitals and the Faculty of Translation and Interpreting of Geneva University.. In:

The jewel in the crown on this occasion must surely be the notebook in which Oscar Wilde wrote his first version of Salomé, but numerous other manuscripts and first