New evidence for prelexical phonological processing in word recognition

य़JT IZQPUIFTJT IBT CFFO QVU UP UIF UFTU CZ UFBDIJOH EJ੖FSFOU QIPOPMPHJDBM QB॒FSOT UP MFBSOFST UP TFF JG DFSUBJO QB॒FSOT BSF MFBSOU CF॒FS PS NPSF RVJDLMZ UIBO PUIFST 'PS FYBNQMF

The fact that the subject does not know in advance whether the prime is a word or a pseudoword (half of the previews presented to the subjects are correct words) implies that the

When further tested for visual word recognition, CI users applied the same basic reading procedure as TH children, i.e., they read pseudowords through phonological decoding

Repp, Healy, & Crowder (1990) use an ad hoc stimulus set to examine the neutralization hypothesis formulated by Cowan & Morse (1986) and according to which

Our initial hypothesis being that the perception of the [i]-[e] contrast is not mainly based on F1 or F2, but on F2', we have examined the extent of the phenomenon of asymmetry

Although in a reanalysis of Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1996)’s data, Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1999) also showed that biases were reduced but not eliminated by the use of

Hence, it becomes an important research objective within this perspective to identify which words are activated during the recognition process — even if only temporarily or

The presence or absence of foils and the use of different blocking conditions (by vowel and by pivotal consonant) did not allow us to replicate the syllable effect obtained