RISK ASSESSMENT OF SPREADING
·
:-1
~
BANANA STREAK V/RUSES
(BSV)
U
.
reuropeTHROUGH LARGE SCALE DISTRIBUTION
~
~
~
,..,.1
s
~
OF BANANA INTERSPECIFIC HVBRIDS
E
li
sa Javer Higg
inson
'
, Reina Teresa Martinez
l
,
M
.
D.L.
R
eyes
3,A. Ba
r
ahona
,
M.A.
Fonseca
3R.M Garz6n
3,N.
Arencibia
3,
R.
Chi
nea
• &
Pierre Yves Teycheney'
'
I
N
ISAV ejave
r @inisav
.
cu
,
2IDIAF, rmartinez@
idiaf.gov.do
,
3LAPROSAVS
,
Cuba
,'
LCCV, Cuba
,
5C
I
RAD, Guade
loupe
--
~
-
i
-
~9
.
9.
...
..
..
...
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
.
..
...
..
.
.
..
..
.
...
.
.
.. .
...
.
...
...
..
.
Musa b
albisiana
spp host infectious
endogenous
Banana streak virus (eBSV)
..
.
.
-
....
••
••
••
••
••
•
•
•
• •
• •
•
•
•
•
•
Viral particles
lnfectious eBSV integrated
~
. . into the genome of thej
'
ActivatingM. balbisiana parent stress
taeld survey & sample collection
• FHIA 21 (AAABl, MxH (AAB) (DR) FHIA 18 (AAAB .CEMSA % (AAB) {Cuba)
Mealybug vector species present
Agronomical data
•
••
.,
.
Ol,GF lM and MYspBSV forPCR -IC-Mbylndexing
IC30 RT stresses:
•
.
.
.
• interspecifie crosses • temperature differences • micropropagationS
tudyi
n
g t
h
e
levels of prevalence and molecular
divers
ity of BS
V can provide a hint into the risk of
sprea
ding
BSV
s
through
large
scale distribution
of interspecific
hybrid
s
Cuba and the Dom
in
i
can Re
p
ublic are
1 1 1 1
YYYY
Ti
l
l
pnmers SSV • specifie
Monkeys
+
primersimportant producers
h
ybr
i
ds
in
Coating 0/N 4C0 ~ ~
t
DNAsel Multiplex- PCR ~...
1!1 eBSGFV-7 VI al"'
::;
eBSGFV-9the Car
i
b
b
ean
--
-
-
-• •-•~ lnfectious
1 • a .tH H t- . Non-lnfectious PCR markers
...
-
•
•
-
te
-
•
lnfectiouse
0 VI al"'
eBSOIV-1 eBSOIV-2 ut • .,_ - - Non-lnfectious ~ - Alle w>
eBSimV-1m
--
H
i
tt
tl
•
--•
-
·
·
-
lnfectious o 111 ~~ lnfectious~
eBSimV-2eBSVs patterns of studied hybrids
• Low proportion of symptomatic
plants in both cultivars (6%)
FHIA18
CEMSA 3/4
Location
13/2
4
7/21
• Symptoms based diagnostic is not No.
reliable samoles Presence of mealybugs/ location
18/24
Infection (%) Symptomatic 40 32,5% Asymptomatic 631 2,0%r
• The percentage of ssv infecte"tïjïian"ïsis-~erv simila;in ..
boÏÏ;
··
cultivars CEMSA 3/4 FHIA 18 .,_~._.,;.;..
....
Infection% (sucker) 3.1% 4.1% ...__ _
lnfecction %(in vitro culture) 5% 5.4%
No. of • 3,2% of infected plants were colonized by
identified
o
.
O.brevipes P. citri mealybugs. There is no relationshipBrevipes
+
P.minor between presence/absence mealybugs and sa molesinfection%
26 23 2 1
No. lndexing Total % eBSVs oattern sa moles B50LV BSGFV BSIMV BSMYVinfected 0 eBSOLV eBSGFV eBSimV
CEMSA3/4 248 8
0
0
0
8 3.2 Oll GF7 - - - - - -FHIA18 423 17 1 00
184.3
Oll/ GF7/ l OL2? GF9 Total 671 250
0
0
26 % 96,1 3,8%0
0
%1. Overalllow% of infection by BSV 2. BSOLV causes the 96,1% of ali infections 3. BSIMV and BSMYV not detected
4. FHIA 18 has both alleles for eBSGFV and eBSOLV: true AAAB? Technical problem with PCR?
Chabannes et al., (2013).
J. Virol,
doi:10.1128/JVI.00899 -13
Pseudostem splitting was the
most commonly observed
Symptoms /location symptom FHIA-21 MXH 18/21 10/21 FHIA-21 MXH Total
%
G
enotype No . 1 samp es AAAB 88 AAB 88 176 lndexing BSOLV BSIMV 220
1
0
260
1000
-
-mealybugs~
/location 17/21 13/21 Infection (%) 25 1.1 14.8% eBSV patterns eBSOLV eBSGFV Oll 1 GF7 OL1 1 GF71. A significant proportion of FHIA-21 (25%) is infected with BSOLV, the level of infection in MXH is very low (1,1%).
2. Good correlation between indexing results and eBSOLV patterns for both hybrids.
3. BSIMV not detected eBSIMV pattern has not been established yet. ....-...;_---,
Conclusions
'.
••
. :