A NNALES DE L ’I. H. P., SECTION A
M. D E L EÓN
E. M ERINO
J. A. O UBIÑA
M. S ALGADO
A characterization of tangent and stable tangent bundles
Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 61, n
o1 (1994), p. 1-15
<http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1994__61_1_1_0>
© Gauthier-Villars, 1994, tous droits réservés.
L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam.
org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright.
Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques
http://www.numdam.org/
1
A characterization of tangent
and stable tangent bundles
*M. de
LEÓN
E. MERINO
J. A.
OUBIÑA
and M. SALGADOInstituto de Matematicas y Fisica Fundamental, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas,
Serrano 123, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Departamento de Matematicas,
Escola Politecnica Superior de Enxeñería, Esteiro Ferrol 15403, Universidade da Coruna, Spain.
Departamento de Xeometría e Topoloxia, Facultade de Matematicas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Vol. 61, n° 1, 1994, Physique theorique
ABSTRACT. - We
apply
a result ofNagano
to prove that anintegrable
almost tangent manifold M endowed with a vector field
satisfying
similarproperties
to those satisfiedby
the canonical vector field of a vector bundle admits aunique
vector bundle structure such that M isisomorphic
to atangent
bundle. Thus we obtain a characterization oftangent
bundles. This characterization was obtainedby Crampin et
al. andFilippo et
al. in adifferent way. We also extend the result to stable
tangent
bundles. Anapplication
to reduction ofdegenerate
autonomous and non-autonomousLagrangian systems
isgiven.
Key words : Tangent bundles, stable tangent bundles, almost tangent and stable tangent
structures.
Nous utilisons un resultat du a
Nagano
pour demontrerqu’une
variete
tangente
presqueintegrable
Mequipee
d’unchamp
de vecteurs* Partially supported by DGICYT-Spain, Proyecto PB91-0142, Universidade da Coruna and Xunta de Galicia, Proxecto XUGA8050189.
MS Classification : 53 C 15, 58 F 05, 70 H 35.
PACS 1992: 03.20.+i, 02.40.+m.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique - 0246-0211
Vol. 61/94/01/$ 4.00/@ Gauthier-Villars
2 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBIÑA AND M. SALGADO
obeissant a des
propriétés
similaires a celles satisfaites par Iechamp
devecteurs
canonique
d’un fibre vectoriel admet une structure de fibre vectorielunique
telle que M soitisomorphe
a un fibretangent.
Nous obtenons ainsiune caracterisation des fibres tangents. Cette derniere a ete aussi obtenue par
Crampin
et al. ainsi que parFilippo et
2/. de maniere differente. Nous etendons ce resultat aux fibres tangents stables. Nousappliquons
ce resultata la reduction des
systemes lagrangiens
autonomesdegeneres
ou bien nonautonomes.
1. INTRODUCTION
The
problem
of the characterization of tangent bundles has beenrecently
studied
by
several authors([2], [5], [13]).
Since the tangent bundle of anarbitrary
manifold possesses a canonical almosttangent
structure thestarting point
is to consider an almost tangent manifold M. If M isintegrable
andsatisfies some
global hypothesis,
then it ispossible
to prove that M is anaffine bundle modelled on the tangent bundle
T Q
of some manifoldQ
andhence
diffeomorphic
to it. Moreover, if the affine bundle admits aglobal section,
then M isisomorphic
toTQ via
theisomorphism
inducedby
thesection. Similar results were obtained for cotangent bundles
(see [12]).
Adifferent
approach
is due toFilippo et
al.[5].
In fact these last authors prove that if anintegrable
almost tangent manifold M endowed with a vectorfield satisfies some
global hypothesis,
then there exists on M a maximal tangent bundle atlasand,
hence M is a tangent bundle. However, this last fact isnot sufficiently emphasized by Filippo et
al.!There exists an
early approach
in the case of the characterization of cotangent bundles due toNagano [10].
Infact, Nagano
proves that if M is a differentiable manifold endowed with a vector fieldsatisfying
thesame
properties
of those satisfiedby
the canonical vector field of a vectorbundle, then there exists a
unique
bundle structure on M over thesingular
submanifold S of the vector field.
If,
moreover, M is an exactsympletic
manifold then M is
isomorphic
to the cotangent bundleT* S,
indeed assymplectic
vector bundles.In the present paper we use the ideas of
Nagano
togive
a characterization oftangent
and stable tangent bundles. Infact,
wegive
a differentproof
of the result of
Filippo et
al.[5]:
if M is anintegrable
almosttangent
manifold endowed with a vector field C which satisfies the
properties
ofthe Liouville vector field of a tangent
bundle,
then there exists aunique
vector bundle structure on M
isomorphic
to T S(6’ being
thesingular
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
submanifold)
and such that the Liouville vector field and the canonicalalmost
tangent
structure of TS’ aretransported
via theisomorphism
to Cand the almost
tangent
structure onM, respectively.
Similar results areobtained for
integrable
almost stable tangent manifolds.All these
problems
areinteresting
for Mechanics. Infact,
tangent and stabletangent
bundles are the natural framework where theLagrangian
formalism is
developed
in the autonomous and non-autonomous cases,respectively [9]. Also,
in the reduction ofdegenerate Lagrangian
systemsone obtains local
regular Lagrangians
with the samedynamical
information and defined on someintegrable
almosttangent
or stable tangent manifoldaccording
to theLagrangian
be autonomous or not([ 1 ], [7], [6]).
To dothis,
we
project
thegeometric
structures onTQ
and R xT Q (the phase
space of velocities and the evolution space,respectively)
to thequotient
spacesby
the gauge distribution. Then it is
important
to have some criteria to decide ifthese manifolds are
globally
tangent or stabletangent
bundles. It isamazing
that under the
hypotheses
for theprojectiveness
we deduce that thequotient
spaces are in
fact
tangent and stable tangentbundles, respectively.
The paper is structured as follows. In section
2,
we recall the main results ofNagano.
In section3,
we obtain the characterization of tangent bundles and in section 4 we extend the results to the case of almost stable tangent bundles.Finally,
in section 5 weapply
the results of these two last sectionsto
study
thedynamics
ofdegenerate Lagrangian
systems.2. CHARACTERIZATION OF VECTOR BUNDLES
Let M be a differentiable manifold and X a vector field on M. If
x E M is a
singular point
ofX ,
i.e. 0, then we define thecharacteristic operator of X at x as the linear
endomorphism TxM
--+TxM given by
~nx~~ ~1 ~ - ~ Y~ ~
where V is an
arbitrary
linear connection on M. It is easy to prove that does notdepend
on B7. Infact,
choose local coordinates onM and put
Then
since x is a
singular point.
Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.
4 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBIÑA AND M. SALGADO
Now,
let M be the total space of a vector bundle M 2014~ N. Then the canonicalvector field of the
vector bundle M is the infinitesimal generator C of theglobal
flow on M inducedby
the scalarmultiplication
on eachfibre. This vector field satisfies the
following properties:
(i)
C generates aglobal
one-parameter transformation group on M.(ii)
For eachpoint x EM,
there exists aunique
lim(exp tC) (x),
where exp tC denotes the flow of C.
(iii)
The characteristic operator associated to C satisfies= for each
singular point x
of C.(iv)
The set S of thesingular points
of C is a submanifold of M of codimension = rank for all x E 5’.In
fact,
choose bundle coordinates(xi,
onM,
where(xi )
arecoordinates in Nand are coordinates in the fibre. Then C is
locally expressed by
Hence the
singular
set 8 of C is the zero section ofM,
and so, it isdiffeomorphic
to N.Nagano [ 10]
hasproved
the converse:THEOREM 2.1. -
Suppose
that there exists a vectorfield
C on amanifold
M
satisfying
the above conditions(i)-(iv).
Then there exists aunique
vectorbundle structure on M such that C is the canonical vector
field.
We
give
a sketch of theproof.
If S is thesingular submanifold,
we putfor each ~ E 9. Then N
(9)
is the normal bundle of 5’ inM,
i.e.,Moreover we have
Then we can define a N
(S)
2014~ M as follows. We first define theexponential
map exp : E 2014~ M with respect to some linearconnection,
where E is asphere
bundle E c N( S)
and then weextend (~
to N(9).
This construction is
possible
from theproperties
of C.Moreover (~
becomesa
diffeomorphism
and then the vector bundle structure on N(S)
2014~ S istransferred to M 2014~ S in such a way that C becomes the canonical vector
field of M -~ S.
de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
As a direct consequence we have the
following
COROLLARY 2. 1. - Two vector bundles are
isomorphic if and only if there
exists a
diffeomorphism which preserves
the canonicalvector fields.
3. CHARACTERIZATION OF TANGENT BUNDLES
Let
Q
be a differentiable manifold andT Q
itstangent
bundle. Let Jbe the canonical almost tangent structure on
T Q.
J is a(1, 1 )-type
tensorfield
locally expressed by
where
vi)
are bundle coordinates forTQ (see [9]).
Let C be thecanonical vector field on
T Q;
C isusually
called the Liouvillevector field
on
TO
and it islocally given by
A direct
computation
in local coordinates shows thatObviously,
C satisfies the conditions(i)-(iv)
since it is the canonicalvector field of
TQ.
Now,
we prove the converse.THEOREM 3.1. - Let M be a 2n-dimensional
manifold
endowed with anintegrable
almost tangent structure J and C a vectorfield
on Msatisfying (3.1 ), i.e.,
If
C alsosatisfies
the conditions(i)-(iv),
then there exists aunique
vectorbundle structure on M which is
isomorphic
to the tangent bundle T,S’of
the
singular submanifold
,S’of
C. Moreover thisisomorphism
transports the canonical almost tangent structure and the Liouville vectorfield of
T,S’ toJ and
C, respectively.
Proof -
Since J isintegrable
then there existadapted
local coordinates(xi, ~i)
in such a way that J islocally given by
Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.
6 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBINA AND M. SALGADO
Suppose
that C islocally
writtenby
where ~ = Ai (x, ~/), B~
=Bi (x, ~) .
From JC = 0 we haveAi
=0,
and from
LCJ
= - J we haveHence,
we may define a new system of local coordinatesby
Thus we obtain
and moreover are also
adapted
coordinates for J. As a first consequence we deduce that thesingular
submanifold S definedby
C hasdimension n.
Now, by Nagano’ s
theorem we obtain aunique
vector bundle structureon Mover 9 such that C is the canonical vector field. This
isomorphism
~
is the one defined from N(S’)
to M:where 7r is the canonical
projection
and 7r’ is the inducedprojection
via~.
Note that in coordinates
y )
the characteristicoperator AC
isgiven by
at each
point x ~ S. Therefore,
from(2.2)
and(2.3)
it followsAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
and then J : TS 2014~
N (S)
is adiffeomorphism.
Infact,
thisdiffeomorphism
is a vector bundle
isomorphism
where TS : T S --+ S is the canonical
projection. Combining
both resultswe obtain a vector bundle
isomorphism
which
applies
the canonical vectorC s
field of ~’S to C. Moreover we candirectly
check that thefollowing diagram
is commutative:where
JS
denotes the canonical almost tangent structure onFinally,
theunicity
is a direct consequence ofCorollary
2.1. DRemark 3.1. - It would not be necessary to assume conditions
(iii)
and(iv)
in the statement of Theorem 3.1, becausethay
are a direct consequence of(3.2).
In fact, thesingular
setS, locally
definedby
thevanishing
of thecoordinates ~ ,
is aregular
submanifold of M of dimension nand,
from(3.3)
it follows that rank = n and = for all xES.Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.
8 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBINA AND M. SALGADO
Remark 3.2. - In the
approach
ofFilippo et
al.[5]
these authors prove that under thehypotheses
of Theorem 3.1 there exists on M a maximal tangent bundle atlas. As a direct consequence M becomes a tangent bundle, say M = T S. Ourapproach enphasizes
this result.4. CHARACTERIZATION OF STABLE TANGENT BUNDLES Let R x
TQ
be a stabletangent
bundle of an n-dimensional differentiable manifoldQ
with canonicalprojection
xTQ
--3Q.
The Liouville vector field C and the canonical almost tangent structure J onTQ
may becanonically
extended to R xTQ.
Then we construct a new tensor fieldJ of type
(1, 1)
on R xTQ by
Then
where
(t, q2, vi)
are local coordinates on R xT Q.
ThusIt is clear that C is the canonical vector field of the vector bundle R x
TQ
R xQ.
Also the vector field t + C on R xTQ
isthe canonical vector field of the vector bundle R x
TQ
->Q. Furthermore,
we have
Bearing
in mind theproperties ( 1 )-(3)
above, Oubina[11] ]
has introduced the notion of almost stable tangent structures as follows.DEFINITION 4.1. - Let M
be
a differentiable manifold of dimension 2n -f-1.A
triple ( J,
cv,~),
where J is a tensor field of type( 1, 1 ),
w is a 1-formand ç
is a vector field on M such thatis called an almost stable tangent structure and the manifold M an almost stable tangent
manifold.
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
The
integrability
of an almost stable tangent structure was established in[8]:
PROPOSITION 4.1. - An almost stable tangent
struc_ture (J,
L~,integrable if
andonly if
the tensorNJ of
J vanishes and w is closed.Here the
integrability
means that around eachpoint
there exists a system of local coordinates(t, xi, yi) (called adapted coordinates)
such thatIn other
words, (J,
w,ç)
isintegrable
if andonly
if it islocally isomorphic
to the canonical almost stable tangent structure on IR x
T Q.
THEOREM 4.1. - Let M be a
(2n -~ 1 )-dimensio_nal manifold
endowed withan
integrable
almost stable tangent structure( J,
w,ç)
such that w is anexact
1 form,
say w =df,
and C a vectorfield
on Msatisfying (4.1 ),
i.e.,v v - , sr y v - v
where J =
J -
úJ 0ç. Suppose
that the vectorfield
C =f ~
+ Csatisfies
the conditions
(i)-(iv).
Then there exists aunique vector
bundle structure onMover
S,
where S is thesingular submanifold of C,
which isisomorphic
to the stable tangent bundle R x TS. Moreover this
isomorphism
transports the canonicalalmost stable
tangent structure and the canonical vectorfield of R
x toJ
andC, respectively.
Proof. -
Let(t, xi, yi)
be a system of local coordinatesadapted
to( J,
cv,ç).
We haveSuppose
that C islocally given by
Since JC = 0, we obtain T = 0 and
Ai
= 0.Moreover,
fromLCJ
= - Jand
(4.2)
we deduceThen we have a new
adapted
coordinate system(t,
definedby
Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.
10 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBINA AND M. SALGADO
C and C are
actually
written as follows:Hence the
singular
submanifold S of C has dimension n.According
toNagano’s
theorem we deducethat
there exists aunique
vector bundlestructure on M over 9 such that C is the canonical vector field. In
fact,
we have the
following
commutativediagram:
where N
(8) = {X
E = is the normalbundle of S. From
(2.1)
and(4.3)
it follows thatÇx
E N(5’).,,
foreach xES. On the other
hand,
we define a vector bundleisomorphism :
R x TS -~ N(S)
bvThus,
we have thefollowing
commutativediagram:
where
TS :
R x 9 is the canonicalprojection. Now,
~
R x vector bundleisomorphism
whichtransports
the canonicalalmost stable tangent
structure and the canonical vector fieldof R x TS to J and C
respectively.
0Remark 4.1. - As in section
3,
it is not necessary to assume conditions(iii)
and(iv). They
are now a direct consequence of(4.3).
Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique théorique
5. AN APPLICATION TO DEGENERATE LAGRAGIAN SYSTEMS Let L :
TQ -~
R be aLagrangian
function and aL = J*(dL) (resp.
WL =-daL)
the Poincaré-Cartan 1-form(resp. 2-form).
If Cis the Liouville vector field on
TQ
then the energy associated to L isEL
= CL - L and theEuler-Lagrange equations corresponding
to L canbe written in the intrinsic form
We say that L is
regular
if the Hessian matrix of L with repect to the velocities isnon-singular.
Hence L isregular
if andonly
if CJJ L is
symplectic.
In such a case there exists aunique
vector field~
on
T Q
such that~L
is called theEuler-Lagrange
vector field and it has thefollowing properties :
( 1 ) ~
is a second-order differentialequation (SODE), (i. e.,
=C);
(2)
thepaths
of~
are the solutions of theEuler-Lagrange equations
If L is
degenerate
then(5.1)
will not possesses aglobally
defined solutionin
general,
and even if it exists it will not beunique
nor SODE. We say that adegenerate Lagrangian
L admits aglobal dynamics
if there exists a vector field X onTQ
such thatLet K = ker cvL
= ~ X E
T =0}
be the characteristic distribution of I~ is called the gauge distribution. If we suppose that has constant rank 2r(i.e.,
WL is apresymplectic
structure of rank2r)
then K is an involutive distribution of dimension 2 dim
Q -
2r.In order to
study
the reduction ofdegenerate Lagrangians
we assumethat the
following
conditions are satisfied:(Al)
WL ispresymplectic;
(A2)
L admits aglobal dynamics;
(A3 )
the foliation definedby K
is afibration;
i. e. ,(TQ)o
=TQ / K
has a structure of
quotient
manifold such that the canonicalprojection
7r~ :
TQ 2014~
is asurjective
submersion.Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.
12 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBINA AND M. SALGADO
Cantrijn et
al.[1]
have obtained a classification ofLagrangians
in threetypes
accordingly
to the dimension of K n V(TQ),
whereV(TQ)
is thevertical distribution.
Type
I: dim K = dim K n V(TQ)
= 0,Type
II: dim K = 2 dim K n V 0,Type
III: dim K 2 dim K n V(TQ).
Lagrangians
of type I areprecisely regular Lagrangians.
ALagrangian
Lis of type II if and
only
if J(K)
= K n V(TQ).
If L is oftype
II and itadmits a
global dynamics,
then there exists aSODE ç
onTQ
such thatThe
following properties
wereproved
in[ 1 ] : ( 1 ) ~ projects
onto(TQ)o
to a vector field~ (2) EL projects
onto(TQ)o
to a functionEo;
(3) Moreover,
if K is a tangent distribution(i.e.,
K is the natural lift ofa distribution D on
Q,
see[ 1 ] )
then J and Cprojects
onto(TQ)o
to anintegrable
almosttangent
structureJo
and to a vector fieldCo.
If L satisfies
(Al), (A2), (A3)
and K is a tangentdistribution,
we deducethat
(TQ)o
is anintegrable
almosttangent
manifold with almost tangentstructure
Jo
and a vector fieldCo
such thatbecause JC = 0 and
LCJ
= - J. Since C iscomplete
we deduce thatCo
iscomplete
too, in such a way that the flow ofCo
isprecisely
theprojection
of the flow ofC,
i.e.,Hence there exists lim
(exp tCo) (xo)
and it isunique.
Thus,
from Theorem3.1,
we havePROPOSITION 5.1. -
(TQ)o
has aunique
structureof
vector bundle whichis
isomorphic
to the tangent bundle T Sof
thesingular manifold
Sof Co.
Moreover thisisomorphism
transports the canonical almost tangentstructure and the Liouville vector
field of
T,S’ toJo
andCo, respectively.
Furthermore,
under the abovehypothesis, Cantrijn
et al. haveproved
thatthere exists a local
regular Lagrangian Lo
on(TQ)o
such thatLo
03C0L and Lare gauge
equivalent,
andhence, they give
the samedynamical
information.Actually,
we haveproved
that this localLagrangian Lo
is in fact definedon some bona
fide
tangent bundle T S.Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincare - Physique theorique
As an illustration we can consider the
dynamics
of an electron in amonopole
field[5].
There are no aglobal regular Lagrangian description,
but there exists a
global degenerate Lagrangian description.
Infact,
theconfiguration
manifold isQ
= SU(2)
x R and theglobal degenerate Lagrangian
L is defined onTQ
= T(SU (2)
x The gauge distribution iswhere
X3
is the fundamental vector field of U(1) ~ S1
in theHopf
bundleSU
(2) ~ S3 ~ S2.
Then a directcomputation
shows thatNext,
we shallgive
anapplication
of Theorem 4.1 todegenerate
non-autonomous
Lagrangian systems.
Let L : R x
T Q
2014~ R be a non-autonomousLagrangian
function and8L
= =-d8L )
the Poincare-Cartan1-form (resp.
2-form),
where J = J - C (g) dt. The motionsequations corresponding
toL are
globally
written asA direct
computation
shows that L isregular
if andonly
if(2L, dt)
isa
cosymplectic
structure on R xTQ.
In such a case there exists aunique
vector field
~L
on R xTQ
such thatAs in the autonomous case,
~L
is called theEuler-Lagrange
vector fieldand we have
(1) ~L
is a non-autonomousSODE, (i.e., J~L -
+C),
and(2)
the solutions of~L
are the solutions of theEuler-Lagrange equations
As in the autonomous case, if L is
degenerate
then(5.2)
will not possess aglobally
defined solution ingeneral,
and even if it exists it will be neitherunique
nor a non-automomous SODE.The gauge distribution is defined
by
..In order to
study
the reduction ofdegenerate
non-autonomousLagrangians
we assume that thefollowing
conditions are satisfied:Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.
14 M. DE LEON, E. MERINO, J. A. OUBINA AND M. SALGADO
(NA1) dt)
is aprecosymplectic
structure of rank 2r(i.e.,
or 0
=0).
(NA2)
L admits aglobal dynamics X ;
thatis,
there exists a solution of(5.2).
(NA3)
the foliation definedby K
is a fibration.We remark that
(NA1) implies (NA2) (see [3], [4], [7]).
The canonicalprojection
is denotedby
7rL : R xT Q
--+(R
xThe reduction of L was studied
by
deLeon,
Mello andRodrigues (see [7])
and Ibort and Marin(see [6]). Furthermore,
these last authors have obtained a classification ofdegenerate
non-autonomousLagrangians
in threetypes
accordingly
to the dimension of K n V(R
xTQ),
where V(R
xTQ)
is the vertical subbundle of T
(R
xTQ) corresponding
to theprojection R TQ ~ R Q.
Type I: dim K = dim K ~ V (R TQ) = 0, Type
II: dim K = 2 dim K n V(R
xTQ) /
0,Type
III: dim K 2 dim K n V(R
xTQ).
Lagrangians
of type Iare precisely regular Lagrangians.
ALagrangian
If L is of type II and it admits a
global dynamics,
then there exists anon-autonomous
SODE ç
on R xTQ
such thatSuppose
that L is the type II and it satisfies(NA1), (NA2)
and(NA3).
Then
dt) projects
onto acosymplectic
structure(2o, 7]0)
on thequotient
manifold(R
xand ç
onto a vector fieldço
such thatMoreover, if K is an s-tangent distribution
(i.e.,
K is the naturallift
of aninvolutive distribution D on R x
Q)
then(see
de Leon et al.[7]) J,
and the Liouville vector field C
project
onto a(1, l)-type
tensor fieldJo, a vector
fieldTo
and a vector fieldCo, respectively,
in such a way thatZ’o
a~o )
is anintegrable
almost stable tangent structure.Also,
we canprove that there exists a local
regular Lagrangian Lo
defined on some opensubset of
(R
xTQ)/K
such thatLo
o 7rL and L are gaugeequivalent.
Furthermore,
suppose that the distribution D on R xQ
is tangent toQ,
i. e. ,where D is an involutive distribution on
Q.
Notice that dt(X)
= 0 for any X E K. In such a case it is easy to see that( ~
xTQ)/~ ~ R
x(TQ / K)
and further the almost tangent structure J
projects
onto an almost tangentAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré - Physique theorique
structure
Jo
onAlso,
=dt, To
= andJo
=Jo
-I- ~To.
Then, we can
apply
Theorem 4.1 and conclude thatCOROLLARY 5.1. - x
T~)/.Ff ’"
IR x has aunique
structureof
vector bundle over ,S’ which is
isomorphic
to IR xT,5‘,
where ,5’ is thesingular submanifold of Co.
Thisisomorphism
transports the canonicalalmost stable
tangent structure
and the canonieal vectorfield of
IR x T,S‘ toJo
andCo,
where
Co
=To
+G‘o .
Consequently,
the localLagrangians Lo
are infact defined
on some bonefide stable tangent bundle R x T,S’.
[1] F. CANTRIJN, J. F. CARIÑENA, M. CRAMPIN and L. A. IBORT, Reduction of Degenerate Lagrangian Systems. J. Geom. Phys, 3, 1986, (3) p. 353-400.
[2] M. CRAMPIN and G. THOMPSON, Affine Bundles and Integrable Almost Tangent Structures, Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 98, 1985, p. 61-71.
[3] D. CHINEA M. DE LEÓN and J. C. MARRERO, The Constraints Algorithm for Degenerate Non-
Autonomous Lagrangian Systems, Proceedings Workshop Recent Topics in Differential Geometry, Puerto de la Cruz (Tenerife, Spain), Publ. Univ. La Laguna, Serie Informes, 32, 1991, p. 13-29.
[4] D. CHINEA M. DE LEÓN and J. C. MARRERO, The Constraints Algorithm for Time-dependent Lagrangians, to appear in Journal of Mathematical Physics, 1994.
[5] S. DE FILIPPO, G. LANDI, G. MARMO and G. VILASI, Tensor fields defining a Tangent Bundle Structure, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 50, 1989 (2), p. 205-218.
[6] L. A. IBORT and J. MARÍN-SOLANO, A Geometric Classification of Lagrangian Functions
and the Reduction of Evolution Space, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen, 25, 1992, p. 3353-3367.
[7] M. DE LEÓN, M. H. MELLO and P. R. RODRIGUES, Reduction of Degenerate Non-
autonomous Lagrangian Systems, Mathematical Aspects of Classical Field Theory, Seatle, Washington (USA), July 21-25, 1991. Ed. by Mark J. Gotay, Jerrold E. Marsden
and Vincent Moncrief, Contemporary Mathematics, 132, 1992, p. 275-305.
[8] M. DE LEÓN, J. A. OUBIÑA and M. SALGADO, Integrable Almost s-Tangent Structures, to appear in Rendiconti di Matematica, 14, 1994.
[9] M. DE LEÓN and P. R. RODRIGUES, Methods of Differential Geometry in Analytical Mechanics, North-Holland Math., Ser. 152, Amsterdam, 1989.
[10] T. NAGANO 1-Forms with the Exterior Derivative of Maximal Rank, J. Differential Geometry, 2, 1968, p. 253-264
[11] J. A. OUBIÑA, Almost S-Tangent Structures, Geometriae Dedicata 14, 1983, p. 395-403.
[12] G. THOMPSON, Integrable Almost Cotangent Structures and Legendrian Bundles, Math.
Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 101, 1987, p. 61-78.
[13] G. THOMPSON and U. SCHWARDMANN, Almost Tangent and Cotangent Structure in the Large,
Transactions of the Amer. Math. Soc., 327, 1991 (1), p. 313-328.
(Manuscript received January 17, 1993;
revised version accepted April 7, oo
Vol. 61, n° 1-1994.