• Aucun résultat trouvé

On Performance Bounds for the Integration of Elastic and Adaptive Streaming Flows

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Partager "On Performance Bounds for the Integration of Elastic and Adaptive Streaming Flows"

Copied!
12
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

HAL Id: hal-01282906

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01282906

Submitted on 4 Mar 2016

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- entific research documents, whether they are pub- lished or not. The documents may come from teaching and research institutions in France or abroad, or from public or private research centers.

L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

On Performance Bounds for the Integration of Elastic and Adaptive Streaming Flows

Thomas Bonald, Alexandre Proutière

To cite this version:

Thomas Bonald, Alexandre Proutière. On Performance Bounds for the Integration of Elastic and Adaptive Streaming Flows. ACM Sigmetrics, 2004, New York, United States. �hal-01282906�

(2)

On Performance Bounds for the Integration of Elastic and Adaptive Streaming Flows

Thomas Bonald and Alexandre Prouti `ere

France Telecom R&D

38-40 rue du G ´en ´eral Leclerc, 92794 Issy-les-Moulineaux, France

ABSTRACT

Categories and Subject Descriptors

General Terms

Keywords

1. INTRODUCTION

SIGMETRICS/Performance’04,June 12–16, 2004, New York, NY, USA.

.

(3)

2. A SINGLE BOTTLENECK LINK

2.1 Traffic assumptions

2.2 Performance metrics

2.3 A processor sharing network

Absence of streaming traffic.

(4)

Presence of streaming traffic.

2.4 Insensitive bounds

Upper bound.

Lower bound.

All traffic elastic.

(5)

2.5 Numerical example

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Elatsic flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Streaming flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

3. ACCOUNTING FOR RATE LIMITS

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Pr[ streaming throughput > 0.1 ]

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

3.1 Traffic assumptions

3.2 A processor sharing network

3.3 Insensitive bounds

Upper bound.

(6)

Lower bound.

All traffic elastic.

3.4 Numerical example

4. MULTICLASS EXTENSION

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Elastic flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Streaming flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

Notation.

4.1 Balanced fairness

(7)

4.2 Traffic assumptions

4.3 A processor sharing network

4.4 Insensitive bounds

Upper bound.

Lower bound.

All traffic elastic.

(8)

4.5 Numerical examples Tree network.

C1 C2

1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Elastic flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Streaming flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Elastic flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Streaming flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

(9)

Multirate system.

a1

a2

1

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Elastic flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Streaming flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Elastic flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Streaming flow throughput

Elastic traffic load Upper bound

Simulation Lower bound All traffic elastic

5. CONCLUSION

APPENDIX

A. INSENSITIVITY RESULTS

(10)

Balanced networks.

x x

1 2

φ φ

0

x

1 2

Non-balanced networks.

(11)

B. PROOF OF THEOREM 1 Necessary stability condition.

Sufficient stability condition.

C. PROOF OF PROPOSITION 1 Proof of inequality (20).

Proof of inequality (21).

(12)

REFERENCES

Références

Documents relatifs

Si certains travaux ont abordé le sujet des dermatoses à l’officine sur un plan théorique, aucun n’a concerné, à notre connaissance, les demandes d’avis

Using the Fo¨rster formulation of FRET and combining the PM3 calculations of the dipole moments of the aromatic portions of the chromophores, docking process via BiGGER software,

Later in the clinical course, measurement of newly established indicators of erythropoiesis disclosed in 2 patients with persistent anemia inappropriately low

Households’ livelihood and adaptive capacity in peri- urban interfaces : A case study on the city of Khon Kaen, Thailand.. Architecture,

3 Assez logiquement, cette double caractéristique se retrouve également chez la plupart des hommes peuplant la maison d’arrêt étudiée. 111-113) qu’est la surreprésentation

Et si, d’un côté, nous avons chez Carrier des contes plus construits, plus « littéraires », tendant vers la nouvelle (le titre le dit : jolis deuils. L’auteur fait d’une

la RCP n’est pas forcément utilisée comme elle devrait l’être, c'est-à-dire un lieu de coordination et de concertation mais elle peut être utilisée par certains comme un lieu

The change of sound attenuation at the separation line between the two zones, to- gether with the sound attenuation slopes, are equally well predicted by the room-acoustic diffusion