HAL Id: jpa-00206775
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00206775
Submitted on 1 Jan 1969
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
The configurations (d + s)N and the group R6
B.G. Wybourne, P.H. Butler
To cite this version:
B.G. Wybourne, P.H. Butler. The configurations (d + s)N and the group R6. Journal de Physique,
1969, 30 (2-3), pp.181-186. �10.1051/jphys:01969003002-3018100�. �jpa-00206775�
By
B. G. WYBOURNE(2),
Laboratoire Aimé-Cotton, C.N.R.S. and Faculté des Sciences, Orsay, Essonne, and P. H.
BUTLER,
Physics Department, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
(Reçu
le 15 mays1968.)
Résumé. 2014 On
présente
une méthodesimple
pour calculer lesrègles
de branchement intervenant dans la suite des groupes :R24 ~ SU2 Sp12 ~ SU2 SU2 (R6 ~ R5 ~ R3)
utilises dans la classification des états de
configurations (d + s)N,
ainsiqu’une
méthoded’analyse
non
ambiguë
desproduits
de Kronecker dansR6
utilisantl’isomorphisme déjà
connu entre R6 etU4.
Plusieurs corrections sontapportées
à des travaux antérieurs. On donne enfin uneformule
explicite
desproduits
de Kronecker dansR4.
Abstract. 2014 A
simple
method ofcomputing
thebranching
rulesarising
in the chain ofgroups :
R24 ~ SU2 Sp12 ~ SU 2 SU2 (R6 ~ R5 ~ R3)
used in
classifying
the states of the(d
+s)N configurations
ispresented
in addition to anunambiguous
method foranalyzing
Kroneckerproducts
forR6 using
the knownisomorphism
between R6 and U4. Several corrections to earlier works are noted.
Finally,
anexplicit
formula for the Kronecker
products
in R4 isgiven.
1. Introduction. - The
problem
of the group- theoreticaldescription
of the states andproperties
ofthe
(d
+s) N configurations
was first consideredby
Elliot
[1]
whoproposed
to treat the set ofconfigura- tions,
for agiven N,
as asingle entity
and tostudy
their
properties
withrespect
to the chain of groupsU6 D R6 D R5 D R3. Recently,
Feneuille[2, 3, 4]
hasmade an exhaustive
study
of theirproperties using
thechain of groups :
thereby fully exploiting
the concepts ofquasi-spin
and
symplectic symmetry [5, 6].
Feneuille used the classical
theory
of groups[7, 8]
to determine the relevant
branching
rules and toevaluate the Kronecker
products
of the various irre-(1)
Researchsponsored
inpart by
the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Office ofAerospace
Research,United States Air Force, under A.F.O.S.R. Grant No. 1275-67.
(2)
This work was done inpart
while one of us(B.
G.W.)
was a
visiting
Professor with Laboratoire Aim6-Cotton, under thesponsorship
of D.G.R.S.T.ducible
representations.
These methods tend to beparticularly
cumbersome in all but thesimplest
casesand it is desirable to look for alternative methods.
It is the purpose of this paper to show that the bran-
ching
rules may besimply
determinedby
a theoremthat is a direct consequence of Littlewood’s
algebra
of
plethysm [9, 10]
and to discuss thecomputation
of the Kronecker
products
of the irreducible represen- tations ofRs, noting
several corrections to Feneuille’scomputations. Throughout
thisarticle,
we shall fol-low the well-defined notation of Littlewood
[11].
2.
Branching
rules andplethysm.
- The basicproperties
of thealgebra
ofplethysm,
as it bears uponproblems
in atomicspectroscopy,
haverecently
beenoutlined
by
Smith andWybourne [12, 13].
Consider a group G which
corresponds
to the fulllinear group, or to a proper
subgroup
of the full linear group, and let us suppose G contains asubgroup
H.The characters of the irreducible
representations
of Gand H will be labelled
by
variouspartitions
ofintegers.
The character of the irreducible
representation
of Gcorresponding
to the unarypartition (1)
mayalways
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01969003002-3018100
182
TABLE I
DECOMPOSITION OF THE UNARY CHARACTERS FOR SEVERAL GROUPS
DECOMPOSITION GROUP RESTRICTION OF THE UNARY CHARACTER
be
trivially decomposed
into the characters of itssubgroup 1-1,
the entries in table Ibeing specific
toFeneuille’s
problem.
Let
[X] represent
the character of G labelledby
thepartition (X)
and(p)
the character of H labelledby
the
partition (p). Then,
thefollowing
theorem fol- lowsdirectly
from Littlewood’salgebra
ofplethysm
and the
duality
that exists between thesymmetric
andfull linear groups
[11, 14] :
TheOrem :
If
under the restriction G - H the unary character[1] decomposes
as :then the character
[À] of
Gdecomposes
into the charactersof
Hto
yield
the characters contained in theplethysm :
The
plethysm
of eq.(2)
may be evaluated in the usual manner[9, 13] by
firstexpressing
the characters of G and H in terms of S-functions[11], evaluating
the
plethysm
togive
S-functionspertaining
to thecharacters of H and then
expressing
them in termsof the characters of H to
give
the final result. Thefollowing
twoexamples
should suffice to demonstrate theapplication
of the theorem.Consider the
decomposition
of the[11]
represen- tation ofR24
into those ofSU2
XSP12- Inspection
of table I shows that the unary character
[1]
ofR24 decomposes
upon restriction toSU2
XSpl2 as :
Expressing
the characters in terms ofS-functions,
we have :
Since the character
[11] of R24
is theS-function 111 },
it follows from eq.
(2)
that the relevantplethysm
is :Converting
the S-functions into characters ofSU2
and
Spl2 yields
the result :where the
superscript
attached to thesymplectic
characters are the
multiplicities
of therepresentations
of
SU2.
As the second
example,
consider thedecomposition
of the character
[22] of R6
upon the restrictionR6 -* R5.
From table I we conclude that the relevant
plethysm,
in terms of
S-functions,
is :Expressing
the S-functions in terms of the characters ofR5 yields immediately
the result :3. Kronecker
products
forR6.
- Feneuille[3, 4]
has discussed the
symmetry properties
of the Coulomb interaction and scalarthree-particle
effective operators under the chain of groupsof eq. (1).
Inparticular,
he has shown that operators may be constructed that have well-defined transformation
properties
under thegroup of rotations in six
dimensions, R6.
If the sym- bol W is used todesignate
the irreducible represen- tations ofR6,
then the determination of the number of timesC(WW’ W")
theidentity representation
occurs in the
triple
Kroneckerproduct W
X W’X
W",
orequivalently
the number of times W" occursin W X
W’, plays
a central role in the detailed numericalanalysis
of the matrix elements of operatorsacting
in the(d
+s)N configurations.
It is to theanalysis
of thesetriple
Kroneckerproducts
we shallbe
turning
our attention after firstmaking
a fewremarks on the
properties
of the irreducible repre- sentations of the groupR6.
The
decomposition
of the Kroneckerproducts
ofthe irreducible
representations
of theorthogonal
orsymplectic
groups presents noproblems
and Little-wood
[15]
haspresented
anelegant, yet
verysimple,
solution.
Special
difficulties arise in the case of the rotation groupR.
in an even number of dimensions.If n = 2u and in the
partition (1..1, 1..2,
...,Àu)
label-ling
the character[ÀI,À2,
...,X,,]’
ofOn
we haveÀu
= 0 then thesimple
characters of theorthogonal
group
On
are alsosimple
characters ofRn,
but ifÀu =1=
0 therepresentation
of0.
is self-associated and separates into two irreduciblerepresentations
ofRn.
Thus,
thecorresponding
character[h]
ofOn
may beexpressed
as the sum of twosimple conjugate
characters
[Xl]
+[1..2]
ofRn.
The two representa- tions areinterchanged by
a transformation ofnegative
determinant. The distinction between these two
representations
is indicatedby making
theseparation
of the character
[Xl, X2)
...,Àu]’ of On
under restrictionto
R. according
to theequation [16] :
Separations
of thistype
aregiven by
Feneuille[2].
Clearly
informing
Kroneckerproducts
of irredu-cible
representations,
a careful distinction must be made between those of the group02u
and thoseof
R2u.
Thus table X of Feneuille’s paper[4]
isreally appropriate
to the group06
and notRs.
The
analysis
of the Kroneckerproducts
of theirreducible
representations of R6
may be mostreadily
made in terms of the basic
spin representation [1/2 1/2 ± 1/2]
ofR6
andmaking
use of the isomor-phism
that exists between the characters ofR6
andthose of the four-dimensional
unitary
group[16, 17].
It is not difficult to establish the correspon- dences
rl6l :
and :
where { abc }
is an S-function for theunitary
group in four dimensions.Equivalently :
The basic
multiplication
law for theoperation
ofplethysm :
leads
directly
to thefollowing expressions
for theKronecker
product
of the characters ofR6 :
and :
Thus,
the Kroneckerproducts
of the characters of both the true and thespin representations of R6
may beunambiguously analyzed by
the use of eithereq.
(9)
or(10)
followedby multiplication
of theS-functions
appearing
in theright
hand sideproducts.
The
resulting
S-functionshaving
more than four partsare discarded and those with four parts reduced to three or less parts
by
use of theequivalence :
These
remaining
S-functions are then converted back into characters ofR6 by
use of eq.(4)
or(5)
asappropriate.
The choice of whether to use eq.
(9)
or(10)
isusually
made on the basis of thesimplicity
of themultiplication
of the resultant S-functionsappearing
in the
product.
Thefollowing
two results may bereadily
deduced :If :
then : and if : then :
The
multiplication
of the S-functions may be checkedby calculating
thedegrees
of the correspon-ding representations
for thesymmetric
groupsusing
the method of hook
graphs [14, 18]
andnoting
that if :then :
where
f{P}, f{6} and fl V
} are thedegrees
of therepresentations {p}, {cr} and (v )
of thesymmetric
groups on m, n, and m + n
symbols respectively.
Inpractice,
thecomputation
isfrequently simplified by considering only
those parts of themultiplication
ofS functions that
give
rise to S-functionsinvolving
notmore than four parts and then
checking
the finalresults in terms of the dimensional formula for the irreducible
representations
ofR6.
As an
example
of thetechniques outlined,
considerthe Kronecker
products involving
the irreduciblerepresentations [111]
and[11-1] of Rs.
It followsfrom eq.
(4)
and(9)
that :Using
eq.(4) gives
the final result :Equation (12)
then establishes the result :The Kronecker
product [111]
X[11-1]
is obtainedby
useof eq . (9)
followedby
eq.(11)
and(4)
toyield :
The
multiplication
of two S-functions ofweights m
and n can
only yield
S-functions ofweight (m
+n).
Thus,
if in the formation of the Kroneckerproduct
oftwo characters of
R6 only
S-functions ofweight
m + narise,
then the Kroneckerproduct
canonly
be decom-posed
intorepresentations
ofR6
whose S-functionrepresentatives
inU4
are ofweight
m + n. Forexample,
the Kroneckerproduct [210]
X[220]
in-volves the
multiplication
of theS-functions f 321 } { 422}
which must
yield
S-functions ofweight 14,
whereasthe character
[310]
canonly
be derived from theS-functions {431}, {5421}, {6532},
etc., which are ofweights 8, 12, 16,
etc., and hence we may conclude thatC([210] [220] [310])
= 0.The method outlined for
calculating
the Kroneckerproducts
forR6
has theadvantage
ofyielding
results184
TABLE II
TABLE II
(continued)
186
TABLE II
(continued)
rapidly
and in aconsistently unambiguous
manner.We have
recently developed
a computer programme forexecuting
themultiplication
of S-functions and forforming
the Kroneckerproducts
ofrepresentations
ofthe group
R6
with dimensional checksapplied
at allstages. This programme has been used to recalculate all the entries in Feneuille’s tables of
c(ww’ w")
num-bers. A number of differences were found to exist.
These are due to differences in convention in separa-
ting
the characters whenÀ3 =1= 0,
sometypographical
errors that occured in the final
preparation
of Fe-neuille’s
tables,
andambiguities
that arise in theapplication
of modification rules in the conventionaltreatment of Kronecker
products. Fortunately,
thenature of the corrections that have been made is such
as to leave the numerical results
presented by
Feneuilleunaffected. The final results for the numbers
c(ww’ w")
aregiven
in table II.The
striking simplifications
that arise inrecognizing
the
isomorphism
that exists betweenR6
andU4
evi-dently
have noanalogues
in the groupsR2v,
wherev >
4,
but dopoint
to a need for a carefulanalysis
ofthe
properties
of the even-dimensional rotation groups.For
example,
once theisomorphism
betweenR4
andthe double
binary
group isrecognized [11]
it is asimple
matter to derive thefollowing expression
forthe Kronecker
products
of the characters ofR4 :
where t is the lesser of
(a
+b)
and(c
+d),
and u isthe lesser of
(a
-b)
and(c
-d).
This result holds for both the true and thespin representations
ofR4.
Acknowledgements.
- We aregrateful
to theUniversity
ofCanterbury Computing
Center for useof their IBM 360-44 computer, to
Julian
Brown forassistance in
developing
the programmes and toSerge
Feneuille for several
profitable
discussions.REFERENCES
[1]
ELLIOT(J. P.),
Proc. Roy. Soc., London, 1958,A 245, 128.
[2]
FENEUILLE(S.), J. Physique,
1967, 28, 61.[3]
FENEUILLE(S.), J. Physique,
1967, 28, 315.[4] FENEUILLE
(S.), J. Physique,
1967, 28, 701.[5]
JUDD(B. R.),
Phys. Rev., 1966, 141, 4.[6]
JUDD(B. R.),
SecondQuantization
and AtomicSpectroscopy,
1967, TheJohns Hopkins
Press,Baltimore.
[7] WEYL
(H.),
The ClassicalGroups,
1939, Princeton University Press, Princeton.[8] JUDD
(B. R.), Operator Techniques
in AtomicSpectroscopy,
1963, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York.[9] LITTLEWOOD
(D. E.),
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, 1944, A 239, 305.[10]
LITTLEWOOD(D. E.),
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, 1944, A 239, 387.[11]
LITTLEWOOD(D.E.), The Theory
ofGroup Characters,
2nd Ed., 1950, Oxford University Press, London.
[12]
SMITH(P. R.)
and WYBOURNE(B. G.), J.
Math.Phys., 1967, 8, 2434.
[13] SMITH
(P. R.)
and WYBOURNU(B. G.), J.
Math.Phys., 1968, 9, 1040.
[14]
ROBINSON(G.
deB.), Representation Theory
of theSymmetric Group,
1961,Edinburgh University
Press,
Edinburgh.
[15] LITTLEWOOD
(D. E.),
Canad.J.
Math., 1958, 10, 17.[16] LITTLEWOOD
(D. E.),
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 1948, 50, 349.[17] LITTLEWOOD
(D. E.),
Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., 1947, 49, 307.[18] FRAME