• Aucun résultat trouvé

Problem Set n°5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Problem Set n°5"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

University of Toronto – MAT246H1-S – LEC0201/9201

Concepts in Abstract Mathematics

Problem Set n°5

Jean-Baptiste Campesato Due on April 12th, 2021

Write your solutions concisely but without skipping important steps.

Make sure that your submission is readable on Crowdmark.

Exercise 1.

Prove that∀𝑥 ∈ ℝ ⧵ ℚ, ∀𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, 𝑑 ∈ ℚ, 𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐 ≠ 0 ⟹ 𝑎𝑥+𝑏

𝑐𝑥+𝑑 ∉ ℚ.

Remark: note that𝑐𝑥 + 𝑑 ≠ 0under the given assumptions.

Either𝑐 = 0but then𝑐𝑥 + 𝑑 = 𝑑 ≠ 0since𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐 ≠ 0. Or𝑐 ≠ 0but then𝑐𝑥 ∈ ℝ ⧵ ℚand−𝑑 ∈ ℚthus𝑐𝑥 + 𝑑 ≠ 0.

Exercise 2.

Let𝐸be a finite set. Express

|{(𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫(𝐸) × 𝒫(𝐸) ∶ 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = 𝐸}|

in terms of|𝐸|.

Hint: you may start studying the case where the cardinality of𝐴is fixed.

Exercise 3.

The following questions are independent.

1. Does it exist a set𝐸such that|𝒫(𝐸)| = ℵ0? 2. Prove that|[0, 1]| = |(0, 1)|.

Exercise 4.

We set

𝑆 = {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∶ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ, ∃𝑎0, 𝑎1, … , 𝑎𝑛∈ ℤ, 𝑎𝑛≠ 0and𝑎𝑛𝑥𝑛+ 𝑎𝑛−1𝑥𝑛−1+ ⋯ + 𝑎1𝑥 + 𝑎0= 0}

What is|𝑆|?

Remark: you can use basic facts concerning polynomials and their roots.

(2)

2 Problem Set 5

Sample solution to Exercise 1.

Let𝑥 ∈ ℝ ⧵ ℚ. Let𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, 𝑑 ∈ ℚbe such that𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐 ≠ 0.

Assume by contradiction that𝑞 ≔ 𝑎𝑥+𝑏

𝑐𝑥+𝑑 ∈ ℚ, then 𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏

𝑐𝑥 + 𝑑 = 𝑞 ⇔ 𝑥(𝑎 − 𝑞𝑐) = 𝑞𝑑 − 𝑏

• First case: if𝑎 ≠ 𝑞𝑐then𝑥 = 𝑞𝑑−𝑏

𝑎−𝑞𝑐 ∈ ℚ, so there is a contradiction.

• Second case: if𝑎 = 𝑞𝑐then𝑞𝑑 − 𝑏 = 𝑥(𝑎 − 𝑞𝑐) = 0, i.e.𝑏 = 𝑞𝑑.

Therefore𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐 = 𝑞𝑐𝑑 − 𝑞𝑑𝑐 = 0, so there is a contradiction.

Sample solution to Exercise 2.

Set𝑛 ≔ |𝐸|.

Let𝑖 = 0, … , 𝑛. SetΩ𝑖≔ {(𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫(𝐸) × 𝒫(𝐸) ∶ 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = 𝐸 and|𝐴| = 𝑖}.

There are(𝑛𝑖)subsets𝐴 ∈ 𝒫(𝐸)such that|𝐴| = 𝑖(See Q10E09).

For a given𝐴as above, in order to have𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = 𝐸,𝐵must be of the form𝐵 = 𝐴𝑐⊔ 𝐶where𝐶 ⊂ 𝐴.

There are2𝑖= |𝒫(𝐴)|choices for such a subset𝐶, and hence for𝐵(See Q10E10).

Therefore|Ω𝑖| = (𝑛𝑖)2𝑖. Finally

|{(𝐴, 𝐵) ∈ 𝒫(𝐸) × 𝒫(𝐸) ∶ 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 = 𝐸}| =

|

𝑛

𝑖=0

Ω𝑖

|=

𝑛

𝑖=0

𝑖|

=

𝑛

𝑖=0(𝑛 𝑖)2𝑖 =

𝑛

𝑖=0(𝑛

𝑖)2𝑖1𝑛−𝑖= (2 + 1)𝑛= 3𝑛 = 3|𝐸|

Sample solution to Exercise 3.

1. Let𝐸be a set, then:

• Either𝐸is finite and then𝒫(𝐸)is finite too by Q10E10, so that|𝒫(𝐸)| < ℵ0.

• Or𝐸is infinite and thenℵ0≤ |𝐸| < |𝑃 (𝐸)|by Cantor’s theorem.

In both cases|𝒫(𝐸)| ≠ ℵ0, so there is no set𝐸such that|𝒫(𝐸)| = ℵ0. 2. Method 1.

Note that(0, 1) ⊂ [0, 1], therefore|(0, 1)| ≤ |[0, 1]|.

Define𝑓 ∶ [0, 1] → (0, 1)by𝑓 (𝑥) = 𝑥+1

3 .

Note that𝑓 is well-defined since if0 ≤ 𝑥 ≤ 1then0 < 1

3𝑥+1

32

3 < 1.

Besides𝑓 is injective since if𝑥, 𝑦 ∈ [0, 1]satisfy𝑓 (𝑥) = 𝑓 (𝑦), then𝑥+1

3 = 𝑦+1

3 which implies𝑥 = 𝑦.

Therefore|[0, 1]| ≤ |(0, 1)|.

By Cantor–Schröder–Bernstein theorem, we conclude that|[0, 1]| = |(0, 1)|.

Method 2.

We know that(0, 1) ⊂ [0, 1] ⊂ ℝand that|(0, 1)| = |ℝ|(see Q11E08).

Therefore|[0, 1]| = |(0, 1)|(see Q11E01).

(3)

MAT246H1-S – LEC0201/9201 – J.-B. Campesato 3

Sample solution to Exercise 4.

Comment: a complex number that is the root of a non-zero polynomial with integers (or rational, it is equivalent) coefficients is said to be analgebraic number. Complex numbers which are not roots of such polynomials are called transcendental numbers.

The field of algebraic real numbers is quite often denoted by

alg≔ {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∶ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ, ∃𝑎0, 𝑎1, … , 𝑎𝑛 ∈ ℤ, 𝑎𝑛≠ 0and𝑎𝑛𝑥𝑛+ 𝑎𝑛−1𝑥𝑛−1+ ⋯ + 𝑎1𝑥 + 𝑎0 = 0}

The goal of this exercise was to prove that|ℝalg| = ℵ0, i.e. there are infinitely countably many algebraic real numbers, so thatalmost allreal numbers are transcendental (but it is usually quite difficult to prove that a number is tran- scendental: we still don’t know whether𝜋 + 𝑒or𝜋𝑒are transcendental or not). This was first proved by Cantor in is famous articleUeber eine Eigenschaft des Inbegriffes aller reellen algebraischen Zahlenpublished 1874.

Claim.∀𝑛 ∈ ℕ ⧵ {0}, |ℤ𝑛| = ℵ0. Proof by induction on𝑛 ≥ 1.

Base case at𝑛 = 1: |ℤ1| = |ℤ| = ℵ0(from the lecture notes).

Induction step.Assume that|ℤ𝑛| = ℵ0for some𝑛 ≥ 1.

Since|ℤ𝑛| = |ℕ|and|ℤ| = |ℕ|, we have|ℤ𝑛+1| = |ℤ𝑛× ℤ| = |ℕ × ℕ| = ℵ0.

Method 1.

For𝑛 ∈ ℕand𝑎0, 𝑎1, … , 𝑎𝑛∈ ℤwith𝑎𝑛≠ 0, the set

{𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∶ 𝑎𝑛𝑥𝑛+ 𝑎𝑛−1𝑥𝑛−1+ ⋯ + 𝑎1𝑥 + 𝑎0 = 0}

is finite since a polynomial of degree𝑛has at most𝑛roots.

For𝑛 ∈ ℕ, we set 𝐴𝑛 =

(𝑎0,𝑎1,…,𝑎𝑛)∈ℤ𝑛×(ℤ⧵{0})

{𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∶ 𝑎𝑛𝑥𝑛+ 𝑎𝑛−1𝑥𝑛−1+ ⋯ + 𝑎1𝑥 + 𝑎0 = 0}

Since|ℤ𝑛| = |ℕ|and|ℤ ⧵ {0}| = |ℕ|, we have that|ℤ𝑛× (ℤ ⧵ {0})| = |ℕ × ℕ| = ℵ0. Therefore𝐴𝑛is countable as a countable union of finite sets.

Hence𝑆 = ⋃𝑛∈ℕ𝐴𝑛is countable as a countable union of countable sets.

Note thatℤ ⊂ 𝑆, since𝑚 ∈ ℤis a root of𝑥 − 𝑚 = 0.

Therefore𝑆is countably infinite, i.e.|𝑆| = ℵ0.

Method 2.

For𝑛 ∈ ℕ, we denote by𝑃𝑛the set of polynomials of degree𝑛with integer coefficients.

Note that|𝑃𝑛| = |ℤ𝑛× ℤ ⧵ {0}|since a polynomial𝑎𝑛𝑥𝑛+ 𝑎𝑛−1𝑥𝑛−1+ ⋯ + 𝑎1𝑥 + 𝑎0of degree𝑛is characterized by its coefficients(𝑎0, 𝑎1, … , 𝑎𝑛) ∈ ℤ𝑛× (ℤ ⧵ {0}).

Since|ℤ𝑛| = |ℕ|and|ℤ ⧵ {0}| = |ℕ|, we have that|𝑃𝑛| = |ℤ𝑛× (ℤ ⧵ {0})| = |ℕ × ℕ| = ℵ0. Hence the set𝑃 =⋃

𝑛∈ℕ

𝑃𝑛of non-zero polynomials with integer coefficients is countable as a countable union of countable sets.

Given𝑓 ∈ 𝑃,𝑓−1({0}) = {𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∶ 𝑓 (𝑥) = 0}is finite since a polynomial of degree𝑛has at most𝑛roots.

Therefore𝑆 = ⋃

𝑓 ∈𝑃

𝑓−1(0)is countable as a countable union of finite sets.

Note thatℤ ⊂ 𝑆, since𝑚 ∈ ℤis a root of𝑥 − 𝑚 = 0.

Therefore𝑆is countably infinite, i.e.|𝑆| = ℵ0.

Références

Documents relatifs

In the global theory with irreducible automorphic representations, if we fix the archimedean data (the “weight”) then the space of invariant vectors under a compact open subgroup of

This conjecture, which is similar in spirit to the Hodge conjecture, is one of the central conjectures about algebraic independence and transcendental numbers, and is related to many

A quite different interplay between diophantine approximation and algebraic dynamics arises from the interpretation of the height of algebraic numbers in terms of the entropy

A real

Given a Hilbert space H characterise those pairs of bounded normal operators A and B on H such the operator AB is normal as well.. If H is finite dimensional this problem was solved

To be sure, sortalist theories aren’t without controversy, but despite the controversy we can see from the foregoing considerations the deep confusion in the

One might ask whether there are infinitely many primes in a given arithmetic progression; and since the arithmetic progression a (mod q) can be viewed as the values of the polynomial

for some partial answers in this direction... We give in section 2 all tropical denitions needed to prove Theorem 1.1. In particular, we set-up tropical enumerative problems studied