• Aucun résultat trouvé

Ketogenic diet for weight loss

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Ketogenic diet for weight loss"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

906 Canadian Family Physician | Le Médecin de famille canadien } Vol 64: DECEMBER | DÉCEMBRE 2018

T O O L S F O R P R A C T I C E

Tools for Practice articles in Canadian Family Physician are adapted from articles published on the Alberta College of Family Physicians (ACFP) website, summarizing

medical evidence with a focus on topical issues and practice-modifying information. The ACFP summaries and the series in Canadian Family Physician are coordinated by Dr G. Michael Allan, and the summaries are co-authored by at least 1 practising family physician and are peer reviewed. Feedback is welcome and can be sent to

toolsforpractice@cfpc.ca. Archived articles are available on the ACFP website: www.acfp.ca.

Ketogenic diet for weight loss

Rhonda Ting Nicolas Dugré PharmD MSc G. Michael Allan MD CCFP Adrienne J. Lindblad ACPR PharmD

Clinical question

Is the ketogenic diet effective for weight loss?

Bottom line

Ketogenic diets can help patients lose about 2 kg more than low-fat diets do at 1 year, but higher- quality studies show no difference. Weight loss peaks at about 5 months but is often not sustained.

Individual weight change can vary from losing 30 kg to gaining 10 kg with any diet.

Evidence

• In a systematic review of 13 RCTs of ketogenic versus low-fat diets (N = 1577, 61% women, BMI 30 to 43 kg/m

2

), those on ketogenic diets lost 0.9 kg more than those on low-fat diets at 12 to 24 months (statistically different).

1

-There were statistically significant but likely clinically

meaningless changes in surrogate markers.

-The dropout rate was 13% to 84% across studies.

• A systematic review of 11 RCTs (N = 1369, 71% women, BMI 30 to 36 kg/m

2

) found at 6 to 24 months

2

that the ketogenic diet group lost 2.2 kg more than the low-fat diet group (statistically different but results were inconsis- tent). Higher-quality studies showed no difference.

-Surrogate marker changes were similar to those above.

1,2

• Other systematic reviews (5 to 24 RCTs) were confounded by low-carbohydrate diets that were likely not ketogenic.

Results ranged from no difference

3-5

to a 3.6-kg loss.

6-8

• No systematic reviews or RCTs examined mortality or cardiovascular disease.

2

• An RCT (N = 609) found weight loss at 1 year for low- carbohydrate diets (< 20 g/d to start) of 6.0 kg compared with 5.3 kg for low-fat diets (not statistically different).

9

-Patient genotypes (favouring 1 diet type) had no effect.

-Weight change varied from losing 30 kg to gaining 10 kg in either group.

Context

• A typical Canadian diet contains 48% carbohydrates, 32% fat, and 17% protein.

10

• Most ketogenic diets start with carbohydrate restric- tion of less than 20 to 50 g/d (10% of energy intake) for about 2 months before slow reintroduction.

1,11

• Weight loss peaks at about 5 months, then weight is slowly regained.

12

• Ketogenic diets tend to decrease caloric intake.

9,12

• Observational data suggest long-term low carbohydrate intake might be associated with increased mortality.

13

Implementation

Ketogenic diets imply minimizing carbohydrate intake and maximizing protein intake to induce ketosis.

12

Adverse effects are common, including constipation (33%), halitosis (30%), muscle cramps (28%) (numbers needed to harm of 3 to 4 compared with low-fat diets), headache, diarrhea, weak- ness, and rash (numbers needed to harm of 5 to 7).

14

Urine ketone monitoring is advocated in the lay press, but it is not consistently reported in RCTs and its benefit is unknown.

Ms Ting is a doctoral student in the Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. Dr Dugré is Clinical Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Montreal in Quebec. Dr Allan is Professor with the PEER Group in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta and the Alberta College of Family Physicians. Dr Lindblad is Knowledge Translation and Evidence Coordinator for the Alberta College of Family Physicians and Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Alberta.

Competing interests None declared

The opinions expressed in Tools for Practice article are those of the authors and do not necessar- ily mirror the perspective and policy of the Alberta College of Family Physicians.

References

1. Bueno NB, de Melo IS, de Oliveira SL, da Rocha Ataide T. Very-low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet v.

low-fat diet for long-term weight loss: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Nutr 2013;110(7):1178-87.

2. Mansoor N, Vinknes KJ, VeierØd MB, RetterstØl K. Effects of low-carbohydrate diets v. low-fat diets on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Br J Nutr 2016;115(3):466-79.

3. Meng Y, Bai H, Wang S, Li Z, Wang Q, Chen L. Efficacy of low carbohydrate diet for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;131:124-31.

4. Hu T, Mills KT, Yao L, Demanelis K, Eloustaz M, Yancy WS Jr, et al. Effects of low-carbohydrate diets versus low-fat diets on metabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Am J Epidemiol 2012;176(Suppl 7):S44-54.

5. Huntriss R, Campbell M, Bedwell C. The interpretation and effect of a low-carbohydrate diet in the management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Clin Nutr 2018;72(3):311-25.

6. Nordmann AJ, Nordmann A, Briel M, Keller U, Yancy WS Jr, Brehm BJ, et al. Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2006;166(3):285-93. Erratum in: Arch Intern Med 2006;166(8):932.

7. Sackner-Bernstein J, Kanter D, Kaul S. Dietary intervention for overweight and obese adults: com- parison of low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets. A meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10(10):e0139817.

8. Bravata DM, Sanders L, Huang J, Krumholz HM, Olkin I, Gardner CD, et al. Efficacy and safety of low-carbohydrate diets: a systematic review. JAMA 2003;289(14):1837-50.

9. Gardner CD, Trepanowski JF, Del Gobbo LC, Hauser ME, Rigdon J, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Effect of low-fat vs low-carbohydrate diet on 12-month weight loss in overweight adults and the associa- tion with genotype pattern or insulin secretion. The DIETFITS randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2018;319(7):667-79. Errata in: JAMA 2018;319(13):1386, JAMA 2018;319(16):1728.

10. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey – nutrition: nutrient intakes from food and nutritional supplements. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada; 2017. Available from: https://www150.

statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/170620/dq170620b-eng.htm. Accessed 2018 Sep 20.

11. Moreno B. Crujeiras AB, Bellido D, Sajoux I, Casanueva FF. Obesity treatment by very low-calorie- ketogenic diet at two years: reduction in visceral fat and on the burden of disease. Endocrine 2016;54(3):681-90.

12. Johnstone AM, Horgan GW, Murison SD, Bremner DM, Lobley GE. Effects of a high-protein ketogenic diet on hunger, appetite, and weight loss in obese men feeding ad libitum. Am J Clin Nutr 2008;87(1):44-55.

13. Seidelmann SB, Claggett B, Cheng S, Henglin M, Shah A, Steffen LM, et al. Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2018;3(9):e419-28.

14. Yancy WS Jr, Olsen MK, Guyton JR, Bakst RP, Westman EC. A low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet ver- sus a low-fat diet to treat obesity and hyperlipidemia: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;140(10):769-77.

This article is eligible for Mainpro+ certified Self-Learning credits. To earn credits, go to www.cfp.ca and click on the Mainpro+ link.

La traduction en français de cet article se trouve à www.cfp.ca dans la

table des matières du numéro de décembre 2018 à la page e529.

Références

Documents relatifs

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess whether patients with T2DM treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) present a lower incidence of

We systematically searched MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE via OVID, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the last search performed in December 2013,

Starch Fiber Starch Fiber s.e.m.. This reinforces the idea that microbial protein synthesis and consequently the rumen protein sparing effect of starch diets compared with fiber diets

Geyer S (2010) Research on social determinants and health: what sorts of data do we need. Int J Public

Résultats : 15 patients furent inclus dans l’étude. Une moyenne de 1,5 PRP par patient a été détectée à leur départ. Tous les PRP ont été asso- ciés à une intervention.

Vous est-il arrivé de vous demander quel intérêt pour- rait-il y avoir à échanger davantage avec l’étranger?. L’ac- te d’échanger n’a-t-il pas pour fondement l’idée

VLCD, very low carbohydrate diet; MAD, modified Atkins diet; Zone, the Zone diet; KLC, ketogenic low carbohydrate diet; WW, Weight Watchers diet; VLFD, very low fat diet;

fluorescent labels, used in the detection of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua), Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida), capelin (Mallotus villosus), and sand lance (Ammodytes spp.) in