• Aucun résultat trouvé

Experimental modal analysis and finite element model updating for structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete radioactive waste packages

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Experimental modal analysis and finite element model updating for structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete radioactive waste packages"

Copied!
32
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01823459

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01823459

Submitted on 26 Jun 2018

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

Experimental modal analysis and finite element model updating for structural health monitoring of reinforced

concrete radioactive waste packages

Jesús Eiras, Cedric Payan, Sandrine Rakotonarivo, Vincent Garnier

To cite this version:

Jesús Eiras, Cedric Payan, Sandrine Rakotonarivo, Vincent Garnier. Experimental modal analy- sis and finite element model updating for structural health monitoring of reinforced concrete ra- dioactive waste packages. Construction and Building Materials, Elsevier, 2018, 180, pp.531-543.

�10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.004�. �hal-01823459�

(2)

1

g

2

package

3 4 J

. 5

6 7 8 9 10 11

. 12

13

. 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 , 31 . 32

*Revised Manuscript

Click here to view linked References

(3)

1 33 34

g — : “ ”—

35 36

. 37

38

. 39

40

, 41

42

, 43

44 . 45 46 47 48

1.

n .

49

(4)

50 51 52

100 65

53

. ,

54 55

– . 56

57 58 59

. Previous 60

, 61

9 62

63

. 64

65 66

0 67

. 68

69 70 71

, 72

73 74 75

1 2 .

76 77 78 79 80

(5)

3 81

82 . 83

4 84

85

15– 7 . 86

87 . 88

n 89

, is used ,

90 91 8 . 92

, 93

18 . 94

95 96 97

u ng . n

98 99

, 100

19 0 . 101

102 103 104 105

1 2 , 3 , 24 ,

106

25 , 25 27 1 , 8 29 29 , 0 .

107

, 108

109 .

. 110

(6)

. 112

113

. 114

115

19 1 , 32

116

7 6 28 3 4 5

117 118

. ,

119 120

on 121

122 .

. 123

124 125 126 127 128

, ’

129 130 131 132 133 134

. 135

136 137 138

3 139

140 n 4 141 142

(7)

143 144 145

2 146 147 2.1 148 149

. , ,

150

2b 151

2b 152

153 1.5

1 154

2.

1. d

155

. 156

360 kg 662 kg

package 3831 kg

8417 kg

(8)

157 158 .

. 159

. 160

161 162 163 3 164 165 166 167 2

. 168

3.

169 170 on

. 171

dynamic modulus and Poisson’

172

14 36 . d

173

longitudinal frequency mode, and Poisson’s 174

c

(9)

, 14.

175 176

, 177

178

2 179

d .

180

2.

181

, Poisson’s ratio,ν ρ(kg/m3

39 0.18 2320

182 183 2.2 184 185

. 186

187 188 189 on

. 190

191 192 2

. 4

193 194 d

. 195

196 7 .

p p(ω)

197

, 1

198

(10)

p(ω) p(ω) 199

200 .

p, 201

1ω , 2 ω , …, 80 ω , , ω , o

202

o .

203

37 38 1

204 205 38 206 207

1 208

37 39 . 209

1000 210

211

4.

. 3

212

5 213

214

(11)

215 216 20

5 217

218 219

5 6

220 221 20 222 223 224 225 226 227

5.

20 and

228

(12)

6

. *

4 229

7 7b

230

, 7

231

7 . spring ,

232 233

(13)

. 234

235 ,

. 236

spring ,

237 238 239 240

ρ 2320 3 . 241

242

. 243

7 244

245 2

246

, 247

248 249 250 251

0 1

252 253

2 . 1 2

254

— 255

3 2 —

256 257 258 .

3831 kg 2

259

, 260

261

, 262

263

(14)

265 266

267 n

ϕn 7

268 269

2, 270

271

. 272

, 26, 27 273

274 . 275

, 276

, 2

277

ϕ ϕn

278

n 279

n v

280

. 8 20

281

shown in Figure 6 282

shown in Figure 283

284 285

. ,

286

, 16

287

8 288

289 290 291

. 292

(15)

7.

c

(16)

8.

,

293 5 294 295 296 297 , 298

, the Poisson’s ratio 299

ν, ,

300

, 301

302

, 3

303

304 305

n 306

(17)

307 4

308 , 309 310

on 311

. 312

313 314

7 315

316 7 . ob 317 318

4 . 319

320 5 321

. 322

323

, 5

324

, , , 325

. 326

1 5

327

1 6

328

indicative values obtained for the elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the concrete (those 329

, , 330

331

(18)

332 333

4 334

5 335

336 337 338

genetic algorithms mimic “natural selection” to 339

340 341 342

on 343

by on

344 345 346 347 348 . 349 350 351 352 6 .

1.

353 354

104 355

356 357 358

3 1 9

359 360 361

(19)

3.

362

1 40 35 30

2 Poisson’s ratio 0.300 0.225 0.150

3 2 10.00 5.05 0.10

4 2 10.00 5.05 0.10

5 1000 500 0

6 2 10.00 5.05 0.10

363

9. .

364 365

10 0

366

, ,

367

. 368

10 369

0 0 .

370

ions of Poisson’s ratio 0 , 371

0 0

372 373

(20)

. 375

376 .

f’

377

10. 3

r loaded and unloaded FEM. a) Elastic modulus, b) Poisson’s ratio, c) , , , .

4 .

378 379 380

ν 381

c

(21)

382 383 384 385 386

. 1

387 388 1b

. 389

390 391 392

0 . 393

394 395 396 397 398

Figures 11 1d 399

400 401

both cases, while Poisson’s ratio, the added mass, and the boundary conditions variations 402

403

4.

404

ν

2 2 2

f ’4 4

k 7a 35.00 0.15 5.05 0.10 500.0 3.16

38.74 0.18 0.10 0.45 967.0 1.82 2.04

35.85 0.17 5.26 0.77 576.8 1.77

k 7 35.00 0.30 10.00 0.10 0 5.005 5.89

38.24 0.29 10.00 1.27 1000 10.00 12.63 3.57

(22)

5.

405

k

1 230.7 220.9 0.98 228.4 0.98 231.1 0.98

2 474.0 470.9 0.99 479.5 0.99 475.3 0.99

3 491.7 486.0 0.99 493.9 0.99 489.7 0.99

4 530.3 521.4 0.98 518.7 0.98 523.1 0.98

5 558.3 540.9 0.89 548.2 0.90 544.6 0.90

6 606.9 605.8 0.82 616.5 0.80 612.1 0.81

7 660.2 659.4 0.92 675.2 0.92 667.9 0.92

8 742.8 749.2 0.81 740.4 0.82 751.6 0.82

9 758.0 757.6 0.81 769.6 0.79 763.3 0.80

10 774.0 761.3 0.90 775.8 0.90 767.1 0.90

11 813.1 802.5 0.76 818.5 0.77 807.8 0.75

12 837.1 842.0 0.74 852.2 0.70 846.3 0.74

13 901.9 928.2 0.83

1 239.5 232.3 0.99 241.03 0.99 237.7 0.99

2 476.8 485.0 0.99 480.16 0.99 479.4 0.99

3 493.2 490.8 0.99 486.20 0.99 491.4 0.99

4 534.0 524.3 0.98 524.19 0.98 534.3 0.98

5 562.8 553.0 0.75 550.09 0.75 553.6 0.75

6 612.3 622.5 0.73 620.08 0.82 617.2 0.74

7 660.0 686.1 0.95 675.48 0.94 670.6 0.94

8 747.7 764.8 0.67 752.84 0.67 760.9 0.65

9 759.1 786.7 0.81 772.25 0.81 766.1 0.80

10 775.5 790.0 0.89 775.50 0.88 769.4 0.88

11 824.7

12 839.7 839.83 0.83 848.6 0.70

13 902.8 944.00 0.89 933.0 0.85

406 407 408 409

(23)

11.

a

410 6 411 412 p

. d two

413

, .

414

. 415

c

(24)

d 417

418 . 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428

. 429

430 431 432

27 4 . 433

434 435 436

, 437

b 438

439 440 441 442

65 . 47

443 444 445 446

48 49 . 447

(25)

448 449 450

0 . 451

, 452

453 . 454 455 456 457 458 459 460

1 1 2

461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468

3 . 469

470

support g

471

Investissements d’avenir, 472

, o .

473

on 474

475 476

(26)

477 478 479 480 481

. 482

483

, , 1006984, 2016.

484

olar, “Concrete and cement 485

composites used for radioactive waste deposition,” –

486

179, pp. 147–155, 2017.

487

K. E. Kurtis, Y. Xi, M. A. Glinicki, J. Provis, E. R. Giannini, and T. Fu, “Can We 488

Environments?,”

489

53–59, 2017.

490

B. Pomaro, “A Review on Radiation Damage in Concrete for Nuclear Facilities:

491

From Experiments to Modeling,” –10, 2016.

492

llote, and P. Zuloaga, “Some principles of service 493

494

radioactive waste containers of El Cabril disposal (Spain),”

495

no. 2–3, pp. 82–95, 2006.

496

. S. Duffó, E. A. Arva, F. M. Schulz, and D. R. Vazquez, “Durability of a 497

498

waste disposal facility,” –3, pp. 382–387, 2012.

499

a, H. Sasano, Y. Nishioka, and G. Igarashi, “Strength and Young’s 500

term drying and heating up to 90°C,”

501

– 502

N. Trivedi and R. K. Singh, “Assessment of in 503

(27)

specimen and prototype nuclear containment structure,”

504

71, pp. 16–

505 9 506

L. Areias, “Detection and evaluation of cra 507

Nuclear Waste container using combined NDT techniques,” , 508

–378, 2015.

509

0 A. G. Davis, J. G. Evans, and B. H. Hertlein, “Nondestructive Evaluation of 510

Tanks,”

511

–167, 1997.

512 513 1 514

“Trul 515

516

and concrete structure strain monitoring,”

517

2 . Bethmont, M. Landolt, and S. Lesoille, “Optical fiber for 3D 518

imaging of deformations in concrete containers stacked,” in 519

, 2017.

520

3 G. Hearn and R. Testa, “Modal Analysis for Damage Detection in Structures,”

521

–3063, 1991.

522

4 “ of civil engineering structures,”

523 524

, 1993.

525

5 , C. Farrar, and M. Prime, “A summary review of vibration 526

damage identification methods,” , –105, 1998.

527

6 . Fan and P. Qiao, “Vibration 528

(28)

2011.

530

7 S. Das, P. Saha, and S. K. Patro, “Vibration 531

for health monitoring of structures: a review,”

532

3, pp. 477–507, 2016.

533

8 X. Kong, C. Cai, and J. Hu, “The State 534

Structural Damage Identification for Decision Making,” p.

535

497, 2017.

536 19 537

. 538

1995.

539

0 J. E. Mottershead and M. I. Friswell, “Model Updating In Structural Dynamics: A 540

Survey,” –375, 1993.

541

1 E. Caetano, “Experimental Modal Analysis of Civil Engineering 542

Structures,” –20, 2006.

543 2 544

Aguilera, “Integrating geomatic approaches, Operational Modal Analysis, 545

546

of the historical Bôco Bridge,” –984, 2018.

547

3 . Brehm, V. Zabel, and C. Bucher, “An automatic mode pairing strategy using an 548

enhanced modal assurance criterion based on modal strain energies,” , 549

–5392, 2010.

550

4 G. Osmancikli, A. Bayraktar, T. Türker, Ş. Uçak, and A. Mosallam, “Finite element 551

model calibration of precast structures using ambient vibrations,”

552

–21, 2015.

553

5 D. P. Thambiratnam, “Model

554

(29)

updating of real structures with ambient vibration data,” , 555

–341, 2016.

556

26 . , M.A. Diaferio, “Preliminary approach of dynamic 557

nder buildings by neural networks,”

558

80, pp. 183 189, 2016.

559

7 P. G. Bakir, E. Reynders, and G. De Roeck, “Sensitivity 560

updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm,”

561

–225, 2007.

562

8 S. Ivorra, F. J. Pallares, and J. M. Adam, “Dynamic b 563

A case study,” –1092, 2009.

564

29 A. Cabboi, C. Gentile, and A. Saisi, “From continuous vibration mo 565

masonry tower,”

566

–265, 2017.

567

0 Mayorga, and A. Sáez, “Control of structural

568 569

destructive techniques,” –583, 2015.

570 571 1

. , , , ,

572

32 J. L. Zapico, M. P. González, M. I. Friswell, C. A. Taylor, and A. J. Crewe, “Finite 573

element model updating of a small scale bridge,”

574

993–1012, 2003.

575

33 . , , , “

576

,” . 138, pp.

577

183 194, 2014.

578

4 “

579

(30)

” , 50, no. 3, 580

pp. 875 886, 2015.

581

35 , . , “

582

,” . 481–495, 2013.

583

6 14,

584

, ,

585

, 2014.

586

37 .

587

, , 1995.

588

38 R. J. Allemang and D. L. Brown, “A complete review of the complex mode indicator 589

function (CMIF) with applications,” in . . . . . ,

590

2006, pp. 3209–3246.

591

39 ng, “Structural Testing. Part 2 : Modal Analysis and Simulation.” Brüel &

592

, , 1988.

593

0 H. Takabatake, “Effect of Dead Loads on Natural Frequencies of Beams,”

594

–1052, 1991.

595

1 and X. Zhu, “Analysis of effect of dead loads on natural frequencies of 596

element techniques,” –516,

597

1996.

598

2 P. Lundqvist and N. Rydén, “Acoustoelastic effects on the resonance frequencies of 599

term measurements,” –

600

41, 2012.

601

3 C. Payan, V. Garnier, J. Moysan, and P. A. Johnson, “Determination of third order 602

elastic constants in a complex solid applying coda wave interferometry,”

603 604

(31)

R. J. Allemang and D. L. Brown, “A correlation coefficient for modal vector 605

analysis,” , pp. 110–116, 1982.

606

5 Response surface methodology :

607 608

6 L. P. Khoo and C. H. Chen, “Integration of Response Surface Methodology with 609

Genetic Algorithms,” –489, 2001.

610

47 as, J. S. Popovics, M. V. Borrachero, J. Monzó, and J. Payá, “The effects of 611

612

NDT methods,” pp. 565 571, 2015.

613

48 D. G. Lam, and C. S. Apstein, “Exponential

614

Temperature Dependance of Young’s Modulus for Several Oxides,”

615

122, no. 6, pp. 1754 1759, 1961.

616

49 S. N. Shoukry, G. W. William, M. Y. Riad, and B. Downie, “Effect of moisture and 617

n the mechanical properties of concrete,”

618

25, no. 2, pp. 688–696, 2011.

619

50 H. Sohn, “Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health 620

monitoring,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 365, no. 1851, pp.

621

539–560, 2007.

622

1 C. Boutin, S. Hans, E. Ibraim, and P. Roussillon, “In situ experiments and seismic 623

analysis of existing buildings. Part I: Experimental investigations,”

624

–1546, 2005.

625

2 A. De la Foye, “Development of a mechanical device meant to excite buildings 626

slated for demolition,” in ,

627

2017.

628

(32)

630 631 632 633 634

Références

Documents relatifs

In this paper, a subspace fitting method is proposed to update, in the time domain, the finite element model of a rotating machine.. The procedure is achieved by minimizing an

Finally, the effect of colour diversity on aesthetic scores was meas- ured using a Spearman’s correlation test between Shannon diversity of colours among species for each quadrat

It can also be seen that the updated uncertain computational model related to the eigenvector probabilistic constraint is more sensitive to the updated mean parameter s opt than to

Then the permanent additional dead load of 30 t was also modeled by elements without intermediate nodes (SOLID185). The last step concerns the modeling of the bearings. The bridge

Similarly, based on eigenfrequencies, the optimal values

The part (a) of these figures demonstrates the mean value of the predicted parameters and part (b) is the Coefficient of Variation of the estimated parameters. Figures 3, 4 and

Finite Element Model-Based Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Systems for Composite Material under Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) Effect.. EWSHM - 7th European Workshop on

For the purposes of this investigation into damage detection of a reinforced concrete beam using an energy harvesting system, a finite element analysis and an