• Aucun résultat trouvé

Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields

Olivier DEBARRE

(joint with Antonio LAFACE and Xavier ROULLEAU)

Ecole normale sup´´ erieure, Paris, France

Moscow, HSE, September 2015

(2)

Theorem (Chevalley–Warning)

Any subscheme ofPmFq defined by equations of degrees d1, . . . ,ds with d1+· · ·+ds ≤m has anFq-point.

→any cubicFq-hypersurface of dimension ≥2 contains an Fq-point.

What about Fq-lines?

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 2 of 22

(3)

The scheme F (X )

X ⊂Pn+1k cubic of dimension n.

F(X)⊂Gr(1,Pn+1k ) projective scheme of lines contained in X.

F(X) connected ifn ≥3.

Sing(X) finite =⇒ F(X) lci of dimension 2n−4 and ωF(X) =OF(X)(4−n).

X smooth =⇒ F(X) smooth.

(4)

High dimensions

Theorem

AnyFq-cubic of dimension≥5 contains anFq-line.

Proof. Let x∈X(Fq). The scheme of lines through x contained in X is the intersection inPn of hyperplane, a quadric, and a cubic

→Chevalley–Warning when n≥6.

WhenX is smooth,F(X) is Fano whenn ≥5

→Esnault, and Fakhruddin–Rajan to extend to all X. We now look at cubic surfaces, threefolds, and fourfolds.

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 4 of 22

(5)

Cubic surfaces

The diagonal cubic surface

x13+x23+x33+ax43 = 0 contains noFq-lines when a∈Fq is not a cube.

aexists wheneverq ≡1 (mod 3)

There are smooth cubicFq-surfaces with no Fq-lines forq arbitrarily large.

(6)

The Galkin–Shinder “beautiful formula”

X ⊂Pn+1F

q Fq-cubic F(X)⊂Gr(1,Pn+1F

q ) scheme of lines contained in X Nr(X) := Card(X(Fqr))

Nr(F(X)) = Nr(X)2−2(1 +qnr)Nr(X) +N2r(X) 2q2r

+q(n−2)rNr(Sing(X)).

This formula comes from a relation between the classes ofX and F(X) in the Grothendieck ring of varieties.

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 6 of 22

(7)

Y smooth projective scheme defined over Fq

Pi(Y,T) := det(Id−TF,Hi(Y,Q`)) =:

bi(Y)

Y

j=1

(1−Tωij)∈Z[T] where|ωij|=qi/2. The trace formula (n:= dim(Y))

Nr(Y) = X

0≤i≤2n

(−1)iTr(F∗r,Hi(Y,Q`)) = X

0≤i≤2n

(−1)i

bi(Y)

X

j=1

ωrij

implies, for the zeta function, Z(Y,T) := expX

r≥1

Nr(Y)Tr r

= Y

0≤i≤2n

Pi(Y,T)(−1)i+1.

(8)

Zeta function of F (X )

X ⊂P4F

q smooth cubic.The trace formula reads Z(X,T) =

Q

1≤j≤10(1−qωjT)

(1−T)(1−qT)(1−q2T)(1−q3T), withωj algebraic integers and |ωj|=q1/2.

The Galkin–Shinder formula implies Z(F(X),T) =

Q

1≤j≤10(1−ωjT)Q

1≤j≤10(1−qωjT) (1−T)(1−q2T)Q

1≤j<k≤10(1−ωjωkT)

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 8 of 22

(9)

Cohomology of F (X )

This formula gives the Betti numbers ofF(X). Actually, the full Galkin–Shinder relation gives isomorphisms of Gal(Fq/Fq)-modules

H3(X,Q`) //H1(F(X),Q`(1))

V2

H1(F(X),Q`) //H2(F(X),Q`) V2

H1(A(F(X)),Q`) //

OO

H2(A(F(X)),Q`)

OO

The first one can also be obtained using the incidence correspondence.

The second one can also be deduced by smooth and proper base change from the statement in char. 0.

(10)

Existence of lines

Theorem

Any smoothFq-cubic threefold contains at least 10Fq-lines if q≥11.

Proof. Write the Frobenius eigenvalues asω1, . . . , ω5, ω1, . . . , ω5. Setrj :=ωjj ∈[−2√

q,2√

q]. Use the trace formula N1(F(X)) = 1− X

1≤j≤5

rj − X

1≤j≤5

qrj +q2

+ 5q+ X

1≤j<k≤5

jωkjωkjωkjωk)

= 1 + 5q+q2−(q+ 1) X

1≤j≤5

rj + X

1≤j<k≤5

rjrk and study the minimum of this real function...

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 10 of 22

(11)

Examples

We found smooth cubic threefolds overF2,F3,F4, andF5 with no lines.

The cubic threefold inP4F

5 with equation

x13+ 2x23+x22x3+ 3x1x32+x12x4+x1x2x4+x1x3x4

+ 3x2x3x4+ 4x32x4+x2x42+ 4x3x42+ 3x22x5+x1x3x5 + 3x2x3x5+ 3x1x4x5+ 3x42x5+x2x52+ 3x53 is smooth and contains noF5-lines and 126F5-points.

RemainsF7,F8, andF9...

(12)

Average numbers of lines

Average numbers of lines computed on random samples of 105 F2-cubic threefolds

all cubics; average∼9.651 smooth cubics; average∼6.963.

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 12 of 22

(13)

Singular threefolds

LetX ⊂P4Fq Fq-cubic with a single singular point, of typeA1 or A2.

The curveC of lines in X through the singular point is smooth of genus 4 and canonically embedded inP3F

q. It has two pencilsg31 andh13, used to embedC in C(2) by

x7→g31−x

Clemens–Griffiths, Kouvidakis–van der Geer

F(X) is the non-normal surface obtained by gluing in C(2) these two copies ofC.

(14)

Lines on singular threefolds

Theorem

For any r≥1, set nr := Card(C(Fqr)). We have

Card(F(X)(Fq)) =













1

2(n12+n2)−n1 if g31 6=h31 are defined overFq;

1

2(n12+n2) +n1 if g31 6=h31 are not defined overFq;

1

2(n12+n2) if g31 =h31.

Again, this can also be obtained with the Galkin–Shinder method.

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 14 of 22

(15)

Lines on singular threefolds

Corollary

When q≥4, any cubic threefold X ⊂P4F

q defined over Fq with a single singular point, of type A1 or A2, contains an Fq-line.

Proof. We need to exclude

n1=n2 = 1 andg316=h13 defined overFq. Write C(Fq) =C(Fq2) ={x}, andg31≡x+x0+x00.

g31 is defined over Fq ⇒ x0+x00 defined overFq

⇒ x0,x00 are defined over Fq2

⇒ x0 =x00=x

⇒ g31≡3x≡h13 Contradiction.

(16)

Lines on singular threefolds

n1=n2 = 0. Thenq≤7 (Howe–Lauter–Top).

Weil conjectures forC:

Frobenius rootsω1, . . . , ω4,ω¯1, . . . ,ω¯4, withj|= q;

H monic with (real) rootsrj:=ωj+ ¯ωj with|rj| ≤2 q has integral coefficients;

P

1≤j≤4rj =P

1≤j≤8ωj =q+ 1n1=q+ 1;

P

1≤j≤4rj2=P

1≤j≤8j2+2q) =q2+8q+1−n2=q2+8q+1.

Hence

H(T) =T4−(q+ 1)T3−3qT2+aT+b, with |b|=|r1r2r3r4| ≤16q2 and|a|=|P4

j=1b/rj| ≤32q3/2 integral.

Computer search: such polynomials with 4 such real roots and q ∈ {2,3,4,5,7}only exist for q ≤3.

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 16 of 22

(17)

Examples

We found nodal cubics threefolds overF2 and F3 with no lines.

OverF2:

x23+x22x3+x33+x1x2x4+x32x4+x43+x12x5+x1x3x5+x2x4x5 contains noF2-lines and

H(T) =T4−3T3−6T2+ 24T −15.

OverF3:

2x13+ 2x12x2+x1x22+ 2x2x32+ 2x1x2x4+x2x3x4

+x1x42+ 2x43+x2x3x5+ 2x32x5+x2x52+x53 contains noF3-lines and

H(T) =T4−4T3−9T2+ 47T −32.

(18)

Zeta function of F (X )

X ⊂P5F

q smooth cubic.The trace formula reads

Z(X,T) = 1

(1−T)(1−qT)(1−q3T)(1−q4T)Q23

j=1(1−qωjT),

withωj algebraic integers,|ωj|=q, andω23=q.

The Galkin–Shinder formula implies Z(F(X),T) = (1−T)(1−q4T)Q 1

j((1−ωjT)(1−q2ωjT))Q

j≤k(1−ωjωkT).

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 18 of 22

(19)

Cohomology of F (X )

Again, the Galkin–Shinder relation implies that there are isomorphisms of Gal(Fq/Fq)-modules

H4(X,Q`) //H2(F(X),Q`(1))

Sym2H2(F(X),Q`) //H4(F(X),Q`) The first also follows using the incidence correspondence.

The second one can also be deduced by smooth and proper base change from statement in char. 0 (Beauville–Donagi, Bogomolov).

(20)

Existence of lines

Theorem

Any smoothFq-cubic fourfold contains at least 26Fq-lines if q≥5.

One can use another trace formula (Katz). If Sing(X) finite, the cohomology ofOF(X) is very simple (Altman–Kleiman):

dimFqHj(F(X),OF(X)) = 1

forj ∈ {0,2,4}, the others are 0, and the multiplication H2(F(X),OF(X))⊗H2(F(X),OF(X))→H4(F(X),OF(X)) is an isomorphism of Galois modules (Serre duality).

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 20 of 22

(21)

The Katz trace formula

N1(F(X)) ≡

4

X

j=0

(−1)jTr(F,Hj(F(X),OF(X))) (mod p)

≡ 1 +t+t2 (modp) Corollary

Assume q≡2 (mod 3). AnyFq-cubic fourfold with finite singular set contains anFq-line.

This applies toq = 2 and leaves only the casesq ∈ {3,4} open for the existence of a line on a smooth cubic fourfold.

(22)

Final question

The computer found a smooth cubic fourfold overF2 with a single line.

Question

We found no cubic fourfolds without lines. Do they exist?

Olivier DEBARRE Cubic hypersurfaces over finite fields 22 of 22

Références

Documents relatifs

[r]

We consider approximation problems for tensor product and additive random fields based on standard information in the average case setting.. We also study the probabilistic setting

As is known from work of Alladi [All87] and Hildebrand [Hil87], the number ω(n) of prime factors of n ∈ S(x, y) typically tends to grow with n, in such a way that we may expect the

Also, Lehmer [11] and Lazarus [10] have shown that the minimal polynomials for so-called cubic Gaussian periods, when composed with some x − a for a an integer, will equal one of

Specific rational examples are known, but people seem to believe that most smooth complex cubic hypersurfaces of dimensions ≥ 4 should be irrational, although no single example

POULIN, « L’exploitation de l’énergie des mouvements humains », Colloque Energie portable : autonomie et intégration dans l’environnement humain (Journées Electrotechniques

level s by the random walk with deterministic transition probability at u,. The above argument can be applied to other vertices of level lone

In this paper, we use results on the average number of minimal transversals in random hypergraphs to show that the base of proper premises is, on average, of quasi-polynomial