• Aucun résultat trouvé

Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Partager "Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras"

Copied!
44
0
0

Texte intégral

(1)

Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras

Maria Chlouveraki (joint work with Nicolas Jacon)

University of Edinburgh

Nikolaus Conference 2009 December 11, 2009

(2)

Iwahori-Hecke algebras

Let

(W,S) be a finite Weyl group,

u,v:W →Zbe class functions on W (write u(w) =:uw), q be an indeterminate.

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra Hof W is generated over A:=Z[q,q−1] by the elements (Tw)w∈W, whose multiplication is determined by the following rules:

TwTw0 =Tww0, if`(ww0) =`(w) +`(w0). (Ts−q2us)(Ts+q2vs) = 0, for all s ∈S.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 2 / 11

(3)

Iwahori-Hecke algebras

Let

(W,S) be a finite Weyl group,

u,v:W →Zbe class functions on W (write u(w) =:uw), q be an indeterminate.

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra Hof W is generated over A:=Z[q,q−1] by the elements (Tw)w∈W, whose multiplication is determined by the following rules:

TwTw0 =Tww0, if`(ww0) =`(w) +`(w0). (Ts−q2us)(Ts+q2vs) = 0, for all s ∈S.

(4)

Iwahori-Hecke algebras

Let

(W,S) be a finite Weyl group,

u,v:W →Zbe class functions on W (writeu(w) =:uw),

q be an indeterminate.

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra Hof W is generated over A:=Z[q,q−1] by the elements (Tw)w∈W, whose multiplication is determined by the following rules:

TwTw0 =Tww0, if`(ww0) =`(w) +`(w0). (Ts−q2us)(Ts+q2vs) = 0, for all s ∈S.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 2 / 11

(5)

Iwahori-Hecke algebras

Let

(W,S) be a finite Weyl group,

u,v:W →Zbe class functions on W (writeu(w) =:uw), q be an indeterminate.

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra Hof W is generated over A:=Z[q,q−1] by the elements (Tw)w∈W, whose multiplication is determined by the following rules:

TwTw0 =Tww0, if`(ww0) =`(w) +`(w0). (Ts−q2us)(Ts+q2vs) = 0, for all s ∈S.

(6)

Iwahori-Hecke algebras

Let

(W,S) be a finite Weyl group,

u,v:W →Zbe class functions on W (writeu(w) =:uw), q be an indeterminate.

The Iwahori-Hecke algebra Hof W is generated over A:=Z[q,q−1] by the elements (Tw)w∈W, whose multiplication is determined by the following rules:

TwTw0 =Tww0, if`(ww0) =`(w) +`(w0).

(Ts−q2us)(Ts+q2vs) = 0, for all s ∈S.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 2 / 11

(7)

Let K :=Q(q) be the field of fractions ofA.

Then the algebra KH:=K ⊗AH

is split semisimple. By Tits’ deformation theorem, we have a canonical bijection:

Irr(KH)↔Irr(W).

Therefore, if Λ is an indexing set for Irr(W), i.e., Irr(W) ={Eλ|λ∈Λ}, then

Irr(KH) ={Vλ |λ∈Λ}.

(8)

Let K :=Q(q) be the field of fractions ofA. Then the algebra KH:=K ⊗AH

is split semisimple.

By Tits’ deformation theorem, we have a canonical bijection:

Irr(KH)↔Irr(W).

Therefore, if Λ is an indexing set for Irr(W), i.e., Irr(W) ={Eλ|λ∈Λ}, then

Irr(KH) ={Vλ |λ∈Λ}.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 3 / 11

(9)

Let K :=Q(q) be the field of fractions ofA. Then the algebra KH:=K ⊗AH

is split semisimple. By Tits’ deformation theorem, we have a canonical bijection:

Irr(KH)↔Irr(W).

Therefore, if Λ is an indexing set for Irr(W), i.e., Irr(W) ={Eλ|λ∈Λ}, then

Irr(KH) ={Vλ |λ∈Λ}.

(10)

Let K :=Q(q) be the field of fractions ofA. Then the algebra KH:=K ⊗AH

is split semisimple. By Tits’ deformation theorem, we have a canonical bijection:

Irr(KH)↔Irr(W).

Therefore, if Λ is an indexing set for Irr(W), i.e., Irr(W) ={Eλ|λ∈Λ},

then

Irr(KH) ={Vλ |λ∈Λ}.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 3 / 11

(11)

Let K :=Q(q) be the field of fractions ofA. Then the algebra KH:=K ⊗AH

is split semisimple. By Tits’ deformation theorem, we have a canonical bijection:

Irr(KH)↔Irr(W).

Therefore, if Λ is an indexing set for Irr(W), i.e., Irr(W) ={Eλ|λ∈Λ}, then

Irr(KH) ={Vλ |λ∈Λ}.

(12)

The a-function

The linear formt :H →Agiven by t(Tw) =

1, if w = 1 0, if w 6= 1

is a symmetrizing form for the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH,

i.e., for all h,h0 ∈ H,

1 t(hh0) =t(h0h),

2 the bilinear form (h,h0)7→t(hh0) is non-degenerate.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 4 / 11

(13)

The a-function

The linear formt :H →Agiven by t(Tw) =

1, if w = 1 0, if w 6= 1

is a symmetrizing form for the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH, i.e., for all h,h0 ∈ H,

1 t(hh0) =t(h0h),

2 the bilinear form (h,h0)7→t(hh0) is non-degenerate.

(14)

The a-function

The linear formt :H →Agiven by t(Tw) =

1, if w = 1 0, if w 6= 1

is a symmetrizing form for the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH, i.e., for all h,h0 ∈ H,

1 t(hh0) =t(h0h),

2 the bilinear form (h,h0)7→t(hh0) is non-degenerate.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 4 / 11

(15)

The a-function

The linear formt :H →Agiven by t(Tw) =

1, if w = 1 0, if w 6= 1

is a symmetrizing form for the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH, i.e., for all h,h0 ∈ H,

1 t(hh0) =t(h0h),

2 the bilinear form (h,h0)7→t(hh0) is non-degenerate.

(16)

We have

t= X

V∈Irr(KH)

1 sV χV

where sV ∈Ais the Schur element of the irreducible characterχV.

Definition

Recall that Irr(KH) ={Vλ|λ∈Λ}.Set sλ:=sVλ and aλ:=−valuation(sλ).

Example: Ifsλ=q−2+q−1+q3, thenaλ= 2.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 5 / 11

(17)

We have

t= X

V∈Irr(KH)

1 sV χV

where sV ∈Ais the Schur element of the irreducible characterχV.

Definition

Recall that Irr(KH) ={Vλ|λ∈Λ}.Set sλ:=sVλ and aλ:=−valuation(sλ).

Example: Ifsλ=q−2+q−1+q3, thenaλ= 2.

(18)

We have

t= X

V∈Irr(KH)

1 sV χV

where sV ∈Ais the Schur element of the irreducible characterχV.

Definition

Recall that Irr(KH) ={Vλ|λ∈Λ}.Set sλ:=sVλ and aλ:=−valuation(sλ).

Example: Ifsλ=q−2+q−1+q3, thenaλ= 2.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 5 / 11

(19)

The decomposition matrix

Let

θ:A=Z[q,q−1]→L, q 7→ξ

be a ring homomorphism such that Lis the field of fractions of θ(A).

We have a good parametrization for Irr(KH). What about the simple modules of the specialized algebra LH?

Assume that LH is split. LetR0(KH) (resp. R0(LH)) be the Grothendieck group of finitely generatedKH-modules (resp.

LH-modules). It is generated by the classes [U] of the simpleKH-modules (resp. LH-modules)U.

(20)

The decomposition matrix

Let

θ:A=Z[q,q−1]→L, q 7→ξ

be a ring homomorphism such that Lis the field of fractions of θ(A).

We have a good parametrization for Irr(KH). What about the simple modules of the specialized algebra LH?

Assume that LH is split. LetR0(KH) (resp. R0(LH)) be the Grothendieck group of finitely generatedKH-modules (resp.

LH-modules). It is generated by the classes [U] of the simpleKH-modules (resp. LH-modules)U.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 6 / 11

(21)

The decomposition matrix

Let

θ:A=Z[q,q−1]→L, q 7→ξ

be a ring homomorphism such that Lis the field of fractions of θ(A).

We have a good parametrization for Irr(KH). What about the simple modules of the specialized algebra LH?

Assume that LH is split. LetR0(KH) (resp. R0(LH)) be the Grothendieck group of finitely generatedKH-modules (resp.

LH-modules). It is generated by the classes [U] of the simpleKH-modules (resp. LH-modules)U.

(22)

We have a well-defined decomposition map dθ:R0(KH)→R0(LH) such that, for all λ∈Λ , we have

dθ([Vλ]) = X

M∈Irr(LH)

[Vλ:M][M].

The matrix

Dθ =

[Vλ:M]

λ∈Λ,M∈Irr(LH)

is called the decomposition matrix associated with θ.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 7 / 11

(23)

We have a well-defined decomposition map dθ:R0(KH)→R0(LH) such that, for all λ∈Λ , we have

dθ([Vλ]) = X

M∈Irr(LH)

[Vλ:M][M].

The matrix

Dθ =

[Vλ:M]

λ∈Λ,M∈Irr(LH)

is called the decomposition matrix associated with θ.

(24)

Basic sets

We say thatH admits acanonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect to θ:A→Lif and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

1 For all M ∈Irr(LH), there existsλM ∈ B such that

I [VλM :M] = 1, and

I if [Vµ:M]6= 0, then eitherµ=λor aµ>aλM.

2 The map

Irr(LH) → B M 7→ λM is a bijection.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 8 / 11

(25)

Basic sets

We say thatH admits acanonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect to θ:A→Lif and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

1 For all M ∈Irr(LH), there existsλM ∈ B such that

I [VλM :M] = 1, and

I if [Vµ:M]6= 0, then eitherµ=λor aµ>aλM.

2 The map

Irr(LH) → B M 7→ λM is a bijection.

(26)

Basic sets

We say thatH admits acanonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect to θ:A→Lif and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

1 For all M ∈Irr(LH), there existsλM ∈ B such that

I [VλM :M] = 1, and

I if [Vµ:M]6= 0, then eitherµ=λor aµ>aλM.

2 The map

Irr(LH) → B M 7→ λM is a bijection.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 8 / 11

(27)

Basic sets

We say thatH admits acanonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect to θ:A→Lif and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

1 For all M ∈Irr(LH), there existsλM ∈ B such that

I [VλM :M] = 1, and

I if [Vµ:M]6= 0, then eitherµ=λoraµ>aλM.

2 The map

Irr(LH) → B M 7→ λM is a bijection.

(28)

Basic sets

We say thatH admits acanonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect to θ:A→Lif and only if the following two conditions are satisfied:

1 For all M ∈Irr(LH), there existsλM ∈ B such that

I [VλM :M] = 1, and

I if [Vµ:M]6= 0, then eitherµ=λoraµ>aλM.

2 The map

Irr(LH) → B M 7→ λM is a bijection.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 8 / 11

(29)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B. Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

(30)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S,

by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S. Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B. Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 9 / 11

(31)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for alls ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B. Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

(32)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for alls ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B. Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 9 / 11

(33)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for alls ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs),

B 7→ B.

Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

(34)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for alls ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B.

Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 9 / 11

(35)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for alls ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B.

Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs),

B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B} where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

(36)

IfL is a field of characteristic 0, then the existence of canonical basic sets for all finite Weyl groups has been proved

by Geck and Rouquier, when us =a∈Nandvs = 0 for all s ∈S, by Geck and Jacon, when us ∈Nandvs = 0 for alls ∈S.

Theorem (C.-Jacon)

Let Lbe a field of characteristic 0. The algebraH admits a canonical basic set with respect to any specializationθ:A→L.

Idea of the proof: Let s ∈S. If us ≥vs, then (us −vs,0)→(us,vs), B 7→ B.

Ifus <vs, then

(vs−us,0)→(0,vs −us)→(us,vs), B 7→ Bε={ε(λ)|λ∈ B}

where ε: Λ→Λ is a bijection induced on the set of irreducible representations of KHby the action of the cyclic group Z/2Z.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 9 / 11

(37)

An example: Type A

Let W be the symmetric group Sn andS the set of transpositions (i,i + 1), fori = 1, . . . ,n−1.

All elements of S are conjugate inW. Hence, the generators of the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH of Sn satisfy

(Ts−q2u)(Ts+q2v) = 0, ∀s ∈S for some integers u,v.

The indexing set Λ forIrr(W) is the set P(n) :=

(

1, λ2, . . . , λr)

λ1 ≥λ2 ≥ · · · ≥λr ≥1 and

r

X

i=1

λi =n )

of partitions of n. The bijectionεon Λ induced by the action ofZ/2Zis simply the conjugation of partitions.

(38)

An example: Type A

Let W be the symmetric group Sn andS the set of transpositions (i,i + 1), fori = 1, . . . ,n−1. All elements of S are conjugate inW.

Hence, the generators of the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH of Sn satisfy (Ts−q2u)(Ts+q2v) = 0, ∀s ∈S

for some integers u,v.

The indexing set Λ forIrr(W) is the set P(n) :=

(

1, λ2, . . . , λr)

λ1 ≥λ2 ≥ · · · ≥λr ≥1 and

r

X

i=1

λi =n )

of partitions of n. The bijectionεon Λ induced by the action ofZ/2Zis simply the conjugation of partitions.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 10 / 11

(39)

An example: Type A

Let W be the symmetric group Sn andS the set of transpositions (i,i + 1), fori = 1, . . . ,n−1. All elements of S are conjugate inW. Hence, the generators of the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH of Sn satisfy

(Ts−q2u)(Ts+q2v) = 0, ∀s ∈S for some integers u,v.

The indexing set Λ forIrr(W) is the set P(n) :=

(

1, λ2, . . . , λr)

λ1 ≥λ2 ≥ · · · ≥λr ≥1 and

r

X

i=1

λi =n )

of partitions of n. The bijectionεon Λ induced by the action ofZ/2Zis simply the conjugation of partitions.

(40)

An example: Type A

Let W be the symmetric group Sn andS the set of transpositions (i,i + 1), fori = 1, . . . ,n−1. All elements of S are conjugate inW. Hence, the generators of the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH of Sn satisfy

(Ts−q2u)(Ts+q2v) = 0, ∀s ∈S for some integers u,v.

The indexing set Λ forIrr(W) is the set P(n) :=

(

1, λ2, . . . , λr)

λ1 ≥λ2 ≥ · · · ≥λr ≥1 and

r

X

i=1

λi =n )

of partitions of n.

The bijectionεon Λ induced by the action ofZ/2Zis simply the conjugation of partitions.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 10 / 11

(41)

An example: Type A

Let W be the symmetric group Sn andS the set of transpositions (i,i + 1), fori = 1, . . . ,n−1. All elements of S are conjugate inW. Hence, the generators of the Iwahori-Hecke algebraH of Sn satisfy

(Ts−q2u)(Ts+q2v) = 0, ∀s ∈S for some integers u,v.

The indexing set Λ forIrr(W) is the set P(n) :=

(

1, λ2, . . . , λr)

λ1 ≥λ2 ≥ · · · ≥λr ≥1 and

r

X

i=1

λi =n )

of partitions of n. The bijectionεon Λ induced by the action ofZ/2Zis

(42)

Proposition (Dipper-James, C.-Jacon)

Let θ:Z[q,q−1]→Lbe a specialization such that θ(q)2u−2v is a primitive root of 1 of order e >1.

1 Ifu >v, thenHadmits a canonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect toθ and we have

B= Rege(n)

where the set Rege(n) ofe-regular partitions is defined by

λ= (λ1, . . . , λr)∈/Rege(n) ⇐⇒ ∃i ∈N, λi =· · ·=λi+e−1 6= 0.

2 Ifu <v, thenHadmits a canonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect toθ and we have

B= Rese(n)

where the set Rese(n) ofe-restricted partitions is defined by λ= (λ1, . . . , λr)∈Rese(n) ⇐⇒ ∀i ∈N, λi−λi+1 <e.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 11 / 11

(43)

Proposition (Dipper-James, C.-Jacon)

Let θ:Z[q,q−1]→Lbe a specialization such that θ(q)2u−2v is a primitive root of 1 of order e >1.

1 Ifu >v, thenHadmits a canonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect toθ and we have

B= Rege(n)

where the set Rege(n) ofe-regular partitions is defined by

λ= (λ1, . . . , λr)∈/Rege(n) ⇐⇒ ∃i ∈N, λi =· · ·=λi+e−1 6= 0.

2 Ifu <v, thenHadmits a canonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect toθ and we have

B= Rese(n)

where the set Rese(n) ofe-restricted partitions is defined by λ= (λ1, . . . , λr)∈Rese(n) ⇐⇒ ∀i ∈N, λi−λi+1 <e.

(44)

Proposition (Dipper-James, C.-Jacon)

Let θ:Z[q,q−1]→Lbe a specialization such that θ(q)2u−2v is a primitive root of 1 of order e >1.

1 Ifu >v, thenHadmits a canonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect toθ and we have

B= Rege(n)

where the set Rege(n) ofe-regular partitions is defined by

λ= (λ1, . . . , λr)∈/Rege(n) ⇐⇒ ∃i ∈N, λi =· · ·=λi+e−1 6= 0.

2 Ifu <v, thenHadmits a canonical basic set B ⊂Λ with respect toθ and we have

B= Rese(n)

where the set Rese(n) ofe-restricted partitions is defined by λ= (λ1, . . . , λr)∈Rese(n) ⇐⇒ ∀i ∈N, λi−λi+1 <e.

Maria Chlouveraki (Edinburgh) Basic sets for cyclotomic Hecke algebras December 11, 2009 11 / 11

Références

Outline

Documents relatifs

The Kazhdan–Lusztig equivalence [27] implies that the module category of the q-Schur algebra is equivalent to a highest weight subcategory of the affine category O of GL n at a

The rest of the section is devoted to the deformation argument and the proof that A is a highest weight cover of the module category of a cyclotomic Hecke algebra satisfying

He showed that the Grothendieck group of the category of finitely generated projective modules of these algebras admits a module structure over the affine Lie algebra of type A1 ,

They are cellular algebras, the simple modules have been classified in both semi-simple and modular cases and the decomposition matrices are known in characteristic 0 (see [21] for

We note that Boys and Mathas [Bo, BoMa] already studied a restriction of the isomorphism of [BrKl] to the fixed point subalgebra of an automorphism, in order to study

We prove that cyclotomic Yokonuma–Hecke algebras of type A are cyclotomic quiver Hecke algebras and we give an explicit isomorphism with its inverse, using a similar result of

The main point of this paper is to prove a similar decomposition theorem for some generalisations of quiver Hecke algebras and hence obtain an analogue of the Dipper–Mathas

Rapha¨ el Rouquier, Gunter Malle, Michel B., Sungsoon Kim,. &amp;