Rouquier Blocks for Cyclotomic Hecke Algebras
Michel Brou´ e
Institut Henri–Poincar´e
July 2007
After work of
Rapha¨el Rouquier, Gunter Malle, Michel B., Sungsoon Kim,
& Maria Chlouveraki
HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS
Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :
G
2:
s
2
t
2
, G
4:
s
3
t 3
and a field of realisation Q
G(ring of integers Z
G) : Q
G2= Q and Q
G4= Q (ζ
3) .
The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :
H(G
2) := < S , T ;
STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u
0)(S − u
1) = 0 (T − v
0)(T − v
1) = 0
>
H(G
4) := < S , T ;
( STS = TST
(S − u
0)(S − u
1)(S − u
2) = 0 >
HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :
G
2:
s
2
t
2
, G
4:
s
3
t 3
and a field of realisation Q
G(ring of integers Z
G) : Q
G2= Q and Q
G4= Q (ζ
3) .
The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :
H(G
2) := < S , T ;
STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u
0)(S − u
1) = 0 (T − v
0)(T − v
1) = 0
>
H(G
4) := < S , T ;
( STS = TST
(S − u
0)(S − u
1)(S − u
2) = 0 >
HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :
G
2:
s
2
t
2
, G
4:
s
3
t 3
and a field of realisation Q
G(ring of integers Z
G) : Q
G2= Q and Q
G4= Q (ζ
3) .
The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :
H(G
2) := < S , T ;
STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u
0)(S − u
1) = 0 (T − v
0)(T − v
1) = 0
>
H(G
4) := < S , T ;
( STS = TST
(S − u
0)(S − u
1)(S − u
2) = 0 >
HECKE ALGEBRAS OF COMPLEX REFLECTION GROUPS Every complex reflection group G has a nice presentation “` a la Coxeter” :
G
2:
s
2
t
2
, G
4:
s
3
t 3
and a field of realisation Q
G(ring of integers Z
G) : Q
G2= Q and Q
G4= Q (ζ
3) .
The associated generic Hecke algebra is defined from such a presentation :
H(G
2) := < S , T ;
STSTST = TSTSTS (S − u
0)(S − u
1) = 0 (T − v
0)(T − v
1) = 0
>
(
1
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ].
2
It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :
if G =
s
d m
t
e
· · · ,
then for
(x
i|µ(QG)|= ζ
d−iu
i)
i=0,1,...,d−1, (y
j|µ(QG)|= ζ
e−jv
j)
j=0,1,...,e−1I
the algebra Q
G((x
i), (y
j), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,
I
through the specialisation x
i7→ 1 y
j7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q
G.
The above specialisation defines a bijection
Irr(G) −
∼→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ
H.
1
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ].
2
It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :
if G =
s
d m
t
e
· · · ,
then for
(x
i|µ(QG)|= ζ
d−iu
i)
i=0,1,...,d−1, (y
j|µ(QG)|= ζ
e−jv
j)
j=0,1,...,e−1I
the algebra Q
G((x
i), (y
j), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,
I
through the specialisation x
i7→ 1 y
j7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q
G.
The above specialisation defines a bijection
Irr(G) −
∼→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ
H.
1
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ].
2
It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :
if G =
s
d m
t
e
· · · ,
then for
(x
i|µ(QG)|= ζ
d−iu
i)
i=0,1,...,d−1, (y
j|µ(QG)|= ζ
e−jv
j)
j=0,1,...,e−1I
the algebra Q
G((x
i), (y
j), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,
I
through the specialisation x
i7→ 1 y
j7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q
G.
The above specialisation defines a bijection
Irr(G) −
∼→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ
H.
1
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ].
2
It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :
if G =
s
d m
t
e
· · · ,
then for
(x
i|µ(QG)|= ζ
d−iu
i)
i=0,1,...,d−1, (y
j|µ(QG)|= ζ
e−jv
j)
j=0,1,...,e−1I
the algebra Q
G((x
i), (y
j), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,
I
through the specialisation x
i7→ 1 y
j7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q
G.
The above specialisation defines a bijection
Irr(G) −
∼→ Irr(H(G )) , χ 7→ χ
H.
1
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is free of rank |G | over the corresponding Laurent polynomial ring Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ].
2
It becomes a split semisimple algebra over a field obtained by extracting suitable roots of the indeterminates :
if G =
s
d m
t
e
· · · ,
then for
(x
i|µ(QG)|= ζ
d−iu
i)
i=0,1,...,d−1, (y
j|µ(QG)|= ζ
e−jv
j)
j=0,1,...,e−1I
the algebra Q
G((x
i), (y
j), . . . ))H(G ) is split semisimple,
I
through the specialisation x
i7→ 1 y
j7→ 1, . . . , that algebra becomes the group algebra of G over Q
G.
The above specialisation defines a bijection
4
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ]
I
which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q
GG ,
I
and satisfies some other condition.
5
The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s
χ∈ Z
G[(x
i±1), (y
j±1), . . . ] defined by
t = X
χ∈Irr(G)
1 s
χχ
H.
4
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ]
I
which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q
GG ,
I
and satisfies some other condition.
5
The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s
χ∈ Z
G[(x
i±1), (y
j±1), . . . ] defined by
t = X
χ∈Irr(G)
1 s
χχ
H.
4
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ]
I
which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q
GG ,
I
and satisfies some other condition.
5
The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s
χ∈ Z
G[(x
i±1), (y
j±1), . . . ] defined by
t = X
χ∈Irr(G)
1 s
χχ
H.
4
The generic Hecke algebra H(G ) is endowed with a canonical symmetrizing form t : H(G ) → Z [(u
i±1), (v
j±1), . . . ]
I
which specialises to the canonical form of the group algebra Q
GG ,
I
and satisfies some other condition.
5
The Schur elements of the irreducible characters of G are the elements s
χ∈ Z
G[(x
i±1), (y
j±1), . . . ] defined by
t = X
χ∈Irr(G)
1
s
χχ
H.
Theorem (M. Chlouveraki) We have
s
χ(x) = ξ
χN
χY
i∈Iχ
Ψ
χ,i(M
χ,i)
nχ,iwhere
ξ
χ∈ Z
G, N
χis a degree zero monomial in Z
G[x, x
−1], (n
χ,i)
i∈Iχare integers,
(Ψ
χ,i)
i∈Iχis a family of K -cyclotomic polynomials,
(M
χ,i)
i∈Iχis a family of degree zero primitive monomials in Z
G[x, x
−1].
That factorisation is unique in K [x, x
−1] and the monomials (M
χ,i)
i∈Iχare
unique (up to inversion).
Schur elements of G
2( x
02= u
0, x
12= −u
1y
02= v
0, y
12= −v
1Elements of the orbit under S(x
0, x
1) × S(y
0, y
1) of
s
1:= Φ
2(x
0x
1−1)Φ
2(y
0y
1−1)Φ
3(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)Φ
6(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)) (corresponding to the four degree 1 irreducible characters)
s
2:= 2Φ
6(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)Φ
3(x
0y
1x
1−1y
0−1)
(corresponding to the two degree 2 irreducible characters)
Schur elements of G
2( x
02= u
0, x
12= −u
1y
02= v
0, y
12= −v
1Elements of the orbit under S(x
0, x
1) × S(y
0, y
1) of
s
1:= Φ
2(x
0x
1−1)Φ
2(y
0y
1−1)Φ
3(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)Φ
6(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)) (corresponding to the four degree 1 irreducible characters)
s
2:= 2Φ
6(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)Φ
3(x
0y
1x
1−1y
0−1)
(corresponding to the two degree 2 irreducible characters)
Schur elements of G
2( x
02= u
0, x
12= −u
1y
02= v
0, y
12= −v
1Elements of the orbit under S(x
0, x
1) × S(y
0, y
1) of
s
1:= Φ
2(x
0x
1−1)Φ
2(y
0y
1−1)Φ
3(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)Φ
6(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)) (corresponding to the four degree 1 irreducible characters)
s
2:= 2Φ
6(x
0y
0x
1−1y
1−1)Φ
3(x
0y
1x
1−1y
0−1)
(corresponding to the two degree 2 irreducible characters)
Schur elements of G
4:
x
06:= u
9,x
16:=
ζ3−1u
1,x
26:=
ζ3u
2Obtained by permutations of the parameters from 8
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> <
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> :
s
1=
Φ009(x0x1−1)Φ
018(x
0x
1−1)
Φ4(x0x1−1)Φ
012(x
0x
1−1) Φ
0012(x
0x
1−1) Φ
036(x
0x
1−1)
Φ09(x0x2−1)Φ
0018(x
0x
2−1)
Φ4(x0x2−1)Φ
012(x
0x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
0x
2−1) Φ
0036(x
0x
2−1)
Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)Φ
012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1)
(corresponding to the three characters of degree 1)
s
2=
−ζ32x
26x
1−6Φ09(x1x0−1)
Φ
0018(x
1x
0−1)
Φ009(x2x0−1)Φ
018(x
2x
0−1)
Φ4(x1x2−1)Φ
012(x
1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
1x
2−1) Φ
036(x
1x
2−1)
Φ4(x0−2x1x2)Φ
012(x
0−2x
1x
2) Φ
0012(x
0−2x
1x
2)
(corresponding to the three characters of degree 2)
s
3=
Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)Φ
012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1)
Φ4(x12x2−1x0−1)Φ
012(x
12x
2−1x
0−1) Φ
0012(x
12x
2−1x
0−1)
Φ4(x22x0−1x1−1)Φ
012(x
22x
0−1x
1−1) Φ
0012(x
22x
0−1x
1−1)
(corresponding to the unique character of degree 3)
Schur elements of G
4: x
06:= u
9,x
16:=
ζ3−1u
1,x
26:=
ζ3u
2Obtained by permutations of the parameters from 8
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> <
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> :
s
1=
Φ009(x0x1−1)Φ
018(x
0x
1−1)
Φ4(x0x1−1)Φ
012(x
0x
1−1) Φ
0012(x
0x
1−1) Φ
036(x
0x
1−1)
Φ09(x0x2−1)Φ
0018(x
0x
2−1)
Φ4(x0x2−1)Φ
012(x
0x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
0x
2−1) Φ
0036(x
0x
2−1)
Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)Φ
012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1)
(corresponding to the three characters of degree 1)
s
2=
−ζ32x
26x
1−6Φ09(x1x0−1)
Φ
0018(x
1x
0−1)
Φ009(x2x0−1)Φ
018(x
2x
0−1)
Φ4(x1x2−1)Φ
012(x
1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
1x
2−1) Φ
036(x
1x
2−1)
Φ4(x0−2x1x2)Φ
012(x
0−2x
1x
2) Φ
0012(x
0−2x
1x
2)
(corresponding to the three characters of degree 2)
s
3=
Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)Φ
012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1)
Φ4(x12x2−1x0−1)Φ
012(x
12x
2−1x
0−1) Φ
0012(x
12x
2−1x
0−1)
Φ4(x22x0−1x1−1)Φ
012(x
22x
0−1x
1−1) Φ
0012(x
22x
0−1x
1−1)
(corresponding to the unique character of degree 3)
Schur elements of G
4: x
06:= u
9,x
16:=
ζ3−1u
1,x
26:=
ζ3u
2Obtained by permutations of the parameters from 8
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> <
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
s
1=
Φ009(x0x1−1)Φ
018(x
0x
1−1)
Φ4(x0x1−1)Φ
012(x
0x
1−1) Φ
0012(x
0x
1−1) Φ
036(x
0x
1−1)
Φ09(x0x2−1)Φ
0018(x
0x
2−1)
Φ4(x0x2−1)Φ
012(x
0x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
0x
2−1) Φ
0036(x
0x
2−1)
Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)Φ
012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1)
(corresponding to the three characters of degree 1)
s
2=
−ζ32x
26x
1−6Φ09(x1x0−1)
Φ
0018(x
1x
0−1)
Φ009(x2x0−1)Φ
018(x
2x
0−1)
Φ4(x1x2−1)Φ
012(x
1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
1x
2−1) Φ
036(x
1x
2−1)
Φ4(x0−2x1x2)Φ
012(x
0−2x
1x
2) Φ
0012(x
0−2x
1x
2)
(corresponding to the three characters of degree 2)
s
3=
Φ4(x02x1−1x2−1)Φ
012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1) Φ
0012(x
02x
1−1x
2−1)
2 −1 −1 0 2 −1 −1 00 2 −1 −1
Cyclotomic algebras
Let ζ be a root of unity. A ζ–cyclotomic specialisation of the generic Hecke algebra is a morphism
ϕ : x
i7→ (ζ
−1q)
mi, y
j7→ (ζ
−1q)
nj, . . . (m
i, n
j∈ Z ) , which gives rise to a ζ–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H
ϕ(G ).
A 1–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for G
2=
s
2
t 2
:
< S , T ;
STSTST = TSTSTS (S − q
2)(S + 1) = 0 (T − q )(T + 1) = 0
>
Cyclotomic algebras
Let ζ be a root of unity. A ζ–cyclotomic specialisation of the generic Hecke algebra is a morphism
ϕ : x
i7→ (ζ
−1q)
mi, y
j7→ (ζ
−1q)
nj, . . . (m
i, n
j∈ Z ) , which gives rise to a ζ–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H
ϕ(G ).
A 1–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for G
2=
s
2
t 2
:
< S , T ;
STSTST = TSTSTS (S − q
2)(S + 1) = 0 (T − q)(T + 1) = 0
>
A ζ
3–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for B
2(3) =
s
d
t 2
:
< S , T ;
STST = TSTS
(S − 1)(S − q)(S − q
2) = 0 (T − q
3)(T + 1) = 0
>
Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups The unipotent characters in a given d –Harish–Chandra series
UnCh(G
F; (L, λ)) are described by a suitable ζ
d–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H
GF(L, λ)) for the corresponding d –cyclotomic Weyl group W
GF(L, λ)) :
UnCh(G
F; (L, λ)) ←→ Irr(H
GF(L, λ))) .
A ζ
3–cyclotomic Hecke algebra for B
2(3) =
s
d
t 2
:
< S , T ;
STST = TSTS
(S − 1)(S − q)(S − q
2) = 0 (T − q
3)(T + 1) = 0
>
Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups The unipotent characters in a given d –Harish–Chandra series
UnCh(G
F; (L, λ)) are described by a suitable ζ
d–cyclotomic Hecke algebra H
GF(L, λ)) for the corresponding d –cyclotomic Weyl group W
GF(L, λ)) :
UnCh(G
F; (L, λ)) ←→ Irr(H
GF(L, λ))) .
ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS
• The Rouquier ring R
G(q) is
R
G(q ) := Z
G[q, q
−1, ((q
n− 1)
−1)
n≥1] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.
• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H
ϕ(G ) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R
G(q)H
ϕ(G ).
Let (e
k), (e
k0)
k=1,2,...,|G|be a pair of dual basis of H
ϕ(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.
Then a Rouquier block b has the form
b = X
k
X
χ∈b
χ
Hϕ(e
k0) s
χϕ
e
kwhere X
χ∈b
χ
Hϕ(e
k0)
s
χϕ∈ R
G(q)
ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS
• The Rouquier ring R
G(q) is
R
G(q ) := Z
G[q, q
−1, ((q
n− 1)
−1)
n≥1] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.
• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H
ϕ(G ) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R
G(q)H
ϕ(G ).
Let (e
k), (e
k0)
k=1,2,...,|G|be a pair of dual basis of H
ϕ(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.
Then a Rouquier block b has the form
b = X
k
X
χ∈b
χ
Hϕ(e
k0) s
χϕ
e
kwhere X
χ∈b
χ
Hϕ(e
k0)
s
χϕ∈ R
G(q)
ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS
• The Rouquier ring R
G(q) is
R
G(q ) := Z
G[q, q
−1, ((q
n− 1)
−1)
n≥1] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.
• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H
ϕ(G) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R
G(q)H
ϕ(G ).
Let (e
k), (e
k0)
k=1,2,...,|G|be a pair of dual basis of H
ϕ(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.
Then a Rouquier block b has the form
b = X
k
X
χ∈b
χ
Hϕ(e
k0) s
χϕ
e
kwhere X
χ∈b
χ
Hϕ(e
k0)
s
χϕ∈ R
G(q)
ROUQUIER BLOCKS OF CYCLOTOMIC ALGEBRAS
• The Rouquier ring R
G(q) is
R
G(q ) := Z
G[q, q
−1, ((q
n− 1)
−1)
n≥1] . The Rouquier ring is a Dedekind domain.
• The Rouquier blocks of a cyclotomic algebra H
ϕ(G) are the blocks (primitive central idempotents) of the algebra R
G(q)H
ϕ(G ).
Let (e
k), (e
k0)
k=1,2,...,|G|be a pair of dual basis of H
ϕ(G ) relative to the canonical trace form t.
Then a Rouquier block b has the form
b = X
X χ
Hϕ(e
k0)
e where X χ
Hϕ(e
k0)
∈ R (q)
Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups
For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) = Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) .
Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition
UnCh(G
F) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F
on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) :
Irr(H(G
F, (L, λ))) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F ∩ Irr(H
GF(L, λ))
| {z }
Rouquier Block or∅
.
Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify
UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) = Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) .
Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition
UnCh(G
F) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F
on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) :
Irr(H(G
F, (L, λ))) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F ∩ Irr(H
GF(L, λ))
| {z }
Rouquier Block or∅
.
Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify
UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) = Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) . Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition
UnCh(G
F) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F
on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) :
Irr(H(G
F, (L, λ))) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F ∩ Irr(H
GF(L, λ))
| {z }
Rouquier Block or∅
.
Relevance to character theory of finite reductive groups For each integer d and each d –cuspidal pair (L, λ), let us identify
UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) = Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) . Then the trace of the Lusztig family partition
UnCh(G
F) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F
on the d –Harish–Chandra series UnCh(G
F, (L, λ)) is the partition into Rouquier blocks of Irr(H
GF(L, λ)) :
Irr(H(G
F, (L, λ))) =
•
[
F ∈Fam(GF)
F ∩ Irr(H
GF(L, λ))
| {z }
Rouquier Block or∅
.
Computation of Rouquier Blocks
p–Blocks and Bad primes
For p a prime ideal of Z
G, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )
p(resp. H
ϕ(G )
p) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H
ϕ(G )).
A bad prime for H
ϕ(G ) is a prime ideal of Z
Gwhich divides some Schur element s
χϕ.
A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.
Proposition
The Rouquier blocks of H
ϕ(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H
ϕ(G )
for p running over the set bad(H
ϕ(G )) of bad primes.
Computation of Rouquier Blocks p–Blocks and Bad primes
For p a prime ideal of Z
G, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )
p(resp. H
ϕ(G )
p) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H
ϕ(G )).
A bad prime for H
ϕ(G ) is a prime ideal of Z
Gwhich divides some Schur element s
χϕ.
A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.
Proposition
The Rouquier blocks of H
ϕ(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H
ϕ(G )
for p running over the set bad(H
ϕ(G )) of bad primes.
Computation of Rouquier Blocks
p–Blocks and Bad primes
For p a prime ideal of Z
G, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )
p(resp. H
ϕ(G )
p) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H
ϕ(G )).
A bad prime for H
ϕ(G ) is a prime ideal of Z
Gwhich divides some Schur element s
χϕ.
A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.
Proposition
The Rouquier blocks of H
ϕ(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H
ϕ(G )
for p running over the set bad(H
ϕ(G )) of bad primes.
Computation of Rouquier Blocks
p–Blocks and Bad primes
For p a prime ideal of Z
G, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )
p(resp. H
ϕ(G )
p) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H
ϕ(G )).
A bad prime for H
ϕ(G ) is a prime ideal of Z
Gwhich divides some Schur element s
χϕ.
A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.
Proposition
The Rouquier blocks of H
ϕ(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H
ϕ(G )
for p running over the set bad(H
ϕ(G )) of bad primes.
Computation of Rouquier Blocks
p–Blocks and Bad primes
For p a prime ideal of Z
G, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )
p(resp. H
ϕ(G )
p) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H
ϕ(G )).
A bad prime for H
ϕ(G ) is a prime ideal of Z
Gwhich divides some Schur element s
χϕ.
A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.
Proposition
The Rouquier blocks of H
ϕ(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H
ϕ(G )
for p running over the set bad(H
ϕ(G )) of bad primes.
Computation of Rouquier Blocks
p–Blocks and Bad primes
For p a prime ideal of Z
G, the blocks of the localised algebra H(G )
p(resp. H
ϕ(G )
p) are called p–blocks of H(G ) (resp. H
ϕ(G )).
A bad prime for H
ϕ(G ) is a prime ideal of Z
Gwhich divides some Schur element s
χϕ.
A prime p is bad if and only if there is at least one p–block which is nontrivial.
Proposition
The Rouquier blocks of H
ϕ(G ) are the union of the p–blocks of H
ϕ(G )
for p running over the set bad(H
ϕ(G )) of bad primes.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M. If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M. If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.
If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.
If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.
If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.
If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.
If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
p–Blocks and p–essential monomials
Definition Let M = Q
i
x
iaiy
jbj· · · be a monomial.
We say that M is p–essential if there exist a Q
G–cyclotomic polynomial Ψ and an irreducible character χ of G such that
1
Ψ(M ) divides s
χH,
2
p divides Ψ(1).
A character χ as above is then said to be p–singular at M.
If M is p–essential, the hyperplane H
Mdefined by Log(M ), i.e., P
i
a
iX
i+ P
j
b
jY
j+ · · · = 0 , is called a p–essential hyperplane.
Cyclotomic specialisation and p–singularity
Definition
Let ϕ be a cyclotomic specialisation of H(G ), defined by the family of integers (m
i), (n
j), . . . . Let M be a p–essential monomial.
We say that ϕ is p–singular at M (or at H
M) if ϕ(M ) = 1 ,
i.e., if the parameters of ϕ belong to the p–essential hyperplane H
M: X
i
a
im
i+ X
j
b
jn
j+ · · · = 0 .
Cyclotomic specialisation and p–singularity
Definition
Let ϕ be a cyclotomic specialisation of H(G ), defined by the family of integers (m
i), (n
j), . . . . Let M be a p–essential monomial.
We say that ϕ is p–singular at M (or at H
M) if ϕ(M ) = 1 ,
i.e., if the parameters of ϕ belong to the p–essential hyperplane H
M: X
i
a
im
i+ X
j