• Aucun résultat trouvé

Preface

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Preface"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

AIED 2013 Workshops Proceedings Volume 7

Recommendations for Authoring, Instructional Strategies and Analysis for

Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS):

Towards the Development of a Generalized Intelligent Framework for

Tutoring (GIFT)

Workshop Co-Chairs:

Robert A. Sottilare & Heather K. Holden

Army Research Laboratory, Human Research and Engineering Directorate, Orlando, Florida, USA

https://gifttutoring.org/news/14

(2)

Preface

This workshop provides the AIED community with an in-depth exploration of the Army Research Laboratory’s effort to develop tools, methods and standards for Intel- ligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) as part of their Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) research project. GIFT is a modular, service-oriented architecture developed to address authoring, instructional strategies, and analysis constraints cur- rently limiting the use and reuse of ITS today. Such constraints include high devel- opment costs; lack of standards; and inadequate adaptability to support tailored needs of the learner. GIFT’s three primary objectives are to provide: (1) authoring tools for developing new ITS, ITS components (e.g., learner models, pedagogical models, user interfaces, sensor interfaces), tools, and methods based on authoring standards that support reuse and leverage external training environments; (2) an instructional man- ager that encompasses best tutoring principles, strategies, and tactics for use in ITS;

and (3) an experimental testbed for analyzing the effect of ITS components, tools, and methods. GIFT is based on a learner-centric approach with the goal of improving linkages in the adaptive tutoring learning effect chain in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Adaptive Tutoring Learning Effect Chain

The goal of GIFT is to make ITS affordable, effective, usable by the masses, and provide equivalent (or better) instruction than expert human tutors in one-to-one and one-to-many educational and training domains. GIFT’s modular design and standard messaging provides a largely domain-independent approach to tutoring where do- main-dependent information is concentrated in the one module making most of its components, tools and methods reusable across training domains. More information about GIFT can be found at www.GIFTtutoring.org.

The workshop is divided into five themes: (1) Fundamentals of GIFT (includes a tutorial on GIFT and a detailed demonstration of the latest release); (2) Authoring ITS using the GIFT Authoring Construct; (3) Adapting Instructional Strategies and Tac- tics using GIFT; (4) Analyzing Effect using GIFT; and (5) Learner Modeling. Themes include presentations from GIFT users regarding their experiences within the respec- tive areas and their recommendations of design enhancements for future GIFT releas- es. Theme 5 is dedicated to discussing the outcomes of the learner modeling advisory board meeting conducted at the University of Memphis Meeting in September 2012.

July, 2013 Robert Sottilare, Heather Holden.

(3)

Program Committee

Co-Chair: Robert Sottilare, Army Research Laboratory, Orlando, FL, USA (robert.a.sottilare@us.army.mil)

Co-Chair: Heather Holden, Army Research Laboratory, Orlando, FL, USA (heather.k.holden@us.army.mil)

Arthur Graesser, University of Memphis Xiangen Hu, University of Memphis

James Lester, North Carolina State University Ryan Baker, Columbia University

(4)

Table of Contents

Motivations for a Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring (GIFT) 1 for Authoring, Instruction and Analysis

Robert Sottilare and Heather Holden.

Unwrapping GIFT: A Primer on Developing with the Generalized Intelligent 10 Framework for Tutoring

Charles Ragusa, Michael Hoffman, and Jon Leonard

GIFT Research Transition: An Outline of Options: How transition in 21 GIFT moves through phases of idea, project, paper, and to real-world use.

Keith Brawner

Experimentation with the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring 27 (GIFT): A Testbed Use Case

Benjamin Goldberg and Jan Cannon-Bowers

Bringing Authoring Tools for Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Serious Games 37 Closer Together: Integrating GIFT with the Unity Game Engine

Colin Ray and Stephen Gilbert

Authoring a Thermodynamics Cycle Tutor Using GIFT 45

Mostafa Amin-Naseri, Enruo Guo, Stephen Gilbert, John Jackman, Mathew Hagge, Gloria Starns, and LeAnn Faidly

Integrating GIFT and AutoTutor with Sharable Knowledge Objects (SKOs 54 Benjamin Nye

Leveraging a Generalized Tutoring Framework in Exploratory Simulations 62 Of Ill-Defined Domains

James Thomas, Ajay Divakaran, and Saad Khan

Toward “Hyper-Personalized” Cognitive Tutors: Non-Cognitive Personalization 71 in the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring

Stephen Fancsali, Steven Ritter, John Stamper, and Tristan Nixon

Using GIFT to Support an Empirical Study on the Impact of the Self-Reference 80 Effect on Learning

Anne Sinatra

Detection and Transition Analysis of Engagement and Affect in a Simulation- 88 Based Combat Medic Training Environment

Jeanine DeFalco and Ryan Baker

(5)

Run-Time Affect Modeling in a Serious Game with the Generalized Intelligent 95 Framework for Tutoring

Jonathan Rowe, Eleni Lobene, Jennifer Sabourin, Bradford Mott, and James Lester

Towards a Generalized Framework for Intelligent Teaching and Learning 105 Systems: The Argument for a Lightweight Multiagent Architecture

Benjamin Nye and Donald Morrison

Recommendations for the Generalized Intelligent Framework for Tutoring 116 Based on the Development of the Deep Tutor Service

Vasile Rus, Nobal Niraula, Mihai Lintean, Rajendra Banjade, Dan Stefanescu, and William Baggett

The SCHOLAR Legacy: A New Look at the Affordances of Semantic Networks 128 for Conversational Agents in Intelligent Tutoring Systems

Donald Morrison and Vasile Rus

XNAgent: Authoring Embodied Conversational Agents for Tutor-User Interfaces 137 Andrew Onley

Références

Documents relatifs

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

The six children’s emerging metacognitive knowledge and skills, developed in a range of subjects, enabled them to develop ‘general’ learner strategies and

Again, with accurately calibrated performance models for each component, we apply Formula (1) to predict the mean response time of the whole system for different levels of mean

We propose to develop a common user interface for both model layers in or- der to provide systematic and uniform access through operation calls to design time and runtime

We have worked in the intersection of component-based and model-based development, mostly targeting the domain of embedded systems, in a number of research projects ranging

For example, a simple score could be given but in general each user who is evaluat- ing the plan considers each of the post conditions (or another member of the community does) to

GIFT’s three prima- ry objectives are to develop: (1) authoring tools to develop new ITS, ITS components (e.g., learner models, pedagogical models, user interfaces, sensor

In this paper we describe how we created an embodied conversational agent in XNA using skeletal and morph animation, motion cap- ture, and event-driven animation and how