• Aucun résultat trouvé

Comparing geological and statistical approaches for element selection in sediment tracing research

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "Comparing geological and statistical approaches for element selection in sediment tracing research"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: cea-02648134

https://hal-cea.archives-ouvertes.fr/cea-02648134

Submitted on 29 May 2020

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access

archive for the deposit and dissemination of

sci-entific research documents, whether they are

pub-lished or not. The documents may come from

teaching and research institutions in France or

abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est

destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents

scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,

émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de

recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires

publics ou privés.

Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License

Comparing geological and statistical approaches for

element selection in sediment tracing research

Jean-Patrick Laceby, Joe Mcmahon, Olivier Evrard, Jon Olley

To cite this version:

Jean-Patrick Laceby, Joe Mcmahon, Olivier Evrard, Jon Olley. Comparing geological and statistical

approaches for element selection in sediment tracing research. EGU General Assembly 2015, Apr

2015, Vienne, Austria. �cea-02648134�

(2)

Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 17, EGU2015-6640, 2015 EGU General Assembly 2015

© Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Comparing geological and statistical approaches for element selection in

sediment tracing research

J. Patrick Laceby (1), Joe McMahon (2), Olivier Evrard (1), and Jon Olley (2)

(1) Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (LSCE/IPSL) – Unité Mixte de Recherche, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France, (2) Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Australia

Elevated suspended sediment loads reduce reservoir capacity and significantly increase the cost of operating wa-ter treatment infrastructure, making the management of sediment supply to reservoirs of increasingly importance. Sediment fingerprinting techniques can be used to determine the relative contributions of different sources of sedi-ment accumulating in reservoirs. The objective of this research is to compare geological and statistical approaches to element selection for sediment fingerprinting modelling. Time-integrated samplers (n=45) were used to obtain source samples from four major subcatchments flowing into the Baroon Pocket Dam in South East Queensland, Australia. The geochemistry of potential sources were compared to the geochemistry of sediment cores (n=12) sampled in the reservoir. The geochemical approach selected elements for modelling that provided expected, ob-served and statistical discrimination between sediment sources. Two statistical approaches selected elements for modelling with the Kruskal-Wallis H-test and Discriminatory Function Analysis (DFA). In particular, two differ-ent significance levels (0.05 & 0.35) for the DFA were included to investigate the importance of elemdiffer-ent selection on modelling results. A distribution model determined the relative contributions of different sources to sediment sampled in the Baroon Pocket Dam. Elemental discrimination was expected between one subcatchment (Obi Obi Creek) and the remaining subcatchments (Lexys, Falls and Bridge Creek). Six major elements were expected to provide discrimination. Of these six, only Fe2O3and SiO2provided expected, observed and statistical

discrimina-tion. Modelling results with this geological approach indicated 36% (+/- 9%) of sediment sampled in the reservoir cores were from mafic-derived sources and 64% (+/- 9%) were from felsic-derived sources. The geological and the first statistical approach (DFA0.05) differed by only 1% (σ 5%) for 5 out of 6 model groupings with only the

Lexys Creek modelling results differing significantly (35%). The statistical model with expanded elemental se-lection (DFA0.35) differed from the geological model by an average of 30% for all 6 models. Elemental selection

for sediment fingerprinting therefore has the potential to impact modeling results. Accordingly is important to in-corporate both robust geological and statistical approaches when selecting elements for sediment fingerprinting. For the Baroon Pocket Dam, management should focus on reducing the supply of sediments derived from felsic sources in each of the subcatchments.

Références

Documents relatifs

Lady Mary Wortley Montagu’s Turkish Embassy Letters and Elizabeth Gaskell’s forth novel North and South seem not to be the only literary works that tackle the

Flows in unsaturated porous media are modelled by the Richards’ equation which is a degenerate parabolic nonlinear equation. Its limitations and the challenges raised by its

Our approach was compared to the three baselines, namely Naïve Bayes classifier, language model and an approach based on finding significant collo- cations.. We have

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des

Feature Reduction methods have been used in this research to solve the problem of long computational time required for segmentation, this time is due to the huge amount of data

La métaphore exploiterait en quelque sorte au maximum une propriété plus générale du lexique, qui, selon Cadiot et Visetti (2001), fonctionne d’abord comme un

•a variable is retained in the model only if it’s removal from the current model results in a significant decrease in the fraction of variation in the response variable explained

We propose to model the output of transcriptome sequencing technologies (RNA-Seq) using the negative binomial distribution, as well as build segmentation models suited to their study