HAL Id: jpa-00208275
https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00208275
Submitted on 1 Jan 1975
HAL
is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire
HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.
Nanosecond isomers in 186W
H. Karwowski, S. Majewski, B. Pietrzyk, L. Wencel, J. Jastrzebski
To cite this version:
H. Karwowski, S. Majewski, B. Pietrzyk, L. Wencel, J. Jastrzebski. Nanosecond isomers in 186W.
Journal de Physique, 1975, 36 (6), pp.471-474. �10.1051/jphys:01975003606047100�. �jpa-00208275�
NANOSECOND ISOMERS IN 186W
H.
KARWOWSKI,
S. MAJEWSKI(*),
B. PIETRZYK(*),
L. WENCEL
(*)
and J.JASTRZEBSKI
Institute of Nuclear
Research, 015Awierk
near Warsaw, Poland(Reçu
le 28 novembre1974,
révisé le 30janvier
1975,accepté
le7 février 1975)
Résumé. 2014 Les niveaux du 186W alimentés par la
désintégration
du 186Ta et par la capture électro- nique du 186Re ont été étudiés. Les spectres simples et les coincidences retardées ont été mesurés. Les temps de vie des trois isomères dans 186W ont été déterminés :et la valeur limite supérieure de la vie moyenne du niveau à 1 463 keV,
T1/2 ~
0,1 ns, a été estimée. Lesénergies des états à deux
quasi-particules
ont été calculées et leur attribution aux niveaux observésexpérimentalement
est proposée.Abstract. 2014 The levels of 186W fed in the
03B2-decay
of 186Ta and ECdecay
of 186Re were inves- tigated. Thesingle
spectrum and the delayed coincidence spectra were measured. The half-lives ofthree isomers in 186W were determined :
and the upper limit of the 1463 keV level half-life
T1/2 ~
0.1 ns was estimated. Two-quasiparticleexcitations were calculated and their
assignment
toexperimentally
observed states is proposed.Classification
Physics Abstracts
4.220 - 4.240 - 4.470
1. Introduction. - Levels of the heaviest stable tungsten
isotope 186W
have beeninvestigated by
several authors since 1955. Monnand et al.
[1],
Pathaket al.
[2]
andGujrathi
and Mark[3]
measured energy levels of186W
in thefl-decay
of186Ta.
Coulombexcitation methods were used
by
de Boer et al.[4],
McGowan and Stelson
[5]
and Milner et al.[6].
Anextensive
study
of 186W andlighter tungsten
nucleiwere
performed by
Gunther et al.[7].
The life-time of the first excited 122.3 keV level in
186W
hasalready
been measuredby
differentmethods. The data obtained
by
electronic measu-rements
[8, 9, 10]
have the mean valueExperiments
based on the Môssbauer effect[11, 12]
gave
Tl,2
= 1.39 ± 0.12 ns and a nuclear recoilexperiment [13]
gave7B/2
= 1.30 ± 0.21 ns.An indication that the 952.4 keV level has a life- time of about 0.2 ns was
given by
Monnand et al.[1].
The aim of the present
investigation
was to deter-mine the exact values of the lifetimes of the 122.3 keV and 952.4 keV levels.
Furthermore,
the half-life ofthe 1 661 keV level was measured and an upper limit for the lifetime of the 1 463 keV level was estimated.
Single
gamma-ray spectra were also measured butonly slight
modifications to thedecay
schemeproposed
in reference
[3]
were introduced[14].
These modi- fications are notimportant
for the present work.Calculations of
two-quasiparticle
excitations in 186W and 184W wereperformed
and the calculated confi-gurations
wereassigned
to someexperimentally
observed states.
2.
Experimental procédure.
- The excited states of186W
can be reached inthe p decay
of 1116 Ta(T1/2
= 10.5min)
andby
ECfrom 186Re (Tl/2
= 90h).
Natural tungsten
samples
were irradiated with 14.5 MeV neutrons from a NE-246 type neutrongenerator (typical
flux 5 x 109n/s cm2)
and the1116 Ta
activity
was obtainedby
the(n, p)
reaction.For the measurements of the half-life of the first excited state
samples
of natural rhenium were acti- vatedduring
1 h in the flux of thermal neutrons of about1014 n/s cm2
in the EWA reactor at Swierk.(*) From the Institute of Expérimental Physics, Warsaw Uni-
versity, Polaud.
Article published online by EDP Sciences and available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/jphys:01975003606047100
472
The half-lives of the excited states were measured
using
the standardtime-to-pulse-height
convertertechnique,
NaI(Tl) crystals,
fastplastic
scintillators connected with XP 1021phototubes
and a truecoaxial 20
cm’ Ge(Li)
detector[15]
were used as timesignal
generators.3. Results. - Two
plastic
scintillators were used to determine the half-life of the 952.4 keV level(cf. Fig. 1).
Thedelayed
coincidence curve,analyzed using
the convolution method[16],
is shown infigure
2.The value
T1/2 (952.4 keV)
= 0.193 ± 0.015 ns was obtained. The lifetimes of the 396.5 keV and 737.5 keV levels do not influence the measured value sinceT1/2 (737.5 keV)
= 9 psand, although T,12 (396.5 keV)
= 40 ps, this level isweakly populated
in
the 186Ta decay.
Fie. l. - The simplified decay scheme of 186Ta (ref. [1, 3, 14]). The intensity limit of the 952.4 keV transition is taken from refe-
rence [14].
It was
proved
in an additionalexperiment
that theobserved isomer
in 186W corresponds
to the 952.4 keV level and not to the 1 463 keV one(cf. Fig. 1).
To avoidregistration
of the 198.0 keV and 214.9 keV transitions the energy windows in bothphotomultipliers
werechosen between 300 and 500 keV. The value
T1/2
= 0.200 ± 0.040 ns obtained in this measure-ment is in
good agreement
with theprevious
expe- riment.An
electron-gamma
quantum coincidence expe- riment wasperformed
to determine the half-life of the 1 661 keV level. The results of one of the measure- ments are shown infigure
3. The value of the half-life obtained is
Tij2 (1. 661 keV)
= 4.92 + 0.10 ns.FIG. 2. - The half-life of the 952.4 keV level. The dashed line indicates the normalized prompt curve. The full line indicates the fitted time distribution assuming the transition intensities shown
in figure 1.
FIG. 3. - The half-life of the 1661 keV level. The arrow indicates the beginning of the fitted area.
In these
experiments
the NE111-Ge(Li) assembly
allowed a
unique
determination of the isomeric level.On the basis of the
analysis
of thedelayed
coinci-dence curves the upper limit of the lifetime of 1463 keV level was estimated to be 0.1 ns.
The half-life of the 122.3 keV level was measured
by Xk-Xk
coincidence.X-rays accompanying
electroncapture and
X-rays produced
as a result of the conver-sion of the 122.3 keV transition were measured
by
two Pb loaded
plastic
scintillators PILOT B and the valueT,12 (122.3 keV) =
1.036 ± 0.010 ns was _obtained. This result is ingood
agreement with theprevious
electronic measurements and issubstantially
lower than the one obtained in the
experiments
basedon the Môssbauer effect.
4. Discussion. - 4.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.
- The
simplified decay
scheme of 186Ta based onreferences
[1, 3, 14]
is shown infigure
1. The1116 Ta ground
stateconfiguration
can be1/2 -(510), 7/2+(404)
with W = 3 - or
3/2-(512), 7/2 + (404)
with Kn = 5 - .Both
configurations
werepreviously proposed [1, 3]
and are consistent with the
experimental
data.The low
log ft
value ofthe f3
transitionleading
tothe 1661 keV level
(ah
or 1 utransition)
indicates that this level should bemainly
of atwo-quasiparticle
nature with one
particle
in the same orbital as in 186Taground
state.The 1 661 keV level
decays preferentially
to the1 463 keV state. The 198.0 keV transition has a retar- dation factor
FsP
= 2.1 x105, typical
for the oneparticle
El transition in deformed nuclei.Therefore, although
a twophonon interpretation
wasproposed
for the 1 463 keV level
[3],
atwo-quasiparticle
confi-guration
can also be considered. In this case one should find for this level aconfiguration
in whichonly
oneparticle
is in a différent orbital incomparison
withthe 1 661 keV state and for which the El transition is of the OSl
= 0,1
type. Thisconfiguration
shouldalso
explain
thedecay properties
of the 1 463 keV state,taking
into account the nature of the 952.4 keVand 1 045.0 keV levels.
4.2 THE 952.4 keV LEVEL. - The Kn = 2- characteristics of the 952.4 keV and 1 045.0 keV levels are now well established
[1, 3, 7].
For the analo-gous level at 1 290 keV excitation energy
in 182W
the maintwo-quasiparticle configuration contributing
to this
octupole
excitation was found to be[17]
pp,§’(514), 5/2 + (402).
Our numerical calculations for186W
indicate that thisconfiguration
is at 0.98 MeV.Also the two neutron
configuration 2/7 - (503), 11/2 + (615)
has low energy
(Ecale
= 1.1MeV)
and may contribute to this excitation.The
decay
characteristics of the 2-octupole
vibra-tional level were
investigated previously
in many nuclei in thisregion.
It has been shown[18-23]
that asignificant mixing
of E 1 + M 2 + E 3multipolarities
exists in the 2-
> 2g+
transition. A recentcompilation
of the transition
probabilities
from this statein 174 Yb, 176Hf, 180W and 182W
nuclei can be found in refe-rences
[18, 19].
In the case
of 186W
the energy difference of the 2-octupole
level and the2+
level is muchhigher
than inthe
previously
mentioned nuclei and the maindecay
of the 2- level
proceeds by
an El transition to the2+
state.
Assuming
puremultipolarity
thesingle particle
retardation factor for this transition is
equal
to1.0 x 104.
Although
as in other nuclei in thisregion
the2- ->
2+
830.0 keV transition isprobably
also anEl + M2 + E3
mixture,
noexperimental
data areavailable to evaluate the
mixing
ratios.Assuming by analogy
with 18 2B W[19]
that the El component takes about50 %
of this transitionintensity,
oneobtains the El retardation factor of 4 x
10’,
i.e.of the same order as in
176Hf (5
x10’), 180W (4
x10’)
andi82W (7
x10’).
4. 3 THE 1463 keV ANn 1661 keV LEVELS. - Direct
experimental
evidenceconcerning
thespin-parity
of the levels discussed is not decisive.
However,
basedon the
qualitative
considerations in section4.1,
thenature of the 952.4 keV leBtel and our
two-quasipar-
ticle state calculations
(cf. Fig. 4)
thefollowing
confi-gurations
for these levels can beproposed :
FIG. 4. - Calculated two-quasiparticle excitations. Calculation
procedure is described in references [17, 27]. Deformation parame- ters are taken from reference [28].
The 1 463 keV level is connected with the
2-,
952.4 keV state
by
the 511 keV transition. The expe-rimentally
determined[1]
conversion coefficients of this transitionindicate,
within the limit of errors(Monnand,
E. andMoussa, A., private
communi-cation),
El or E2multipolarity
and therefore do not contradict theproposed
values ofspin
andparity
of the 1 463 keV level.
For both
previously
mentionedconfigurations
ofthe 186Ta ground
state thefl-transition
to the 1 661 keVlevel is classified as 1 u, in agreement with the expe-
rimentally
determined[1] log ft equal
6.2.With the
configuration proposed
for the 1 661 keV and 1 463 keV levels the 198.0 keV transition would474
occur between
2 +(404)
and2 -(514)
orbitals. In theodd-A nuclei the retardation factor of the
analogous
E 1 transition
[24]
varies from 4 x 104 for181Ta
to 3 x 106 for 177Lu. The
preferential decay
of the1 463 keV level to the 2- state is
explained
as E2transition between
2 + (411 )
and2 + (402)
orbitals.The 1n’ = 5 - state of nn
2 - (510), 2 + (615)
confi-guration
wasrecently
identified in184w (cf.
ref.[25, 26])
at the energy of 1 285 keV(Ecale
= 1.3MeV).
The calculated energy of this state in
186W
isequal
to 1.1 MeV. The
feeding
of such a level from the 1 661 keV and 1 463 keV states is not observed[1, 3, 4].
This fact can be
easily explained
within theproposed
configurations
because transitions to this 5 - state wouldrequire
achange
of twoparticles.
It should be mentioned that no other
configurations
for the considered levels were found which could
explain
all of theexperimental
data discussed above.We would like to thank Mr A. Sulik for
running
the neutron generator for many
hours,
to DoctorsJ. Blocki and W. Kurcewicz who
put
to ourdisposal
their
two-quasiparticle
calculation code and to Mr W.Szymczyk
for hishelp
in someexperiments.
We are
greatly
indebted to Prof. J. Zakrzewskifor his kind interest in the progress of the present work.
References
[1] MONNAND, E., BLACHOT, J. and MOUSSA, A., Nucl. Phys.
A 134 (1969) 321.
[2] PATHAK, B. P., MURTY, K. S. N., MUKHERJEE, S. K. and GUJRATHI, S. C., Phys. Rev. C 1 (1970) 1477.
[3] GUJRATHI, S. C. and MARK, S. K., Can. J. Phys. 51 (1973) 241.
[4] DE BOER, J., GOLDRING, G. and WINKLER, H., Phys. Rev. 134 (1964) B 1032.
[5] MC GOWAN, F. K. and STELSON, P. H., Phys. Rev. 122 (1961)
1274.
[6] MILNER, W. T., MC GOWAN, F. K., ROBINSON, R. L., STELSON,
P. H. and SAYER, R. O., Nucl. Phys. A 177 (1971) 1.
[7] GUNTHER, C., KLEINHEINZ, P., CASTEN, R. F. and ELBEK, B., Nucl. Phys. A 172 (1971) 273.
[8] KURFESS, J. D. and SCHARENBERG, R. P., Phys. Rev. 161 (1967) 1185.
[9] GOLDRING, G. and VAGER, Z., Phys. Rev. 127 (1962) 929.
[10] BIRK, M., BLAUGRUND, A. E., GOLDRING, G., SKURNIK, E. Z.
and SOKOLOWSKI, J. S., Phys. Rev. 126 (1962) 726.
[11] OBERLEY, L. W., HERSHKOWITZ, N., WENDER, S. A. and CARPENTER, A. B., Phys. Rev. C 3 (1971) 1585.
[12] MEKSHES, M. W. and HERSHKOWITZ, N., Phys. Rev. C 2 (1970)
289.
[13] ASHERY, D., BAHCALL, N., GOLDRING, G., SPRINZAK, A. and WOLFSON, Y., Nucl. Phys. A 101 (1967) 51.
[14] KARWOWSKI, H., MAJEWSKI, S., PIETRZYK, B., WENCEL, L.
and JASTRZEBSKI, J., INR Report, to be publ.
[15] SZYMCZYK, W. and KARWOWSKI, H., INR Report 1446/IA/PL,
1973.
[16] KACZAROWSKI, R. and PIETRZYK, B., INR Report 1422/IA/PL,
1972.
[17] GALLAGHER, C. J. and SOLOVIEV, V. G., Kgl. Dan. Vid. Sels. ; Mat.-Fys. Skr. 2, N° 2 (1962).
[18] SCHMIDT, A. G., MICHELICH, J. W., FUNK, E. G., MADDEN,
M. S. and RIEDINGER, L. L., Proc. Int. Conf. on Nucl. Phys.
München 1973 p.301.
[19] SCHMIDT, A. G., MICHELICH, J. W. and FUNK, E. G., to be
published, in Nucl. Phys.
[20] LOBNER, K. E. G., SMITH, H. A. and BUNKER, M. E., Nucl.
Phys. A 179 (1972) 276.
[21] KONDN, J., GOUDSMIT, P. F. A., KOLDEWIJN, P. and MEYER, B. J., Proc. Int. Conf. on Nucl. Phys. Munchen 1973 p. 302.
[22] KONIJN, J., MEIJER, B. J. and VAN MIDDELKOOP, G., Phys.
Lett. 35B (1971) 567.
[23] KRANE, K. S., SITES, R. and STEYERT, W. A., Phys. Rev. C 5 (1972) 1104.
[24] LOBNER, K. E. G. and MALMSKOG, S. G., Nucl. Phys. 80 (1966)
505.
[25] YATES, S. W., DALY, P. J., JOHNSON, N. R. and ARAS, N. K., Nucl. Phys. A 204 (1973) 33.
[26] KLEINHEINZ, P., DALY, P. J. and CASTEN, R. F., Nucl. Phys.
A 208 (1973) 93.
[27] NATHAN, O. and NILSSON, S. G., in Alpha-, beta- and gamma- ray spectroscopy edited by K. Siegbahn (North Holland, Amsterdam) 1965.
[28] GABRAKOV, S., KANIOWSKA, T., ZIELINSKA-PFABÉ, M., Acta.
Phys. Pol. B 5 (1974) 295.