373-
A monogenic Hasse-Arf theorem
par JAMES BORGER
RÉSUMÉ. On étend le théorème de Hasse-Arf de la classe des extensions résiduellement
séparables
des anneaux de valuationdiscrète
complets
à la classe des extensionsmonogènes.
ABSTRACT. I extend the Hasse-Arf theorem from
residually
sepa- rable extensions ofcomplete
discrete valuation rings to monogenicextensions.
Let be a finite extension of henselian discrete valuation
rings
whichis
generically
Galois with groupG,
thatis,
for which thecorresponding
extension of fraction fields is Galois with group G. For Q E
G - ~l},
letIB(a)
be the ideal of Bgenerated by (Q - 1)B
and letiB (a)
be thelength
of the B-module
B/IB(Q).
For any finite dimensional
complex representation
p : G ~Autc (V) ,
wedefine the naive Artin conductor
exactly
as we do whenB/A
isresidually separable, i.e.,
when the extension of residue fields isseparable:
By looking
at realparts,
it is immediate that this is anon-negative
rationalnumber,
and whenB/A
isresidually separable,
the Hasse-Arf theorem[3,
VI
§2]
tells us that it is also aninteger.
In
[4],
De Smit shows that most of the classical ramification-theoreticproperties
ofresidually separable
extensionsB/A
hold in theslightly
moregeneral, "monogenic"
case where werequire only
that B isgenerated
as anA-algebra by
one element. The purpose of this note is to show that the Hasse-Arf theorem also holds in this context.Partial results in this direction were obtained
by Spriano [5].
Aproof
of the Hasse-Arf theorem in
equal
characteristic that isstrong enough
tocover
monogenic
extensions was outlined at the 1999Luminy
conference onramification
theory.
It was based on a technicalanalysis
of a refinement[2, 3.2.2]
of Kato’s refined Swan conductor[I] ,
but sincethen,
anelementary
reduction to the classical Hasse-Arf theorem has been found.
The contents of this paper are contained in my dissertation
(U.C.
Berke-ley, 2000),
which was written under the direction of Hendrik Lenstra.374
Proposition
1. LetB/A
be afinite generically separable
extensionof
henselian discrete valuation
rings.
Then thefollowing
areequivalent.
(i)
There exists an x E B such that B =A[x].
(ii)
The second exterior powerQ 2 of the module of
relative Kähler
differentials
is zero.(iii)
There is a henselian discrete valuationring
A’ that isfinite
overthe maximal
unramified
subextension Anrof B/A
such thateA’/Anr
= 1 andB’/A’
is aresidually separable
extensionof
discrete valuationrings,
whereB’ = A’ 0Anr B.
Proof.
De Smit[4, 4.2]
shows that(i)
follows from(ii).
For any A’ as in(iii),
we haveB’ B Q2 /A B’ n2
rv n2 0
so (iii) implies
111 ,
we have0B B
££0B
££B’IA’ = 0,
soIII implies (ii).
Now we show(i) implies (iii).
Assume,
as we may, that A =Anr,
and let denote the residue exten- sion ofB/A.
Take some x E B such that B =A[x]
and let x denote theimage
of x in 1. Letg(X)
EA[X]
be a monic lift of the minimalpolynomial
Xq - a of x over k. Since the maximal ideal of B is
generated by
that of Aand
g(x),
we may assume thatg(x) generates
the maximal ideal of B. Then modulo the maximal ideal ofB,
we haveg(X
+x) -
Xq + xq - a -Xq,
sog(X
-+-x)
is an Eisensteinpolynomial
with coefficients in B. Now let A’ be the discrete valuationring A[X]/(g(X)).
Thenis a discrete valuation
ring
which has the same residue field as Band, hence,
A’. El
Proposition
2. LetB/A
be afinite
extensionof
henselian discrete valua- tionrings
that isgenerically
Galois with groupG,
and let p : G -Autc(V)
be a
finite
dimensionalrepresentation of
G.If A’/A
is afinite
extensionof
henselian discrete valuationrings
such that B’ = A’ Q9 A B is a discrete valuationring,
then we havearn(p’)
=e A’ / A ar n (p),
wherep’
is p viewed asa
representation of
thegeneric
Galois groupof
the extensionB’/A’.
Thus
375
Corollary
3.Let B/A
be afinite monogenic
extensionof
henselian discrete valuationsTings
that isgenerically
Galois with groupG,
and let p : G -finite
dimensionalrepresentation of
G. Thenarn(p) is
aninteger.
Proof. Restricting
to the maximal unramified subextension ofB/A
doesnot
change
the naive Artin conductor or themonogeneity
of the extension.So assume
B / A
isresidually purely inseparable.
Nowjust apply
theprevi-
ous
proposition
with A’ taken as in the firstproposition
and then use theclassical Hasse-Arf theorem. D
Remark. One can define a naive Swan conductor
[1, 6.7]
as well. It alsois an
integer
in themonogenic
case butsimply
because it agrees with the naive Artin conductor wheneverB/A
ismonogenic
and notresidually
sep- arable. It isnot, however,
agood
invariant even in themonogenic
case: itis a consequence of results outlined at the
Luminy
conference that in the(monogenic) equal-characteristic
case, the naive Swan conductor of a faith-ful,
one-dimensionalrepresentation
agrees with Kato’s Swan conductor if andonly
if eitherB/A
isresidually separable
oreB/A
=1,
whereas forgeneral monogenic
extensions inequal-characteristic,
the naive Artin con-ductor of a one-dimensional
representation
isequal
to anon-logarithmic,
"Artin-type"
variant of Kato’s Swan conductor.References
[1] K. KATO, Swan conductors for characters of degree one in the imperfect residue field case.
Algebraic K-theory and algebraic number theory, ed. M. Stein and R. K. Dennis, Contemp.
Math. 83, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 1989, 101-131.
[2] S. MATSUDA, On the Swan conductor in positive characteristic. Amer. J. Math. 119 (1997),
no. 4, 705-739.
[3] J-P. SERRE, Corps locaux. Deuxième édition. Hermann, Paris, 1968.
[4] B. DE SMIT, The Different and Differentials of Local Fields with Imperfect Residue Fields.
Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. 40 (1997), 353-365.
[5] L. SPRIANO. Thesis, Université de Bordeaux, 1999.
James BORGER
The University of Chicago Department of Mathematics 5734 University Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60637-1546, USA borgerOmath. uchicago. edu