• Aucun résultat trouvé

Growth and aggregation regulate clusters structural properties and gel time

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Growth and aggregation regulate clusters structural properties and gel time"

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

S1

Growth and Aggregation Regulate Clusters Structural Properties and Gel Time

Electronic Supplementary Information

Stefano Lazzari1*, Marco Lattuada2*

1Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77, Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA

2Université de Fribourg, Adolphe Merkle Institute, Chemin des Verdiers 4, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland

Corresponding authors

(2)

S2

Calculation of the hydrodynamic radius of a cluster made of interpenetrating particles having different sizes

In the following, we will use Kirkwood-Riseman (KR) theory extended to the case of clusters with partially-overlapping primary particles having different size.

We will begin by considering the general formalism of KR theory. For colloidal particles, the interactions with the surrounding fluid can be described in the framework of Stokes equations, according to which is the linear relationship between the hydrodynamic force experience by a particle and its relative velocity. The KR approach consists in writing that for each particle in a cluster the hydrodynamic force equals:

Fi= 6πηRP,i

(

ui− vi

)

(1)

where Fi is the force acting on the ith particle, ui is the ith particle velocity and vi is the fluid velocity at the center of the ith particle. The fluid velocity is written as a combination of the unperturbed fluid velocity and of the perturbations due to all other particles in the cluster. Assuming that there the unperturbed velocity of the fluid is zero, one can write:

vi= vi'= Tij⋅Fj

j=1≠ì N

(2)

In Equation(2), the tensor Tij provides the relationship between the force acting on particle j and the corresponding velocity perturbation caused by it at the center of particle i 1. By combining the two previous equations, we obtain the following result:

Fi = 6πηRP,i uiTij⋅Fj j=1≠ì N

⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ (3)

(3)

S3

By taking the angular average of Equation (3) (which amounts to considering the cluster as an isotropic object), and by summing over the total number of particles N in a cluster, we can obtain the following expression for the total hydrodynamic force acting on it:

FT = Fi i=1 N

= 6πηRP,i uiTij ⋅Fj j=1≠ì N

⎛ ⎝⎜ ⎞ ⎠⎟ ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥ ⎥ i=1 N

= 6πηRP,iu− 1 N 6πηRP,i Tij j=1≠ì N

i=1 N

FT i=1 N

(4)

The latter equation can be rearranged as follows:

FT = 6πη RP,i i=1 N

1+ 1 N 6πηRP,i Tij j=1≠ì N

i=1 N

u (5)

This leads to the following expression for the hydrodynamic radius of a cluster:

RH = RP,i i=1 N

1+ 1 N 6πηRP,i Tij j=1≠ì N

i=1 N

(6)

The only open question about the above equation, is the necessity to use a suitable expression for the tensor Tij, valid for partially overlapping spheres with different sizes. This requires an extension of

Rotne-Prager-Yamakawa tensor, valid for equal size particles 2. Such an expression has been developed by Zuk et al.3:

(4)

S4 Tij= 1 8πηRij 1+ Rp,i2+ R p, j 2 3Rij2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ I + 1− Rp,i 2+ R p, j 2 Rij2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟RRiRj ij 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ for Rij ≥ Rp.i+ Rp, j 1 6πηRp,iRp, j 16Rij3 R p,i+ Rp, j

(

)

− R

(

p,i− Rp, j

)

2+ 3Rij2 ⎝ ⎞⎠ 2 32Rij3 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟⎟I + 3 R

(

p,i− Rp, j

)

2 − Rij2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎞⎠ 2 32Rij3 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟⎟ RiRj Rij2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜ ⎜⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟ ⎟⎟ for Rp,>− Rp,<≤ Rij≤ Rp,i+ Rp, j 1 6πηRp,> I for Rij≤ Rp,>− Rp,< ⎧ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ (7)

By performing the orientation average, we obtain the following final result:

Tij = 1 6πηRij I for Rij ≥ Rp.i+ Rp, j 1 6πηRp,iRp, j Rp,i+ Rp, j

(

)

2 − Rij 4 − Rp,i− Rp, j

(

)

2 4Rij ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ ⎟I for Rp,>− Rp,<≤ Rij ≤ Rp,i+ Rp, j 1 6πηRp,> I for Rij≤ Rp,>− Rp,< ⎧ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ (8)

When Equation (8) is substituted in Equation (6), we obtain the general expression used for the calculation of the hydrodynamic radius of the clusters generated by the Monte Carlo code developed in this work.

(5)

S5 Convergence on NMAX

Figure S1 dm vs

τ

N in DLCA at φ0= 1% and gR=1.00% for different values of iMAX. Color code: violet iMAX =1000; blue iMAX =2000; green iMAX =3000; yellow iMAX =4000; red iMAX =5000.

As iMAX =4000 and iMAX =5000 are superimposed, iMAX =5000 has been selected as the upper boundary of cluster mass to be considered for the calculation of dm

(6)

S6 DLCA case – kinetic information

i) φ against

τ

N

Figure S2 φ vs

τ

N in DLCA at different φ0 and gR. Color code: violet gR =0.00%; blue gR =0.25% ; green gR=0.50%; yellow gR=0.75%; red gR=1.00%

(7)

S7 ii) NAVE against

τ

N

Figure S3 NAVE vs

τ

N in DLCA at different φ0 and gR. Color code: violet gR =0.00%; blue

0.25%

R

(8)

S8 iii) φP against

τ

N

Figure S4

φ

P vs

τ

N in DLCA at different φ0 and gR. Color code: violet gR =0.00%; blue

0.25%

R

(9)

S9 RLCA case – kinetic information

i) φ against

τ

N

Figure S5 φ vs

τ

N in RLCA with pS =0.1 at different φ0 and gR. Color code: violet gR=0.00%; blue gR =0.25%; green gR =0.50%; yellow gR =0.75%; red gR =1.00%

(10)

S10 ii) NAVE against

τ

N

Figure S6 NAVE vs

τ

N in RLCA with pS =0.1 at different φ0 and gR. Color code: violet gR=0.00%; blue gR =0.25%; green gR =0.50%; yellow gR =0.75%; red gR =1.00%

(11)

S11 iii) φP against

τ

N

Figure S7

φ

P vs

τ

N in RLCA at different φ0 and gR. Color code: violet gR =0.00%; blue

0.25%

R

(12)

S12 References

1. Lattuada, M.; Wu, H.; Morbidelli, M. Hydrodynamic radius of fractal clusters. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2003, 268 (1), 96-105.

2. Lazzari, S.; Jaquet, B.; Colonna, L.; Storti, G.; Lattuada, M.; Morbidelli, M. Interplay between Aggregation and Coalescence of Polymeric Particles: Experimental and Modeling Insights. Langmuir 2015, 31 (34), 9296-9305.

3. Zuk, P. J.; Wajnryb, E.; Mizerski, K. A.; Szymczak, P. Rotne-Prager-Yamakawa approximation for different-sized particles in application to macromolecular bead models. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2014, 741.

Figure

Figure S1   d m  vs  τ N  in DLCA at  φ 0 = 1%  and  g R = 1.00%  for different values of  i MAX
Figure S2  φ  vs  τ N  in DLCA at different  φ 0  and  g R . Color code: violet  g R = 0.00% ; blue  g R = 0.25%
Figure  S3  N AVE   vs  τ N   in  DLCA  at  different  φ 0   and  g R .  Color  code:  violet  g R = 0.00% ;  blue  0.25%
Figure  S4  φ P   vs  τ N   in  DLCA  at  different  φ 0   and  g R .  Color  code:  violet  g R = 0.00% ;  blue  0.25%
+4

Références

Documents relatifs

Thus, the future development of the financial sector’s three main activities (private banking, investment funds, and financial engineering) will depend very much on the

specific heat contains contributions not only from the strongly coupled levels which are observed in phonon scattering experiments but also from more weakly coupled levels..

The interest in introducing the 0-(p approach in turbulence modelling is that (S) may be considered as a stabilization of the k-e model in the sense that we can state some

Okita: Optimal decay rate for strong solutions in critical spaces to the compressible Navier- Stokes equations, Journal of Differential Equations, 257, 3850–3867 (2014).

Takada, Global well-posedness and ill-posedness for the Navier-Stokes equations with the Coriolis force in function spaces of Besov type. Takada, Dispersive effects of the

But the “isomorphism” hypothesis introduced by Gestalt psychology actually provides Koffka with a very easy and interesting answer to this objection: according to

By measuring the scattered intensities it is possi- ble to obtain information on different properties; on the one hand, the time averaged intensity as a function of the scattering

Gaëlle Gueritaine, Patrick Favre, Bruno Andrieu, Rachid Boumaza, Sabine Demotes-Mainard, Christian Fournier, Gilles Galopin, Lydie Huche-Thelier,.. Philippe Morel-Chevillet,