Publisher’s version / Version de l'éditeur:
Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n’arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca.
Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team at
PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information.
https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/droits
L’accès à ce site Web et l’utilisation de son contenu sont assujettis aux conditions présentées dans le site LISEZ CES CONDITIONS ATTENTIVEMENT AVANT D’UTILISER CE SITE WEB.
Building Research Note, 1980-09
READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/copyright
NRC Publications Archive Record / Notice des Archives des publications du CNRC : https://nrc-publications.canada.ca/eng/view/object/?id=a6d9f404-36f2-4d03-9e93-bfd4d95b86f6 https://publications-cnrc.canada.ca/fra/voir/objet/?id=a6d9f404-36f2-4d03-9e93-bfd4d95b86f6
NRC Publications Archive
Archives des publications du CNRC
This publication could be one of several versions: author’s original, accepted manuscript or the publisher’s version. / La version de cette publication peut être l’une des suivantes : la version prépublication de l’auteur, la version acceptée du manuscrit ou la version de l’éditeur.
For the publisher’s version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l’éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.
https://doi.org/10.4224/40000545
Access and use of this website and the material on it are subject to the Terms and Conditions set forth at
Density of columnar-grained ice made in a laboratory
TSSN
0 7 0 1 - 5 2 3 2DENSITY
OFCOLUMNAR-GRAINED
ICE MADE I N A LABORATORY byMasayoshi Nakawo
-AN
A t YZ E D
Columnar-grained fresh-water ice, classified as 5-2 i c e (Michel and
Ramseier, 1969) i s f a i r l y easy to grow in a laboratory, simulating t h e
ice commonly found i n lakes and rivers. This laboratary-made ice has
been used intensively, t h e r e f o r e , f o r investigating t h e mechanical
properties of ice (e-g., Gold, 1 9 7 2 ; Frederking, 1977; S i n h a , 1 9 7 8 ) .
It was found necessary to determine its density w i t h reasonable accuracy
f o r f u t u r e i n v e s t i g a t i o n s , The hydrostatic method was adopted because of
i t s feasibility and wide applicability f o r various types of i c e , such a s snow i c e and sea i c e . Measurements were made w i t h t h e i c e grown by t h e
standard method described by Gold (1972). The density
of
single icecrystal prepared by t h e zone-melting method (Ramseier, 19661, was a l s o
determined by the same procedure.
PR I N C 1
PLE OF
THE
MEASUREMENTS
Weight o f an i c e specimen C0.08 to 0.09 kg] was measured b o t h in air
[Ha) and i n i c e s a t u r a t e d 2, 2 , 4 trimethylpentane (W
1
with a calibratedR
electronic balance (Sartorius-Werke, Type 1204 MP) which read t o
1 kg. The volume V, mass M and density p o f a specimen are given
i
where pa and pi are t h e d e n s i t y o f the
a i r and
l i q u i d , r e s p e c t i v e l y .DERSITY OF THE AIR
Density of dry a i r p a [dry) is given by
-3
where pa ( d r y ) is in kg n , Ta i s air temperature in O G , and pa i s
atmospheric pressure in mb. p a with a vapour pressure of p in mh is
V
g i v e n by
As it is difficult to determine pv below the f r e e z i n g p o i n t , and
p, ( C pa (e.g., py i s about 4 mb a t -S0C), pv was assumed to be zero and hence p a = p a ( d r y ) , The error in d e n s i t y estimation caused by t h i s
assumption is d i s c u s s e d later. Ta was measured using a thermocouple with
a precision of
+
0 . 5 " C . p was measured w i t h a calibrated ordinarya
balemeter (? 1 mb)
DENSITY
OF
THE LIOUTDDensity of 2 , 2, 4 trimethylpentane has been determined f o r a w i d e
temperature range by several i n v e s t i g a t o r s ; t h e results have been
compiled by Rossini et a1 (19531. It shows a l i n e a r i n c r e a s e with
-3
where P is
i n
kg m and T is t h e temperature of t h e liquid i n "C.L
RThe deviation of t h e o r i g i n a l d a t a from Equation (6) i s about -3
+
0.5 kgm
i n ;I t e m p e r a t u r e range of 0 t o -30°C (Smysh and Stoops,1928; Timermans, 1950).
The i n f l u e n c e of i c e saturation in t h e liquid was i n v e s t i g a t e d by - 4 3
weighing an acrylic p l a s t i c CPlexigPass) block of a b o u t 10 m in b o t h
pure and i c e saturated 2 , 2, 4 trimethylpentane. Since
no
discernible d i f f e r e n c e was obsemed, Equation (6) was a d o p t e d f o r the ice-saturatedl i q u i d d e n s i t y in the calculation of ice density. Uncertainty in t h i s
assumed density was considered to be
in
t h e same order a s t h e scatter of-
5t h e observed d a t a for t h e pure liquid, i . e . , ? 0 . 5 kg m
.
Precised e n s i t y determinations o f i c e s a t u r a t e d 2, 2 , 4 t r i m e t h y l p e n t : ~ n e was madc
by Butkovich (1953) i n a temperature range of O t o -5°C and h i s d a t a fa11
into a range g i v e n by Equation (6) with t h e accuracy of i 0 . 5 kg m-"'.
T was measured w i t h a precision o f t 0 . 0 5 O ~ by a calibrated thermocouple
a
p l a c e d a t t h e same l e v e l as t h e specimen. The measurements were made a f t e r the liquid and the specimen had reached thermal equilibrium, which was checked by monitoring t h e temperature o f a dummy i c e block t h e same s i z e as t h e i c e specimen.
ACCURACY OF THE MEASUREMENTS
AND
SAMPLE CALCULATIONThe p o s s i b l e absolute error was estimated u s i n g t h e general formulae
f o r calculating t h e error of a f u n c t i o n
given by
where A£ i s the error o f she function and Axl, Ax2,
.
.
.
Ax are t h e n-
5The e r r o r in each w e i g h i n g was considered k 1 x 10 kg. Since
W and W were o b t a i n e d by t h e difference o f t h e weight between t h e t w o
a
e
r e a d i n g s , weight of t h e container and t h e specimen minus w e i g h t of t h e container, t h e e r r o r in K a and M was estimated by E q u a t i o n ( 8 ) t o be
- 5 R
1 1 . 4 x 10 kg.
An
example calculation o f t h e d e n s i t y and i t s possible error is shown below, in which i n p u t d a t a areFrom E q u a t i o n s (43 and ( 8 ) ,
Pa (dry) = 1.3302 5 0.0028 kg m-3
T h i s e r r o r i s m a i n l y caused by t h e uncertainty i n T
.
Taking aPv = 0 1 3 rnb [saturation vapour pressure at -8°C i s 3 mb),
Thc e f f e c t o f neglecting t h e water vapaur in estimating t h e density of
t h e a i r i s comparatively small because o f the low saturation v a p s u r pressure below t h e freezing p o i n t . From Equations ( 6 ) and ( 8 ) ,
More t h a n 90% of t h e error i s caused by the uncertainty in t h e liquid
d e n s i t y d e t e r m i n e d by Equation (G)
.
The r e s t is a t t r i b u t e d to t h e e r r o r i n v o l v e d in t h e measurement of T With the v a l u e s of W \ Y e , oa and p L,and u s i n g Equation (31, p . i s estimated to be 9 1 7 . 9 3 kg n d 5 . From
1
Equations (3) and ( R ) , Api i s g i v e n by
where
Inserting t h e appropriate v a l u e s , A = 0.001, B = 0.64, C = 0.04 and
D = 0 . 1 9 , r e s u l t s i n A p i = 0.67, where a l l t h e terms a r e given in kg R - ~ .
The possible a b s o l u t e e r r o r involved
i n
thc estimation o f i c edensity i s mainly attributable to the u n c e r t a i n t y in t h e value o f t h e liquid d e n s i t y . To compare t h e r e l a t i v e value of various samples a t the
-
3same temperature w i t h t h e same method, b p Q is considered t o be 0.04 kg
m
caused by the e r r o r in t h e measurements of TL only. The possible
-3
relative error becomes 0.20 kg m
.
RESULTSThe results o b t a i n e d a r e shown in F i g , 1. Open and s o l i d circles
respectively. Each p a i n t represents t h e mean value
of
3 t a 8 measure- rncnts. The scatter of the d a t a a2 a given temperature was about-3
+
0.37 kg m,
which was comparable 10 t h e estimated possible relative-
5e r r o r ,
+
0.20 kg m.
No
discernible difference could be found between the densities ofsingle-crystal and columnar-grained i c e within t h e accuracy of the
measurements. The density increased almost linearly w i t h decreasing
temperature, although t h e r e was a slight decrease in the increasing r a t e . Ice density data d e t e r m i n e d in the p a s t were a l s o plotted in Fig. 2 f o r
comparison. Bader (1964) estimated t h e density of polycrystalline i c e in
a temperature range af Q to -30°C, based on the thermal expansion
coefficient (Butkovich, 19571 and t h e density of commercial i c e at - 3 . S 0 C
(Butkovich, 19533.
His
estimation (shown by solid line in Fig. 1 )compared favourably w i t h t h e d a t a of t h e present study.
The author would like to thank S.J. Jones o f Environment Canada for
p r o v i d i n g a single i c e crystal, and E. Penner and N . K . Sinha
of
DBR/NIlCCf o r t h e i r encnuragement to w r i t e t h i s r e p o r t .
REFERENCES
Badar, H . 1964. Density of i c e as a f u n c t i o n o f temperature and s t r e s s .
CRREL
Special Report 6 4 .B u t k o v i c h , T.R. 1953. Density o f single crystals o f i c e from a
temperate glacier. SIPRE Research Paper 7.
Butkovich, T.R. 1957. Linear thermal expansion of ice, SIPRE Research
Report 40.
Eisenberg, D . , and Kauzmann, W. 1969. The structure and properties o f water. Oxford U n i v e r s i t y Press.
Frederking, R. 1977. Plane-strain compressive s t r e n g t h of columnar- grained and granular-snow i c e . J. Glaciology, Vol, 18, No. 80,
Ginnings,
D.C.,
and Corruccini, R . 3 , 1947. An improved i c e calorimeter - t h e determination o f its calibration f a c t o r and the density o f i c c at D O C , J. Research, National Bureau of Standards, Vol. 3 8 , 5 8 3 - 5 9 1 ,Geld, L . W . 1972. The process of failure of columnar-grained i c e . Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 26, No. 2 , 311-3223,
IIobbs, P.V. 1 9 7 4 . Ice physics. Clarendsn Press.
Loasdale, K. 1958. The s t r u c t u r e of i c e . Proceedings 05 Royal Society, A247, 424-434.
MicheL, R . , and Ramseier, R.O. 1969. Classification of r i v e r and lake
ice based on i t s genesis, structure and texture. Lava1 University,
Report S-15.
Rarnseler,
R.O.
1966, Zone-melting apparatus for growing i c ernonocrystals. Materials Research Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 4 , 293-297. Rossini, F.D., Pitzer, K . S , , Arnett, R.L., Braun,
R.M.,
and Pimentel,G.C.
1953. Selected values of p h y s i c a l and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons and r e l a t e d compounds. Carnegie Press.
Sinha, N.K. 1978. Rheology of columnar-grained ice. Experimental
Mechanics, VoI. 18, No. 12, 464-470.
Smyth,
C.P.,
and Stoops, W . N . 1928. The d i e l e c t r i c p o l a r i z a t i o n of liquids. 111. The polarization o f t h e isomers o f heptane. Journalof t h e American Chemical S o c i e t y , Vol. 50, 1883-1890.
Timmermans,
J.
1950, Physico-chemical constants of pure o r g a n i cSING11 CRYSTAL ITHIS STUDY1 COLUMNAR-GRAINED ICE lTHlS STUDY1
BUTKWICH 119531
LOUSDALE (15581
EI5ENBERG AND KAUZMANN (1%9I
GINNING5 AND FORRUCClNl 11947)
BADER 119WI
TEMPERATURE. " C
Figure 1
Density o f i c e i n a temperature range of O t o - 3 0 O C . Butkovichqs value
(1953) was determined by t h e hydrostatic method for s i n g l e crystals from a
glacier and f o r commercial i c e . The
data given by Lorisdale (19581, a n d
E i senberg a n d Kauzmanm (1969) were
o b t a i n e d by determining t h e unit-cell
parameters with X-ray and electron-
diffraction measurements (Hobbs, 2974)
.
G i n n i n g s and Casruccinirs v a l u e 11947)
was obtained by the Bunsen i c e
calorimeter. Badcr's estimation (1964)
was based on Butkovich's density data
(1953) and t h e t h e r m a l expansion