• Aucun résultat trouvé

Families of characters for cyclotomic Hecke algebras

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Families of characters for cyclotomic Hecke algebras"

Copied!
59
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Families of characters for cyclotomic Hecke algebras

Maria Chlouveraki EPFL 30 MAIOY 2008

(2)

A complex reflection groupW is a finite group of matrices with coefficients in a number field K generated by pseudo-reflections,i.e., elements whose vector space of fixed points is a hyperplane.

IfK =Q, then W is a Weyl group.

(3)

A complex reflection groupW is a finite group of matrices with coefficients in a number field K generated by pseudo-reflections,i.e., elements whose vector space of fixed points is a hyperplane.

IfK =Q, then W is a Weyl group.

(4)

Weyl groups →

Complex reflection groups Finite reductive groups → “Spetses” (?)

Families of characters → Rouquier blocks

(5)

Weyl groups → Complex reflection groups

Finite reductive groups → “Spetses” (?) Families of characters → Rouquier blocks

(6)

Weyl groups → Complex reflection groups Finite reductive groups →

“Spetses” (?) Families of characters → Rouquier blocks

(7)

Weyl groups → Complex reflection groups Finite reductive groups → “Spetses” (?)

Families of characters → Rouquier blocks

(8)

Weyl groups → Complex reflection groups Finite reductive groups → “Spetses” (?)

Families of characters →

Rouquier blocks

(9)

Weyl groups → Complex reflection groups Finite reductive groups → “Spetses” (?)

Families of characters → Rouquier blocks

(10)

Hecke algebras of complex reflection groups

Every complex reflection group W has a nice“presentation a la Coxeter”:

G2 = <s,t|(st)3= (ts)3, s2 =t2 = 1>

= <s,t|(st)3= (ts)3,(s −1)(s+ 1) = (t−1)(t+ 1) = 0>

The generic Hecke algebraH(W) has a presentation of the form:

H(G2) =< σ, τ|(στ)3 = (τ σ)3,(σ−u0)(σ−u1) = (τ−u2)(τ−u3) = 0>

and it’s defined over the Laurent polynomial ring Z[u,u−1], where u= (u0,u1,u2,u3) is a set of indeterminates.

(11)

Hecke algebras of complex reflection groups

Every complex reflection group W has a nice“presentation a la Coxeter”:

G2 = <s,t|(st)3= (ts)3, s2 =t2 = 1>

= <s,t|(st)3= (ts)3,(s−1)(s+ 1) = (t−1)(t+ 1) = 0>

The generic Hecke algebraH(W) has a presentation of the form:

H(G2) =< σ, τ|(στ)3 = (τ σ)3,(σ−u0)(σ−u1) = (τ−u2)(τ−u3) = 0>

and it’s defined over the Laurent polynomial ring Z[u,u−1], where u= (u0,u1,u2,u3) is a set of indeterminates.

(12)

Hecke algebras of complex reflection groups

Every complex reflection group W has a nice“presentation a la Coxeter”:

G2 = <s,t|(st)3= (ts)3, s2 =t2 = 1>

= <s,t|(st)3= (ts)3,(s−1)(s+ 1) = (t−1)(t+ 1) = 0>

The generic Hecke algebraH(W) has a presentation of the form:

H(G2) =< σ, τ|(στ)3 = (τ σ)3,(σ−u0)(σ−u1) = (τ−u2)(τ−u3) = 0>

and it’s defined over the Laurent polynomial ring Z[u,u−1], where

(13)

A theorem by G. Malle provides us with a set of indeterminates vsuch that the the K(v)-algebra K(v)H(W) is split semisimple:

v02 =u0, v12=−u1, v22=u2, v32 =−u3

By “Tits’ deformation theorem”, the specialization vj 7→1 induces a bijection

Irr(K(v)H(W)) ↔ Irr(W)

χv 7→ χ

(14)

A theorem by G. Malle provides us with a set of indeterminates vsuch that the the K(v)-algebra K(v)H(W) is split semisimple:

v02 =u0, v12=−u1, v22=u2, v32 =−u3

By “Tits’ deformation theorem”, the specialization vj 7→1 induces a bijection

Irr(K(v)H(W)) ↔ Irr(W)

χv 7→ χ

(15)

Generic Schur elements

The generic Hecke algebra is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t. We have that

t = X

χ∈Irr(W)

1 sχ

χv,

where sχ is the Schur element associated toχv∈Irr(K(v)H(W)). Theorem (C.)

The generic Schur elements are polynomials inZK[v,v−1] whose irreducible factors are of the form Ψ(M),

where Ψis aK-cyclotomic polynomial in one variable, M is a primitive monomial of degree 0,

i.e.,if M =Q

jvjaj, thengcd(aj) = 1 and P

jaj = 0.

The primitive monomials appearing in the factorization of sχ are unique up to inversion.

(16)

Generic Schur elements

The generic Hecke algebra is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t. We have that

t = X

χ∈Irr(W)

1 sχχv,

where sχ is the Schur element associated toχv∈Irr(K(v)H(W)).

Theorem (C.)

The generic Schur elements are polynomials inZK[v,v−1] whose irreducible factors are of the form Ψ(M),

where Ψis aK-cyclotomic polynomial in one variable, M is a primitive monomial of degree 0,

i.e.,if M =Q

jvjaj, thengcd(aj) = 1 and P

jaj = 0.

The primitive monomials appearing in the factorization of sχ are unique up to inversion.

(17)

Generic Schur elements

The generic Hecke algebra is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t. We have that

t = X

χ∈Irr(W)

1 sχχv,

where sχ is the Schur element associated toχv∈Irr(K(v)H(W)).

Theorem (C.)

The generic Schur elements are polynomials inZK[v,v−1] whose irreducible factors are of the form Ψ(M), where

Ψis aK-cyclotomic polynomial in one variable, M is a primitive monomial of degree 0,

i.e.,if M =Q

jvjaj, thengcd(aj) = 1 and P

jaj = 0.

The primitive monomials appearing in the factorization of sχ are unique up to inversion.

(18)

Generic Schur elements

The generic Hecke algebra is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t. We have that

t = X

χ∈Irr(W)

1 sχχv,

where sχ is the Schur element associated toχv∈Irr(K(v)H(W)).

Theorem (C.)

The generic Schur elements are polynomials inZK[v,v−1] whose irreducible factors are of the form Ψ(M), where

Ψis aK-cyclotomic polynomial in one variable, M is a primitive monomial of degree 0,

i.e.,if M =Q

jvjaj, thengcd(aj) = 1 andP

jaj = 0.

The primitive monomials appearing in the factorization of sχ are unique up to inversion.

(19)

Generic Schur elements

The generic Hecke algebra is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t. We have that

t = X

χ∈Irr(W)

1 sχχv,

where sχ is the Schur element associated toχv∈Irr(K(v)H(W)).

Theorem (C.)

The generic Schur elements are polynomials inZK[v,v−1] whose irreducible factors are of the form Ψ(M), where

Ψis aK-cyclotomic polynomial in one variable, M is a primitive monomial of degree 0,

i.e.,if M =Q

jvjaj, thengcd(aj) = 1 andP

jaj = 0.

The primitive monomials appearing in the factorization of sχ are unique up to inversion.

(20)

Schur elements of G2

s1 = Φ4(v0v1−1)·Φ4(v2v3−1)·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2v3−1) s2 = 2·v12v0−2·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2−1v3)

Φ4(x) =x2+ 1, Φ3(x) =x2+x+ 1, Φ6(x) =x2−x+ 1.

(21)

Cyclotomic Hecke algebras

Definition

Let y be an indeterminate. A cyclotomic specializationofH(W) is a ZK-algebra morphism φ:ZK[v,v−1]→ZK[y,y−1] such that

φ:vj 7→ynj, with nj ∈Zfor all j.

The correspondingcyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφ is theZK[y,y−1]-algebra obtained as the specialization of H(W) via the morphism φ.

Proposition (C.)

The algebra K(y)Hφ is split semisimple.

(22)

Cyclotomic Hecke algebras

Definition

Let y be an indeterminate. Acyclotomic specialization ofH(W) is a ZK-algebra morphism φ:ZK[v,v−1]→ZK[y,y−1] such that

φ:vj 7→ynj, with nj ∈Zfor all j.

The correspondingcyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφis the ZK[y,y−1]-algebra obtained as the specialization of H(W) via the morphism φ.

Proposition (C.)

The algebra K(y)Hφ is split semisimple.

(23)

Cyclotomic Hecke algebras

Definition

Let y be an indeterminate. Acyclotomic specialization ofH(W) is a ZK-algebra morphism φ:ZK[v,v−1]→ZK[y,y−1] such that

φ:vj 7→ynj, with nj ∈Zfor all j.

The correspondingcyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφis the ZK[y,y−1]-algebra obtained as the specialization of H(W) via the morphism φ.

Proposition (C.)

The algebra K(y)Hφ is split semisimple.

(24)

Cyclotomic Hecke algebras

Definition

Let y be an indeterminate. Acyclotomic specialization ofH(W) is a ZK-algebra morphism φ:ZK[v,v−1]→ZK[y,y−1] such that

φ:vj 7→ynj, with nj ∈Zfor all j.

The correspondingcyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφis the ZK[y,y−1]-algebra obtained as the specialization of H(W) via the morphism φ.

Proposition (C.)

The algebra K(y)Hφ is split semisimple.

(25)

By “Tits’ deformation theorem”, we obtain

Irr(K(v)H(W)) ↔ Irr(K(y)Hφ) ↔ Irr(W)

χv 7→ χφ 7→ χ

Proposition

The Schur element sχφ(y)associated to the irreducible character χφ of K(y)Hφis a Laurent polynomial iny of the form

sχφ(y) =ψχφyaχφ Y

Φ∈CK

Φ(y)nχφ,Φ,

where ψχφ ∈ZK,aχφ ∈Z,nχφ ∈Nand CK is a set ofK-cyclotomic polynomials.

(26)

By “Tits’ deformation theorem”, we obtain

Irr(K(v)H(W)) ↔ Irr(K(y)Hφ) ↔ Irr(W)

χv 7→ χφ 7→ χ

Proposition

The Schur element sχφ(y)associated to the irreducible character χφ of K(y)Hφis a Laurent polynomial iny of the form

sχφ(y) =ψχφyaχφ Y

Φ∈CK

Φ(y)nχφ,Φ,

where ψχφ ∈ZK,aχφ ∈Z,nχφ ∈Nand CK is a set ofK-cyclotomic polynomials.

(27)

Rouquier blocks

We call Rouquier ringof K theZK-subalgebra ofK(y) RK(y):=ZK[y,y−1,(yn−1)−1n≥1]

Definition

The Rouquier blocksof the cyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφ are the blocks of RK(y)Hφ,

i.e., the partitionBR(Hφ) ofIrr(W) minimal for the property: For allB∈ BR(Hφ)and h∈ Hφ,X

χ∈B

χφ(h)

sχφ ∈ RK(y).

(28)

Rouquier blocks

We call Rouquier ringof K theZK-subalgebra ofK(y) RK(y):=ZK[y,y−1,(yn−1)−1n≥1]

Definition

The Rouquier blocksof the cyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφ are the blocks of RK(y)Hφ,

i.e., the partitionBR(Hφ) ofIrr(W) minimal for the property: For allB∈ BR(Hφ)and h∈ Hφ,X

χ∈B

χφ(h)

sχφ ∈ RK(y).

(29)

Rouquier blocks

We call Rouquier ringof K theZK-subalgebra ofK(y) RK(y):=ZK[y,y−1,(yn−1)−1n≥1]

Definition

The Rouquier blocksof the cyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφ are the blocks of RK(y)Hφ,

i.e., the partitionBR(Hφ) ofIrr(W) minimal for the property: For allB∈ BR(Hφ) and h∈ Hφ,X

χ∈B

χφ(h)

sχφ ∈ RK(y).

(30)

Rouquier blocks

We call Rouquier ringof K theZK-subalgebra ofK(y) RK(y):=ZK[y,y−1,(yn−1)−1n≥1]

Definition

The Rouquier blocksof the cyclotomic Hecke algebra Hφ are the blocks of RK(y)Hφ,i.e., the partitionBR(Hφ) ofIrr(W) minimal for the property:

For all B∈ BR(Hφ) and h∈ Hφ,X

χ∈B

χφ(h)

sχφ ∈ RK(y).

(31)

Let p be a prime ideal ofZK.

We denote by Bp(Hφ) the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofHφ (i.e.,the blocks of the algebra ZK[y,y−1]pHφ).

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of Hφis the partition of Irr(W) generated by the partitions Bp(Hφ), where pruns over the set of prime ideals of ZK.

(32)

Let p be a prime ideal ofZK.

We denote by Bp(Hφ) the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofHφ (i.e.,the blocks of the algebra ZK[y,y−1]pHφ).

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of Hφis the partition of Irr(W) generated by the partitions Bp(Hφ), where pruns over the set of prime ideals of ZK.

(33)

Let p be a prime ideal ofZK.

We denote by Bp(Hφ) the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofHφ (i.e.,the blocks of the algebra ZK[y,y−1]pHφ).

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of Hφ is the partition of Irr(W) generated by the partitions Bp(Hφ), where pruns over the set of prime ideals of ZK.

(34)

p-essential monomials

Definition

A primitive monomial M in ZK[v,v−1] is calledp-essential forW if there exists an irreducible characterχ of W and a K-cyclotomic polynomial Ψ such that

1 Ψ(M) dividessχ(v)

2 Ψ(1)∈p.

(35)

p-essential monomials

Definition

A primitive monomial M in ZK[v,v−1] is calledp-essential for W if there exists an irreducible characterχ of W and a K-cyclotomic polynomial Ψ such that

1 Ψ(M) dividessχ(v)

2 Ψ(1)∈p.

(36)

p-essential monomials

Definition

A primitive monomial M in ZK[v,v−1] is calledp-essential for W if there exists an irreducible characterχ of W and a K-cyclotomic polynomial Ψ such that

1 Ψ(M) dividessχ(v)

2 Ψ(1)∈p.

(37)

p-essential monomials

Definition

A primitive monomial M in ZK[v,v−1] is calledp-essential for W if there exists an irreducible characterχ of W and a K-cyclotomic polynomial Ψ such that

1 Ψ(M) dividessχ(v)

2 Ψ(1)∈p.

(38)

p-essential monomials and p-blocks

Set A:=ZK[v,v−1] and letBp(H)be the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofH(W) (i.e., the blocks of the algebra ApH(W)).

Theorem (C.)

For every p-essential monomialM for W, there exists a unique partition BpM(H) ofIrr(W) with the following properties:

1 The parts ofBMp (H) are unions of the parts ofBp(H).

2 The partition Bp(Hφ) is the partition generated by the partitions Bp(H) et BpM(H), where M runs over the set of allp-essential monomials which are sent to 1 byφ.

Moreover, the partition BMp (H) coincides with the blocks of the algebra AqMH(W), where qM := (M −1)A+pA.

(39)

p-essential monomials and p-blocks

Set A:=ZK[v,v−1] and letBp(H)be the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofH(W) (i.e., the blocks of the algebraApH(W)).

Theorem (C.)

For every p-essential monomialM for W, there exists a unique partition BpM(H) ofIrr(W) with the following properties:

1 The parts ofBMp (H) are unions of the parts ofBp(H).

2 The partition Bp(Hφ) is the partition generated by the partitions Bp(H) et BpM(H), where M runs over the set of allp-essential monomials which are sent to 1 byφ.

Moreover, the partition BMp (H) coincides with the blocks of the algebra AqMH(W), where qM := (M −1)A+pA.

(40)

p-essential monomials and p-blocks

Set A:=ZK[v,v−1] and letBp(H)be the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofH(W) (i.e., the blocks of the algebraApH(W)).

Theorem (C.)

For every p-essential monomialM for W, there exists a unique partition BpM(H) ofIrr(W) with the following properties:

1 The parts ofBMp (H) are unions of the parts ofBp(H).

2 The partition Bp(Hφ) is the partition generated by the partitions Bp(H) et BpM(H), where M runs over the set of allp-essential monomials which are sent to 1 byφ.

Moreover, the partition BMp (H) coincides with the blocks of the algebra AqMH(W), where qM := (M −1)A+pA.

(41)

p-essential monomials and p-blocks

Set A:=ZK[v,v−1] and letBp(H)be the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofH(W) (i.e., the blocks of the algebraApH(W)).

Theorem (C.)

For every p-essential monomialM for W, there exists a unique partition BpM(H) ofIrr(W) with the following properties:

1 The parts ofBMp (H) are unions of the parts ofBp(H).

2 The partition Bp(Hφ) is the partition generated by the partitions Bp(H) et BpM(H), where M runs over the set of allp-essential monomials which are sent to 1 byφ.

Moreover, the partition BMp (H) coincides with the blocks of the algebra AqMH(W), where qM := (M −1)A+pA.

(42)

p-essential monomials and p-blocks

Set A:=ZK[v,v−1] and letBp(H)be the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofH(W) (i.e., the blocks of the algebraApH(W)).

Theorem (C.)

For every p-essential monomialM for W, there exists a unique partition BpM(H) ofIrr(W) with the following properties:

1 The parts ofBMp (H) are unions of the parts ofBp(H).

2 The partition Bp(Hφ) is the partition generated by the partitions Bp(H) et BpM(H), where M runs over the set of allp-essential monomials which are sent to 1 byφ.

Moreover, the partition BMp (H) coincides with the blocks of the algebra AqMH(W), where qM := (M −1)A+pA.

(43)

p-essential monomials and p-blocks

Set A:=ZK[v,v−1] and letBp(H)be the partition of Irr(W) into p-blocks ofH(W) (i.e., the blocks of the algebraApH(W)).

Theorem (C.)

For every p-essential monomialM for W, there exists a unique partition BpM(H) ofIrr(W) with the following properties:

1 The parts ofBMp (H) are unions of the parts ofBp(H).

2 The partition Bp(Hφ) is the partition generated by the partitions Bp(H) et BpM(H), where M runs over the set of allp-essential monomials which are sent to 1 byφ.

Moreover, the partition BMp (H) coincides with the blocks of the algebra AqMH(W), where qM := (M −1)A+pA.

(44)

The example of G

2

We denote the characters of G2 as follows:

χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2.

Schur elements: 2-essential in purple, 3-essential in green

s1 = Φ4(v0v1−1)·Φ4(v2v3−1)·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2v3−1)

s2 = 2·v12v0−2·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2−1v3)

Φ4(x) =x2+ 1, Φ3(x) =x2+x+ 1, Φ6(x) =x2−x+ 1

Φ4(1) = 2 Φ3(1) = 3 Φ6(1) = 1

(45)

The example of G

2

We denote the characters of G2 as follows:

χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2.

Schur elements: 2-essential in purple, 3-essential in green

s1 = Φ4(v0v1−1)·Φ4(v2v3−1)·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2v3−1)

s2 = 2·v12v0−2·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2−1v3)

Φ4(x) =x2+ 1, Φ3(x) =x2+x+ 1, Φ6(x) =x2−x+ 1

Φ4(1) = 2 Φ3(1) = 3 Φ6(1) = 1

(46)

The example of G

2

We denote the characters of G2 as follows:

χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2.

Schur elements: 2-essential in purple, 3-essential in green

s1 = Φ4(v0v1−1)·Φ4(v2v3−1)·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2v3−1)

s2 = 2·v12v0−2·Φ3(v0v1−1v2v3−1)·Φ6(v0v1−1v2−1v3)

Φ4(x) =x2+ 1, Φ3(x) =x2+x+ 1, Φ6(x) =x2−x+ 1

(47)

The 2-essential monomials for G2 are:

M1 :=v0v1−1 and M2:=v2v3−1.

The 3-essential monomials for G2 are:

M3 :=v0v1−1v2v3−1 and M4:=v0v1−1v2−1v3.

Monomial BM2 (H) BM3 (H)

1 (χ2,1, χ2,2) -

M11,0, χ1,30), (χ2,1, χ2,2), (χ1,6, χ1,300) - M21,0, χ1,300), (χ2,1, χ2,2), (χ1,6, χ1,30) -

M32,1, χ2,2) (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2) M42,1, χ2,2) (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

(48)

The 2-essential monomials for G2 are:

M1 :=v0v1−1 and M2:=v2v3−1. The 3-essential monomials for G2 are:

M3 :=v0v1−1v2v3−1 and M4:=v0v1−1v2−1v3.

Monomial BM2 (H) BM3 (H)

1 (χ2,1, χ2,2) -

M11,0, χ1,30), (χ2,1, χ2,2), (χ1,6, χ1,300) - M21,0, χ1,300), (χ2,1, χ2,2), (χ1,6, χ1,30) -

M32,1, χ2,2) (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2) M42,1, χ2,2) (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

(49)

The 2-essential monomials for G2 are:

M1 :=v0v1−1 and M2:=v2v3−1. The 3-essential monomials for G2 are:

M3 :=v0v1−1v2v3−1 and M4:=v0v1−1v2−1v3.

Monomial BM2 (H) BM3 (H)

1 (χ2,1, χ2,2) -

M11,0, χ1,30), (χ2,1, χ2,2), (χ1,6, χ1,300) - M21,0, χ1,300), (χ2,1, χ2,2), (χ1,6, χ1,30) -

M32,1, χ2,2) (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2) M42,1, χ2,2) (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

(50)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra

φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(51)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(52)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(53)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(54)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra

φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1 v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(55)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1

All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(56)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(57)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(58)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#1 Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

(59)

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra φs : v0 7→y v2 7→y

v17→1 v3 7→1

The only essential monomial sent to 1 is M4. Thus the Rouquier blocks of Hsφ are:

1,0), (χ1,6), (χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2).

Determination of the Rouquier blocks of the group algebra φW : v0 7→1 v2 7→1

v1 7→1 v3 7→1 All essential monomials are sent to 1. We have:

#22-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300),(χ2,1, χ2,2)

#23-blocks (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ2,2),(χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1)

#1Rouquier block (χ1,0, χ1,6, χ1,30, χ1,300, χ2,1, χ2,2)

Références

Documents relatifs

Lusztig’s description of the canonical basis of f in type A (1) in [L1] implies that this basis can be naturally identified with the set of isomorphism classes of simple objects of

More precisely it is conjectured there that θ V(λ) admits a canonical basis which is naturally identified with the set of isomorphism classes of simple objects of a category of

The rest of the section is devoted to the deformation argument and the proof that A is a highest weight cover of the module category of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra satisfying

We give an explicit description of the “canonical basic set” for all Iwahori-Hecke algebras of finite Weyl groups in “good” characteristic.. We obtain a complete classification

Rapha¨ el Rouquier, Gunter Malle, Michel B., Sungsoon Kim,. &amp;

We note that Boys and Mathas [Bo, BoMa] already studied a restriction of the isomorphism of [BrKl] to the fixed point subalgebra of an automorphism, in order to study

We prove that cyclotomic Yokonuma–Hecke algebras of type A are cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras and we give an explicit isomorphism with its inverse, using a similar result of

The main point of this paper is to prove a similar decomposition theorem for some generalisations of quiver Hecke algebras and hence obtain an analogue of the Dipper–Mathas