• Aucun résultat trouvé

Rouquier Blocks for Cyclotomic Hecke Algebras

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Rouquier Blocks for Cyclotomic Hecke Algebras"

Copied!
62
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Rouquier Blocks for Cyclotomic Hecke Algebras

Michel Brou´ e

Institut Henri–Poincar´e

July 2007

After work of

Rapha¨el Rouquier, Gunter Malle, Michel B., Sungsoon Kim,

& Maria Chlouveraki

(2)

HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS

Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :

G

2

:

s

2

t

2

, G

4

:

s

3

t 3

and a field of realisation Q

G

(ring of integers Z

G

) : Q

G2

= Q and Q

G4

= Q (ζ

3

) .

The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :

H(G

2

) := < S , T ;

 

 

STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u

0

)(S − u

1

) = 0 (T − v

0

)(T − v

1

) = 0

>

H(G

4

) := < S , T ;

( STS = TST

(S − u

0

)(S − u

1

)(S − u

2

) = 0 >

(3)

HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :

G

2

:

s

2

t

2

, G

4

:

s

3

t 3

and a field of realisation Q

G

(ring of integers Z

G

) : Q

G2

= Q and Q

G4

= Q (ζ

3

) .

The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :

H(G

2

) := < S , T ;

 

 

STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u

0

)(S − u

1

) = 0 (T − v

0

)(T − v

1

) = 0

>

H(G

4

) := < S , T ;

( STS = TST

(S − u

0

)(S − u

1

)(S − u

2

) = 0 >

(4)

HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :

G

2

:

s

2

t

2

, G

4

:

s

3

t 3

and a field of realisation Q

G

(ring of integers Z

G

) : Q

G2

= Q and Q

G4

= Q (ζ

3

) .

The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :

H(G

2

) := < S , T ;

 

 

STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u

0

)(S − u

1

) = 0 (T − v

0

)(T − v

1

) = 0

>

H(G

4

) := < S , T ;

( STS = TST

(S − u

0

)(S − u

1

)(S − u

2

) = 0 >

(5)

HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :

G

2

:

s

2

t

2

, G

4

:

s

3

t 3

and a field of realisation Q

G

(ring of integers Z

G

) : Q

G2

= Q and Q

G4

= Q (ζ

3

) .

The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :

H(G

2

) := < S , T ;

 

 

STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u

0

)(S − u

1

) = 0 (T − v

0

)(T − v

1

) = 0

>

(

(6)

1

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ].

2

It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :

if G =

s

d m

t

e

· · · ,

then for

(x

i|µ(QG)|

= ζ

d−i

u

i

)

i=0,1,...,d−1

, (y

j|µ(QG)|

= ζ

e−j

v

j

)

j=0,1,...,e−1

I

the algebra Q

G

((x

i

), (y

j

), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,

I

through the specialisation x

i

7→ 1 y

j

7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q

G

.

The above specialisation defines a bijection

Irr(G) −

→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ

H

.

(7)

1

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ].

2

It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :

if G =

s

d m

t

e

· · · ,

then for

(x

i|µ(QG)|

= ζ

d−i

u

i

)

i=0,1,...,d−1

, (y

j|µ(QG)|

= ζ

e−j

v

j

)

j=0,1,...,e−1

I

the algebra Q

G

((x

i

), (y

j

), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,

I

through the specialisation x

i

7→ 1 y

j

7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q

G

.

The above specialisation defines a bijection

Irr(G) −

→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ

H

.

(8)

1

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ].

2

It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :

if G =

s

d m

t

e

· · · ,

then for

(x

i|µ(QG)|

= ζ

d−i

u

i

)

i=0,1,...,d−1

, (y

j|µ(QG)|

= ζ

e−j

v

j

)

j=0,1,...,e−1

I

the algebra Q

G

((x

i

), (y

j

), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,

I

through the specialisation x

i

7→ 1 y

j

7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q

G

.

The above specialisation defines a bijection

Irr(G) −

→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ

H

.

(9)

1

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ].

2

It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :

if G =

s

d m

t

e

· · · ,

then for

(x

i|µ(QG)|

= ζ

d−i

u

i

)

i=0,1,...,d−1

, (y

j|µ(QG)|

= ζ

e−j

v

j

)

j=0,1,...,e−1

I

the algebra Q

G

((x

i

), (y

j

), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,

I

through the specialisation x

i

7→ 1 y

j

7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q

G

.

The above specialisation defines a bijection

Irr(G) −

→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ

H

.

(10)

1

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ].

2

It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :

if G =

s

d m

t

e

· · · ,

then for

(x

i|µ(QG)|

= ζ

d−i

u

i

)

i=0,1,...,d−1

, (y

j|µ(QG)|

= ζ

e−j

v

j

)

j=0,1,...,e−1

I

the algebra Q

G

((x

i

), (y

j

), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,

I

through the specialisation x

i

7→ 1 y

j

7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q

G

.

The above specialisation defines a bijection

(11)

4

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ]

I

which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q

G

G ,

I

and satisfies some other condition.

5

The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s

χ

∈ Z

G

[(x

i±1

), (y

j±1

), . . . ] defined by

t = X

χ∈Irr(G)

1 s

χ

χ

H

.

(12)

4

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ]

I

which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q

G

G ,

I

and satisfies some other condition.

5

The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s

χ

∈ Z

G

[(x

i±1

), (y

j±1

), . . . ] defined by

t = X

χ∈Irr(G)

1 s

χ

χ

H

.

(13)

4

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ]

I

which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q

G

G ,

I

and satisfies some other condition.

5

The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s

χ

∈ Z

G

[(x

i±1

), (y

j±1

), . . . ] defined by

t = X

χ∈Irr(G)

1 s

χ

χ

H

.

(14)

4

The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u

i±1

), (v

j±1

), . . . ]

I

which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q

G

G ,

I

and satisfies some other condition.

5

The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s

χ

∈ Z

G

[(x

i±1

), (y

j±1

), . . . ] defined by

t = X

χ∈Irr(G)

1

s

χ

χ

H

.

(15)

Theorem (M. Chlouveraki) We have

s

χ

(x) = ξ

χ

N

χ

Y

i∈Iχ

Ψ

χ,i

(M

χ,i

)

nχ,i

where

ξ

χ

∈ Z

G

, N

χ

is a degree zero monomial in Z

G

[x, x

−1

], (n

χ,i

)

i∈Iχ

are integers,

χ,i

)

i∈Iχ

is a family of K -cyclotomic polynomials,

(M

χ,i

)

i∈Iχ

is a family of degree zero primitive monomials in Z

G

[x, x

−1

].

That factorisation is unique in K [x, x

−1

] and the monomials (M

χ,i

)

i∈Iχ

are

unique (up to inversion).

(16)

Schur elements of G

2

( x

02

= u

0

, x

12

= −u

1

y

02

= v

0

, y

12

= −v

1

Elements of the orbit under S(x

0

, x

1

) × S(y

0

, y

1

) of

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

1

:= Φ

2

(x

0

x

1−1

2

(y

0

y

1−1

3

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

6

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

)) (corresponding to the four degree 1 irreducible characters)

s

2

:= 2Φ

6

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

3

(x

0

y

1

x

1−1

y

0−1

)

(corresponding to the two degree 2 irreducible characters)

(17)

Schur elements of G

2

( x

02

= u

0

, x

12

= −u

1

y

02

= v

0

, y

12

= −v

1

Elements of the orbit under S(x

0

, x

1

) × S(y

0

, y

1

) of

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

1

:= Φ

2

(x

0

x

1−1

2

(y

0

y

1−1

3

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

6

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

)) (corresponding to the four degree 1 irreducible characters)

s

2

:= 2Φ

6

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

3

(x

0

y

1

x

1−1

y

0−1

)

(corresponding to the two degree 2 irreducible characters)

(18)

Schur elements of G

2

( x

02

= u

0

, x

12

= −u

1

y

02

= v

0

, y

12

= −v

1

Elements of the orbit under S(x

0

, x

1

) × S(y

0

, y

1

) of

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

1

:= Φ

2

(x

0

x

1−1

2

(y

0

y

1−1

3

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

6

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

)) (corresponding to the four degree 1 irreducible characters)

s

2

:= 2Φ

6

(x

0

y

0

x

1−1

y

1−1

3

(x

0

y

1

x

1−1

y

0−1

)

(corresponding to the two degree 2 irreducible characters)

(19)

Schur elements of G

4

:

x

06

:= u

9,

x

16

:=

ζ3−1

u

1,

x

26

:=

ζ3

u

2

Obtained by permutations of the parameters from 8

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> <

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> :

s

1

=

Φ009(x0x1−1)

Φ

018

(x

0

x

1−1

)

Φ4(x0x1−1)

Φ

012

(x

0

x

1−1

) Φ

0012

(x

0

x

1−1

) Φ

036

(x

0

x

1−1

)

Φ09(x0x2−1)

Φ

0018

(x

0

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x0x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

0

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

0

x

2−1

) Φ

0036

(x

0

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

)

(corresponding to the three characters of degree 1)

s

2

=

−ζ32

x

26

x

1−6

Φ09(x1x0−1)

Φ

0018

(x

1

x

0−1

)

Φ009(x2x0−1)

Φ

018

(x

2

x

0−1

)

Φ4(x1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

1

x

2−1

) Φ

036

(x

1

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x0−2x1x2)

Φ

012

(x

0−2

x

1

x

2

) Φ

0012

(x

0−2

x

1

x

2

)

(corresponding to the three characters of degree 2)

s

3

=

Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x12x2−1x0−1)

Φ

012

(x

12

x

2−1

x

0−1

) Φ

0012

(x

12

x

2−1

x

0−1

)

Φ4(x22x0−1x1−1)

Φ

012

(x

22

x

0−1

x

1−1

) Φ

0012

(x

22

x

0−1

x

1−1

)

(corresponding to the unique character of degree 3)

(20)

Schur elements of G

4

: x

06

:= u

9,

x

16

:=

ζ3−1

u

1,

x

26

:=

ζ3

u

2

Obtained by permutations of the parameters from 8

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> <

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> :

s

1

=

Φ009(x0x1−1)

Φ

018

(x

0

x

1−1

)

Φ4(x0x1−1)

Φ

012

(x

0

x

1−1

) Φ

0012

(x

0

x

1−1

) Φ

036

(x

0

x

1−1

)

Φ09(x0x2−1)

Φ

0018

(x

0

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x0x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

0

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

0

x

2−1

) Φ

0036

(x

0

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

)

(corresponding to the three characters of degree 1)

s

2

=

−ζ32

x

26

x

1−6

Φ09(x1x0−1)

Φ

0018

(x

1

x

0−1

)

Φ009(x2x0−1)

Φ

018

(x

2

x

0−1

)

Φ4(x1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

1

x

2−1

) Φ

036

(x

1

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x0−2x1x2)

Φ

012

(x

0−2

x

1

x

2

) Φ

0012

(x

0−2

x

1

x

2

)

(corresponding to the three characters of degree 2)

s

3

=

Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x12x2−1x0−1)

Φ

012

(x

12

x

2−1

x

0−1

) Φ

0012

(x

12

x

2−1

x

0−1

)

Φ4(x22x0−1x1−1)

Φ

012

(x

22

x

0−1

x

1−1

) Φ

0012

(x

22

x

0−1

x

1−1

)

(corresponding to the unique character of degree 3)

(21)

Schur elements of G

4

: x

06

:= u

9,

x

16

:=

ζ3−1

u

1,

x

26

:=

ζ3

u

2

Obtained by permutations of the parameters from 8

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> <

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

s

1

=

Φ009(x0x1−1)

Φ

018

(x

0

x

1−1

)

Φ4(x0x1−1)

Φ

012

(x

0

x

1−1

) Φ

0012

(x

0

x

1−1

) Φ

036

(x

0

x

1−1

)

Φ09(x0x2−1)

Φ

0018

(x

0

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x0x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

0

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

0

x

2−1

) Φ

0036

(x

0

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

)

(corresponding to the three characters of degree 1)

s

2

=

−ζ32

x

26

x

1−6

Φ09(x1x0−1)

Φ

0018

(x

1

x

0−1

)

Φ009(x2x0−1)

Φ

018

(x

2

x

0−1

)

Φ4(x1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

1

x

2−1

) Φ

036

(x

1

x

2−1

)

Φ4(x0−2x1x2)

Φ

012

(x

0−2

x

1

x

2

) Φ

0012

(x

0−2

x

1

x

2

)

(corresponding to the three characters of degree 2)

s

3

=

Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)

Φ

012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

) Φ

0012

(x

02

x

1−1

x

2−1

)

2 −1 −1 0 2 −1 −1 00 2 −1 −1

(22)

Cyclotomic algebras

Let ζ be a root of unity. A ζ–cyclotomic specialisation of the generic Hecke algebra is a morphism

ϕ : x

i

7→ (ζ

−1

q)

mi

, y

j

7→ (ζ

−1

q)

nj

, . . . (m

i

, n

j

∈ Z ) , which gives rise to a ζ–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H

ϕ

(G ).

A 1–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for G

2

=

s

2

t 2

:

< S , T ;

 

 

STSTST = TSTSTS (S − q

2

)(S + 1) = 0 (T − q )(T + 1) = 0

 

 

>

(23)

Cyclotomic algebras

Let ζ be a root of unity. A ζ–cyclotomic specialisation of the generic Hecke algebra is a morphism

ϕ : x

i

7→ (ζ

−1

q)

mi

, y

j

7→ (ζ

−1

q)

nj

, . . . (m

i

, n

j

∈ Z ) , which gives rise to a ζ–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H

ϕ

(G ).

A 1–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for G

2

=

s

2

t 2

:

< S , T ;

 

 

STSTST = TSTSTS (S − q

2

)(S + 1) = 0 (T − q)(T + 1) = 0

 

 

>

(24)

A ζ

3

–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for B

2

(3) =

s

d

t 2

:

< S , T ;

 

 

STST = TSTS

(S − 1)(S − q)(S − q

2

) = 0 (T − q

3

)(T + 1) = 0

 

 

>

Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups The unipotent characters in a given d –Harish–Chandra series

UnCh(G

F

; (L, λ)) are described by a suitable ζ

d

–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H

GF

(L, λ)) for the corresponding d –cyclotomic Weyl group W

GF

(L, λ)) :

UnCh(G

F

; (L, λ)) ←→ Irr(H

GF

(L, λ))) .

(25)

A ζ

3

–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for B

2

(3) =

s

d

t 2

:

< S , T ;

 

 

STST = TSTS

(S − 1)(S − q)(S − q

2

) = 0 (T − q

3

)(T + 1) = 0

 

 

>

Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups The unipotent characters in a given d –Harish–Chandra series

UnCh(G

F

; (L, λ)) are described by a suitable ζ

d

–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H

GF

(L, λ)) for the corresponding d –cyclotomic Weyl group W

GF

(L, λ)) :

UnCh(G

F

; (L, λ)) ←→ Irr(H

GF

(L, λ))) .

(26)

ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS

• The Rouquier ring R

G

(q) is

R

G

(q ) := Z

G

[q, q

−1

, ((q

n

− 1)

−1

)

n≥1

] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.

• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H

ϕ

(G ) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R

G

(q)H

ϕ

(G ).

Let (e

k

), (e

k0

)

k=1,2,...,|G|

be a pair of dual basis of H

ϕ

(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.

Then a Rouquier block b has the form

b = X

k

 X

χ∈b

χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

) s

χϕ

 e

k

where X

χ∈b

χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

)

s

χϕ

∈ R

G

(q)

(27)

ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS

• The Rouquier ring R

G

(q) is

R

G

(q ) := Z

G

[q, q

−1

, ((q

n

− 1)

−1

)

n≥1

] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.

• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H

ϕ

(G ) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R

G

(q)H

ϕ

(G ).

Let (e

k

), (e

k0

)

k=1,2,...,|G|

be a pair of dual basis of H

ϕ

(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.

Then a Rouquier block b has the form

b = X

k

 X

χ∈b

χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

) s

χϕ

 e

k

where X

χ∈b

χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

)

s

χϕ

∈ R

G

(q)

(28)

ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS

• The Rouquier ring R

G

(q) is

R

G

(q ) := Z

G

[q, q

−1

, ((q

n

− 1)

−1

)

n≥1

] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.

• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H

ϕ

(G) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R

G

(q)H

ϕ

(G ).

Let (e

k

), (e

k0

)

k=1,2,...,|G|

be a pair of dual basis of H

ϕ

(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.

Then a Rouquier block b has the form

b = X

k

 X

χ∈b

χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

) s

χϕ

 e

k

where X

χ∈b

χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

)

s

χϕ

∈ R

G

(q)

(29)

ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS

• The Rouquier ring R

G

(q) is

R

G

(q ) := Z

G

[q, q

−1

, ((q

n

− 1)

−1

)

n≥1

] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.

• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H

ϕ

(G) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R

G

(q)H

ϕ

(G ).

Let (e

k

), (e

k0

)

k=1,2,...,|G|

be a pair of dual basis of H

ϕ

(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.

Then a Rouquier block b has the form

b = X

X χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

)

e where X χ

Hϕ

(e

k0

)

∈ R (q)

(30)

Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups

For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) = Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) .

Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition

UnCh(G

F

) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F

on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) :

Irr(H(G

F

, (L, λ))) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F ∩ Irr(H

GF

(L, λ))

| {z }

Rouquier Block or∅

.

(31)

Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify

UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) = Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) .

Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition

UnCh(G

F

) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F

on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) :

Irr(H(G

F

, (L, λ))) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F ∩ Irr(H

GF

(L, λ))

| {z }

Rouquier Block or∅

.

(32)

Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify

UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) = Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) . Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition

UnCh(G

F

) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F

on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) :

Irr(H(G

F

, (L, λ))) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F ∩ Irr(H

GF

(L, λ))

| {z }

Rouquier Block or∅

.

(33)

Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify

UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) = Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) . Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition

UnCh(G

F

) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F

on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G

F

, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H

GF

(L, λ)) :

Irr(H(G

F

, (L, λ))) =

[

F ∈Fam(GF)

F ∩ Irr(H

GF

(L, λ))

| {z }

Rouquier Block or∅

.

(34)

Computation of Rouquier Blocks

p–Blocks and Bad primes

For p a prime ideal of Z

G

, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )

p

(resp. H

ϕ

(G )

p

) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H

ϕ

(G )).

A bad prime for H

ϕ

(G ) is a prime ideal of Z

G

which divides some Schur element s

χϕ

.

A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of H

ϕ

(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H

ϕ

(G )

for p running over the set bad(H

ϕ

(G )) of bad primes.

(35)

Computation of Rouquier Blocks p–Blocks and Bad primes

For p a prime ideal of Z

G

, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )

p

(resp. H

ϕ

(G )

p

) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H

ϕ

(G )).

A bad prime for H

ϕ

(G ) is a prime ideal of Z

G

which divides some Schur element s

χϕ

.

A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of H

ϕ

(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H

ϕ

(G )

for p running over the set bad(H

ϕ

(G )) of bad primes.

(36)

Computation of Rouquier Blocks

p–Blocks and Bad primes

For p a prime ideal of Z

G

, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )

p

(resp. H

ϕ

(G )

p

) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H

ϕ

(G )).

A bad prime for H

ϕ

(G ) is a prime ideal of Z

G

which divides some Schur element s

χϕ

.

A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of H

ϕ

(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H

ϕ

(G )

for p running over the set bad(H

ϕ

(G )) of bad primes.

(37)

Computation of Rouquier Blocks

p–Blocks and Bad primes

For p a prime ideal of Z

G

, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )

p

(resp. H

ϕ

(G )

p

) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H

ϕ

(G )).

A bad prime for H

ϕ

(G ) is a prime ideal of Z

G

which divides some Schur element s

χϕ

.

A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of H

ϕ

(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H

ϕ

(G )

for p running over the set bad(H

ϕ

(G )) of bad primes.

(38)

Computation of Rouquier Blocks

p–Blocks and Bad primes

For p a prime ideal of Z

G

, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )

p

(resp. H

ϕ

(G )

p

) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H

ϕ

(G )).

A bad prime for H

ϕ

(G ) is a prime ideal of Z

G

which divides some Schur element s

χϕ

.

A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of H

ϕ

(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H

ϕ

(G )

for p running over the set bad(H

ϕ

(G )) of bad primes.

(39)

Computation of Rouquier Blocks

p–Blocks and Bad primes

For p a prime ideal of Z

G

, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )

p

(resp. H

ϕ

(G )

p

) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H

ϕ

(G )).

A bad prime for H

ϕ

(G ) is a prime ideal of Z

G

which divides some Schur element s

χϕ

.

A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.

Proposition

The Rouquier blocks of H

ϕ

(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H

ϕ

(G )

for p running over the set bad(H

ϕ

(G )) of bad primes.

(40)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M. If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(41)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M. If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(42)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.

If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(43)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.

If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(44)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.

If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(45)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.

If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(46)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.

If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(47)

p–Blocks and p–essential monomials

Definition Let M = Q

i

x

iai

y

jbj

· · · be a monomial.

We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q

G

–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that

1

Ψ(M ) divides s

χH

,

2

p divides Ψ(1).

A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.

If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H

M

defined by Log(M ), i.e., P

i

a

i

X

i

+ P

j

b

j

Y

j

+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.

(48)

Cyclotomic specialisation and p–singularity

Definition

Let ϕ be a cyclotomic specialisation of H(G ), defined by the family of integers (m

i

), (n

j

), . . . . Let M be a p–essential monomial.

We say that ϕ is p–singular at M (or at H

M

) if ϕ(M ) = 1 ,

i.e., if the parameters of ϕ belong to the p–essential hyperplane H

M

: X

i

a

i

m

i

+ X

j

b

j

n

j

+ · · · = 0 .

(49)

Cyclotomic specialisation and p–singularity

Definition

Let ϕ be a cyclotomic specialisation of H(G ), defined by the family of integers (m

i

), (n

j

), . . . . Let M be a p–essential monomial.

We say that ϕ is p–singular at M (or at H

M

) if ϕ(M ) = 1 ,

i.e., if the parameters of ϕ belong to the p–essential hyperplane H

M

: X

i

a

i

m

i

+ X

j

b

j

n

j

+ · · · = 0 .

Références

Documents relatifs

In this paper we complete the determination of the Brauer trees of unipotent blocks (with cyclic defect groups) of finite groups of Lie type.. These trees were conjectured by the

In this paper we complete the determination of the Brauer trees of unipotent blocks (with cyclic defect groups) of finite groups of Lie type.. These trees were conjectured by the

The Kazhdan–Lusztig equivalence [27] implies that the module category of the q-Schur algebra is equivalent to a highest weight subcategory of the affine category O of GL n at a

The rest of the section is devoted to the deformation argument and the proof that A is a highest weight cover of the module category of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra satisfying

Suivant la définition de Rouquier de « familles de caractères » d’un groupe de Weyl et sa généralisation au cas d’un groupe de réflexions complexe W, déjà utilisée dans

The functions a and A are constant on the Rouquier families of any cyclotomic Hecke algebra associated with an exceptional complex reflection group....

Decomposition matrices for cyclotomic Hecke algebras.

Let us denote by A ∞,q the subspace of C ∞,q whose elements are finite linear combinations of generic norms; this is in fact a subalgebra, which we call the Hecke-Ivanov-Kerov