• Aucun résultat trouvé

Three Tools of Belief Change: Selection, Retention and Distribution

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Three Tools of Belief Change: Selection, Retention and Distribution"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Three Tools of Belief Change: Selection, Retention and Distribution

Abhaya Nayak

Intelligent Systems Group Department of Computing Macquarie University, Australia

Abstract

Belief Change deals with how a belief state should rationally be modified in response to some observation made or evidence received. There are several re- lated approaches to deal with different issues relevant to belief change. A body of knowledge could be a finite set or infinite, the modification method could be used on a one off basis or repeatedly, the body of knowledge could be probabilis- tic or non-probabilistic, the modification could involve removal of knowledge or addition of knowledge, and so on. There are some standard tools that are used in modifying a body of knowledge. The “selection” tool is possibly the best known among them. It comes in the form of epistemic entrenchment, plausi- bility ordering or other such tie breaking mechanisms, and used mostly in the context of non-probabilistic belief change. In the probabilistic context we need two more tools, Retention and Distribution that will help with rational modi- fication of probabilistic knowledge. In this talk I will briefly touch upon some ideas in this context.

1

Références

Documents relatifs

In a more specific mean- ing a Boolean category should provide the abstract algebraic structure underlying the proofs in Boolean Logic, in the same sense as a Carte- sian

Schematically, the hypothesis relies on the following reasoning: (i) TCC must be considered as a tool for reducing environmental and anthropogenic vulnerability;

Third, we included the set of regular and irregular nouns that Gordon used, but augmented it in three ways: (a) Both the singular and the plural forms of each noun were used as

Could TReMs be relevant conservation forestry targets and/or biodiversity indicators.. Christophe Bouget,

That is why as a second step, we propose to dig deeper into this question of the compatibility of representative democracy with the alternatives of

We take the bowling ball argument to show exactly that the main problem behind the definitions (SV) and (NV) is not that absence is not complementary to presence, but that ignorance

We demonstrated that animals living in naturalistic situations, without predators and with continuous access to (food) resources expressed the same low level as

Mean (6standard deviation) percentage of time spent performing stereotypic behaviour in the box according to working category: Category 1 (N = 28): dressage and high school